The recent proliferation of trans health literature for the past 20 years has prompted a need to examine two contested approaches used in designing study protocols and analyses in trans health research, as either specific to only one gender group (gender-specific approach) or across gender groups (i.e., gender-inclusive approach). In this critique, we aim to explicate and provide guidance for when the application of each approach is methodologically appropriate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SweilehWM. Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature in transgender health (1900–2017). BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018; 18:16.
2.
PedersonA, GreavesL, PooleN. Gender-transformative health promotion for women: a framework for action. Health Promotion Int. 2014; 30:140–150.
3.
Study TWsHI. Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. Control Clin Trials. 1998; 19:61–109.
4.
RexrodeKM, LeeI-M, CookNR, et al.Baseline characteristics of participants in the Women's Health Study. J Womens Health Gender Based Med. 2000; 9:19–27.
5.
ArmstrongB, CohallAT, VaughanRD, et al.Involving men in reproductive health: the Young Men's Clinic. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89:902–905.
6.
DiNennoE, ShouseL, MartinT, et al.The MSM Testing Initiative (MTI): innovative approaches for HIV testing and linkage to medical care. Atlanta: National HIV Prevention Conference,, 2015; 2015.
7.
KingWM, RestarA, OperarioD. Exploring multiple forms of intimate partner violence in a gender and racially/ethnically diverse sample of transgender adults. J Interpers Violence. 2019; 36:NP10477–NP10498.
8.
BaralSD, PoteatT, StrömdahlS, et al.Worldwide burden of HIV in transgender women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013; 13:214–222.
9.
GrantRM, AndersonPL, McMahanV, et al.Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual practices, and HIV incidence in men and transgender women who have sex with men: a cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014; 14:820–829.
10.
WilsonEC, JinH, LiuA, RaymondHF. Knowledge, indications and willingness to take pre-exposure prophylaxis among transwomen in San Francisco, 2013. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0128971.
11.
HIV Prevention Trials Network. HPTN 083: a phase 2b/3 double blind safety and efficacy study of injectable cabotegravir compared to daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC), for pre-exposure prophylaxis in HIV-uninfected cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men. 2017. Available at https://www.hptn.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/HPTN%20083_Final%20Version%202.0_25July2018.pdf Accessed May21, 2019.
12.
SplanskyGL, CoreyD, YangQ, et al.The third generation cohort of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study: design, recruitment, and initial examination. Am J Epidemiol. 2007; 165:1328–1335.
13.
SyvertsenJL, RobertsonAM, AbramovitzD, et al.Study protocol for the recruitment of female sex workers and their non-commercial partners into couple-based HIV research. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:136.
14.
MasvawureTB, MantellJE, ToccoJU, et al.Intentional and unintentional condom breakage and slippage in the sexual interactions of female and male sex workers and clients in Mombasa, Kenya. AIDS Behav. 2018; 22:637–648.
15.
ValentePK, MantellJE, MasvawureTB, et al.“I Couldn't Afford to Resist”: Condom Negotiations Between Male Sex Workers and Male Clients in Mombasa, Kenya. AIDS Behav. 2020; 24:925–937.
16.
KatsulisY, DurfeeA. Prevalence and correlates of sexual risk among male and female sex workers in Tijuana, Mexico. Global Public Health. 2012; 7:367–383.
17.
NybladeL, ReddyA, MboteD, et al.The relationship between health worker stigma and uptake of HIV counseling and testing and utilization of non-HIV health services: the experience of male and female sex workers in Kenya. AIDS Care. 2017; 29:1364–1372.
18.
RestarAJ, ToccoJU, MantellJE, et al.Perspectives on HIV pre-and post-exposure prophylaxes (PrEP and PEP) among female and male sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya: implications for integrating biomedical prevention into sexual health services. AIDS Educ Prev. 2017; 29:141–153.
19.
OkalJ, ChersichMF, TsuiS, et al.Sexual and physical violence against female sex workers in Kenya: a qualitative enquiry. AIDS Care. 2011; 23:612–618.
20.
TordoffD, AndrasikM, HajatA. Misclassification of sex assigned at birth in the behavioral risk factor surveillance system and transgender reproductive health: a quantitative bias analysis. Epidemiology. 2019; 30:669–678.
21.
PoteatT, GermanD, FlynnC. The conflation of gender and sex: gaps and opportunities in HIV data among transgender women and MSM. Global Public Health. 2016; 11:835–848.
22.
TebbeEA, BudgeSL. Research with trans communities: applying a process-oriented approach to methodological considerations and research recommendations. Counsel Psychol. 2016; 44:996–1024.
23.
TebbeEA, MoradiB, BudgeSL. Enhancing scholarship focused on trans people and issues. Counsel Psychol. 2016; 44:950–959.
24.
BagusoGN, TurnerCM, SantosGM, et al.Successes and final challenges along the HIV care continuum with transwomen in San Francisco. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019; 22:e25270.
