Chagas disease is one of the world's most neglected tropical diseases, infecting over six million people across the Americas. The hemoparasite Trypanosoma cruzi is the etiological agent for the disease, circulating in domestic, peridomestic, and sylvatic transmission cycles that are maintained by triatomine vectors and a diversity of wild and synanthropic hosts. Public health and wildlife management interventions targeting the interruption of T. cruzi transmission rely on an understanding of the dynamics driving the ecology of this zoonotic pathogen. One wildlife host that purportedly plays a role in the transmission of Chagas disease within the southern United States is the striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), although infection prevalence in this species is poorly understood.
Materials and Methods:
To this end, we conducted a PCR-based surveillance of T. cruzi in 235 wild skunks, representing 4 species, across 76 counties and 10 ecoregions in Texas, United States, along with an evaluation of risk factors associated with the infection.
Results:
We recovered an overall T. cruzi prevalence of 17.9% for all mephitid taxa aggregated, ranging between 6.7% for plains spotted skunks (Spilogale putorius interrupta) and 42.9% for western spotted skunks (Spilogale gracilis). We report the first cases of T. cruzi infection in plains spotted and American hog-nosed skunks (Conepatus leuconotus), of important note for conservation medicine since populations of both species are declining within Texas. Although not statistically significant, we also detected trends for juveniles to exhibit greater infection risk than adults and for differential sex biases in T. cruzi prevalence between taxa, which align with variations in species-specific seasonal activity patterns. No geographic or taxonomic risk factors were identified.
Conclusion:
Our study contributed key data for population viability analyses and epidemiologic models in addition to providing a baseline for future T. cruzi surveillance among skunks and other wildlife species.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alkmim-OliveiraSM, Costa-MartinsAG, KappelHB, et al.Trypanosoma cruzi experimental congenital transmission associated with TcV and TcI subpatent maternal parasitemia. Parasitol Res, 2013; 112:671–678.
2.
AndradeSG. The influence of the strain of Trypanosoma cruzi in placental infections in mice. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 1982; 76:123–128.
Arce-FonsecaM, Carrillo-SánchezSC, Molina-BarriosRM, et al.Seropositivity for Trypanosoma cruzi in domestic dogs from Sonora, Mexico. Infect Dis Poverty, 2017; 6:1–7.
5.
BaileyVB. 1905. Biological survey of Texas. North Am Fauna, 1905; 25:1–1222.
6.
BeattyNL, KlotzSA. Autochthonous Chagas disease in the United States: How are people getting infected?. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2020; 103:967–969.
7.
BernC. Chagas' disease. N Engl J Med, 2015; 373:456–466.
8.
BernC, KjosS, YabsleyMJ, MontgomerySP. Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas' disease in the United States. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2011; 24:655–681.
9.
BrashearWA, FergusonAW, NegovetichNJ, DowlerRC. Spatial organization and home range patterns of the American hog-nosed skunk (Conepatus leuconotus). Am Midl Nat, 2015; 174:310–320.
10.
BrazLM. Reactivation of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in immunosuppressed patients: Contributions for the laboratorial diagnosis standardization. Letter to the editor. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo, 2008; 50:65–66.
11.
BrownEL, RoelligDM, GompperME, et al.Seroprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi among eleven potential reservoir species from six states across the southern United States. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 2010; 10:757–763.
12.
CardinalMV, LauricellaMA, CeballosLA, et al.Molecular epidemiology of domestic and sylvatic Trypanosoma cruzi infection in rural northwestern Argentina. Int J Parasitol, 2008; 38:1533–1543.
13.
CeballosLA, CardinalMV, Vazquez-ProkopecGM, et al.Long-term reduction of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in sylvatic mammals following deforestation and sustained vector surveillance in northwestern Argentina. Acta Trop, 2006; 98:286–296.
14.
CharlesRA, KjosS, EllisAE, et al.Southern Plains Woodrats (Neotoma micropus) from southern Texas are important reservoirs of two genotypes of Trypanosoma cruzi and host of a putative novel Trypanosoma species. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 2013; 13:22–30.
15.
CrabbWD. Growth, development and seasonal weights of spotted skunks. J Mammal, 1944; 25:213–221.
