Neotropical cichlids include hundreds of species whose taxonomy has benefited of molecular phylogeny and whose karyotype evolution has been related to the amount and distribution of different classes of repetitive sequences. This study provides the first integrative molecular (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 and 16S sequences) and cytogenetic analyses of wild samples of the green terror Andinoacara rivulatus, a cichlid naturally distributed in Ecuador and spread throughout the world as an aquarium pet. Molecular data revealed that sequences of green terror constitute a single monophyletic clade within the genus and allowed species attribution of uncertain samples previously cytogenetically analyzed. Chromosome number (2n = 48) conforms to the general trend observed within neotropical cichlids. However, mapping of different classes of repeated sequences (18S rDNA, 5S rDNA, U1 snDNA and telomeric) revealed the presence of features uncommon among representatives of these fishes, like multiple major rDNA sites, and suggested a recent occurrence of rearrangements (fusion/inversion) in two chromosome pairs.
NelsonJS, GrandeTC, WilsonMVH. Fishes of the World. Fifth edition. John Wiley & Sons, 2016. Hoboken, New Jersey.
3.
GennerMJ, SeehausenO, LuntDH, JoyceDA, ShawPW, CarvalhoGR, et al.Age of cichlids: new dates for ancient lake fish radiations. Mol Biol Evol, 2007; 24:1269–1282.
4.
KullanderSO.Family cichlidae. In: Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America. ReisRE, KullanderSO, and FerrarisCJJr (eds), pp. 605–654, Edipucrs, Porto Alegre, 2003.
5.
López-FernándezH, WinemillerKO, HoneycuttRL. Multilocus phylogeny and rapid radiations in Neotropical cichlid fishes (Perciformes: Cichlidae: Cichlinae). Mol Phylogenet Evol, 2010; 55:1070–1086.
6.
MusilováZ, ŘíčanO, NovákJ. Phylogeny of the Neotropical cichlid fish tribe Cichlasomatini (Teleostei: Cichlidae) based on morphological and molecular data, with the description of a new genus. J Zoolog Syst Evol Res, 2009; 47:234–247.
7.
MusilováZ, ŘíčanO, ŘíčanováS, JanštaP, GahuraO, NovákJ. Phylogeny and historical biogeography of trans-Andean cichlid fishes (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Verteb Zool, 2015; 65:333–350.
8.
GüntherACLG.Second list of cold-blooded vertebrata collected by Mr. Fraser in the Andes of western Ecuador. Proc Zool Soc Lond, 1860; 1860:402–420.
MusilováZ, SchindlerI, StaeckW. Description of Andinoacara stalsbergi sp. n. (Teleostei: Cichlidae: Cichlasomatini) from Pacific coastal rivers in Peru, and annotations on the phylogeny of the genus. Vertebr Zool, 2009; 59:131–141.
11.
MusilováZ, SchindlerI, StaeckW. Phylogeny of the Neotropical cichlid fish tribe Cichlasomatini (Teleostei: Cichlidae) based on morphological and molecular data, with the description of a new genus. J Zool Syst Evol Res, 2009; 47:234–247.
12.
SchindlerI, MorgensternR. Anmerkungen zur Taxonomie der Andinoacara-Arten [Notes on the taxonomy of Andinoacara species]. DCG Inform, 2010; 41:114–124.
13.
RodríguezRM.Bioecological aspects of Aequidens rivulatus (Pisces: Cichlidae) of the Villa Maria wetland, Chimbote (Perù), for future breeding. In: Technical Communication CIVA. pp. 101–107, 2004.
Jiménez-PradoP, AguirreW, Laaz-MoncayoE, Navarrete-AmayaR, Nugra-SalazarF, Rebolledo-MonsalveE, et al. Guide to freswater fishes of the western slope of Ecuador. Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Esmeralda (PUCESE), University of Azuay (UDA) and Museum of Natural Science of Ecuador (MECN) of the National Institute of Biodevisity, 2015.
16.
CarvalhoPC, de OliveiraEA, BertolloLAC, YanoCF, OliveiraC, DecruE, et al.First chromosomal analysis in Hepsetidae (Actinopterygii, Characiformes): insights into relationship between African and Neotropical Fish Groups. Front Genet, 2017; 8:203.
17.
FerreiraM, GarciaC, MatosoDA, de JesusIS, Cioffi M deB, BertolloLAC, et al.The Bunocephalus coracoideus species complex (Siluriformes, Aspredinidae). signs of a speciation process through chromosomal, genetic and ecological diversity. Front Genet, 2017; 8:120.
18.
NakayamaCM, FeldbergE, BertolloLAC. Mapping of ribosomal genes and chromosomal markers in three species of the genus Serrasalmus (Characidae, Serrasalminae) from the Amazon basin. Genet Mol Biol, 2008; 31:868–873.
