This project was developed to promote understanding of how mathematics and statistical analysis are used as tools in genetic research. It gives students the opportunity to carry out hypothesis-driven experiments in the classroom: students generate hypotheses about Mendelian and non-Mendelian inheritance patterns, gather raw data, and test their hypotheses using chi-square statistical analysis. In the first protocol, students are challenged to analyze inheritance patterns using GloFish, brightly colored, commercially available, transgenic zebrafish that express Green, Yellow, or Red Fluorescent Protein throughout their muscles. In the second protocol, students learn about genetic screens, microscopy, and developmental biology by analyzing the inheritance patterns of mutations that cause developmental defects. The difficulty of the experiments can be adapted for middle school to upper level undergraduate students. Since the GloFish experiments use only fish and materials that can be purchased from pet stores, they should be accessible to many schools. For each protocol, we provide detailed instructions, ideas for how the experiments fit into an undergraduate curriculum, raw data, and example analyses. Our plan is to have these protocols form the basis of a growing and adaptable educational tool available on the Zebrafish in the Classroom Web site.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BabcockEB, CollinsJL. Genetics Laboratory Manual. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1918.
2.
FieldsMC, AdelfioP, AhmadD, BrownO, CoxB, DaviesMet al.Danio rerio in K-12 classrooms: sparking interest in the new generation of scientists. Zebrafish, 2009; 6:145–160.
3.
D'CostaA, ShepherdIT. Zebrafish development and genetics: introducing undergraduates to developmental biology and genetics in a large introductory laboratory class. Zebrafish, 2009; 6:169–177.
4.
ShudaJ, Kearns-SixsmithD. Outreach: empowering students and teachers to fish outside the box. Zebrafish, 2009; 6:133–138.
5.
SchmoldtA, ForeckiJ, HammondDR, UdvadiaAJ. Exploring differential gene expression in zebrafish to teach basic molecular biology skills. Zebrafish, 2009; 6:187–199.
6.
HutsonLD, LiangJO. Making an impact: zebrafish in education. Zebrafish, 2009; 6:119–120.
7.
EmranF, BrooksJM, ZimmermanSR, JohnsonSL, LueRA. Zebrafish embryology and cartilage staining protocols for high school students. Zebrafish, 2009; 6:139–143.
8.
Nusslein-VolhardC, DahmR. Zebrafish: A Practical Approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002; 261.
9.
FukadaY, OkanoT. Circadian clock system in the pineal gland. Mol Neurobiol, 2002; 25:19–30.
10.
WesterfieldM. The Zebrafish Book. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press, 2000.
11.
GrossLJ. Interdisciplinarity and the undergraduate biology curriculum: finding a balance. Cell Biol Educ, 2004; 3:85–87.
12.
CohenJE. Mathematics is biology's next microscope, only better; biology is mathematics' next physics, only better. PLoS Biol, 2004; 2:e439.
13.
HoyR. New math for biology is the old new math. Cell Biol Educ, 2004; 3:90–92.
14.
BrentR. Intuition and innumeracy. Cell Biol Educ, 2004; 3:88–90.
15.
BialekW, BotsteinD. Introductory science and mathematics education for 21st-Century biologists. Science, 2004; 303:788–790.
16.
DertingT. L, Ebert-May D. Learner-centered inquiry in undergraduate biology: positive relationships with long-term student achievement. CBE Life Sci Educ, 2010; 9:462–472.
17.
SchierAF, NeuhaussSC, HarveyM, MalickiJ, Solnica-KrezelL, StainierDYet al.Mutations affecting the development of the embryonic zebrafish brain. Development, 1996; 123:165–178.
18.
FeldmanB, GatesMA, EganES, DouganST, RennebeckG, SirotkinHIet al.Zebrafish organizer development and germ-layer formation require nodal-related signals. Nature, 1998; 395:181–185.
19.
GongZ, WanH, TayTL, WangH, ChenM, YanT. Development of transgenic fish for ornamental and bioreactor by strong expression of fluorescent proteins in the skeletal muscle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2003; 308:58–63.
20.
LamasonRL, MohideenMA, MestJR, WongAC, NortonHL, ArosMCet al.SLC24A5, a putative cation exchanger, affects pigmentation in zebrafish and humans. Science, 2005; 310:1782–1786.
21.
StreisingerG, WalkerC, DowerN, KnauberD, SingerF. Production of clones of homozygous diploid zebra fish (Brachydanio rerio)Nature, 1981; 291:293–296.
22.
TresnakeI. The long-finned zebra Danio. Tropical Fish Hobby, 1981; 29:43–56.
23.
JohnsonSL, WestonJA. Temperature-sensitive mutations that cause stage-specific defects in Zebrafish fin regeneration. Genetics, 1995; 141:1583–1595.
24.
CarvalhoAP, AraujoL, SantosMM. Rearing zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae without live food: evaluation of a commercial, a practical, and a purified starter diet on larval performance. Aquac Res, 2006; 37:1107–1111.
25.
JuB, ChongSW, HeJ, WangX, XuY, WanHet al.Recapitulation of fast skeletal muscle development in zebrafish by transgenic expression of GFP under the mylz2 promoter. Dev Dyn, 2003; 227:14–26.