16.
Curtis-RoblesR, AucklandLD, SnowdenKF, et al.Analysis of over 1500 triatomine vectors from across the US, predominantly Texas, for Trypanosoma cruzi infection and discrete typing units. Infect Genet Evol, 2018; 58:171–180.
17.
DavisDS, RussellLH, AdamsLG, et al.An experimental infection of Trypanosoma cruzi in striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). J Wildl Dis, 1980; 16:403–406.
18.
de Luca D'OroGM, GardenalCN, PerretB, et al.Genetic structure of Trypanosoma cruzi populations from Argentina estimated from enzyme polymorphism. Parasitology, 1993; 107:405–410.
19.
do PradoJCJr, LevyAM, LealMP, et al.Influence of male gonadal hormones on the parasitemia and humoral response of male Calomys callosus infected with the Y strain of Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasitol Res, 1999; 85:826–829.
20.
DragooJW, HoneycuttRL. Western hog-nosed skunk Conepatus mesoleucus. In: The Smithsonian Book of North American Mammals. (Wilson DE, Ruff S. eds.) Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; pp. 191–192.
21.
EllsworthZT. Evaluating the reproductive habits and the breeding season of the hog-nosed skunk (Conepatus leuconotus). MS Thesis. Angelo State University, San Angelo TX. 2016.
22.
FerreiraMS, BorgesAS. Some aspects of protozoan infections in immunocompromised patients—A review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 2002; 97:443–457.
23.
Galaviz-SilvaL, Mercado-HernándezR, Zárate-RamosJJ, et al.Prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in dogs and small mammals in Nuevo León, Mexico. Rev Argent Microbiol, 2017; 49:216–223.
24.
GarciaMN, BurroughsH, GorchakovR, et al.Molecular identification and genotyping of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in autochthonous Chagas disease patients from Texas, USA. Infect Genet Evol, 2017; 49:151–156.
25.
GarciaMN, RiveraH, RossmannSN, et al.Evidence of autochthonous Chagas disease in southeastern Texas. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2015; 92:325–330.
26.
GouldFW, HoffmanGO, RechenthinCA. Vegetational areas of Texas. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Leaflet No. 492. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. 1960.
27.
GreensidesRD, MeadRA. Ovulation in the spotted skunk (Spilogale putorius latifrons). Biol Reprod, 1973; 8:576–584.
28.
Gulas-WroblewskiBE. Infectious diseases of eastern spotted skunks (Spilogale putorius) within a One Health framework. Southeast Nat, 2021; 20:126–172.
29.
Gulas-WroblewskiBE, KairisRB, GorchakovR, et al.Optimization of DNA extraction from field-collected mammalian whole blood on filter paper for Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas disease) detection. Pathogens, 2021; doi: 10.3390/pathogens10081040
30.
GunterSM, BrownEL, GorchakovR, et al.Sylvatic transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi among domestic and wildlife reservoirs in Texas, U.S.A.: A review of the historical literature. Zoonoses Public Health, 2017; 64:313–327.
31.
Gurgel-GonçalvesR, GalvaoC, CostaJ, et al.Geographic distribution of Chagas disease vectors in Brazil based on ecological niche modeling. J Trop Med, 2012; doi: 10.1155/2012/705326
32.
GürtlerRE, CecereMC, PetersenRM, et al.Chagas disease in north-west Argentina: Association between Trypanosoma cruzi parasitaemia in dogs and cats and infection rates in domestic Triatoma infestans. Transact Royal Soc Trop Med Hyg, 1993; 87:12–15.
33.
HanfordEJ, ZhanFB, LuY, et al.Chagas disease in Texas: Recognizing the significance and implications of evidence in the literature. Soc Sci Med, 2007; 65:60–79.
34.
HelgenK, CuarónAD, SchipperJ, et al. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Spilogale pygmaea. 2016. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.20161.RLTS.T41637A45211592.en [Last accessed: November 6, 2020].
35.
HodoCL, WilkersonGK, BirknerEC, et al.Trypanosoma cruzi transmission among captive nonhuman primates, wildlife, and vectors. Ecohealth, 2018; 15:426–436.
36.