19.
NakayamaC, JéguM, PortoJIR, FeldbergE. Karyological Evidence for a Cryptic species of piranha within Serrasalmus rhombeus (Characidae, Serrasalminae) in the Amazon. Copeia, 2001; 3:866–869.
20.
NirchioM, PaimFG, MilanaV, RossiAR, OliveiraC. Identification of a new mullet species complex based on an integrative molecular and cytogenetic investigation of Mugil hospes (Mugilidae: Mugiliformes). Front Genet, 2018; 9:17.
21.
NirchioM, FenocchioAS, SwarçaAC, PérezJE, GranadoA, EstradaA, et al.Cytogenetic characterization of hybrids offspring between Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier, 1818) and Piaractus brachypomus (Cuvier, 1817) from Caicara del Orinoco, Venezuela. Caryologia, 2003; 56:405–411.
22.
NirchioM, OliveiraC, Siccha-RamirezZR, de SeneVF, SolaL, MilanaV, et al.The Mugil curema species complex (Pisces, Mugilidae): a new karyotype for the Pacific white mullet mitochondrial lineage. Comp Cytogenet, 2017; 11:225–237.
23.
NirchioM, OliveiraC, Siccha-RamirezZR, SeneVF, Sánchez-RomeroOR, EhemannNR, et al.Cryptic Caribbean species of Scorpaena (Actinopterygii: Scorpaeniformes) suggested by cytogenetic and molecular data. J Fish Biol, 2016; 89:1947–1957.
24.
AraiR.Fish Karyotypes: A Check List. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
25.
FeldbergE, PortoJIR, BertolloLAC. Chromosomal changes and adaptation of cichlid fishes during evolution. Fish Adapt, 2003; 285:308.
26.
PolettoAB, FerreiraIA, Cabral-de-MelloDC, NakajimaRT, MazzuchelliJ, RibeiroHB, et al.Chromosome differentiation patterns during cichlid fish evolution. BMC Genetics, 2010; 11:1–12.
27.
MarescalchiO.Karyotype and mitochondrial 16S gene characterizations in seven South American Cichlasomatini species (Perciformes, Cichlidae). J Zoological System, 2005; 43:22–28.
28.
GillTN.Synopsis of the Fresh Water Fishes of the Western Portion of the Island of Trinidad, W. I. Ann Lyceum Nat His New York, 1859; 6:363–430.
29.
NicklasW, KullanderSO, RamiroB. Andinoacara blombergi, a new species from the río Esmeraldas basin in Ecuador and a review of A. rivulatus (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Ichthyol Explor Fresh, 2012; 23:117–137.
30.
WardRD, ZemlakTS, InnesBH, LastPR, HebertPDN. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2005; 360:1847–1857.
31.
PalumbiSR.Nucleic acids II: the polymerase chain reaction. In: Molecular Systematics. HillisDM, MoritzC, and MableBK (eds), pp. 205–247, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1996.
32.
MilanaV, FusariA, RossiA, SolaL. Molecular and morphological identification of an uncommon centrolophid fish. Central Europ J Biol, 2011; 6:440–445.
33.
ThompsonJ.The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res, 1997; 25:4876–4882.
34.
HeckelJ.Johann Natterer's neue Flussfische Brasilien's: nach den beobachtungen und mittheilungen des entdeckers. Ann Wiener Mus Naturgeschichte, 1840; 2:325–471.
35.
KumarS, StecherG, TamuraK. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol, 2016; 33:1870–1874.
36.
GuindonS, DufayardJ-F, LefortV, AnisimovaM, HordijkW, GascuelO. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol, 2010; 59:307–321.
PosadaD, CrandallKA. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 1998; 14:817–818.
39.
NylanderJAA, ZoologyS, PosadaD.MrModeltest 2.3. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, 2008.
40.
LozanoR, Ruiz RejonC, Ruiz RejonM. A method for increasing the number of mitoses available for cytogenetic analysis in rainbow trout. Stain Technol, 1988; 63:335–338.
NirchioM, OliveiraC.Fish Cytogenetics, 216 pp. Universidad de Oriente, Cumaná, Venezuela, 2006.
43.
HowellWM, BlackDA. Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. Experientia, 1980; 36:1014–1015.
NilsenTW.The spliceosome: the most complex macromolecular machine in the cell?. Bioessays, 2003; 25:1147–1149.
46.
PinkelD, StraumeT, GrayJW. Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1986; 83:2934–2938.
47.
CostaW.The Simpsonichthys flavicaudatus species group (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae: Cynolebiatinae): phylogenetic relationships, taxonomic revision and biogeography. Ichthyol Explor Freshwaters, 2003; 14:31–60.
48.
