Abstract
Background:
Medical students and pediatric residents are not routinely trained in urgent care telemedicine. Increased demand for virtual care following the COVID-19 pandemic is expected to remain, underscoring the need for health care organizations to develop structured training programs that meet the changing educational requirements of future pediatricians.
Materials and Methods:
The Nemours IRB reviewed this study and designated it a “Not Research” (#1905675). This mixed-methods study assessed knowledge and comfort levels with telemedicine before and after participants completed a virtual telemedicine training rotation. Seven medical students and pediatric residents completed a brief, pre- and post-rotation survey with multiple-choice, true/false, and open-ended questions. Open-ended questions were thematically analyzed.
Results:
Improvement in participant knowledge was most notable for understanding the diagnostic limitations of telemedicine. At pretest, only 28.6% of participants believed they could adequately perform a telemedicine examination; after the program, 100% reported comfort with the modality. The most common theme among the participants was the belief that telemedicine played a role in expanding health care access.
Discussion:
Most participants chose the rotation because of their curiosity about telehealth and came into the training with some general knowledge of its purpose and operation. Exposure to various teaching methods, one-on-one time with attending physicians, and exposure to telemedicine clinical guidelines resulted in positive overall experiences.
Conclusion:
Our virtual telemedicine rotation curriculum uses an iterative process based on participant feedback to provide a learning experience that is increasingly improved to meet the knowledge level of our participants. Through this quality improvement lens, we aim to maximize participant learning and motivate the development of other remote telemedicine training programs.
Introduction
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has become an integral aspect of health care delivery. Although health care systems rapidly deployed providers via this medium during the initial stages of the pandemic, a growing need for training and educational programs was evident. 1 Before the pandemic, medical students and pediatric residents were not trained routinely in telemedicine.2,3 Since then, medical colleges and health care systems have recognized this educational gap and started designing telemedicine programs to develop future physicians.4–7 In 2021, the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) released telehealth core competencies under the following six domains: patient safety, access and equity, communication, data collection, technology, and ethical and legal practices. 8 These domains offer a framework when designing educational telemedicine programs. Many programs use virtual workshops and online modules for telemedicine education.9–12 Our pediatric telehealth teaching program is a clinical model, through which faculty, through a live multiperson platform, provide real-time assessment based on the AAMC telehealth core competencies.
Nemours Children’s Health (NCH) is a pediatric health care system with two hospitals, primary care offices, subspecialty clinics, and urgent care facilities. Centered in the Delaware Valley and Florida, NCH providers care for children across seven states. NCH has operated a pediatric urgent care telemedicine program since 2015, through which its licensed pediatricians provide acute care virtually to patients. In 2021, the NCH residency program in Orlando, Florida, the University of Central Florida (UCF) College of Medicine, and the NCH telemedicine team collaboratively developed an acute care training program aligned with the AAMC core competencies to alleviate the shortfall in medical student and resident education. The program was initiated virtually, with the telehealth technology itself being used as the platform for remotely training young pediatricians in the clinical and technical aspects pertinent to telemedicine care delivery. As a quality improvement initiative, we sought to evaluate and improve the training with each subsequent iteration of resident and student participants who completed the program. We requested feedback from the 19 participants (4 residents and 15 medical students) who completed the first iteration of the training program as we shaped the initial program curriculum. 13 Both residents and medical students benefited from the training, demonstrating that the program was worthwhile and supportive for early career pediatricians. 9 Initial feedback prompted improvements, including allotting academic time to the schedule for independent study, and all preceptors were encouraged to provide real-time feedback after a proctored visit. Participants acknowledged the benefit of the post-visit huddle and expressed a desire to review research regarding current telemedicine topics.
In October 2022, we initiated a revised, 24-item digital version of the pre-and post-rotation survey to administer to present and future participating medical students and pediatric residents. The survey was revised and expanded by the telemedicine physician team to measure the rotation of participants’ changing knowledge and beliefs on the use of telemedicine. Items were revised or developed to align with the revised training content and were inspired by the extant literature on telemedicine and its practical application. For this second iteration, we aimed to obtain participants’ knowledge and experiences with telemedicine that could further refine the training program, thus informing any need for additional emphasis or content revision. The mixed-methods study discussed here represents the learnings obtained from these second-iteration training surveys. To the extent that participants who were knowledgeable about telemedicine and comfortable with its implementation might be more inclined to utilize it in their future practice, we were particularly interested in their incoming knowledge about telemedicine, what they learned from the training, and how comfortable they were with virtual care following the rotation.
