As the zebrafish is rapidly becoming a species of choice in preclinical research, several efforts are being placed toward creating educational programs for K-12 students based on this promising model organism. However, as any other model organisms, the use of zebrafish in classroom settings requires additional experimental resources and poses ethical challenges related to animal use. To mitigate these factors, we have developed an application (app), simUfish, which implements a mathematical model of zebrafish behavior for generating multiple fish trajectories and animating their body undulations. simUfish is developed using a multiplatform game engine and is expected to promote the knowledge of zebrafish behavior to both K-12 students and the general public. Specifically, it demonstrates basic principles of fish individual and social behaviors, including environment interaction; fear response toward a predator; shoaling; and attraction toward a stimulus, which can be a food source or simply a finger placed on the touch screen. The effectiveness of the app as an accessible experimental tool for learning was tested in an outreach activity on middle school students from the New York City school system. The results from this activity show an immediate, tangible improvement of students' satisfaction and willingness to learn about key concepts on zebrafish behavior, accompanied by high level of interest in life sciences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DooleyK, ZonLI. Zebrafish: A model system for the study of human disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 2000; 10:252–256.
2.
MaximinoC, de BritoTM, da Silva BatistaAW, HerculanoAM, MoratoS, GouveiaA. Measuring anxiety in zebrafish: A critical review. Behav Brain Res, 2010; 214:157–171.
3.
RubinsteinAL. Zebrafish assays for drug toxicity screening. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol, 2006; 2:231–240.
4.
ZonLI, PetersonRT. In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2005; 4:35–44.
5.
LawrenceC. The husbandry of zebrafish (Danio rerio): A review. Aquaculture, 2007; 269:1–20.
6.
KimmelCB, BallardWW, KimmelSR, UllmannB, SchillingTF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn, 1995; 203:253–310.
7.
SpenceR, GerlachG, LawrenceC, SmithC. The behaviour and ecology of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc, 2008; 83:13–34.
8.
LieschkeGJ, CurriePD. Animal models of human disease: zebrafish swim into view. Nat Rev Genet, 2007; 8:353–367.
9.
ReedB, JenningsM: Guidance on the Housing and Care of Zebrafish. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Southwater, 2011.
FieldsMC, AdelfioP, AhmadD, BrownO, CoxB, DaviesM, et al.Danio rerio in K-12 classrooms: sparking interest in the new generation of scientists. Zebrafish, 2009; 6:145–160.
12.
KalueffAV, StewartAM, GerlaiR. Zebrafish as an emerging model for studying complex brain disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2014; 35:63–75.
13.
KalueffAV, GebhardtM, StewartAM, CachatJM, BrimmerM, ChawlaJS, et al.Towards a comprehensive catalog of zebrafish behavior 1.0 and beyond. Zebrafish, 2013; 10:70–86.
14.
BagattoB. Guided inquiry lab exercises in development and oxygen consumption using zebrafish. Zebrafish, 2009; 6:161–168.
15.
SaversS. Making an impact: Zebrafish in education. Zebrafish, 2009; 6:119–120.
16.
ShudaJ, Kearns-SixsmithD. Outreach: Empowering students and teachers to fish outside the box. Zebrafish, 2009; 6:133–138.
17.
Guerra-VarelaJ, Cabezas-SainzP, Yebra-PimentelE, Gutiérrez-LoveraC, CedrónVP, Otero ObarrioMA, et al.“A zebra in the water”: Inspiring science in Spain. Zebrafish, 2016; 13:241–247.
18.
MwaffoV, AndersonRP, ButailS, PorfiriM. A jump persistent turning walker to model zebrafish locomotion. J R Soc Interface, 2015; 12:20140884.
19.
MwaffoV, ButailS, PorfiriM. In-silico experiments of zebrafish behaviour: modelling swimming in three dimensions. Sci Rep, 2017; 7:39877.
20.
ButailS, MwaffoV, PorfiriM. Model-free information-theoretic approach to infer leadership in pairs of zebrafish. Phys Rev E, 2016; 93:042411.
21.
MwaffoV, AndersonRP, PorfiriM. Collective dynamics in the Vicsek and vectorial network models beyond uniform additive noise. J Nonlinear Sci, 2015; 25:1053–1076.
22.
MwaffoV, PorfiriM. Turning rate dynamics of zebrafish exposed to ethanol. Int J Bifurcat Chaos, 2015; 25:1540006.
23.
ZienkiewiczA, BartonDAW, PorfiriM, di BernardoM. Leadership emergence in a data-driven model of zebrafish shoals with speed modulation. The Eur Phys J Spec Top, 2015; 224:3343–3460.
24.
ZienkiewiczAK, BartonDAW, PorfiriM, di BernardoM. Data-driven stochastic modelling of zebrafish motion. J Math Biol, 2015; 71:1081–1105.
25.
RussellWMS, BurchRL, HumeCW: The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Methuen & Co. Ltd., London, 1959.
26.
McManisLD, GunnewigSB. Finding the education in educational technology with early learners. Young Child, 2012; 67:14.
27.
ChittaroL. Visualizing information on mobile devices. Computer, 2006; 39:40–45.
