Zebrafish animal models lend themselves to behavioral assays that can facilitate rapid screening of ototoxic, otoprotective, and otoregenerative drugs. Structurally similar to human inner ear hair cells, the mechanosensory hair cells on their lateral line allow the zebrafish to sense water flow and orient head-to-current in a behavior called rheotaxis. This rheotaxis behavior deteriorates in a dose-dependent manner with increased exposure to the ototoxin cisplatin, thereby establishing itself as an excellent biomarker for anatomic damage to lateral line hair cells. Building on work by our group and others, we have built a new, fully automated high-throughput behavioral assay system that uses automated image analysis techniques to quantify rheotaxis behavior. This novel system consists of a custom-designed swimming apparatus and imaging system consisting of network-controlled Raspberry Pi microcomputers capturing infrared video. Automated analysis techniques detect individual zebrafish, compute their orientation, and quantify the rheotaxis behavior of a zebrafish test population, producing a powerful, high-throughput behavioral assay. Using our fully automated biological assay to test a standardized ototoxic dose of cisplatin against varying doses of compounds that protect or regenerate hair cells may facilitate rapid translation of candidate drugs into preclinical mammalian models of hearing loss.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KorverAM, KoningsS, DekkerFW, BeersM, WeverCC, FrijnsJH, et al.Newborn hearing screening vs. later hearing screening and developmental outcomes in children with permanent childhood hearing impairment. JAMA, 2010; 304:1701–1708.
2.
CruickshanksKJ, WileyTL, TweedTS, KleinBE, KleinR, Mares-PerlmanJA, et al.Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Am J Epidemiol, 1998; 148:879–886.
3.
GatesGA, CooperJCJr., KannelWB, MillerNJ. Hearing in the elderly: the Framingham cohort, 1983–1985. Part I. Basic audiometric test results. Ear Hear, 1990; 11:247–256.
4.
MoscickiEK, ElkinsEF, BaumHM, McNamaraPM. Hearing loss in the elderly: an epidemiologic study of the Framingham Heart Study Cohort. Ear Hear, 1985; 6:184–190.
HoshinoT, TabuchiK, NishimuraB, TanakaS, NakayamaM, IshiiT, et al.Protective role of Nrf2 in age-related hearing loss and gentamicin ototoxicity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2011; 415:94–98.
13.
NiihoriM, PlattoT, IgarashiS, HurbonA, DunnAM, TranP, et al.Zebrafish swimming behavior as a biomarker for ototoxicity-induced hair cell damage: a high-throughput drug development platform targeting hearing loss. Transl Res, 2015; 155:440–450.
14.
ThomasAJ, WuP, RaibleDW, RubelEW, SimonJA, OuHC. Identification of small molecule inhibitors of cisplatin-induced hair cell death: results of a 10,000 compound screen in the zebrafish lateral line. Otol Neurotol, 2015; 36:519–525.
15.
TonC, ParngC. The use of zebrafish for assessing ototoxic and otoprotective agents. Hear Res, 2008; 208:79–88.
16.
HarrisJA, ChengAG, CunninghamLL, MacDonaldG, RaibleDW, RubleEW. Neomycin-induced hair cell death and rapid regeneration in the lateral line of zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 2003; 04:219–234.
17.
OwensKN, CoffinAB, HongLS, BennettKO, RubelEW, RaibleDW. Response of mechanosensory hair cells of the zebrafish lateral line to aminogylcosides reveals distinct cell death pathways. Hear Res, 2009; 253:32–41.
18.
CoffinAB, OuH, OwensKN, SantosF, SimonJA, RubelEW, et al.Chemical screening for hair cell loss and protection in the zebrafish lateral line. Zebrafish, 2010; 7:3–11.
19.
OuHC, SantosF, RaibleDW, SimonJA, RubelEW. Drug screening for hearing loss: Using the zebrafish lateral line to screen for drugs that prevents and cause hearing loss. Drug Discovery Today, 2010; 15:265–271.
20.
BuckLM, WinterMJ, RedfernWS, WhitfieldTT. Ototoxin-induced cellular damage in neuromasts disrupts lateral line function in larval zebrafish. Hear Res, 2012; 284:67–81.
21.
OuHC, RaibleDW, RubelEW. Cisplatin-induced hair cell loss in zebrafish (Danio rerio) lateral line. Hear Res, 2007; 233:46–53.
SuliA, WatsonGM, RubelEW, RaibleDW. Rheotaxis in larval zebrafish is mediated by lateral line mechanosensory hair cells. PLoS One, 2012; 7:e29727.
24.
NemethMJ, KruegerCC, JosephsonDC. Rheotactic response of two strains of juvenile landlocked atlantic salmon: implications for population restoration. Trans Am Fish Soc, 2003; 132:904–912.
25.
Van TrumpWJ, McHenryMJ. The lateral line system is not necessary for rheotaxis in the Mexican blind cavefish (Astyanax fasciatus). Integr Comp Biol, 2013; 53:799–809.
26.
KulpaM, Bak-ColemanJ, CoombsS. The lateral line is necessary for blind cavefish in non-uniform flow. J Exp Biol, 2015; 218:1603–1612.
