Animal model systems are dependent on the standardization of husbandry protocols that maximize growth and reduce generation time. The Mexican tetra, Astyanax mexicanus, exists as eyed surface and blind cave dwelling populations. The opportunity for comparative approaches between independently evolved populations has led to the rapid growth of A. mexicanus as a model for evolution and biomedical research. However, a slow and inconsistent growth rate remains a major limitation to the expanded application of A. mexicanus. Fortunately, this temporal limitation can be addressed through husbandry changes that accelerate growth rates while maintaining optimal health outcomes. Here, we describe a husbandry protocol that produces rapid growth rates through changes in diet, feeding frequency, growth sorting and progressive changes in tank size. This protocol produced robust growth rates and decreased the age of sexual maturity in comparison to our previous protocol. To determine whether changes in feeding impacted behavior, we tested fish in exploration and schooling assays. We found no difference in behavior between the two groups, suggesting that increased feeding and rapid growth will not impact the natural variation in behavioral traits. Taken together, this standardized husbandry protocol will accelerate the development of A. mexicanus as a genetic model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlestromP, D'AngeloL, MidtlyngPJ, et al.Zebrafish: Housing and husbandry recommendations. Lab Anim, 2020; 54(3):213–224; doi: 10.1177/0023677219869037
2.
LawrenceC, EisenJS, VargaZM. Husbandry and Health Program Survey synopsis. Zebrafish, 2016; 13Suppl 1:S5–S7; doi: 10.1089/zeb.2016.1309
3.
VargaZM.Aquaculture, husbandry, and shipping at the Zebrafish International Resource Center. Methods Cell Biol, 2016; 135:509–534; doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2016.01.007
4.
LawrenceC.Advances in zebrafish husbandry and management. Methods Cell Biol, 2011; 104:429–451; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374814-0.00023-9
5.
GonderJC, LaberK. A renewed look at laboratory rodent housing and management. ILAR J, 2007; 48(1):29–36; doi: 10.1093/ilar.48.1.29
6.
TothLA, TrammellRA, Ilsley-WoodsM. Interactions between housing density and ambient temperature in the Cage Environment: Effects on mouse physiology and behavior. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2015; 54(6):708–717.
7.
WattsSA, LawrenceC, PowellM, et al.The vital relationship between nutrition and health in Zebrafish. Zebrafish, 2016; 13Suppl 1:S72–S76; doi: 10.1089/zeb.2016.1299
8.
JenningsM, BatchelorGR, BrainPF, et al.Refining rodent husbandry: The mouse. Report of the Rodent Refinement Working Party. Lab Anim, 1998; 32(3):233–259; doi: 10.1258/002367798780559301
9.
HawkinsP, MortonDB, BevanR, et al.Husbandry refinements for rats, mice, dogs and non-human primates used in telemetry procedures. Seventh report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement, Part B. Lab Anim, 2004; 38(1):1–10; doi: 10.1258/00236770460734335
10.
TothLA.The influence of the cage environment on rodent physiology and behavior: Implications for reproducibility of pre-clinical rodent research. Exp Neurol, 2015; 270:72–77; doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.04.010
11.
CorcoranM.Environmental enrichment for aquatic animals. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract, 2015; 18(2):305–321; doi: 10.1016/j.cvex.2015.01.004
12.
FengY, FanH, LiangX, et al.Environmental enrichment changes rabbits' behavior, serum hormone level and further affects cecal microbiota. PeerJ, 2022; 10:e13068; doi: 10.7717/peerj.13068
13.
CorsiAK, WightmanB, ChalfieM. A transparent window into biology: A primer on Caenorhabditis elegans (vol 200, pg 387, 2015). Genetics, 2015; 201(1):339.
14.
ElipotY, LegendreL, PereS, et al.Astyanax transgenesis and husbandry: How cavefish enters the laboratory. Zebrafish, 2014; 11(4):291–299; doi: 10.1089/zeb.2014.1005
15.
JunttiS.The future of gene-guided neuroscience research in non-traditional model organisms. Brain Behav Evol, 2019; 93(2–3):108–121
16.
KeZ, VaidyaA, AscherJ, et al.Novel husbandry techniques support survival of naked mole rat (Heterocephalus glaber) pups. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2014; 53(1):89–91.
17.
PresnellJS, BubelM, KnowlesT, et al.Multigenerational laboratory culture of pelagic ctenophores and CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in the lobate Mnemiopsis leidyi. Nat Protoc, 2022; 17(8):1868–1900.
18.
PowderKE, AlbertsonRC. Cichlid fishes as a model to understand normal and clinical craniofacial variation. Dev Biol, 2016; 415(2):338–346; doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.12.018
19.