PendasAM, MoranP, MartinezJL, Garcia-VazquezE. Applications of 5S rDNA in Atlantic salmon, brown trout, and in Atlantic salmon brown trout hybrid identification. Mol Ecol, 1995; 4:275–276.
49.
UtsunomiaR, Silva DMZ deA, Ruiz-RuanoFJ, Araya-JaimeC, Pansonato-AlvesJC, ScacchettiPC, et al.Uncovering the ancestry of B chromosomes in Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae (Teleostei, Characidae). PLoS One, 2016; 11:e0150573.
50.
SilvaDMZA, UtsunomiaR, Pansonato-AlvesJC, OliveiraC, ForestiF. Chromosomal mapping of repetitive DNA sequences in five species of Astyanax (Characiformes, Characidae) reveals independent location of U1 and U2 snRNA sites and association of U1 snRNA and 5S rDNA. Cytogenet Genome Res, 2015; 146:144–152.
51.
IjdoJW, WellsRA, BaldiniA, ReedersST. Improved telomere detection using a telomere repeat probe (TTAGGG)n generated by PCR. Nucleic Acids Res, 1991; 19:4780.
52.
ReganCT.The fishes of the San Juan river, Colombia. Annals Magaz Nat History, 1913; 12:462–473.
53.
KnerR.Eine Uebersicht der ichthyologischen Ausbeute des Herrn Professors Dr. Mor. Wagner in Central-Amerika. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München, 1863; 2:220–230.
54.
GalettiPM, AguilarCT, MolinaWF. An overview of marine fish cytogenetics. In: Marine Genetics. Solé-CavaAM, RussoCAM, and ThorpeJP (eds), pp. 55–62, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000.
55.
NirchioM, RossiAR, ForestiF, OliveiraC. Chromosome evolution in fishes: a new challenging proposal from Neotropical species. Neotrop Ichthyol, 2014; 12:761–770.
56.
FeldbergE, BertolloLAC. Nucleolar organizing regions in some species of Neotropical Cichlid fish (Pisces, Perciformes). Caryologia, 1985; 38:319–324.
57.
KornfieldI.Descriptive genetics of cichlid fishes. In: Evolutionary Genetics of Fishes. TurnerBJ (ed), pp. 591–616. Springer, Boston, MA, 1984.
58.
ThompsonKW.Cytotaxonomy of 41 species of Neotropical Cichlidae. Copeia, 1979; 4:679–691.
59.
KullanderSO.Cichlid fishes of the Amazon River drainage of Peru. Swedish Museum Nat History, 1986; 1986:1–431.
60.
ReganCT.A revision of the fishes of the South-American cichlid genera Acara, Nannacara, Acaropsis, and Astronotus. Annals Magazine Nat History, 1905; 15:329–347.
61.
OcalewiczK.Telomeres in fishes. Cytogenet Genome Res, 2013; 141:114–125.
62.
SchneiderCH, GrossMC, TerencioML, ArtoniRF, VicariMR, MartinsC, et al.Chromosomal evolution of neotropical cichlids: the role of repetitive DNA sequences in the organization and structure of karyotype. Rev Fish Biol Fish, 2013; 23:201–214.
63.
SlijepcevicP.Telomeres and mechanisms of Robertsonian fusion. Chromosoma, 1998; 107:136–140.
64.
OcalewiczK.Genomic distribution of telomeric DNA sequences-what do we learn from fish about telomere evolution? In: Reviews on Selected Topics of Telomere Biology. LiB (ed), pp. 271–294, Intech Open Access Publisher, 2012.
65.
MandrioliM, BizzaroD, ManicardiGC, GionghiD, BassoliL, BianchiU. Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of a highly repeated DNA sequence in the peach potato aphid Myzus persicae. Chromosoma, 1999; 108:436–442.
66.
DevlinRH, NagahamaY. Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences. Aquaculture, 2002; 208:191–364.
67.
CioffiMB, MartinsC, VicariMR, RebordinosL, BertolloLAC. Differentiation of the XY sex chromosomes in the fish Hoplias malabaricus (Characiformes, Erythrinidae): unusual accumulation of repetitive sequences on the X chromosome. Sex Dev, 2010; 4:176–185.
68.
EzazT, DeakinJE. Repetitive sequence and sex chromosome evolution in vertebrates. Adv Evol Biol, 2014; 2014:9.
69.
CioffiMB, YanoCF, SemberA, BertolloLAC. Chromosomal evolution in lower vertebrates: sex chromosomes in Neotropical fishes. Genes, 2017; 8:pii: E258.
70.
SochorováJ, GarciaS, GálvezF, SymonováR, KovaříkA. Evolutionary trends in animal ribosomal DNA loci: introduction to a new online database. Chromosoma, 2018; 127:141–150.
71.
GuillénAKZ, HiraiY, TanoueT, HiraiH. Transcriptional repression mechanisms of nucleolus organizer regions (NORs) in humans and chimpanzees. Chromosome Res, 2004; 12:225–237.