28.
GikasJ, GrantMM. Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. Internet High Educ, 2013; 19:18–26.
29.
RoschelleJ. Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. J Comput Assist Lear, 2003; 19:260–272.
30.
KumarK, LiuJ, LuY-H, BhargavaB. A survey of computation offloading for mobile systems. Mobile Netw Appl, 2013; 18:129–140.
31.
VirvouM, KatsionisG, ManosK. Combining software games with education: Evaluation of its educational effectiveness. Educ Techno Soc, 2005; 8:54–65.
32.
SommerichC, WardR, SikdarK, PayneJ, HermanL. A survey of high school students with ubiquitous access to tablet PCs. Ergonomics, 2007; 50:706–727.
33.
LewisT, BurnettB, TunstallR, AbrahamsP. Complementing anatomy education using three‐dimensional anatomy mobile software applications on tablet computers. Clin Anat, 2014; 27:313–320.
34.
KeengweJ, BhargavaM. Mobile learning and integration of mobile technologies in education. Educ Inform Technol, 2014; 19:737–746.
35.
BeldarrainY. Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Educ, 2006; 27:139–153.
36.
AbaidN, BernhardtJ, FrankJA, KapilaV, KimaniD, PorfiriM. Controlling a robotic fish with a smart phone. Mechatronics, 2013; 23:491–496.
37.
PhamduyP, LeGrandR, PorfiriM. Robotic fish: Design and characterization of an interactive iDevice-controlled robotic fish for informal science education. IEEE Robot Autom Mag, 2015; 22:86–96.
38.
PhamduyP, MilneC, LeouM, PorfiriM. Interactive robotic fish: A tool for informal science learning and environmental awareness. IEEE Robot Autom Mag, 2015; 22:90–95.
39.
KussDJ. Internet gaming addiction: Current perspectives. Psychol Res Behav Manag, 2013; 6:125–137.
40.
JengY-L, WuT-T, HuangY-M, TanQ, YangSJ. The add-on impact of mobile applications in learning strategies: A review study. Educ Techno Soc, 2010; 13:3–11.
41.
SquiresD, PreeceJ. Predicting quality in educational software: Evaluating for learning, usability and the synergy between them. Interact Comput, 1999; 11:467–483.
42.
PapastergiouM. Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Comput Educ, 2009; 52:1–12.
43.
LewisMS, ZhaoJ, MontclareJK. Development and implementation of high school chemistry modules using touch-screen technologies. J Chem Educ, 2012; 89:1012–1018.
44.
CouseLJ, ChenDW. A tablet computer for young children? Exploring its viability for early childhood education. J Res Technol Educ, 2010; 43:75–96.
45.
CouncilNR: A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2012.
46.
GautraisJ, GinelliF, FournierR, BlancoS, SoriaM, ChatéH, et al.Deciphering interactions in moving animal groups. PLoS Comput Biol, 2012; 8:e1002678.
47.
BartoliniT, MwaffoV, ShowlerA, MacrìS, ButailS, PorfiriM. Zebrafish response to 3D printed shoals of conspecifics: the effect of body size. Bioinspir Biomim, 2016; 11:026003.
48.
SfakiotakisM, LaneDM, DaviesJBC. Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion. IEEE J Oceanic Eng, 1999; 24:237–252.
49.
BarrettD, GrosenbaughM, TriantafyllouM. The optimal control of a flexible hull robotic undersea vehicle propelled by an oscillating foil. Proceedings of the 1996 Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology (AUV’96). IEEE, Monterey, CA, 1996.
50.
HunterJ, ZweifelJ. Swimming speed, tail beat frequency, tail beat amplitude, and size in jack mackerel, trachurus-symmetricus, and other fishes. Fish B-NOAA, 1971; 69:253–266.
51.
MarkhamKM, MintzesJJ, JonesMG. The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: further evidence of validity. JRST, 1994; 31:91–101.
52.
McClureJR, SonakB, SuenHK. Concept map assessment of classroom learning: reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. JRST, 1999; 36:475–492.
53.
KinchinIM, HayDB, AdamsA. How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educ Res, 2000; 42:43–57.
54.
RengierF, MehndirattaA, von Tengg-KobligkH, ZechmannCM, UnterhinninghofenR, KauczorHU, et al.3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 2010; 5:335–341.
55.
HwangG-J, WuP-H, KeH-R. An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses. Comput Educ, 2011; 57:2272–2280.
56.
DedeC. Emerging influences of information technology on school curriculum. J Curriculum Stud, 2000; 32:281–303.
57.
SarmahS, VaughanM, MarrsJ, MuralidharanP, MarrsK, ChismG. Using zebrafish to implement a course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) to study teratogenesis in two biology laboratory courses. 2015; 13:293–304.
58.
MarcoA, BlausteinAR. The effects of nitrite on behavior and metamorphosis in Cascades frogs (Rana cascadae). Environ Toxicol Chem, 1999; 18:946–949.
59.
McClaffertyT, RennieL. Learning in science centres and science museums: A review of recent studies. Res Sci Educ, 1993; 23:351.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
