Anaplasmosis, caused by Anaplasma species, poses significant threats to public health and livestock productivity. Understanding the distribution and genetic diversity of these pathogens in tick vectors across China is critical for risk assessment and disease control.
Materials and Methods:
From April to June 2023, 875 ticks were collected across three Chinese provinces: Jiangxi, Yunnan, and Shaanxi. The collected ticks comprised Rhipicephalus microplus (from Jiangxi and Yunnan) and Haemaphysalis longicornis (from Shaanxi). Pathogen detection was performed using PCR, followed by phylogenetic analysis of the obtained sequences to determine genetic relationships.
Results:
Anaplasma capra was detected predominantly in R. microplus from Yudu County, Jiangxi (4.95%), and in H. longicornis from Meixian County (3.16%), Long County (5.99%), and Zhenba County (0.83%) in Shaanxi, exhibiting regional genetic variations. The detection rate of Anaplasma marginale was 6.59% in Yudu County, Jiangxi; significantly higher rates were found in Yunnan province: 41.75% in Nanjian County, 40.38% in Weishan County, and 52.04% in Yongsheng County. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that A. marginale isolates from Lijiang (Yongsheng), Yunnan, were highly homologous (99.63%–100%) to those from Yudu County, Jiangxi, while isolates from Dali (Nanjian and Weishan), Yunnan, formed a distinct clade.
Conclusion:
The findings demonstrate the widespread distribution of A. capra and A. marginale in ticks across the surveyed regions of China, with notable variations in prevalence and genetic characteristics. These pathogens represent potential threats to local residents and livestock. Future research should expand the geographic sampling range to fully understand their distribution patterns and explore effective prevention and control strategies to safeguard public health and safety.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AliA, KhanMA, ZahidH, et al.Seasonal dynamics, record of ticks infesting humans, wild and domestic animals and molecular phylogeny of rhipicephalus microplus in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. Front Physiol, 2019; 10:793; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00793
2.
BarkerSC, WalkerAR. Ticks of australia. The species that infest domestic animals and humans. Zootaxa, 2014(3816):1–144; doi: 10.1164/6/zootaxa.3816.1.1
3.
ChenSM, DumlerJS, BakkenJS, et al.Identification of a granulocytotropic Ehrlichia species as the etiologic agent of human disease. J Clin Microbiol, 1994; 32(3):589–595; doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.3.589-595.1994
4.
CohenEB, AucklandLD, MarraPP, et al.Avian migrants facilitate invasions of neotropical ticks and tick-borne pathogens into the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2015; 81(24):8366–8378; doi: 10.1128/AEM.02656-15
5.
de la FournièreS, GuillemiEC, PaolettaMS, et al.Transovarial transmission of anaplasma marginale in rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus ticks results in a bottleneck for strain diversity. Pathogens, 2023; 12(8):1010; doi: 10.3390/pathogens12081010
6.
de la FuenteJ, Estrada-PenaA, VenzalJM, et al.Overview: Ticks as vectors of pathogens that cause disease in humans and animals. Front Biosci, 2008; 13:6938–6946; doi: 10.2741/3200
7.
de SouzaWM, WeaverSC. Effects of climate change and human activities on vector-borne diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2024; 22(8):476–491; doi: 10.1038/s41579-024-01026-0
8.
DjimanTA, BiguezotonAS, SaegermanC. Tick-Borne diseases in sub-saharan africa: A systematic review of pathogens, research focus, and implications for public health. Pathogens, 2024; 13(8):697; doi: 10.3390/pathogens13080697
9.
Gaowa, Wulantuya, YinX, CaoM, GuoS, et al.Case of human infection with anaplasma phagocytophilum in inner mongolia, China. Jpn J Infect Dis, 2018; 71(2):155–157; doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2017.450
10.
GinsbergHS. Potential effects of mixed infections in ticks on transmission dynamics of pathogens: Comparative analysis of published records. Exp Appl Acarol, 2008; 46(1–4):29–41; doi: 10.1007/s10493-008-9175-5
11.
GuoWP, HuangB, ZhaoQ, et al.Human-pathogenic Anaplasma spp., and Rickettsia spp. in animals in Xi’an, China. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2018; 12(11):e0006916; doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006916
12.
GuoWP, TianJH, LinXD, et al.Extensive genetic diversity of rickettsiales bacteria in multiple mosquito species. Sci Rep, 2016; 6:38770; doi: 10.1038/srep38770
13.
HeylenDJA, KumsaB, KimbitaE, et al.Tick communities of cattle in smallholder rural livestock production systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Parasit Vectors, 2023; 16(1):206; doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05801-5
14.
IijimaH, WatariY, FurukawaT, et al.Importance of host abundance and microhabitat in tick abundance. J Med Entomol, 2022; 59(6):2110–2119; doi: 10.1093/jme/tjac140
15.
Jafar BeklooA, RamzgouyanMR, ShirianS, et al.Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of anaplasma spp. and ehrlichia spp. Isolated from various ticks in southeastern and northwestern regions of Iran. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 2018; 18(5):252–257; doi: 10.1089/vbz.2017.2219
16.
JiaoJ, ZhangJ, HeP, et al.Identification of tick-borne pathogens and genotyping of coxiella burnetii in rhipicephalus microplus in Yunnan Province, China. Front Microbiol, 2021; 12:736484; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.736484
17.
