The use of larval zebrafish developmental testing and assessment, specifically larval zebrafish locomotor activity, has been recognized as a higher throughput testing strategy to identify developmentally toxic and neurotoxic chemicals. There are, however, no standardized protocols for this type of assay, which could result in confounding variables being overlooked. Two chemicals commonly employed during early-life stage zebrafish assays, methylene blue (antifungal agent) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, a commonly used vehicle) have been reported to affect the morphology and behavior of freshwater fish. In this study, we conducted developmental toxicity (morphology) and neurotoxicity (behavior) assessments of commonly employed concentrations for both chemicals (0.6–10.0 μM methylene blue; 0.3%–1.0% v/v DMSO). A light–dark transition behavioral testing paradigm was applied to morphologically normal, 6 days postfertilization (dpf) zebrafish larvae kept at 26°C. Additionally, an acute DMSO challenge was administered based on early-life stage zebrafish assays typically used in this research area. Results from developmental toxicity screens were similar between both chemicals with no morphological abnormalities detected at any of the concentrations tested. However, neurodevelopmental results were mixed between the two chemicals of interest. Methylene blue resulted in no behavioral changes up to the highest concentration tested, 10.0 μM. By contrast, DMSO altered larval behavior following developmental exposure at concentrations as low as 0.5% (v/v) and exhibited differential concentration–response patterns in the light and dark photoperiods. These results indicate that developmental DMSO exposure can affect larval zebrafish locomotor activity at routinely used concentrations in developmental neurotoxicity assessments, whereas methylene blue does not appear to be developmentally or neurodevelopmentally toxic to larval zebrafish at routinely used concentrations. These results also highlight the importance of understanding the influence of experimental conditions on larval zebrafish locomotor activity that may ultimately confound the interpretation of results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KalueffAV, EchevarriaDJ, StewartAM. Gaining translational momentum: More zebrafish models for neuroscience research. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 2014; 55:1–6; doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.01.022
2.
LetradoP, de MiguelI, LambertoI, et al.Zebrafish: Speeding up the cancer drug discovery process. Cancer Res, 2018; 78(21):6048–6058; doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1029
3.
CornetC, Di DonatoV, TerrienteJ. Combining zebrafish and CRISPR/Cas9: Toward a more efficient drug discovery pipeline. Front Pharmacol, 2018; 9:1–11; doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00703
4.
FontanaBD, MezzomoNJ, KalueffAV, et al.The developing utility of zebrafish models of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders: A critical review. Exp Neurol, 2018; 299(Pt A):157–171; doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.10.004
5.
HorzmannKA, FreemanJL. Making waves: New developments in toxicology with the zebrafish. Toxicol Sci, 2018; 163(1):5–12; doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy044
6.
HoweK, ClarkMD, TorrojaCF, et al.The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature, 2013; 496(7446):498–503; doi: 10.1038/nature12111
7.
TropepeV, SiveHL. Can zebrafish be used as a model to study the neurodevelopmental causes of autism?: Zebrafish as a model for autism. Genes Brain Behav, 2003; 2(5):268–281; doi: 10.1034/j.1601-183x.2003.00038.x
8.
GuoS.Using zebrafish to assess the impact of drugs on neural development and function. Expert Opin Drug Discov, 2009; 4(7):715–726; doi: 10.1517/17460440902988464
9.
de EschC, SliekerR, WolterbeekA, et al.Zebrafish as potential model for developmental neurotoxicity testing: A mini review. Neurotoxicol Teratol, 2012; 34(6):545–553; doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2012.08.006
10.
NishimuraY, MurakamiS, AshikawaY, et al.Zebrafish as a systems toxicology model for developmental neurotoxicity testing: Zebrafish DNT for human risk assessment. Congenit Anom (Kyoto), 2015; 55(1):1–16; doi: 10.1111/cga.12079
11.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects Test Guidelines OPPTS 870.6300 Developmental Neurotoxicity Study. Office of Prevention Pesticides and Toxic Substances; 1996. Available from: https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0156-0088
12.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Test No. 426: Developmental Neurotoxicity Study, 2007, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, OECD Publishing: Paris; doi: 10.1787/9789264067394-en
13.
HammJT, CegerP, AllenD, et al.Characterizing sources of variability in zebrafish embryo screening protocols. ALTEX, 2019; 36(1):103–120; doi: 10.14573/altex.1804162
14.
LegradiJ, el AbdellaouiN, van PomerenM, et al.Comparability of behavioural assays using zebrafish larvae to assess neurotoxicity. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2015; 22(21):16277–16289; doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3805-8
15.
OgungbemiA, LeutholdD, ScholzS, et al.Hypo-or hyperactivity of zebrafish embryos provoked by neuroactive substances: A review on how experimental parameters impact the predictability of behavior changes. Environ Sci Eur, 2019; 31(1):1–26; doi: 10.1186/s12302-019-0270-5
16.