HotezPJ, BottazziME, DumonteilE, et al.Texas and Mexico: Sharing a legacy of poverty and neglected tropical diseases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2012a; doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001497
37.
HotezPJ, DumonteilE, Woc-ColburnL, et al.Chagas disease: “The new HIV/AIDS of the Americas.”. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2012b; doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001498
38.
HowardEJ, XiongX, CarlierY, et al.Frequency of the congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obstet Gynaecol, 2014; 121:22–33.
39.
IrishA, WhitmanJD, ClarkEH, et al.Updated estimates and mapping for prevalence of Chagas disease among adults, United States. Emerg Infect Dis, 2022; 28:1313–1320.
40.
JansenAM, XavierSCC, RoqueALR. The multiple and complex and changeable scenarios of the Trypanosoma cruzi transmission cycle in the sylvatic environment. Acta Trop, 2015; 151:1–15.
41.
Jiménez-CoelloM, Acosta-VianaK, Guzmán-MarínE, et al.American trypanosomiasis and associated risk factors in owned dogs from the major city of Yucatan, Mexico. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis, 2015; 21:37.
42.
Jiménez-CoelloM, Guzmán-MarinES, Ortega-PachecoA, et al.Serological survey of American Trypanosomiasis in dogs and their owners from an urban area of Mérida Yucatán, México. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2010; 57:33–36.
43.
Jiménez-CoelloM, Poot-CobM, Ortega-PachecoA, et al.American trypanosomiasis in dogs from an urban and rural area of Yucatan, Mexico. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 2008; 8:755–762.
44.
KaplanJB, MeadRA. Seasonal changes in testicular function and seminal characteristics of the male eastern spotted skunk (Spilogale putorius ambarvalus). J Mammal, 1994; 75:1013–1020.
KjosSA, SnowdenKF, CraigTM, et al.Distribution and characterization of canine Chagas disease in Texas. Vet Parasitol, 2008; 152:249–256.
47.
Kramm MMIII, GutierrezMR, LuepkeTD, et al.Trypanosoma cruzi in free-ranging mammalian populations in South Texas, USA. J Wildl Dis, 2017; 53:788–794.
48.
Kramm MMIII, MontalvoAE, ParkerID, et al.Immunochromatographic antibody screening for diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi in South Texas meso-mammals. Wildl Soc Bull, 2019; 43:678–682.
49.
LarivièreS, MessierF. Seasonal and daily activity patterns of striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) in the Canadian prairies. J Zool, 1997; 243:255–262.
50.
LevinSA. Self-organization and the emergence of complexity in ecological systems. Bioscience, 2005; 55:1075–1079.
51.
LourençoAM, LevyAM, CaetanoLC, et al.Influence sexual dimorphism on the persistence of blood parasites in infected Calomys callosus. Res Vet Sci, 2008; 85:515–521.
52.
MajeauA, PronovostH, SanfordA, et al.Raccoons as an important reservoir for Trypanosoma cruzi: A prevalence study from two metropolitan areas in Louisiana. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 2020; 20:535–540.
53.
MalikLH, SinghGD, AmsterdamEA. Chagas heart disease: An update. Am J Med, 2015; 128:1251.e7–e1251.e9.
54.
MatamorosMC. Identification of Leishmania spp. and Trypanosoma cruzi in sylvatic animals in El Paso County, Texas. PhD Dissertations, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX. 2016.
55.
McKeeverS, GormanGW, NormanL. Occurrence of a Trypanosoma cruzi-like organism in some mammals from southwestern Georgia and northwestern Florida. J Parasitol, 1958; 44:583–587.
56.
MeadRA. Reproduction in western forms of the spotted skunk (genus Spilogale). J Mammal, 1968; 49:373–390.
57.
MeaneyCA, RugglesAK, BeauvaisGP. American hog-nosed skunk (Conepatus leuconotus): A technical conservation assessment. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project: Lakewood, CO, USA; 2006.
58.
MontamatEE, d'OroGDL, PerretB, et al.Characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi from Argentina by electrophoretic zymograms. Acta Trop, 1991; 50:125–133.
59.
MontgomerySP, PariseME, DotsonEM, et al.What do we know about Chagas disease in the United States?. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2016; 95:1225–1227.
