This article studies the causal effect of COVID-19 pandemic curfew and lockdown durations on gender violence measured by the female homicides rates across Ecuadorian municipalities. To overcome potential endogeneity concerns due to heterogeneous intensity in restriction durations, we implement an instrumental variable approach that adjusts the duration of the lockdown and each of the “red-light” policy stages based on the lags of contagion rates and the length of the policy. We show that the generalized lockdown led to a 0.91 percentage point increase of female homicide rates (12.75% in the prelockdown period), and the less restrictive mobility measures led to a 0.23 to 0.8 pp increases. These results are in line with very recent evidence of the COVID-19 lockdowns and violence against women during the pandemic. These findings appeal for policy interventions addressed to avoid violence against women during mobility restriction and emergencies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AizerA.The gender wage gap and domestic violence. Am Econ Rev, 2010; 100(4):1847–1859; doi: 10.1257/aer.100.4.1847
2.
Alonso-BorregoC, CarrascoR.Employment and the risk of domestic violence: Does the breadwinner's gender matter?. Appl Econ, 2017; 49(50):5074–5091.
3.
AnderbergD, RainerH, WadsworthJ, WilsonT.Unemployment and domestic violence: Theory and evidence. Econ J, 2016; 126(597):1947–1979; doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12246
4.
AngelucciM.Love on the rocks: Domestic violence and alcohol abuse in Rural Mexico. BE J Econ Analysis Policy, 2008; 8(1):1–43.
5.
Arenas-ArroyoE, Fernandez-KranzD, NollenbergerN. Intimate partner violence under forced cohabitation and economic stress: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. J Public Econ, 2020; 194:104350.
6.
AsikG, Nas OzenE. It takes a curfew: The effect of Covid-19 on female homicides. Econ Lett, 2021; 200:109761.
7.
BanerjeeA, La FerraraE, OrozcoV.Entertainment, education, and attitudes toward domestic violence. AEA Papers Proc, 2019; 109:133–137.
8.
BartP, MoranE.Violence Against Women: The Bloody Footprints. Sage: Newbury Park, CA, USA; 1993.
9.
BaumC, SchafferM, StillmanS.Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata J, 2003; 3(1):1–31.
BenítezMA, VelascoC, SequeiraAR, et al.Responses to COVID-19 in five Latin American countries. Health Policy Technol, 2020; 9(4):525–559; doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.014
12.
BhalotraS, KambhampatiU, RawlingsS, SiddiqueZ. Intimate Partner Violence: The Influence of Job Opportunities for Men and Women. Policy Research Working Paper No. 9118. World Bank: Washington, DC, USA; 2020.
13.
BlundellR, BondS.Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econometr, 1998; 87(1):115–143.
14.
BlundellR, BondS.GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econometr Rev, 2000; 19(3):321–340.
15.
BrandJ, McKayD, WheatonMG, AbramowitzJS. The relationship between obsessive compulsive beliefs and symptoms, anxiety and disgust sensitivity, and Swine Flu Fears. J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord, 2013; 2:200–206.
16.
BulteE, LensinkR.Women's empowerment and domestic abuse: Experimental evidence from Vietnam. Eur Econ Rev, 2019; 115:172–191.
17.
CampedelliGM, AzianiA, FavarinS.Exploring the immediate effects of COVID-19 containment policies on crime: An empirical analysis of the short-term aftermath in los angeles. Am J Crim Just, 2021; 46:704–727; doi: 10.1007/s12103-020-09578-6
18.
CardD, DahlGB. Family violence and football: The effect of unexpected emotional cues on violent behavior. Quart J Econ, 2011; 126(1):103–143; doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr001
19.
CARE International. Hope dries up? Women and Girls coping with Drought and Climate Change in Mozambique. CARE in Mozambique, 19; 2016.
20.
DawsonM, BungeVP, BaldeT.National Trends in intimate partner homicides: Explaining declines in Canada, 1976 to 2001. Violence Against Women, 2009; 15(3):276–306.
21.
DiazA, SalasL, TribinA. Hidden benefits of peace: The case of sexual violence. Economics Drafts—Bank of Republic. No. 1124. Colombia; 2020.
22.
DINASED. Information of violent deaths. Quito; 2021.
23.
DobashRE, DobashR.Violence Against Wives. The Free Press: New York, NY, USA.
24.
DuganL, NaginDS, RosenfeldR.Exposure reduction or retaliation? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate-partner homicide. Law Soc Rev, 2003; 37:169–198; doi: 10.1111/1540-5893.3701005
25.
ErikssonL, MazerolleP.A general strain theory of intimate partner homicide. Aggress Violent Behav, 2013; 18(5):462–470; doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2013.07.002
26.
GellesR.The Violent Home: Study of Physical Aggression Between Husbands and Wives. Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, CA, USA; 1974.
27.
