Natural, endogenous electric fields (EFs) and currents arise spontaneously after wounding of many tissues, especially epithelia, and are necessary for normal healing. This wound electrical activity is a long-lasting and regulated response. Enhancing or inhibiting this electrical activity increases or decreases wound healing, respectively. Cells that are responsible for wound closure such as corneal epithelial cells or skin keratinocytes migrate directionally in EFs of physiological magnitude. However, the mechanisms of how the wound electrical response is initiated and regulated remain unclear.
Recent Advances:
Wound EFs and currents appear to arise by ion channel up-regulation and redistribution, which are perhaps triggered by an intracellular calcium wave or cell depolarization. We discuss the possibility of stimulation of wound healing via pharmacological enhancement of the wound electric signal by stimulation of ion pumping.
Critical Issues:
Chronic wounds are a major problem in the elderly and diabetic patient. Any strategy to stimulate wound healing in these patients is desirable. Applying electrical stimulation directly is problematic, but pharmacological enhancement of the wound signal may be a promising strategy.
Future Directions:
Understanding the molecular regulation of wound electric signals may reveal some fundamental mechanisms in wound healing. Manipulating fluxes of ions and electric currents at wounds might offer new approaches to achieve better wound healing and to heal chronic wounds.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KlyceSD: Electrical profiles in the corneal epithelium. J Physiol, 1972; 226: 407.
2.
KlyceSD: Transport of Na, Cl, and water by the rabbit corneal epithelium at resting potential. Am J Physiol, 1975; 228: 1446.
3.
FouldsIS and BarkerAT: Human skin battery potentials and their possible role in wound healing. Br J Dermatol, 1983; 109: 515.
4.
BarkerAT, JaffeLF, and VanableJWJr.: The glabrous epidermis of cavies contains a powerful battery. Am J Physiol, 1982; 242: R358.
5.
MathiasRT, KistlerJ, and DonaldsonP: The lens circulation. J Membr Biol, 2007; 216: 1.
6.
LoisN, ReidB, SongB, ZhaoM, ForresterJ, and McCaigC: Electric currents and lens regeneration in the rat. Exp Eye Res, 2010; 90: 316.
7.
RobinsonKR and PattersonJW: Localization of steady currents in the lens. Curr Eye Res, 1982; 2: 843.
8.
WolosinJM and ChenM: Ontogeny of corneal epithelial tight junctions: stratal locale of biosynthetic activities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1993; 34: 2655.
9.
SapraB, JindalM, and TiwaryAK: Tight junctions in skin: new perspectives. Ther Deliv, 2012; 3: 1297.
10.
VieiraAC, ReidB, CaoL, MannisMJ, SchwabIR, and ZhaoM: Ionic components of electric current at rat corneal wounds. PloS One, 2011; 6: e17411.
11.
ReidB, SongB, McCaigCD, and ZhaoM: Wound healing in rat cornea: the role of electric currents. FASEB J, 2005; 19: 379.
12.
NuccitelliR: A role for endogenous electric fields in wound healing. Curr Topics Dev Biol, 2003; 58: 1.
13.
SongB, ZhaoM, ForresterJV, and McCaigCD: Electrical cues regulate the orientation and frequency of cell division and the rate of wound healing in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002; 99: 13577.
14.
Sta IglesiaDD and VanableJWJr.: Endogenous lateral electric fields around bovine corneal lesions are necessary for and can enhance normal rates of wound healing. Wound Repair Regen, 1998; 6: 531.
15.
RobinsonKR and MesserliMA: Left/right, up/down: the role of endogenous electrical fields as directional signals in development, repair and invasion. BioEssays, 2003; 25: 759.
16.
ZhaoM, SongB, PuJ, WadaT, ReidB, TaiG, et al.: Electrical signals control wound healing through phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase-gamma and PTEN. Nature, 2006; 442: 457.
17.
JaffeLF and NuccitelliR: Electrical controls of development. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng, 1977; 6: 445.
18.
JaffeLF and PooMM: Neurites grow faster towards the cathode than the anode in a steady field. J Exp Zool, 1979; 209: 115.
19.
HinkleL, McCaigCD, and RobinsonKR: The direction of growth of differentiating neurones and myoblasts from frog embryos in an applied electric field. J Physiol, 1981; 314: 121.