Materials and Methods
The virtual telemedicine training program, offered as a 2-week or 4-week elective, includes a detailed clinical and technical orientation, a review of current policy and licensing requirements, and teaching best practices. Orientation begins with a presentation about NCH, an overview of telemedicine, and expectations for the rotation. Training includes a remote one-on-one session with the support staff to ensure secure, efficient connections, device compatibility, equipment readiness, and application of peripheral devices. Participants learn to troubleshoot and seek assistance for patients who experience technical problems. The orientation session concludes with a fully functional and secure test visit.
Following orientation, participants receive a schedule of their virtual clinical shifts. Participants log patient visits and are encouraged to engage in as many telemedicine encounters as possible. The remote training program provides a one-on-one, preceptor-to-participant experience through the virtual platform where the patient, participant, and preceptor are in separate locations. Hands-on training offerings differ between medical students and residents based on their education level. Medical students and residents participate in observed and proctored visit types. In an observed visit, the participant observes the interaction between the preceptor and the family. In the proctored visit, the participant leads the encounter and the preceptor proctors. In a third visit type, only for residents, the participant evaluates the patient independently and invites the preceptor to discuss the wrap-up at the end of the encounter. Medical students do not evaluate patients independently. Residents and medical students receive real-time education and feedback from faculty through a pre- and post-visit huddle using a separate virtual chat. If the patient’s encounter is determined not to be suited for telemedicine, the patient is directed to schedule an in-person examination.
To begin an observed telehealth visit, the preceptor sends a secure email invitation to the participant to join the platform. This invitation includes the patient’s medical record number, enabling the participant to review the patient’s medical history, including primary care visits, subspecialty visits, hospitalizations, and emergency room visits. Participants check their audiovisual equipment to ensure their surroundings are private before connecting with the parent/guardian. Once the participant accepts the preceptor’s invitation, the visit becomes a three-way encounter with the participant, patient, and preceptor on one screen. The preceptor addresses ethical and legal requirements, confirming patient identification, guardianship, and the location at the beginning of every encounter. The preceptor also requests parent/guardian permission regarding comfort with a teaching environment. Once confirmed, the visit proceeds in which the preceptor leads and the participant observes the interaction. At the completion of the visit, the preceptor and participant use a virtual chat for a post-visit huddle; the preceptor shares the computer screen with the participant to demonstrate appropriate telehealth documentation.
Once the participant is comfortable observing a visit, the preceptor recommends a proctored visit. Proctors assess “web-side” manner, history-taking skills, physical examination techniques, professionalism, and communication skills. In a proctored visit, the preceptor transfers the patient to the participant’s waiting room. The participant then sends a secure email invitation to the preceptor to join. Once the preceptor, participant, and family are on the screen, the participant leads the visit. Participants receive intra-visit support and real-time guidance through the virtual chat feature so that the encounter flow is not interrupted, and the visit appears seamless to the family. If working with a medical student, the preceptor writes the note and sends the prescription; otherwise, the resident writes the note, and the preceptor cosigns. Independent visits performed only by residents are similar to proctored visits; however, the resident invites the preceptor to join at the end to review the history, physical, assessment, and plan.
The elective rotation also provides dedicated time toward academics and independent study. During this time, participants practice writing progress notes, review our “interesting clinical cases” file, and select a journal article relevant to telemedicine. The participant presents their article, guideline, and case presentation to the telemedicine team during the final week of the rotation.
A year after the first participant training, we began administering the digital pre- and post-rotation survey. Study data were collected and managed using the Research Electronic Data Capture tools hosted at NCH.14,15 The confidential survey included multiple-choice, true/false, and open-ended questions (see Table 1). Responses to survey items were categorized in the following three ways for purposes of presentation: knowledge demonstration (predominantly multiple-choice, true/false responses), informational/experiential (i.e., no correct or incorrect responses), and open-ended opinion (qualitative) responses. Informational/experiential responses given as “Other” were probed for further detail. Open-ended responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis, through which the authors separately identified and categorized themes in the qualitative responses, followed by collective discussion and coding of common themes across responses to address any discrepancies. 16 Following group discussion, the authors unanimously agreed on the themes as presented.
Survey Items Administered to Pediatric Residents and Medical Student Participants Before and After the Virtual Training Rotation
1HIPAA is the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Results
To date, three residents and four medical students participated in the training and completed the current survey before (pretest) and after (posttest) the telemedicine rotation.
Knowledge demonstration
Eleven questions were drawn from the research literature on telemedicine to develop the Knowledge Demonstration items. In completing the Knowledge Demonstration items, participants were asked to select all the correct answers that applied to a question. Table 2 presents pretest and posttest frequencies and percentages for responses to the multiple-choice, Knowledge Demonstration survey items.