BassarRD, ChildsDZ, ReesM, et al.The effects of asymmetric competition on the life history of Trinidadian guppies. Ecol Lett, 2016; 19(3):268–278; doi: 10.1111/ele.12563
20.
SchulzeL, HenningerJ, KadobianskyiM, et al.Transparent Danionella translucida as a genetically tractable vertebrate brain model. Nat Methods, 2018; 15(11):977–983; doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0144-6
21.
HengK, ThompsonA, ChuD, et al.Three cheers for the three-spined stickleback. Lab Anim (N Y), 2016; 45(11):421; doi: 10.1038/laban.1142
22.
KeeneAC, DuboueER. The origins and evolution of sleep. J Exp Biol, 2018; 221(Pt 11); doi: 10.1242/jeb.159533
23.
KozolRA, AbramsAJ, JamesDM, et al.Function over form: Modeling groups of inherited neurological conditions in Zebrafish. Front Mol Neurosci, 2016; 9:55; doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00055
24.
ChenE, EkkerSC. Zebrafish as a genomics research model. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 2004; 5(5):409–413; doi: 10.2174/1389201043376652
25.
McGaughSE, KowalkoJE, DuboueE, et al.Dark world rises: The emergence of cavefish as a model for the study of evolution, development, behavior, and disease. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol, 2020; 334(7–8):397–404; doi: 10.1002/jez.b.22978
26.
HinauxH, PottinK, ChalhoubH, et al.A developmental staging table for Astyanax mexicanus surface fish and Pachon cavefish. Zebrafish, 2011; 8(4):155–165; doi: 10.1089/zeb.2011.0713
27.
JefferyWR.Cavefish as a model system in evolutionary developmental biology. Dev Biol, 2001; 231(1):1–12; doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.0121
28.
HermanA, BrandvainY, WeagleyJ, et al.The role of gene flow in rapid and repeated evolution of cave-related traits in Mexican tetra, Astyanax mexicanus. Mol Ecol, 2018; 27(22):4397–4416; doi: 10.1111/mec.14877
Sifuentes-RomeroI, FerrufinoE, ThakurS, et al.Repeated evolution of eye loss in Mexican cavefish: Evidence of similar developmental mechanisms in independently evolved populations. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol, 2020; 334(7–8):423–437; doi: 10.1002/jez.b.22977
31.
O'GormanM, ThakurS, ImrieG, et al.Pleiotropic function of the oca2 gene underlies the evolution of sleep loss and albinism in cavefish. Curr Biol, 2021; 31(16):3694–3701.e4; doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.077
32.
ProtasME, HerseyC, KochanekD, et al.Genetic analysis of cavefish reveals molecular convergence in the evolution of albinism. Nat Genet, 2006; 38(1):107–111; doi: 10.1038/ng1700
33.
DuboueER, KeeneAC, BorowskyRL. Evolutionary convergence on sleep loss in cavefish populations. Curr Biol, 2011; 21(8):671–676; doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.020
34.
ChinJSR, GassantCE, AmaralPM, et al.Convergence on reduced stress behavior in the Mexican blind cavefish. Dev Biol, 2018; 441(2):319–327; doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.05.009
35.
KowalkoJ.Utilizing the blind cavefish Astyanax mexicanus to understand the genetic basis of behavioral evolution. J Exp Biol, 2020; 223(Pt Suppl 1); doi: 10.1242/jeb.208835
36.
WarrenWC, BoggsTE, BorowskyR, et al.A chromosome-level genome of Astyanax mexicanus surface fish for comparing population-specific genetic differences contributing to trait evolution. Nat Commun, 2021; 12(1):1447; doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21733-z
37.
KowalkoJE, RohnerN, LindenTA, et al.Convergence in feeding posture occurs through different genetic loci in independently evolved cave populations of Astyanax mexicanus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2013; 110(42):16933–16938; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317192110
38.
BaumannDP, IngallsA. Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus): Biology, Husbandry, and Experimental Protocols. In: Laboratory Fish in Biomedical Research. (D'Angelo L, de Girolamo P. eds.) Academic Press: Cambridge, MA; 2022; pp. 311–347.
39.
MaL, JefferyWR, EssnerJJ, et al.Genome editing using TALENs in blind Mexican Cavefish, Astyanax mexicanus. PLoS One, 2015; 10(3):e0119370; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119370
40.
KlaassenH, WangY, AdamskiK, et al.CRISPR mutagenesis confirms the role of oca2 in melanin pigmentation in Astyanax mexicanus. Dev Biol, 2018; 441(2):313–318; doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.03.014
41.
StahlBA, PeussR, McDoleB, et al.Stable transgenesis in Astyanax mexicanus using the Tol2 transposase system. Dev Dyn, 2019; 248(8):679–687; doi: 10.1002/dvdy.32
42.