60.
Moo-MillanJI, ArnalA, Pérez-CarrilloS, et al.Disentangling Trypanosoma cruzi transmission cycle dynamics through the identification of blood meal sources of natural populations of Triatoma dimidiata in Yucatán, Mexico. Parasit Vectors, 2019; doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3819-7
61.
MorenoEAI, RiveraM, MorenoSC, et al.Vertical transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in Wistar rats during the acute phase of infection [in Spanish]. Invest Clin, 2003; 44:241–254.
62.
PattonRF. Ecological and behavioral relationships of the skunks of Trans Pecos, Texas. PhD Dissertations, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. 1974.
63.
PérezAR, BertoyaAA, RevelliS, et al.A high corticosterone/DHEA-s ratio in young rats infected with Trypanosoma cruzi is associated with increased susceptibility. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 2011; 106:416–423.
64.
PerryRW, SasseDB, PerkinsJC, et al.Distribution and relative abundance of eastern spotted skunk records across their range. Southeast Nat, 2021; 20:13–23.
65.
PetersonAT. Ecologic niche modeling and spatial patterns of disease transmission. Emerg Infect Dis, 2006; 12:1822–1826.
66.
PetersonAT, Sánchez-CorderoV, BeardCB, et al.Ecologic niche modeling and potential reservoirs for Chagas disease, Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis, 2002; 8:662–667.
67.
PickaMC, MeiraDA, de CarvalhoTB, et al.Definition of a diagnostic routine in individuals with inconclusive serology for Chagas disease. Braz J Infect Dis, 2007; 11:226–233.
68.
PietrokovskySM, SchweigmannNJ, RiarteA, et al.The skunk Conepatus chinga as new host of Trypanosoma cruzi in Argentina. J Parasit, 1991; 77:643–645.
69.
PinedaV, SaldañaA, MonfanteI, et al.Prevalence of trypanosome infections in dogs from Chagas disease endemic regions in Panama, Central America. Vet Parasitol, 2011; 178:360–363.
70.
PintoACH, CaetanoLC, LevyAMA, et al.Experimental Chagas' disease in orchiectomized Calomys callosus infected with the CM strain of Trypanosoma cruzi. Exp Parasitol, 2010; 124:147–152.
71.
PiorkowskiG, BarontiC, de LamballerieX, et al.Development of generic Taqman PCR and RT-PCR assays for the detection of DNA and mRNA of β-actin-encoding sequences in a wide range of animal species. J Virol Methods, 2014; 202:101–105.
72.
PironM, FisaR, CasamitjanaN, et al.Development of a real-time PCR assay for Trypanosoma cruzi detection in blood samples. Acta Trop, 2007; 103:195–200.
73.
RabinovichJ, SchweigmannN, YohaiV, et al.Probability of Trypanosoma cruzi transmission by Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) to the opossum Didelphis albiventris (Marsupialia: Didelphidae). Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2001; 65:125–130.
74.
RibeiroRD, GarciaTAR, BonomoWC. Contribution to the study of the transmission mechanisms of the etiological agent of Chagas disease [in Portuguese]. Rev Saúde Pública, 1987; 21:51–54.
75.
Rodríguez-MoralesO, Ballinas-VerdugoMA, Alejandre-AguilarR, et al.Trypanosoma cruzi connatal transmission in dogs with Chagas disease: Experimental case report. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 2011; 11:1365–1370.
76.
RoelligDM, EllisAE, YabsleyMJ. Oral transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi with opposing evidence for the theory of carnivory. J Parasitol, 2009; 95:360–364.
77.
Ruiz-PiñaHA, Cruz-ReyesA. The opossum Didelphis virginiana as a synanthropic reservoir of Trypanosoma cruzi in Dzidzilché, Yucatán, México. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 2002; 97:613–620.
78.
RyanCP, HughesPE, HowardEB. America trypanosomiasis (Chagas' disease) in a striped skunk. J Wildl Dis, 1985; 21:175–176.
79.
Sánchez NegretteO, MoraMC, BasombríoMA. High prevalence of congenital Trypanosoma cruzi infection and family clustering in Salta, Argentina. Pediatrics, 2005; doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1732
80.