20.
StumpRF and RobinsonKR: Xenopus neural crest cell migration in an applied electrical field. J Cell Biol, 1983; 97: 1226.
21.
EricksonCA and NuccitelliR: Embryonic fibroblast motility and orientation can be influenced by physiological electric fields. J Cell Biol, 1984; 98: 296.
22.
CooperMS and SchliwaM: Electrical and ionic controls of tissue cell locomotion in DC electric fields. J Neurosci Res, 1985; 13: 223.
23.
BaiH, McCaigCD, ForresterJV, and ZhaoM: DC electric fields induce distinct preangiogenic responses in microvascular and macrovascular cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2004; 24: 1234.
24.
LutherPW, PengHB, and LinJJ: Changes in cell shape and actin distribution induced by constant electric fields. Nature, 1983; 303: 61.
25.
ZhaoM, DickA, ForresterJV, and McCaigCD: Electric field-directed cell motility involves up-regulated expression and asymmetric redistribution of the epidermal growth factor receptors and is enhanced by fibronectin and laminin. Mol Biol Cell, 1999; 10: 1259.
26.
FangKS, IonidesE, OsterG, NuccitelliR, and IsseroffRR: Epidermal growth factor receptor relocalization and kinase activity are necessary for directional migration of keratinocytes in DC electric fields. J Cell Sci, 1999; 112: 1967.
27.
PuJ and ZhaoM: Golgi polarization in a strong electric field. J Cell Sci, 2005; 118: 1117.
28.
YaoL, McCaigCD, and ZhaoM: Electrical signals polarize neuronal organelles, direct neuron migration, and orient cell division. Hippocampus, 2009; 19: 855.
29.
PullarCE, ZhaoM, SongB, PuJ, ReidB, GhoghawalaS, et al.: Beta-adrenergic receptor agonists delay while antagonists accelerate epithelial wound healing: evidence of an endogenous adrenergic network within the corneal epithelium. J Cell Physiol, 2007; 211: 261.
30.
McBainVA, ForresterJV, and McCaigCD: HGF, MAPK, and a small physiological electric field interact during corneal epithelial cell migration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2003; 44: 540.
31.
CaoL, Graue-HernandezEO, TranV, ReidB, PuJ, MannisMJ, et al.: Downregulation of PTEN at corneal wound sites accelerates wound healing through increased cell migration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011; 52: 2272.
32.
RobinsonKR: The responses of cells to electrical fields: a review. J Cell Biol, 1985; 101: 2023.
33.
McCaigCD, RajnicekAM, SongB, and ZhaoM: Has electrical growth cone guidance found its potential?. Trends Neurosci, 2002; 25: 354.
34.
McCaigCD, RajnicekAM, SongB, and ZhaoM: Controlling cell behavior electrically: current views and future potential. Physiol Rev, 2005; 85: 943.
35.
McCaigCD, SongB, and RajnicekAM: Electrical dimensions in cell science. J Cell Sci, 2009; 122: 4267.
36.
ZhaoM: Electrical fields in wound healing—An overriding signal that directs cell migration. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 2009; 20: 674.
37.
ZhaoM, ChalmersL, CaoL, VieiraAC, MannisM, and ReidB: Electrical signaling in control of ocular cell behaviors. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2012; 31: 65.
38.
SuzukiK, SaitoJ, YanaiR, YamadaN, ChikamaT, SekiK, et al.: Cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions during corneal epithelial wound healing. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2003; 22: 113.
39.
ZhaoB, CooperLJ, BrahmaA, MacNeilS, RimmerS, and FullwoodNJ: Development of a three-dimensional organ culture model for corneal wound healing and corneal transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006; 47: 2840.
40.
ZieskeJD, TakahashiH, HutcheonAE, and DalboneAC: Activation of epidermal growth factor receptor during corneal epithelial migration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2000; 41: 1346.
41.
Pal-GhoshS, TadvalkarG, JurjusRA, ZieskeJD, and SteppMA: BALB/c and C57BL6 mouse strains vary in their ability to heal corneal epithelial debridement wounds. Exp Eye Res, 2008; 87: 478.
42.
ChiffletS, HernandezJA, and GrassoS: A possible role for membrane depolarization in epithelial wound healing. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 2005; 288: C1420.