TabinJA, AspirasA, MartineauB, et al.Temperature preference of cave and surface populations of Astyanax mexicanus. Dev Biol, 2018; 441(2):338–344; doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.04.017
43.
SimonV, ElleboodeR, MaheK, et al.Comparing growth in surface and cave morphs of the species Astyanax mexicanus: Insights from scales. Evodevo, 2017; 8:23; doi: 10.1186/s13227-017-0086-6
44.
NortonA, FranseKF, DawT, et al.Larval rearing methods for small-scale production of healthy zebrafish. East Biol, 2019; 2019(Spec Issue):33–46.
45.
RonnestadI, YuferaM, UeberscharB, et al.Feeding behaviour and digestive physiology in larval fish: Current knowledge, and gaps and bottlenecks in research. Rev Aquacult, 2013; 5:S59–S98; doi: 10.1111/raq.12010
46.
FardMS, PasmansF, AdriaensenC, et al.Chironomidae bloodworms larvae as aquatic amphibian food. Zoo Biol, 2014; 33(3):221–227; doi: 10.1002/zoo.21122
47.
VolkmanET, PangleKL, RajchelDA,. Hatchery performance attributes of juvenile lake sturgeon fed two natural food types. N Am J Aquacult, 2004; 66(2):105–112; doi: 10.1577/A03-047.1
48.
SahooSK, GiriSS, SahuAK. Effect of stocking density on growth and survival of Clarias batrachus (Linn.) larvae and fry during hatchery rearing. J Appl Ichthyol, 2004; 20(4):302–305; doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2004.00534.x
49.
Alvarez-GonzalezCA, Ortiz-GalindoJL, DumasS, et al.Effect of stocking density on the growth and survival of spotted sand bass Paralabrax maculatofasciatus larvae in a closed recirculating system. J World Aquacult Soc, 2001; 32(1):130–137; doi: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2001.tb00932.x
50.
El-SayedAFM.Effects of stocking density and feeding levels on growth and feed efficiency of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) fry. Aquac Res, 2002; 33(8):621–626; doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2109.2002.00700.x
51.
HuntingfordFA.Implications of domestication and rearing conditions for the behaviour of cultivated fishes. J Fish Biol, 2004; 65:122–142; doi: 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00562.x
52.
AnderssonM, KettunenP. Effects of holding density on the Welfare of Zebrafish: A systematic review. Zebrafish, 2021; 18(5):297–306; doi: 10.1089/zeb.2021.0018
53.
KowalkoJE, RohnerN, RompaniSB, et al.Loss of schooling behavior in cavefish through sight-dependent and sight-independent mechanisms. Curr Biol, 2013; 23(19):1874–1883; doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.056
54.
BorowskyR. Breeding Astyanax mexicanus Through Natural Spawning. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols: Long Island, NY; 2008.
55.
Gomez-RequeniP, ConceicaoLE, Olderbakk JordalAE, et al.A reference growth curve for nutritional experiments in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and changes in whole body proteome during development. Fish Physiol Biochem, 2010; 36(4):1199–1215; doi: 10.1007/s10695-010-9400-0
56.
Francis-FloydR. Fish Nutrition: University of Florida Cooperative Extenstion Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, EDIS: Gainesville, FL; 2002.
57.
FarmerSC. Chapter 24—Introduction to ZebrafishHusbandry. AcademicPress; 2019; p. 1019.
58.
WangZ, DuJ, LamSH, et al.Morphological and molecular evidence for functional organization along the rostrocaudal axis of the adult zebrafish intestine. BMC Genomics, 2010; 11:392; doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-392
59.
HernandezRE, GalitanL, CameronJ, et al.Delay of initial feeding of zebrafish larvae until 8 days postfertilization has no impact on survival or growth through the Juvenile Stage. Zebrafish, 2018; 15(5):515–518; doi: 10.1089/zeb.2018.1579
60.
PettyBD, Francis-FloydR. Pet fish care and husbandry. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract, 2004; 7(2):397–419, vii; doi: 10.1016/j.cvex.2004.02.003
61.
StevensCH, ReedBT, HawkinsP. Enrichment for Laboratory Zebrafish—A review of the evidence and the challenges. Animals (Basel), 2021; 11(3):698; doi: 10.3390/ani11030698
62.
LieggiC, KalueffAV, LawrenceC, et al.The influence of behavioral, social, and environmental factors on reproducibility and replicability in Aquatic Animal Models. ILAR J, 2020; 60(2):270–288; doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilz019
Rodriguez-MoralesR, Gonzalez-LermaP, YuiskaA, et al.Convergence on reduced aggression through shared behavioral traits in multiple populations of Astyanax mexicanus. BMC Ecol Evol, 2022; 22(1):116; doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-02069-8
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