26.
XuY, HeJ, WangX, LimTM, GongZ. Asynchronous activation of 10 muscle-specific protein (MSP) genes during zebrafish somitogenesis. Dev Dyn, 2000; 219:201–215.
27.
GoldsmithMI, FisherS, WatermanR, JohnsonSL. Saltatory control of isometric growth in the zebrafish caudal fin is disrupted in long fin and rapunzel mutants. Dev Biol, 2003; 259:303–317.
28.
GeraudieJ, MonnotMJ, BrulfertA, FerrettiP. Caudal fin regeneration in wild type and long-fin mutant zebrafish is affected by retinoic acid. Int J Dev Biol, 1995; 39:373–381.
29.
van EedenFJ, GranatoM, SchachU, BrandM, Furutani-SeikiM, HaffterPet al.Genetic analysis of fin formation in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development, 1996; 123:255–262.
30.
IovineMK, JohnsonSL. A genetic, deletion, physical, and human homology map of the long fin region on zebrafish linkage group 2. Genomics, 2002; 79:756–759.
31.
HattaK, KimmelCB, HoRK, WalkerC. The cyclops mutation blocks specification of the floor plate of the zebrafish central nervous system. Nature, 1991; 350:339–341.
32.
HaffterP, GranatoM, BrandM, MullinsMC, HammerschmidtM, KaneDAet al.The identification of genes with unique and essential functions in the development of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development, 1996; 123:1–36.
33.
DrieverW, Solnica-KrezelL, SchierAF, NeuhaussSC, MalickiJ, StempleDLet al.A genetic screen for mutations affecting embryogenesis in zebrafish. Development, 1996; 123:37–46.
SchierAF, TalbotWS. Nodal signaling and the zebrafish organizer. Int J Dev Biol, 2001; 45:289–297.
36.
AlexanderJ, StainierDY. A molecular pathway leading to endoderm formation in zebrafish. Curr Biol, 1999; 9:1147–1157.
37.
LiangJO, RubinsteinAL. Patterning of the zebrafish embryo by nodal signals. Curr Top Dev Biol, 2003; 55:143–171.
38.
HalpernME, LiangJO, GamseJT. Leaning to the left: laterality in the zebrafish forebrain. Trends Neurosci, 2003; 26:308–313.
39.
ErterCE, Solnica-KrezelL, WrightCV. Zebrafish nodal-related 2 encodes an early mesendodermal inducer signaling from the extraembryonic yolk syncytial layer. Dev Biol, 1998; 204:361–372.
40.
SampathK, RubinsteinAL, ChengAM, LiangJO, FekanyK, Solnica-KrezelLet al.Induction of the zebrafish ventral brain and floorplate requires cyclops/nodal signalling. Nature, 1998; 395:185–189.
41.
RebagliatiMR, ToyamaR, HaffterP, DawidIB. cyclops encodes a nodal-related factor involved in midline signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1998; 95:9932–9937.
42.
RebagliatiMR, ToyamaR, FrickeC, HaffterP, DawidIB. Zebrafish nodal-related genes are implicated in axial patterning and establishing left-right asymmetry. Dev Biol, 1998; 199:261–272.
43.
LiangJO, EtheridgeA, HantsooL, RubinsteinAL, NowakSJ, Izpisua BelmonteJCet al.Asymmetric nodal signaling in the zebrafish diencephalon positions the pineal organ. Development, 2000; 127:5101–5112.
44.
DouganST, WargaRM, KaneDA, SchierAF, TalbotWS. The role of the zebrafish nodal-related genes squint and cyclops in patterning of mesendoderm. Development, 2003; 130:1837–1851.
45.
Aquilina-BeckA, IlaganK, LiuQ, LiangJO. Nodal signaling is required for closure of the anterior neural tube in zebrafish. BMC Dev Biol, 2007; 7:126.
46.
PeiW, WilliamsPH, ClarkMD, StempleDL, FeldmanB. Environmental and genetic modifiers of squint penetrance during zebrafish embryogenesis. Dev Biol, 2007; 308:368–378.
47.
DesjardinsJK, FernaldRD. Fish sex: why so diverse?Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2009; 19:648–653.
48.
TongSK, HsuHJ, ChungBC. Zebrafish monosex population reveals female dominance in sex determination and earliest events of gonad differentiation. Dev Biol, 2010; 344:849–856.
49.
OrbanL, SreenivasanR, OlssonPE. Long and winding roads: testis differentiation in zebrafish. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 2009; 312:35–41.
50.
BeckmannMW, BaniMR, FaschingPA, StrickR, LuxMP. Risk and risk assessment for breast cancer: molecular and clinical aspects. Maturitas, 2007; 57:56–60.
51.
TimmonsL, CourtDL, FireA. Ingestion of bacterially expressed dsRNAs can produce specific and potent genetic interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene, 2001; 263:103–112.
52.
KamathRS, Martinez-CamposM, ZipperlenP, FraserAG, AhringerJ. Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Biol, 2001; 2:RESEARCH0002.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