MacPhailRC, BrooksJ, HunterDL, et al.Locomotion in larval zebrafish: Influence of time of day, lighting and ethanol. Neurotoxicology, 2009; 30(1):52–58; doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2008.09.011
17.
PadillaS, HunterDL, PadnosB, et al.Assessing locomotor activity in larval zebrafish: Influence of extrinsic and intrinsic variables. Neurotoxicol Teratol, 2011; 33(6):624–630; doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2011.08.005
18.
de EschC, van der LindeH, SliekerR, et al.Locomotor activity assay in zebrafish larvae: Influence of age, strain and ethanol. Neurotoxicol Teratol, 2012; 34(4):425–433; doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2012.03.002
19.
SelderslaghsIW, HooyberghsJ, BlustR, et al.Assessment of the developmental neurotoxicity of compounds by measuring locomotor activity in zebrafish embryos and larvae. Neurotoxicol Teratol, 2013; 37:44–56.
20.
FraserTWK, KhezriA, JusdadoJGH, et al.Toxicant induced behavioural aberrations in larval zebrafish are dependent on minor methodological alterations. Toxicol Lett, 2017; 276:62–68; doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.05.021
21.
HartmannS, VogtR, KunzeJ, et al.Zebrafish larvae show negative phototaxis to near-infrared light. PLoS One, 2018; 13(11):e0207264; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207264
22.
ChambelJ, CostaR, GomesM, et al.Hydrogen peroxide, iodine solution and methylene solution highly enhance the hatching rate of freshwater ornamental fish species. Aquac Int, 2014; 22(6):1743–1751; doi: 10.1007/s10499-014-9779-1
23.
ChristouM, KavaliauskisA, RopstadE, et al.DMSO effects larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) behavior, with additive and interaction effects when combined with positive controls. Sci Total Environ, 2020; 709:134490; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134490
24.
de FerreiraK, TachibanaL, ColomboD, et al.Toxic effects in Aphanomyces brasiliensis and zebrafish embryos caused by oomyceticides. Dis Aquat Organ, 2021; 144:75–87; doi: 10.3354/dao03575
25.
PeneyraSM, LerpiriyapongK, RiedelER, et al.Impact of pronase, sodium thiosulfate, and methylene blue combinations on development and survival of sodium hypochlorite surface-disinfected zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Zebrafish, 2020; 17(5):342–353; doi: 10.1089/zeb.2020.1917
26.
VaccaroA, PattenSA, CiuraS, et al.Methylene blue protects against TDP-43 and FUS neuronal toxicity in C. elegans and D. rerio. PLoS One, 2012; 7(7):e42117; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042117
27.
ChenT-H, WangY-H, WuY-H. Developmental exposures to ethanol or dimethylsulfoxide at low concentrations alter locomotor activity in larval zebrafish: Implications for behavioral toxicity bioassays. Aquat Toxicol, 2011; 102(3–4):162–166; doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.01.010
28.
DavidRM, JonesHS, PanterGH, et al.Interference with xenobiotic metabolic activity by the commonly used vehicle solvents dimethylsulfoxide and methanol in zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae but not Daphnia magna. Chemosphere, 2012; 88(8):912–917; doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.018
29.
HallareA, NagelK, KöhlerH-R, et al.Comparative embryotoxicity and proteotoxicity of three carrier solvents to zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2006; 63(3):378–388; doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.07.006
30.
HuangY, CartlidgeR, WalpitagamaM, et al.Unsuitable use of DMSO for assessing behavioral endpoints in aquatic model species. Sci Total Environ, 2018; 615:107–114; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.260
31.
IronsTD, MacPhailRC, HunterDL, et al.Acute neuroactive drug exposures alter locomotor activity in larval zebrafish. Neurotoxicol Teratol, 2010; 32(1):84–90; doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2009.04.066
32.
KaisB, SchneiderKE, KeiterS, et al.DMSO modifies the permeability of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) chorion-implications for the fish embryo test (FET). Aquat Toxicol, 2013; 140–141:229–238; doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.05.022
33.
MaesJ, VerlooyL, BuenafeOE, et al.Evaluation of 14 organic solvents and carriers for screening applications in zebrafish embryos and larvae. PLoS One, 2012; 7(10):e43850; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043850
34.
TeixidóE, KießlingTR, KruppE, et al.Automated morphological feature assessment for zebrafish embryo developmental toxicity screens. Toxicol Sci, 2019; 167(2):438–449; doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy250
35.
XiongX, LuoS, WuB, et al.Comparative developmental toxicity and stress protein responses of dimethyl sulfoxide to rare minnow and zebrafish embryos/larvae. Zebrafish, 2017; 14(1):60–68; doi: 10.1089/zeb.2016.1287
36.