GibbsA, CorbozJ, ChirwaE, et al.The impacts of combined social and economic empowerment training on intimate partner violence, depression, gender norms and livelihoods among women: An individually randomized controlled trial and qualitative study in Afghanistan. BMJ Glob Health, 2020; 5(3):e001946.
28.
HansenLP.Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica J Econometr Soc, 1982; 50(4):1029–1054.
29.
HarveyR.The Ignored Pandemic: The Dual Crises of Gender-Based Violence and COVID-19. Oxfam Briefing Paper. Oxfam GB for Oxfam International; 2021.
30.
HidroboM, FernaldL.Cash transfers and domestic violence. J Health Econ, 2013; 32:304–319.
31.
Hoehn-VelascoL, Silverio-MurilloA, Balmori de la MiyarJR. The great crime recovery: Crimes against women during, and after, the COVID-19 lockdown in Mexico. Econ Hum Biol, 2021; 41:100991.
32.
INEC (National Institute of Statistics and Censuses). Vital statistics of violent deaths. Quito; 2021.
33.
KoppaV. Can Information Save Lives? Effect of a Victim-focused Police Intervention on Intimate Partner Homicides. 2022. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2982227
34.
MassonLV, LimS, BudimirM.Disasters and violence against women and girls: Can disasters shake social norms and power relations?. Overseas Development Institute Working Paper,, 2016; p. 22.
35.
MillerA, SegalC.Do female officers improve law enforcement quality? Effects on crime reporting and domestic violence. Review of Economic Studies,, 2019; 86:2220–2247.
36.
Ministry of Government. Statistics of police personnel 2009–2018. Ministry of Government: Quito; 2019.
37.
MoscosoB. Femicides: laws, women empowerment, and retaliation effects. 2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3959394
38.
PetermanA, PottsA, O'DonnellM, et al.Pandemics and Violence Against Women and Children. Centre for Global Development working paper,, 2020;p. 528.
39.
PetersonC, KearnsMC, McIntoshWL. Lifetime economic burden of intimate partner violence among U.S. adults. Am J Prev Med, 2018; 55(4):433–444; doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.049
40.
Poblete-CazenaveR.The impacts of lockdowns on crime and violence against women—Evidence from India. SSRN working papers, 3623331; 2020.
41.
RavindranS, ShahM.Unintended consequences of lockdowns: Covid-19 and the shadow pandemic. NBER Working Paper 27562; 2021.
42.
ReedWR.On the Practice of Lagging Variables to Avoid Simultaneity. Oxford Bull Econ Stat, 2015; 77(6):897–905.
43.
RobalinoA.ECUACOVID project: National Service of Risks and Emergencies Management of Ecuador (SNGRE in Spanish), Public Health Ministry (MSP in Spanish), and Civil Registry of Ecuador. Quito; 2020.
44.
SchneiderD, HarknettK, McLanahanS.Intimate Partner Violence in the Great Recession. Demography, 2016; 53(2):471–505; doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0462-1
45.
SNGRE (National Service of Risks and Emergencies Management of Ecuador in English). Info-graphics and situational reports—COVID-19. Quito; 2020.
46.
State Attorney General Office (Fiscalia General del Estado—FGE). Analysis of Gender Violence: Ecuador 2020. School of Sciences—National Polytechnic School. Quito; 2020.
47.
TauchenHV, WitteAD, LongSK. Domestic violence: A nonrandom affair. Int Econ Rev, 1991; 32(2):491; doi: 10.2307/2526888
48.
ThurstonAM, StöcklH, RanganathanM. Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Global Health, 2021; 6:e004377.
49.
United Nations. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations General Assembly; 2015.
50.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Global Study on Homicide: Gender-Related Killing of Women and Girls. UNODC: Vienna; 2018.
51.
Van GelderN, PetermanA, PottsA, et al.COVID-19: Reducing the risk of infection might increase the risk of intimate partner violence. EClinicalMedicine, 2020; 21:100348.
52.
Violence Policy Center. When Men Murder Women: An Analysis of 2018 Homicide Data. Violence Policy Center: Washington, DC, USA; 2020.
53.
Violence Policy Center. When Men Murder Women: An Analysis of 2019 Homicide Data. Violence Policy Center: Washington, DC, USA; 2021.
54.
VyasS, WattsC.How does economic empowerment affect women's risk of intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review of published evidence. J Int Econ, 2009; 21(5):577–602.
55.
WangY, BellemareM.Lagged variables as instruments. Working Paper, Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota; 2019.
56.
WhaleyR, MessnerS.Gender equality and gendered homicides. Homicide Stud, 2002; 6:188–210.
57.
World Health Organization (WHO). Global and regional estimates of domestic violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of inti-mate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research: Geneva; 2018.
58.
World Health Organization (WHO). Violence against women: Intimate partner and sexual violence against women. Evidence briefs. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research: Geneva; 2019.
59.
XieM, HeimerK, LauritsenJ. Violence against women in U.S. Metropolitan areas: Changes in women's status and risk, 1980–2004. Criminology, 2012; 50(1):105.
