Positive cultures from hepatic abscess drainage are extremely rare, and in this case the infection would have remained undiagnosed if Brucella suis had not been isolated. Failure to correctly diagnose this zoonosis delays patient treatment and is dangerous, as in this case that could have been a laboratory-acquired disease. This type of infection is preventable if proper safety protocols are established and followed.
ArizaJ, PigrauC, CañasCet al.Current understanding and management of chronic hepatosplenic suppurative brucellosis. CID, 2001; 32:1024–1033.
3.
ChourmouziD, BouligianniG, KalomenopoulouMet al.Brucella liver abscess; imaging approach, differential diagnosis, and therapeutic management: a case report. Cases Journal, 2009; 2:7143.
4.
CorbelMJ, BanaiM. Genus I. Brucella Meyer and Shaw 1920, 173AL. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2BrennerDJ, KriegNR, StaleyJT, GarrityGM. New York: Springer, 2005; 370–386.
5.
DavionT, DelamarreJ, SallebertSet al.Brucellome hépatique (nécrose caséeuse brucellienne hépatique pseudo-tumorale): étude d'un cas et revue de la littérature. Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 1987; 11:424–428.
6.
LuceroNE, AyalaSM, EscobarGIet al.The value of serologic tests for diagnosis and follow up of patients having brucellosis. Am J Infect Dis, 2007; 3:27–35.
7.
OgrediciO, ErbS, LangerIet al.Brucellosis reactivation after 28 years. EID, 2010; 16:2021–2022.
8.
SisteronO, SouciJ, ChevallierPet al.Hepatic abscess caused by Brucella, US, CT, and MRI findings: case report and review of the literature. Clin Imaging, 2002; 26:414–417.
9.
YagupskyP, BaronJE. Laboratory exposures to Brucellas and implications for bioterrorism. EID, 2005; 11:1180–1185.