SantosCD, LevyAMA, ToldoMPA, et al.Haematological and histopathological findings after ovariectomy in Trypanosoma cruzi infected mice. Vet Parasitol, 2007; 143:222–228.
81.
SarkarS, StrutzSE, FrankDM, et al.Chagas disease risk in Texas. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2010; doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000836
82.
SchmidlyDJ, BradleyRD. The Mammals of Texas: Seventh Edition. University of Texas Press: Austin, TX, USA; 2016.
83.
SchmunisGA, YadonZE. Chagas disease: A Latin American health problem becoming a world health problem. Acta Trop, 2010; 115:14–21.
84.
SchusterJP, SchaubGA. Experimental Chagas disease: The influence of sex and psychoneuroimmunological factors. Parasitol Res, 2001; 87:994–1000.
85.
SilveiraA, VinhaesM. Elimination of vector-borne transmission of Chagas disease. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 1999; 94:405–411.
86.
SoaresRCO, SoaresCS, Franzói de MoraesSM, et al.Experimental infection by Trypanosoma cruzi in mice: Influence of physical exercise versus lineages and sexes [in Portuguese]. Rev Bras Med Esporte, 2012; 18:51–57.
87.
SoriaCM. Trypanosoma cruzi. prevalence in mesomammals in South Texas: Is there a host sex-bias? Masters Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; 2018.
88.
TartaliniVM, FontanellaGH, NocitoAL, et al.Preliminary study of experimental acute Chagasic myocarditis and its relationship with the administration of sex steroids [in Spanish]. Insuficiencia Cardíaca, 2011; 6:156–164.
89.
TaylorWP, DavisWB. The Mammals of Texas, Bulletin No. 27. Game, Fish, and Oyster Commission: Austin, TX, USA; 1947.
90.
Texas Department of State Health Services (TDSHS). Chagas Disease Data. Austin, TX, USA; 2019. Available from: https://dshs.texas.gov/IDCU/disease/chagas/Chagas-Disease-Data.aspxAccessed11November2020 [Last accessed: January 15, 2021].
91.
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD). Deer Management Permit Application Information. Austin, TX; 2011. Available from: https://apps.tpwd.state.tx.us/static/dmpEcoregionTable1.pdf [Last accessed: June 29, 2022].
92.
VertsBJ. The Biology of the Striped Skunk. University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA; 1967.
93.
WilberMQ, BriggsCJ, JohnsonPT. Disease's hidden death toll: Using parasite aggregation patterns to quantify landscape-level host mortality in a wildlife system. J Animal Ecol, 2020; 89:2876–2887.
94.
Wisnivesky-ColliC, SchweigmannNJ, AlbertiA, et al.Sylvatic American trypanosomiasis in Argentina. Trypanosoma cruzi infection in mammals from the Chaco forest in Santiago del Estero. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg, 1992; 86:38–41.
95.
World Health Organization (WHO). Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis), Fact sheet No. 340. Geneva, Switzerland; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chagas-disease-(american-trypanosomiasis) [Last accessed: November 19, 2020].
96.
YabsleyMJ, NobletGP. Seroprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi in raccoons from South Carolina and Georgia. J Wildl Dis, 2002; 38:75–83.
97.
Zavala-VelázquezJ, Barrera-PérezM, Rodríguez-FélixME, et al.Infection by Trypanosoma cruzi in mammals in Yucatán, Mexico: A serological and parasitological study. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo, 1996; 38:289–292.
98.
ZeccaIB, HodoCL, SlackS, et al.Trypanosoma cruzi infections and associated pathology in urban-dwelling Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana). Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl, 2020; 11:287–293.
99.
ZeledónR, SolanoG, BurstinL, et al.Epidemiological pattern of Chagas' disease in an endemic area of Costa Rica. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1975; 24:214–225.
100.
ZhangVY, WilliamsCT, TheimerTC, et al.Reproductive and environmental drivers of time and activity budgets of striped skunks. Integr Org Biol, 2019; doi: 10.1093/iob/obz013
101.
ZukM, McKeanKA. Sex differences in parasite infections: Patterns and processes. Int J Parasitol, 1996; 26:1009–1024.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