43.
ZagonIS, SassaniJW, CarrollMA, and McLaughlinPJ: Topical application of naltrexone facilitates reepithelialization of the cornea in diabetic rabbits. Brain Res Bull, 2010; 81: 248.
44.
KaufmanHE: The Cornea. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1988.
45.
ReidB, Graue-HernandezEO, MannisMJ, and ZhaoM: Modulating endogenous electric currents in human corneal wounds—a novel approach of bioelectric stimulation without electrodes. Cornea, 2011; 30: 338.
46.
FarboudB, NuccitelliR, SchwabIR, and IsseroffRR: DC electric fields induce rapid directional migration in cultured human corneal epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res, 2000; 70: 667.
47.
ZhaoM, Agius-FernandezA, ForresterJV, and McCaigCD: Directed migration of corneal epithelial sheets in physiological electric fields. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1996; 37: 2548.
48.
ReidB, NuccitelliR, and ZhaoM: Non-invasive measurement of bioelectric currents with a vibrating probe. Nat Protoc, 2007; 2: 661.
49.
LiL, HartleyR, ReissB, SunY, PuJ, WuD, et al.: E-cadherin plays an essential role in collective directional migration of large epithelial sheets. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2012; 69: 2779.
50.
NishimuraKY, IsseroffRR, and NuccitelliR: Human keratinocytes migrate to the negative pole in direct current electric fields comparable to those measured in mammalian wounds. J Cell Sci, 1996; 109: 199.
51.
JaffeLF and NuccitelliR: An ultrasensitive vibrating probe for measuring steady extracellular currents. J Cell Biol, 1974; 63 (2 Pt 1): 614.
52.
ChiangM, RobinsonKR, and VanableJWJr.: Electrical fields in the vicinity of epithelial wounds in the isolated bovine eye. Exp Eye Res, 1992; 54: 999.
53.
SingerAJ and ClarkRAF: Mechanisms of disease—cutaneous wound healing. New Engl J Med, 1999; 341: 738.
54.
OjingwaJC and IsseroffRR: Electrical stimulation of wound healing. J Invest Dermatol, 2003; 121: 1.
55.
JaffeLF and VanableJWJr.: Electric fields and wound healing. Clin Dermatol, 1984; 2: 34.
56.
GuoA, SongB, ReidB, GuY, ForresterJV, JahodaCA, et al.: Effects of physiological electric fields on migration of human dermal fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol, 2010; 130: 2320.
57.
PullarCE and IsseroffRR: The beta 2-adrenergic receptor activates pro-migratory and pro-proliferative pathways in dermal fibroblasts via divergent mechanisms. J Cell Sci, 2006; 119: 592.
58.
LiJ, NandagopalS, WuD, RomanuikSF, PaulK, ThomsonDJ, et al.: Activated T lymphocytes migrate toward the cathode of DC electric fields in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip, 2011; 11: 1298.
59.
ZhaoM, BaiH, WangE, ForresterJV, and McCaigCD: Electrical stimulation directly induces pre-angiogenic responses in vascular endothelial cells by signaling through VEGF receptors. J Cell Sci, 2004; 117: 397.
60.
ZhaoZ, QinL, ReidB, PuJ, HaraT, and ZhaoM: Directing migration of endothelial progenitor cells with applied DC electric fields. Stem Cell Res, 2012; 8: 38.
61.
FitzGeraldMJ, FolanJC, and O'BrienTM: The innervation of hyperplastic epidermis in the mouse: a light microscopic study. J Invest Dermatol, 1975; 64: 169.
62.
SongB, ZhaoM, ForresterJ, and McCaigC: Nerve regeneration and wound healing are stimulated and directed by an endogenous electrical field in vivo. J Cell Sci, 2004; 117: 4681.
63.
EaglsteinWH and FalangaV: Chronic wounds. Surg Clin N Am, 1997; 77: 689.
64.
KlothLC and FeedarJA: Acceleration of wound healing with high voltage, monophasic, pulsed current. Phys Ther, 1988; 68: 503.
65.
WoodJM, EvansPE3rd, SchallreuterKU, JacobsonWE, SufitR, NewmanJ, et al.: A multicenter study on the use of pulsed low-intensity direct current for healing chronic stage II and stage III decubitus ulcers. Arch Dermatol, 1993; 129: 999.