27.
MontgomeryJC, BakerCF, CartonAG. The lateral line can mediate rheotaxis in fish. Nature, 1997; 389:960–963.
28.
ArnoldGP, WeihsD. The hydrodynamics of rheotaxis in the plaice (Pleuronectes Platessa L.). J Exp Biol, 1977; 75:147–169.
29.
McNeilPL, BoyleD, HenryTB, HandyRD, SlomanKA. Effects of metal nanoparticles on the lateral line system and behaviour in early life stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Aquat Toxicol, 2014; 152:318–323.
30.
OlszewskiJ, HaehnelM, TaguchiM, LiaoJC. Zebrafish larvae exhibit rheotaxis and can escape a continuous suction source using their lateral line. PLoS One, 2012; 7:e36661.
31.
OliveR, WolfS, DubreuilA, BormuthV, DebregeasG, CandelierR. Rheotaxis of larval zebrafish: behavioral study of a multi-sensory process. Front Syst Neurosci, 2016; 10:14.
32.
SantosF, MacDonaldG, RubelEW, RaibleDW. Lateral line hair cell maturation is a determinant of aminoglycoside susceptibility in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Hear Res, 2006; 213:25–33.
33.
RuusuvuoriP, AijoT, ChowdhuryS, Garmendia-TorresC, SelinummiJ, BirbaumerM, et al.Evaluation of methods for detection of fluorescence labeled subcellular objects in microscope images. BMC Bioinformatics, 2010; 11:1–17.
34.
SmalI, LoogM, NiessenW, MeijeringE. Quantitative comparison of spot detection methods in fluorescence microscopy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2010; 29:282–301.
35.
KimoriY, BabaN, MoroneN. Extended morphological processing: a practical method for automatic spot detection of biological markers from microscopic images. BMC Bioinformatics, 2010; 11:1–13.
FawcettT. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett, 2006; 27:861–874.
38.
DudaRO, HartPE, StorkDG: Pattern Classification, 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, 2000.
39.
MackenzieSM, RaibleDW. Proliferative regeneration of zebrafish lateral line hair cells after different ototoxic insults. PLoS One, 2012; 7:e47257.
40.
LushME, PiotrowskiT. Sensory hair cell regeneration in the zebrafish lateral line. Dev Dyn, 2014; 243:1187–1202.
41.
HolmS. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Statist, 1979; 6:65–70.
42.
PattersonSL, Colbert MaressoK, HawkE. Cancer chemoprevention: successes and failures. Clin Chem, 2013; 59:94–101.
43.
GerhauserC. Cancer chemoprevention and nutriepigenetics: state of the art and future challenges. Top Curr Chem, 2103; 329:73–132.
44.
MadhunapantulaSV, RobertsonGP. Chemoprevention of melanoma. Adv Pharmacol, 2012; 65:361–398.
45.
ChirtesF, AlbuS. Prevention and restoration of hearing loss associated with the use of cisplatin. BioMed Res Intl, 2014; 2014:925485.
46.
SwinneyDC. Phenotypic vs. target-based drug discovery for first-in-class medicines. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2013; 93:299–301.
47.
NuberLK, SkulovichO, HartmannS, SeilerTB, CofaliaC, SchuettrumpfH, et al.A sensitive biomarker for the detection of aquatic contamination based on behavioral assays using zebrafish larvae. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2016; 133:271–280.
48.
Mora-ZamoranoFX, SvobodaKR, CarvanMJIII. The nicotine-evoked locomotor response: a behavioral paradigm for toxicity screening in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos and eleutheroembryos exposed to methylmercury. PLoS One, 2016; 11:e0154570.
49.
ScottCA, MarsdenAN, SlusarskiDC. Automated, high-throughput, in vivo analysis of visual function using the zebrafish. Dev Dyn, 2016; 245:605–613.
50.
OlivaresCI, FieldJA, SimonichM, TanguayRL, Sierra-AlvarezR. Arsenic (III, V), indium (III), and gallium (III) toxicity to zebrafish embryos using a high-throughput multi-endpoint in vivo developmental and behavioral assay. Chemosphere, 2016; 148:361–368.
51.
SchachtJ, TalaskaAE, RybakLP. Cisplatin and aminoglycoside antibiotics: hearing loss and its prevention. Anat Rec, 2012; 285:1837–1850.
52.
HuthME, RicciAJ, ChengAG. Mechanisms of aminoglycoside ototoxicity and targets of hair cell protection. Int J Otolaryngol, 2011; 2011:938861.
53.
RybakLP, MukherjeaD, JajooS, RamkumarV. Cisplatin induced ototoxicity and protection: clinical and experimental studies. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2009; 219:177–186.
54.
CoffinAB, WilliamsonKL, MamiyaA, RaibleDW, RubelEW. Profiling drug-induced cell death pathways in the zebrafish lateral line. Apoptosis, 2013; 18:393–408.
55.
MonroeJD, RajadinakaranG, SmithME. Sensory hair cell death and regeneration in fishes. Front Cell Neurosci, 2015; 9:131.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
