The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs and to analyze risk factors associated with infection at Celestun, a coastal locality in southeast Mexico. Blood samples were collected from 279 asymptomatic individuals between August 2007 and March 2008 and analyzed by polymerase chain reaction technique. The association between D. immitis infection and sex, age group, and distance of residence from a wetland of dogs was statistically analyzed. Prevalence of D. immitis infection was of 59.8%. Age of individuals (>2 years) was a risk factor for infection with D. immitis (odds ratio 2.49, confidence interval 1.47–4.23, p = 0.001). In conclusion, Celestun can be considered a focus of D. immitis infection with high levels of transmission among the local dog population, as confirmed by the high prevalence reported and the association of age (dogs >2 years) as a risk associated with infection.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AraújoRT, MarcondesCB, BastosLC, SartorDC. Canine dirofilariasis in the region of Conceição Lagoon, Florianópolis, and in the Military PoliceKennel, São José, State of Santa Catarina. Brazil Vet Parasitol, 2003; 113:239–242.
2.
AvalosRR, FrancoMM, SilvaPM, CantúMMet al. Frecuencia de Dirofilaria immitis en muestras de sangre canina remitidas al laboratorio de patología clínica diagnóstica de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, U.A.N.L. DomínguezAJL, RodriguezVRI. Proceedings of the III Congreso Nacional de Parasitología Veterinaria. Mérida, Yucatán, México: Asociación Mexicana de Parasitólogos Veterinarios A.C., 1993; 40.
3.
BidgoodA, CollinsGH. The prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Sydney. Aust Vet J, 1996; 73:103–104.
4.
Bolio-GonzalezME, Rodriguez-VivasRI, Sauri-ArceoCH, Gutierrez-BlancoEet al.Prevalence of the Dirofilaria immitis infection in dogs from Mérida, Yucatán, México. Vet Parasitol, 2007; 148:166–169.
5.
CancriniG, AllendeE, FaviaG, BornayFet al.Canine Dirofilariosis in two cities of southeastern Spain. Vet Parasitol, 2000; 92:81–86.
6.
CortésBA, GalindoVE, DuránOM, CamposSREet al. Seroprevalencia de Dirofilaria immitis en perros que habitan la zona conurbada de la ciudad de Tecomán, Colima. Mendoza-de-GivesP. Proceedings of the VII Congreso Nacional de Parasitología Veterinaria. Acapulco, Guerrero, México: Asociación Mexicana de Parasitólogos Veterinarios A.C., 2006; 67.
7.
DillonR. Dirofilariasis in dogs, cats. EttingerJE, FeldmanEC. Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 5th edititon1. Saint Louis, MO: W.B. Saunders Company, 2000; 937–963.
8.
EdwardsK, JohnstoneC, ThompsonC. A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res, 1991; 19:1349.
9.
FanCK, SuKE, LinYH, LiaoCWet al.Seroepidemiologic survey of Dirofilaria immitis infection among domestic dogs in Taipei City and mountain aboriginal districts. Vet Parasitol, 2001; 102:113–120.
10.
FaviaG, LanfrancottiA, Della TorreA, CancriniGet al.Polymerase chain reaction: identification of Dirofilaria repens and Dirofilaria immitis. Parasitology, 1996; 113:567–571.
11.
GonzalezS. Frecuencia de microfilaremia en perros del puerto de Celestún, Yucatán, México [DVM Thesis]Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán: Mérida, México, 2008; 1–37.
12.
HiguchiR. Simple and rapid preparation of samples for PCR. ErlichHA. PCR Technology. Stockton Press: New York, NY, 1989; 1–3.
13.
KlotinsKC, WayneS, BonnettBN, PeregrineAS. Canine heartworm testing in Canada: are we being effective?Can Vet J, 2000; 41:929–937.
14.
KnightD.H.Heartworm infection. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract, 1987; 17:1463–1518.
15.
LabartheN, GuerreroJ. Epidemiology of heartworm: what is happening in South America and Mexico?Vet Parasitol, 2005; 133:149–156.
16.
LiuJ, SongKH, LeeSE, LeeJYet al.Serological and molecular survey of Dirofilaria immitis infection in stray cats in Gyunggi province, South Korea. Vet Parasitol, 2005; 130:125–129.
17.
Manrique-SaideP, Bolio-GonzalezME, Sauri-ArceoC, Dzib-FlorezDet al.Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus: a probable vector of Dirofilaria immitis in coastal areas of Yucatan, México. J Med Entomol, 2008; 45:169–171.
18.
MarP, YangI, ChangG, Chang-YoungA. Specific polymerase chain reaction for differential diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis and Dipetalonema reconditum using primers derived from internal transcribed spacer region 2 (ITS2)Vet Parasitol, 2002; 106:243–252.
19.
McCallJW, GenchiC, KramerLH, GuerreroJet al.Heartworm disease in animals and humans. Adv Parasitol, 2008; 66:193–285.
20.
MontoyaJA, MoralesM, FerrerO, MolinaJMet al.The prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain (1994–1996)Vet Parasitol, 1998; 75:221–226.
21.
PlataM. Saneamiento ambiental de la Biósfera de Celestún. Gaceta Ria Celestún, 2007; 1:1–8.
22.
RishniwM, BarrSC, SimpsonKW, FrongilloMFet al.Discrimination between six species of canine microfilariae by a single polymerase chain reaction. Vet Parasitol, 2006; 135:303–314.
23.
RiveroJ. Frecuencia estacional de Dirofilaria immitis en perros de la ciudad de Chetumal, Quintana Roo [DVM thesis]Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia-UNAM: México D.F., 1984; 1–35.
24.
Rodriguez-VivasRI, Domínguez-AlpizarJL, Solis-RodriguezF, Cob-GaleraLA. Prevalencia de Dirofilaria immitis en perros callejeros de la ciudad de Mérida, Yucatán, México. Vet Mex, 1994; 25:145–147.
25.
Rodriguez-VivasRI, Cob-GaleraLA, Domínguez-AlpizarJL. Hemoparásitos en bovinos, caninos y equinos diagnosticados en el laboratorio de Parasitología de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia de la Universidad Autónoma de Yucatan (1984–1999)Rev Biomed, 2000; 11:277–282.
26.
Rodriguez-VivasRI, DomínguezAJL. Grupos etomológicos de importancia veterinaria en Yucatan, Mexico. Rev Bioméd, 1998; 9:26–37.
27.
SelbyLA, CorwinRM, HayesHM. Risk factors associated with canine heartworm infection. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 1980; 176:33–36.
28.
[SEMARNAT] Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Programa de manejo de la Reserva de la Biosfera Ría Celestun. Comisión Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas: México, D.F., 2000; 1–73.
29.
SongKH, LeeSE, HayasakiM, ShiramizuKet al.Seroprevalence of canine dirofilariosis in South Korea. Vet Parasitol, 2003; 114:231–236.
30.
TheisJH. Occult rate of heartworm infected dogs in California appears to be significantly lower than that of infected dogs from Florida and Texas. Canine Pract, 1997; 22:5–7.
31.
TheisJH, StevensF, LawM. Distribution, prevalence, and relative risk of filariasis in dogs from the State of Washington (1997–1999)J Am Anim Hosp Assoc, 2001; 37:339–347.
32.
TheisJH, StevensF, TheodoropoulosG, ZiedinsAC. Studies on the prevalence and distribution of filariasis in dogs from Los Angeles county, California (1996–1998)Canine Pract, 1999; 24:8–16.