SandersE.Methylene Blue Recipe. Aquatic Lab Services: St. Peters, MO; 2022.
37.
MullinsM.Egg Microinjection Technique and Morpholinos. Zebrafish Development and Genetics Course. Woods Hole Marine Biological Laboratory: Woods Hole, MA; 2013.
38.
YeeNS, LorentK, PackM. Exocrine pancreas development in zebrafish. Dev Biol, 2005; 284(1):84–101; doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.04.035
39.
FehrA, EshwarAK, NeuhaussSCF, et al.Evaluation of zebrafish as a model to study the pathogenesis of the opportunistic pathogen Cronobacter turicensis. Emerg Microbes Infect, 2015; 4(5):e29; doi: 10.1038/emi.2015.29
40.
Nüsslein-VolhardC, DahmR.E3 Recipe. Zebrafish: A Practical Approach. Oxford University Press: New York, USA; 2002.
SanabriaC, DiamantA, ZilbergD. Effects of commonly used disinfectants and temperature on swim bladder non-inflation in freshwater angelfish, Pterophyllum scalare (Lichtenstein). Aquaculture, 2009; 292(3–4):158–165; doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.04.015
43.
BartonC. Raising Larvae in the Zebrafish International Resource Center Autonursery. In: The Zebrafish Book; A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio), 5th ed. (WesterfieldM. ed.) University of Oregon Press: Eugene, OR, 2007; p. 3.11.
44.
LiR, ZhangL, ShiQ, et al.A protective role of autophagy in TDCIPP-induced developmental neurotoxicity in zebrafish larvae. Aquat Toxicol, 2018; 199:46–54.
45.
XiaL, ZhengL, ZhouJL. Effects of ibuprofen, diclofenac and paracetamol on hatch and motor behavior in developing zebrafish (Danio rerio). Chemosphere, 2017; 182:416–425; doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.054
46.
LiR, WangH, MiC, et al.The adverse effect of TCIPP and TCEP on neurodevelopment of zebrafish embryos/larvae. Chemosphere, 2019; 220:811–817; doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.198
47.
SunL, XuW, PengT, et al.Developmental exposure of zebrafish larvae to organophosphate flame retardants causes neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicol Teratol, 2016; 55:16–22; doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2016.03.003
48.
OliveriAN, BaileyJM, LevinED. Developmental exposure to organophosphate flame retardants causes behavioral effects in larval and adult zebrafish. Neurotoxicol Teratol, 2015; 52:220–227; doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2015.08.008
49.
CaoF, Souders CLII, LiP, et al.Developmental neurotoxicity of maneb: Notochord defects, mitochondrial dysfunction and hypoactivity in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos and larvae. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2019; 170:227–237; doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.110
50.
GlazerL, WellsCN, DrastalM, et al.Developmental exposure to low concentrations of two brominated flame retardants, BDE-47 and BDE-99, causes life-long behavioral alterations in zebrafish. Neurotoxicology, 2018; 66:221–232; doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2017.09.007
51.
OlsvikPA, WhatmoreP, PenglaseSJ, et al.Associations between behavioral effects of bisphenol A and DNA methylation in zebrafish embryos. Front Genet, 2019; 10:184; doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00184
52.
Perez-RodriguezV, Souders CLII, TischukC, et al.Tebuconazole reduces basal oxidative respiration and promotes anxiolytic responses and hypoactivity in early-staged zebrafish (Danio rerio). Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol, 2019; 217:87–97; doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2018.11.017
53.
WangX, DongQ, ChenY, et al.Bisphenol A affects axonal growth, musculature and motor behavior in developing zebrafish. Aquat Toxicol, 2013; 142–143:104–113; doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.07.011
54.
ZellnerD, PadnosB, HunterDL, et al.Rearing conditions differentially affect the locomotor behavior of larval zebrafish, but not their response to valproate-induced developmental neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicol Teratol, 2011; 33(6):674–679; doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2011.06.007
55.
CowdenJ, PadnosB, HunterD, et al.Developmental exposure to valproate and ethanol alters locomotor activity and retino-tectal projection area in zebrafish embryos. Reprod Toxicol, 2012; 33(2):165–173; doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.11.111
56.
DishawLV, HunterDL, PadnosB, et al.Developmental exposure to organophosphate flame retardants elicits overt toxicity and alters behavior in early life stage zebrafish (Danio rerio). Toxicol Sci, 2014; 142(2):445–454; doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu194
57.
DachK, YaghoobiB, SchmuckMR, et al.Teratological and behavioral screening of the national toxicology program 91-compound library in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Toxicol Sci, 2019; 167(1):77–91; doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy266
58.
