Psychological abuse between partners is a significant aspect of partner abuse. With the rise of technology and social media usage, we seek to examine how cyber partner abuse is related to traditional understanding of psychological abuse, and also how it is unique. Cyber partner abuse is described along with current measurements and initial findings in this new field. We examine how specific behaviors of cyber partner abuse can be understood in terms of traditional psychological abuse (i.e., face-to-face abuse). Although some features overlap, unique aspects of cyber partner abuse qualify it as a distinctive sect of psychological abuse. We describe how these distinctions call for a deeper analysis of how technology affects romantic relationships. In particular, we discuss how this construct is being measured and the challenges that future researchers may face when studying this multifaceted term.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AriasI, PapeKT. (1999). Psychological abuse: Implications for adjustment and commitment to leave violent partners. Violence Vict. 14, 55–67.
2.
ArriagaXB, CapezzaNM, GoodfriendW, AllsopK. (in press). The invisible harm of downplaying a romantic partner's aggression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci.
3.
ArriagaXB, SchkeryantEL. (2015). Intimate relationships and personal distress: The invisible harm of psychological aggression. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 41, 1332–1344.
BelangeeS, BluvshteinM, HaugenD. (2015). Cybersocial connectedness: A survey of perceived benefits and disadvantages of social media use. J Indiv Psychol. 71, 122–134.
6.
BennettDC, GuranEL, RamosMC, MargolinG. (2011). College students' electronic victimization in friendships and romantic relationships: Anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors. Violence Vict. 26, 410–429.
7.
BorrajoE, Gámez-GuadixM. (2015). Cyber dating abuse: Prevalence, context, and relationship with offline dating aggression. Psychol Rep. 116, 565–585.
8.
BorrajoE, Gámez-GuadixM, PeredaN, CalveteE. (2015). The development and validation of the cyber dating abuse questionnaire among couples. Comput Human Behav. 48, 358–365.
9.
BremMJ, SpillerLC, VandeheyMA. (2015). Online mate-retention tactics on Facebook are associated with relationship aggression. J Interpers Violence. 30, 2831–2850.
10.
BussDM, ShackelfordTK, McKibbinWF. (2008). The mate-retention inventory short form (MRI-SF). Pers Individ Dif. 44, 322–344.
11.
CapezzaNM, ArriagaXB. (2008). You can degrade but you can't hit: Differences in acceptability of psychological versus physical aggression. J Soc Pers Relat. 25, 225–245.
12.
DrauckerCB, MartsolfDS. (2010). The role of electronic communication technology in adolescent dating violence. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 23, 133–142.
13.
ElphinstonR, NollerP. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 14, 631–635.
14.
EstefanLF, CoulterML, VandeWeerdC. (2016). Depression in women who have left a violent relationship: The unique impact of frequent emotional abuse. Violence Against Women. 22, 1397–1413.
15.
FollingstadDR. (2011). A measure of severe psychological abuse normed on a nationally representative sample of adults. J Interpers Violence. 26, 1194–1214.
16.
FollingstadDR, CoyneS, GamboneL. (2005). A representative measure of psychological aggression and its severity. Violence Vict., 20, 25.
17.
FollingstadDR, RutledgeLL, BergBJ, et al. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. J Fam Violence. 5, 107–120.
18.
GormleyB, LopezFG. (2009). Psychological Abuse Perpetration in College Dating Relationships. J Interpers Violence. 25, 204–218.
19.
HinesDA, SaudinoKJ. (2003). Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the Revised Conflict Tactic Scales. Violence Vict. 18, 197–217.
20.
JohnsonMP. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. J Marriage Fam. 57, 283–294.
21.
LawrenceE, YoonJ, LangerA, RoE. (2009). Is psychological aggression as detrimental as physical aggression? The independent effects of psychological aggression on depression and anxiety symptoms. Violence Vict., 24, 20–35.
22.
LeisringPA, GiumettiGW. (2014). Sticks and stones may break my bones, but abusive text messages also hurt: Development and validation of the cyber psychological abuse scale. Partner Abuse. 5, 323–341.
MitchellKJ, WolakJ, FinkelhorD. (2007). Trends in youth reports of sexual solicitations, harassment and unwanted exposure to pornography on the Internet. J Adolesc Health. 40, 116–126.
25.
MorelliM, BianchiD, BaioccoR, et al. (2016). Sexting, psychological distress and dating violence among adolescents and young adults. Psicothema. 28, 137–142.
26.
MuiseA, ChristofidesE, DesmaraisS. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy?. Cyberpsychol Behav. 12, 441–444.
ReedL, TolmanR, WardLM. (2016). Snooping and sexting: Digital media as a context for dating violence among college students. Violence Against Women. 22, 1556–1576.
29.
ReedL, TolmanR, WardLM, SayferP. (2016). Keeping tabs: Attachment insecurity and electronic intrusion in high school dating relationships. Comput Human Behav. 58, 259–268.
SalterM, CroftsT, LeeM. (2012). Beyond criminalisation and responsibilisation: Sexting, gender and young people. Curr Issues Crim Justice., 24, 301.
32.
SchnurrMP, MahatmyaD, Basche RAIII. (2013). The role of dominance, cyber aggression perpetration, and gender on emerging adults' perpetration of intimate partner violence. Psychol Violence. 3, 70–83.
33.
StrausMA, DouglasEM. (2004). A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale, and typologies for severity and mutuality. Violence Vict. 19, 507–520.
34.
StrausMA, HambySL, Boney-McCoyS, SugarmanDB. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues. 17, 283–316.
35.
SubrahmanyamK, GreenfieldP. (2008). Online communication and adolescent relationships. Future Child, 18, 119–146.
36.
SulerJ. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychol Behav. 7, 321–326.
37.
TaftCT, O'FarrellTJ, TorresSE, et al. (2006). Examining the correlates of psychological aggression among a community sample of couples. J Fam Psychol. 20, 581–588.
38.
TempleJR, ChoiHJ, BremM, et al. (2016). The temporal association between traditional and cyber dating abuse among adolescents. J Youth Adolesc. 45, 340–349.
39.
TolmanRM. (1999). The validation of the psychological maltreatment of women inventory. Violence Vict. 14, 25–35.
40.
TokunagaRS. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of inter-personal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Comput Human Behav., 27, 705–713.
41.
YahnerJ, DankM, ZweigJM, LachmanP. (2015). The co-occurrence of physical and cyber dating violence and bullying among teens. J Interpers Violence. 30, 1079–1089.
42.
ZweigJM, DankM, YahnerJ, LachmanP. (2013). The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. J Youth Adolesc. 42, 1063–1077.
