Abstract
Poxviruses have evolved numerous mechanisms to avoid the immune response of the infected host, and many of these mechanisms have not been fully described. Here, we studied the transcriptional response of innate immune genes in BALB/c and C57BL/6 peritoneal macrophages following infection with the Moscow strain of ectromelia virus (ECTV-Mos) with the aim of delineating innate immune genes that contribute to the difference between susceptibility and resistance to lethal infection. We show a generalized downregulation of many genes in four categories (toll-like receptor signaling, NOD-like receptor signaling, RIG-I-like receptor signaling, and type I interferon signaling) of antiviral innate immune receptors, downstream signaling pathways, and responsive components. Two important observations were made. First, 14 innate antiviral genes were differentially expressed with fold change upregulation of two and above occurring in C57BL/6 mice, known to be resistant to ECTV-Mos infection, whereas the same genes were downregulated in BALB/c mice with fold change of two and below. Second, the cathepsin group of genes was downregulated in both strains of mice but with profound fold changes of 17, 38, and 62 downregulation for CtsL, CtsB, and CtsS, respectively, in C57BL/6 mice. We show that a poxvirus profoundly downregulates both the mRNA and protein expression of these three cathepsins and this change appears to support virus replication. Based on these data we propose that the variations in gene expression observed may contribute to the difference in resistance/susceptibility between BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice to lethal infection by ECTV-Mos.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
