Acceptability,Feasibility,and Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Group Education Sessions for Women Veterans with a History of Sexual Trauma

Abstract

Women with a history of sexual violence may face obstacles to obtaining preventive health services. Group education models have been used in other settings to improve knowledge and uptake of care. Focus groups were conducted to solicit the concerns and input of the subject population. Interdisciplinary group education sessions (GESs) were designed specifically to address concerns voiced in focus groups. GESs were conducted, addressing mammograms, pelvic examinations, and menopause, and emphasized preventive health education, as well as shared decision-making. GESs were audio recorded and qualitative feedback was collected immediately after each GES. Surveys were administered before and after each GES to evaluate attitude and knowledge change. A total of 18 women attended the focus groups, and 27 women attended at least one GES, with 12 women attending both. GESs were well received, and participants cited the education, group support, and healing dynamic as benefits of participation. Content knowledge improved after all three GESs. Attitude change showed a trend toward improvement, but the sample size was not large enough to detect statistical significance. Group education is an acceptable and feasible model among survivors of sexual violence. GESs improved knowledge among this small group of participants. GESs could be made available in a wide range of topics, as requested by our participants. Larger studies are warranted to examine long-term knowledge and attitude change after GESs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Averill

. (2002). Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res. 12, 855–866.

Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2012). Committee Opinion No. 547: Health care for women in the military and women veterans. Obstet Gynecol., 120, 1538–1542.

Cronholm

, Bowman

. (2009). Women with safety concerns report fewer gender-specific preventive healthcare services. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 18, 1011–1018.

Department of Veterans Affairs. (2015, April). Study of Barriers for Women Veterans to VA Health Care. 1–225. Available at: https://www.womenshealth.va.gov/docs/Womens%20Health%20Services_Barriers%20to%20Care%20Final%20Report_April2015.pdf Accessed April 5, 2017.

Farley

, Golding

, Minkoff

. (2002). Is a history of trauma associated with a reduced likelihood of cervical cancer screening?. J Fam Pract. 51, 827–831.

Geller

, Dube

, Cruz

, et al. (2015). Pediatric obesity empowerment model group medical visits (POEM-GMV) as treatment for pediatric obesity in an underserved community. Child Obes. 11, 638–646.

Grella

, Polinsky

, Hser

Y-I

, et al. (1999). Characteristics of women-only and mixed-gender drug abuse treatment programs. J Subst Abuse Treat. 17, 37–44.

Guest

, MacQueen

, Namey

. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis. (Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA).

Heberlein

, Picklesimer

, Billings

, et al. (2016). Qualitative comparison of women's perspectives on the functions and benefits of group and individual prenatal care. J Midwifery Womens Health. 61, 224–234.

10.

Housden

, Wong

, Dawes

. (2013). Effectiveness of group medical visits for improving diabetes care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Can Med Assoc J. 185, E635–E644.

11.

Ickovics

, Reed

, Magriples

, et al. (2011). Effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial risk in pregnancy: Results from a randomised controlled trial. Psychol Health, 26, 235–250.

12.

Jaber

, Braksmajer

, Trilling

. (2006a). Group visits for chronic illness care: Models, benefits and challenges. Fam Pract Manag. 13, 37–40.

13.

Jaber

, Braksmajer

, Trilling

. (2006b). Group visits: A qualitative review of current research. J Am Board Fam Med. 19, 276–290.

14.

Jotterand

, Amodio

, Elger

. (2016). Patient education as empowerment and self-rebiasing. Med Health Care Philos. 19, 553–561.

15.

Kennedy

, Farrell

, Paden

, et al. (2009). “I wasn't alone”—A study of group prenatal care in the military. J Midwifery Womens Health. 54, 176–183.

16.

Khan

, Windt

, Davis

, et al. (2015). Group medical visits (GMVs) in primary care: An RCT of group-based versus individual appointments to reduce HbA1c in older people. BMJ Open., 5, e007441.

17.

Kimerling

, Gima

, Smith

, et al. (2007). The Veterans Health Administration and military sexual trauma. Am J Public Health. 97, 2160–2166.

18.

Kimerling

, Pavao

, Greene

, et al. (2015). Access to mental health care among women Veterans: Is VA meeting women's needs?. Med Care. 53, S97–S104.

19.

Kimerling

, Pavao

, Valdez

, et al. (2011). Military sexual trauma and patient perceptions of Veteran Health Administration health care quality. Womens Health Issues. 21, S145–S151.

20.

Krueger

, Casey

. (2009). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th edition.). (SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).

21.

Lipari

, Lancaster

. (2003). Armed forces 2002 sexual harassment survey. Available at: http://archive.defense.gov/news/Feb2004/d20040227shs1.pdf (accessed January 23, 2017).

22.

Liu

, Chao

, Jostad-Laswell

, et al. (2017). Does centeringpregnancy group prenatal care affect the birth experience of underserved women? A mixed methods analysis. J Immigr Minor Health., 19, 415–422.

23.

Magriples

, Boynton

, Kershaw

, et al. (2015). The impact of group prenatal care on pregnancy and postpartum weight trajectories. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 213, 688.e1–e9.

24.

Mazzoni

, Hill

, Webster

, et al. (2016). Group prenatal care for women with gestational diabetes (.). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 29, 2852–2856.

25.

Mengeling

, Booth

, Torner

, et al. (2015). Post-sexual assault health care utilization among OEF/OIF servicewomen. Med Care. 53, S136–S142.

26.

National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics (NCVAS). (2016). Profile of Women Veterans: 2014. pp. 1–27. Available at: https://www.va.gov/vetdata/docs/SpecialReports/Women_Veterans_2014.pdf Accessed November 7, 2016.

27.

Novick

, Womack

, Lewis

, et al. (2015). Perceptions of Barriers and facilitators during implementation of a complex model of group prenatal care in six urban sites. Res Nurs Health. 38, 462–474.

28.

Reid

. (2007). Centering Pregnancy®: A model for group prenatal care. Nurs Womens Health. 11, 382–388.

29.

Sabatino

, Lawrence

, Elder

, et al. (2012). Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: Nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 43, 97–118.

30.

Seven

, Akyüz

, Robertson

. (2015). Interventional education methods for increasing women's participation in breast cancer screening program. J Cancer Educ. 30, 244–252.

31.

Suris

, Lind

. (2008). Military sexual trauma: A review of prevalence and associated health consequences in veterans. Trauma Violence Abuse. 9, 250–269.

32.

Thompson

, Meeuwisse

, Dahlke

, et al. (2014). Group medical visits in primary care for patients with diabetes and low socioeconomic status: Users' perspectives and lessons for practitioners. Can J Diabetes. 38, 198–204.

33.

Trento

, Passera

, Tomalino

, et al. (2001). Group visits improve metabolic control in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 24, 995–1000.

34.

Wong

, Lavoie

, Browne

, et al. (2015). Patient confidentiality within the context of group medical visits: Is there cause for concern?. Health Expect. 18, 727–739.

35.

World Health Organization (WHO). Regional Office for Europe. (1998). Therapeutic patient education: Continuing education programmes for health care providers in the field of prevention of chronic diseases: Report of a WHO working group. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

36.

Yehle

, Sands

, Rhynders

. (2009). The effect of shared medical visits on knowledge and self-care in patients with heart failure: A pilot study. Heart Lung. 38, 25–33.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.05 MB

1.68 MB

1.69 MB

0.00 MB