66.
PetersEJ, LaveryLA, ArmstrongDG, and FleischliJG: Electric stimulation as an adjunct to heal diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2001; 82: 721.
67.
HoughtonPE, KincaidCB, LovellM, CampbellKE, KeastDH, WoodburyMG, et al.: Effect of electrical stimulation on chronic leg ulcer size and appearance. Phys Ther, 2003; 83: 17.
68.
RegerSI, HyodoA, NegamiS, KambicHE, and SahgalV: Experimental wound healing with electrical stimulation. Artif Organs, 1999; 23: 460.
69.
StillerMJ, PakGH, ShupackJL, ThalerS, KennyC, and JondreauL: A portable pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) device to enhance healing of recalcitrant venous ulcers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Br J Dermatol, 1992; 127: 147.
70.
BogieKM, RegerSI, LevineSP, and SahgalV: Electrical stimulation for pressure sore prevention and wound healing. Assist Technol, 2000; 12: 50.
71.
HessCL, HowardMA, and AttingerCE: A review of mechanical adjuncts in wound healing: hydrotherapy, ultrasound, negative pressure therapy, hyperbaric oxygen, and electrostimulation. Ann Plast Surg, 2003; 51: 210.
72.
Olyaee ManeshA, FlemmingK, CullumNA, and RavaghiH: Electromagnetic therapy for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006; (2): CD002930.
73.
CullumN, NelsonEA, FlemmingK, and SheldonT: Systematic reviews of wound care management:5 beds; (6) compression; (7) laser therapy, therapeutic ultrasound, electrotherapy and electromagnetic therapy. Health Technol Assess, 2001; 5: 1.
74.
FlemmingK and CullumN: Electromagnetic therapy for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2001; (1): CD002933.
75.
KlothLC: Electrical stimulation for wound healing: a review of evidence from in vitro studies, animal experiments, and clinical trials. Int J Lower Extremity Wounds, 2005; 4: 23.
76.
NuccitelliR, NuccitelliP, LiC, NarsingS, PariserDM, and LuiK: The electric field near human skin wounds declines with age and provides a noninvasive indicator of wound healing. Wound Repair Regen, 2011; 19: 645.
77.
CastanaO, DimitrouliA, ArgyrakosT, TheodorakopoulouE, StampolidisN, PapadopoulosE, et al.: Wireless electrical stimulation: an innovative powerful tool for the treatment of a complicated chronic ulcer. Int J Lower Extremity Wounds, 2013; 12: 18.
78.
CongHL and PanTR: Photopatternable conductive PDMS materials for microfabrication. Adv Funct Mater, 2008; 18: 1912.
79.
YaoHF, ShumAJ, CowanM, LahdesmakiI, and ParvizBA: A contact lens with embedded sensor for monitoring tear glucose level. Biosens Bioelectron, 2011; 26: 3290.
80.
CandiaOA: Electrolyte and fluid transport across corneal, conjunctival and lens epithelia. Exp Eye Res, 2004; 78: 527.
81.
CaoL, ZhangXD, LiuX, ChenTY, and ZhaoM: Chloride channels and transporters in human corneal epithelium. Exp Eye Res, 2010; 90: 771.
82.
WatskyMA: Nonselective cation channel activation during wound healing in the corneal endothelium. Am J Physiol, 1995; 268 (5 Pt 1): C1179.
83.
StanisstreetM: Calcium and wound healing in Xenopus early embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol, 1982; 67: 195.
84.
FuchigamiT, MatsuzakiT, and IharaS: Exposure to external environment of low ion concentrations is the trigger for rapid wound closure in Xenopus laevis embryos. Zoolog Sci, 2011; 28: 633.
85.
FuchigamiT, MatsuzakiT, and IharaS: Possible roles of ENaC and Cl(-) channel in wound closure in Xenopus laevis embryos. Zoolog Sci, 2011; 28: 703.
86.
BorgensRB, VanableJWJr., and JaffeLF: Bioelectricity and regeneration: large currents leave the stumps of regenerating newt limbs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1977; 74: 4528.
87.