HagstromD, TruongL, ZhangS, et al.Comparative analysis of zebrafish and planarian model systems for developmental neurotoxicity screens using an 87-compound library. Toxicol Sci, 2019; 167(1):15–25; doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy180
59.
HoldenLL, TruongL, SimonichMT, et al.Assessing the hazard of E-Cigarette flavor mixtures using zebrafish. Food Chem Toxicol, 2020; 136:110945; doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.110945
60.
JaremaKA, HunterDL, HillBN, et al.Developmental neurotoxicity and behavioral screening in larval zebrafish with a comparison to other published results. Toxics, 2022; 10(5):256; doi: 10.3390/toxics10050256
61.
WesterfieldM.The Zebrafish Book: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio), 5th ed. University of Oregon Press: Eugene, OR; 2007.
62.
EatonJ, KenagaE, KimerleR, et al.Methods for Acute Toxicity Tests with Fish, Macroinvertebrates, and Amphibians. US Environmental Protection Agency: Corvalis, OR; 1975. Available from: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=91013TCX.txt
63.
JaremaKA, HunterDL, ShafferRM, et al.Acute and developmental behavioral effects of flame retardants and related chemicals in zebrafish. Neurotoxicol Teratol, 2015; 52:194–209; doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2015.08.010
64.
BugelSM, TanguayRL. Multidimensional chemobehavior analysis of flavonoids and neuroactive compounds in zebrafish. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2018; 344:23–34; doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.02.019
65.
MatthewsM, VargaZM. Anesthesia and euthanasia in zebrafish. ILAR J, 2012; 53(2):192–204; doi: 10.1093/ilar.53.2.192
66.
LearyS, UnderwoodW, AnthonyR, et al.AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition (Version 20). American Veterinary Medical Association: Schaumburg, IL; 2020.
67.
HillBN, ColdsnowKD, HunterDL, et al.Assessment of Larval Zebrafish Locomotor Activity for Developmental Neurotoxicity Screening. In: Experimental Neurotoxicology Methods. (LlorensJ, BarenysM. eds.) Springer: New York, NY, 2021; pp. 327–351; doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1637-6
68.
SchirmerRH, AdlerH, PickhardtM, et al.Lest we forget you—Methylene blue …. Neurobiol Aging, 2011; 32(12):2325.e7–2325.e16; doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.12.012
69.
ParkI-S, BaekS-W, MoonKH. The sterilization effect of methylene blue, formalin, and iodine on egg and adult stage of marine medaka, Oryzias dancena. Balsaenggwa Saengsig, 2019; 23(3):199–211; doi: 10.12717/dr.2019.23.3.199
70.
PerlbergST, DiamantA, OfirR, et al.Characterization of swim bladder non-inflation (SBN) in angelfish, Pterophyllum scalare (Schultz), and the effect of exposure to methylene blue. J Fish Dis, 2008; 31(3):215–228; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00895.x
71.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Test No. 236: Fish Embryo Acute Toxicity (FET) Test 2013, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, OECD Publishing: Paris; 2013; doi: 10.1787/9789264203709-en
72.
HagenaarsA, StinckensE, VergauwenL, et al.PFOS affects posterior swim bladder chamber inflation and swimming performance of zebrafish larvae. Aquat Toxicol, 2014; 157:225–235; doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.10.017
73.
GodfreyA, HooserB, AbdelmoneimA, et al.Thyroid disrupting effects of halogenated and next generation chemicals on the swim bladder development of zebrafish. Aquat Toxicol, 2017; 193:228–235; doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.10.024
74.
StinckensE, VergauwenL, AnkleyGT, et al.An AOP-based alternative testing strategy to predict the impact of thyroid hormone disruption on swim bladder inflation in zebrafish. Aquat Toxicol, 2018; 200:1–12; doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2018.04.009
75.
RobertsonGN, McGeeCAS, DumbartonTC, et al.Development of the swimbladder and its innervation in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. J Morphol, 2007; 268(11):967–985; doi: 10.1002/jmor.10558
76.
WinataCL, KorzhS, KondrychynI, et al.The role of vasculature and blood circulation in zebrafish swimbladder development. BMC Dev Biol, 2010; 10(1):3; doi: 10.1186/1471-213x-10-3
77.
WinataCL, KorzhS, KondrychynI, et al.Development of zebrafish swimbladder: The requirement of Hedgehog signaling in specification and organization of the three tissue layers. Dev Biol, 2009; 331(2):222–236; doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.035
78.
GoolishEM, OkutakeK. Lack of gas bladder inflation by the larvae of zebrafish in the absence of an air-water interface. J Fish Biol, 1999; 55(5):1054–1063; doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb00740.x
79.
VillamizarN, Blanco-VivesB, MigaudH, et al.Effects of light during early larval development of some aquacultured teleosts: A review. Aquaculture, 2011; 315(1–2):86–94; doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.10.036
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