72.
NirchioM, OliveiraC, FerreiraIA, GranadoA, RonE. Extensive polymorphism and chromosomal characteristics of ribosomal DNA in the characid fish Triportheus venezuelensis (Characiformes, Characidae). Genet Mol Biol, 2007; 30:25–30.
73.
OliveiraIA, ArgoloLA, Bitencourt J deA, DinizD, VicariMR, Affonso PRA deM. Cryptic chromosomal diversity in the complex “Geophagus” brasiliensis (Perciformes, Cichlidae). Zebrafish, 2016; 13:33–44.
74.
CabreroJ, CamachoJPM. Location and expression of ribosomal RNA genes in grasshoppers: abundance of silent and cryptic loci. Chromosome Res, 2008; 16:595–607.
75.
VicariMR, ArtoniRF, Moreira-FilhoO, BertolloLAC. Colocalization of repetitive DNAs and silencing of major rRNA genes. A case report of the fish Astyanax janeiroensis. Cytogenet Genome Res, 2008; 122:67–72.
76.
Ruiz-EstévezM, Ruiz-RuanoFJ, CabreroJ, BakkaliM, PerfecttiF, López-LeónMD, et al.Non-random expression of ribosomal DNA units in a grasshopper showing high intragenomic variation for the ITS2 region. Insect Mol Biol, 2015; 24:319–330.
77.
ManiI, KumarR, SinghM, NagpureNS, KushwahaB, SrivastavaPK, et al.Nucleotide variation and physical mapping of ribosomal genes using FISH in genus Tor (Pisces, Cyprinidae). Mol Biol Rep, 2011; 38:2637–2647.
78.
HorigomeC, UnozawaE, OokiT, KobayashiT. Ribosomal RNA gene repeats associate with the nuclear pore complex for maintenance after DNA damage. PLoS Genet, 2019; 15:e1008103.
79.
SalimD, GertonJL. Ribosomal DNA instability and genome adaptability. Chromosome Res, 2019; 27:73–87.
80.
AmemiyaCT, GoldJR. Chromosomal NORs as taxonomic and systematic characters in North American cyprinid fishes. Genetica, 1988; 76:81–90.
81.
MajtánováZ, SymonováR, Arias-RodriguezL, SallanL, RábP. “Holostei versus Halecostomi” problem: insight from cytogenetics of ancient non teleost Actinopterygian fish, bowfin Amia calva. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol, 2017; 328:620–628.
82.
GornungE.Twenty years of physical mapping of major ribosomal RNA genes across the teleosts: a review of research. Cytogenet Genome Res, 2013; 141:90–102.
83.
KullanderSO.A revision of the South American cichlid genus Cichlasoma (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm, 1983; I–IV:1–296.
84.
ArgôloLA, Affonso PRA deM. First cytogenetic report in Cichlasoma sanctifranciscense Kullander, 1983 (Perciformes, Cichlidae) from northeastern Brazil with inferences on chromosomal evolution of Cichlasomatini. Comp Cytogenet, 2015; 9:671–681.
85.
QuoyJRC, GaimardJP. Description des Poissons. Chapter IX. In: Voyage autour du Monde, Entrepris par Odre du Roi, exécuté sur les corvettes de L. M. “L'Uranie” et “La Physicienne,” pendant les années 1817, 1818, 1819 et 1820.FreycinetL de (ed), pp. 192–401. Paris, 1824.
86.
GosseJP.Description de deux Cichlides nouveaux de la région Amazonienne. Bulletin Institut Royal Sciences Naturelles Belgique, 1963; 39:1–7.
87.
MartinsC, WaskoAP. Organization and evolution of 5S ribosomal DNA in the fish genome. Focus Genome Res, 2004; 289:318.
88.
RebordinosL, CrossI, MerloA. High evolutionary dynamism in 5S rDNA of fish: state of the art. Cytogenet Genome Res, 2013; 141:103–113.
89.
VicariMR, Ferreira ArtoniR, Moreira-FilhoO, BertolloLAC. Basic and molecular cytogenetics in freshwater Cichlidae (Osteichthyes, Perciformes). Karyotypic conservationism and divergence. Caryologia, 2006; 59:260–266.
90.
García-SoutoD, TroncosoT, PérezM, PasantesJJ. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of the European hake Merluccius merluccius (Merlucciidae, Gadiformes): U1 and U2 snRNA gene clusters map to the same location. PLoS One, 2015; 10:e0146150.
91.
Cabral-de-MelloDC, ValenteGT, NakajimaRT, MartinsC. Genomic organization and comparative chromosome mapping of the U1 snRNA gene in cichlid fish, with an emphasis in Oreochromis niloticus. Chromosome Res, 2012; 20:279–292.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