BorgensRB, VanableJWJr., and JaffeLF: Bioelectricity and regeneration. I. Initiation of frog limb regeneration by minute currents. J Exp Zool, 1977; 200: 403.
88.
EltingeEM, CragoeEJJr., and VanableJWJr.: Effects of amiloride analogues on adult Notophthalmus viridescens limb stump currents. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol, 1986; 84: 39.
89.
LeiperLJ, WalczyskoP, KucerovaR, OuJ, ShanleyLJ, LawsonD, et al.: The roles of calcium signaling and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in a Pax6+/- mouse model of epithelial wound-healing delay. BMC Biol, 2006; 4: 27.
90.
ChiffletS, JustetC, HernandezJA, NinV, EscandeC, and BenechJC: Early and late calcium waves during wound healing in corneal endothelial cells. Wound Repair Regen, 2012; 20: 28.
91.
XuS and ChisholmAD: A Galphaq-Ca(2)(+) signaling pathway promotes actin-mediated epidermal wound closure in C. elegans. Curr Biol, 2011; 21: 1960.
92.
SuzukiK, TanakaT, EnokiM, and NishidaT: Coordinated reassembly of the basement membrane and junctional proteins during corneal epithelial wound healing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2000; 41: 2495.
93.
MorishigeN, KoJA, MoritaY, and NishidaT: Expression of semaphorin 3A in the rat corneal epithelium during wound healing. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2010; 395: 451.
94.
GrupchevaCN, LauxWT, RupenthalID, McGheeJ, McGheeCN, and GreenCR: Improved corneal wound healing through modulation of gap junction communication using connexin43-specific antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012; 53: 1130.
BassettCAL and BeckerRO: Generation of electric potentials by bone in response to mechanical stress. Science, 1962; 137: 1063.
97.
YasudaI: Electrical callus and callus formation by electret. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1977; (124): 53.
98.
IsaacsonBM and BloebaumRD: Bone bioelectricity: what have we learned in the past 160 years?. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2010; 95A: 1270.
99.
ZhaoZ, WangY, PengJ, RenZW, ZhanSF, LiuY, et al.: Repair of nerve defect with acellular nerve graft supplemented by bone marrow stromal cells in mice. Microsurg, 2011; 31: 388.
100.
ShawJE and BoultonAJ: The pathogenesis of diabetic foot problems: an overview. Diabetes, 1997; 46Suppl 2: S58.
101.
RamseySD, NewtonK, BloughD, McCullochDK, SandhuN, ReiberGE, et al.: Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 1999; 22: 382.
102.
XuK and YuFS: Impaired epithelial wound healing and EGFR signaling pathways in the corneas of diabetic rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011; 52: 3301.
103.
BlakytnyR and JudeE: The molecular biology of chronic wounds and delayed healing in diabetes. Diabetic Med, 2006; 23: 594.
104.
CaseyEB and Le QuesnePM: Digital nerve action potentials in healthy subjects, and in carpal tunnel and diabetic patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1972; 35: 612.
105.
Ionescu-TírgovişteC, BajenaruO, ZugravescuI, DorobantuE, HartiaD, DumitrescuC, et al.: Study of the cutaneous electric potentials and the perception threshold to an electric stimulus in diabetic patients with and without clinical neuropathy. Med Interne, 1985; 23: 213.
106.
CameronNE, CotterMA, and RobertsonS: Chronic low frequency electrical activation for one week corrects nerve conduction velocity deficits in rats with diabetes of three months duration. Diabetologia, 1989; 32: 759.
107.
CameronNE, CotterMA, RobertsonS, and MaxfieldEK: Nerve function in experimental diabetes in rats: effects of electrical stimulation. Am J Physiol, 1993; 264 (2 Pt 1): E161.
108.
ThawerHA and HoughtonPE: Effects of electrical stimulation on the histological properties of wounds in diabetic mice. Wound Repair Regen, 2001; 9: 107.
109.
BakerLL, ChambersR, DeMuthSK, and VillarF: Effects of electrical stimulation on wound healing in patients with diabetic ulcers. Diabetes Care, 1997; 20: 405.
110.
KucerovaR, WalczyskoP, ReidB, OuJ, LeiperLJ, RajnicekAM, et al.: The role of electrical signals in murine corneal wound re-epithelialization. J Cell Physiol, 2011; 226: 1544.