KazimAR, LowVL, HoussainiJ, et al.Ticks and tick-borne pathogens in ruminant farms of Peninsular Malaysia: First molecular evidence of Borrelia theileri in Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports, 2024; 56:101145; doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2024.101145
18.
KeesingF, OstfeldRS. Ecology. Is biodiversity good for your health? Science, 2015; 349(6245):235–236; doi: 10.1126/science.aac7892
19.
KocanKM, de la FuenteJ, GuglielmoneAA, et al.Antigens and alternatives for control of Anaplasma marginale infection in cattle. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2003; 16(4):698–712; doi: 10.1128/cmr.16.4.698-712.2003
20.
KohFX, PanchadcharamC, SitamFT, et al.Molecular investigation of Anaplasma spp. in domestic and wildlife animals in Peninsular Malaysia. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports, 2018; 13:141–147; doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2018.05.006
21.
LeviT, KeesingF, HoltRD, et al.Quantifying dilution and amplification in a community of hosts for tick-borne pathogens. Ecol Appl, 2016; 26(2):484–498; doi: 10.1890/15-0122
22.
LiH, ZhengYC, MaL, et al.Human infection with a novel tick-borne Anaplasma species in China: A surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis, 2015; 15(6):663–670; doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70051-4
23.
LuM, JiY, ZhaoH, et al.Circulation of multiple rickettsiales bacteria in ticks from sichuan province, Southwest China. Microb Pathog, 2023a;183:106313; doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106313
24.
LuM, MengC, LiY, et al.Rickettsia sp. and Anaplasma spp. in Haemaphysalis longicornis from Shandong province of China, with evidence of a novel species “Candidatus Anaplasma Shandongensis. Ticks Tick Borne Dis, 2023b;14(1):102082; doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.102082
25.
LuM, TianJ, WangW, et al.High diversity of rickettsia spp., Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in ticks from Yunnan Province, Southwest China. Front Microbiol, 2022; 13:1008110; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1008110
26.
Mahlobo-ShwabedeSIC, ZishiriOT, ThekisoeOMM, et al.Ticks of domestic animals in Lesotho: Morphological and molecular characterization. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports, 2022; 29:100691; doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2022.100691
27.
OgdenNH, Ben BeardC, GinsbergHS, et al.Possible Effects of Climate Change on Ixodid Ticks and the Pathogens They Transmit: Predictions and Observations. J Med Entomol, 2021; 58(4):1536–1545; doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaa220
28.
OliverJHJr, TanakaK, SawadaM. Cytogenetics of ticks (Acari: Ixodoidea). 12. Chromosome and hybridization studies of bisexual and parthenogenetic Haemaphysalis longicornis races from Japan and Korea. Chromosoma, 1973; 42(3):269–288; doi: 10.1007/bf00284775
29.
RarV, TkachevS, TikunovaN. Genetic diversity of Anaplasma bacteria: Twenty years later. Infect Genet Evol, 2021; 91:104833; doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104833
30.
RemesarS, PrietoA, García-DiosD, et al.Diversity of Anaplasma species and importance of mixed infections in roe deer from Spain. Transbound Emerg Dis, 2022; 69(4):e374–e385; doi: 10.1111/tbed.14319
31.
SahinOF, ErolU, AltayK. Buffaloes as new hosts for Anaplasma capra: Molecular prevalence and phylogeny based on gtlA, groEL, and 16S rRNA genes. Res Vet Sci, 2022; 152:458–464; doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.09.008
32.
SmitA, MulandaneFC, WojcikSH, et al.Sympatry of Amblyomma eburneum and Amblyomma variegatum on African buffaloes and prevalence of pathogens in ticks. Ticks Tick Borne Dis, 2023; 14(6):102247; doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102247
33.
XieX, ZhangY, TengZ, et al.The Prevalence of Rickettsial and Rickettsial-Like Diseases in Patients with Undifferentiated Febrile Illness - Hainan Province, China, 2018-2021. China CDC Wkly, 2024; 6(30):734–739; doi: 10.4623/4/ccdcw2024.165
34.
YanY, WangK, CuiY, et al.Molecular detection and phylogenetic analyses of Anaplasma spp. in Haemaphysalis longicornis from goats in four provinces of China. Sci Rep, 2021; 11(1):14155; doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93629-3
35.
YangJ, LiuZ, NiuQ, et al.A novel zoonotic Anaplasma species is prevalent in small ruminants: Potential public health implications. Parasit Vectors, 2017; 10(1):264; doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2182-9
36.
ZhangL, LiuY, NiD, et al.Nosocomial transmission of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in China. JAMA, 2008a;300(19):2263–2270; doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.626
37.
ZhangL, ShanA, MathewB, et al.Rickettsial Seroepidemiology among farm workers, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China. Emerg Infect Dis, 2008b;14(6):938–940; doi: 10.3201/eid1406.071502
38.
ZhangX, LvW, TengZ, et al.Molecular detection of Rickettsiales and a potential novel Ehrlichia species closely related to Ehrlichia chaffeensis in ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) from Shaanxi Province, China, in 2022 to 2023. Front Microbiol, 2023; 14:1331434; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1331434