Pretest and Posttest Frequencies and Percentages for the Ten Knowledge Demonstration Multiple-Choice Survey Items
Correct answers are indicated with an asterisk.
HIPAA, health insurance portability and accountability act.
At pretest, all participants demonstrated basic knowledge of telemedicine at the start of the rotation, correctly responding to questions about the requirement for broadband/reliable internet connection, time efficiencies, necessary documentation, patient satisfaction, and federal telemedicine regulations. Following the rotation, pretest to posttest improvement was especially notable in participants’ understanding of the role of telemedicine in patient education (29–86% correct) and its diagnostic limitations (81–95% correct). On the open-ended Knowledge Demonstration item “How would you define the term ‘telemedicine?’” all participants correctly identified telemedicine as a remote modality for providing health care at pretest. Table 3 presents participant pretest and posttest verbatim responses to this open-ended Knowledge Demonstration item.
Categorized Pretest and Posttest Responses to Open-Ended Knowledge Demonstration and Informational/Experiential Questions
Informational/experiential survey items
At pretest, one participant (14.3%) reported having had prior telemedicine training; following the rotation, all participants reported having formal telemedicine training. Reasons provided at pretest for choosing the telemedicine rotation included having an interest in telemedicine/telehealth (71.4%), an interest in pediatrics (71.4%), convenience for schedule (71.4%), or other (limited infectious exposure risk, 14.3%). Regarding participants’ prior experience with telemedicine at pretest, four participants (57.1%) indicated that they had observed and conducted a telemedicine patient encounter. More participants experienced a telemedicine encounter as a patient following the rotation (71.4%) than they had before its start (42.9%).
Participants reported improvement in their comfort level of seeing a patient via telemedicine following the rotation experience. Before the rotation, five participants reported being “comfortable” or “very comfortable” seeing a patient virtually. Following the rotation, all seven participants reported being “comfortable” (14.3%), “very comfortable” (42.9%), or “extremely comfortable” (42.9%) conducting a telemedicine visit.
Based on participants’ comments on the open-ended Informational/Experiential item “Do you believe you can adequately do an exam via telemedicine? Why or why not?” at pretest, 28.6% of participants believed they could adequately perform an examination via telemedicine, 14.3% did not, and 57.1% were unsure. At posttest, all participants (100%) reported feeling comfortable conducting an examination via telemedicine. Table 3 presents participant pretest and posttest verbatim responses to this open-ended Informational/Experiential item.
Content analysis themes
There were four open-ended questions on the pretest and seven on the posttest that were subject to content analysis. Table 4 presents verbatim responses and thematic results of the content analysis.
Content Analysis Pretest and Posttest Themes and Responses to Open-Ended Questions
Please see Table 1 for a complete list of survey questions.
On pretest, when asked what role telemedicine plays in health care, the most common theme among answers was access to care (n = 3), followed by triage/redirection (n = 2), patient safety (n = 1), and innovation (n = 1). On the posttest, response themes included access to care (n = 5) and triage (n = 2).
When asked on the pretest what the participants expected to learn from the rotation, the themes included how to conduct a telemedicine visit (n = 4) and how to triage using telemedicine (n = 3). By posttest, responses to what they had learned centered on how to conduct a telemedicine visit (n = 4) and appropriate use of telemedicine (n = 3).
Pretest responses regarding the benefit of this rotation on their medical training generated two themes, including future telemedicine utilization (n = 3) and satisfying curiosity on telemedicine methodology (n = 3). Three themes identified from posttest responses included future telemedicine utilization (n = 2), familiarity with telemedicine will be useful (n = 2), and knowledge of telemedicine will make [me] a better physician (n = 3).
The final question asked what one thing the participant would like to learn more or had learned from the rotation that could be implemented in practicing pediatric medicine. At pretest, response themes included the appropriate use of telemedicine (n = 2), characteristics of a telemedicine visit (n = 2), equipment and peripheral devices (n = 1), and general clinical knowledge (n = 2). By posttest, the response themes included clinical elements/complaints that can be examined virtually (n = 4), procedural elements of virtual care (n = 2), and importance of telemedicine (n = 1).
To gain participants’ recommendations regarding future training, three additional posttest questions asked what was most helpful and least helpful in developing an understanding of pediatric telemedicine and what participants had hoped to learn about telemedicine but were not taught in the training. Participants found one-on-one time with multiple attending physicians (n = 4), platform experience (n = 2), and learning telemedicine-specific standards and guidelines (n = 1) to be most helpful in developing their understanding of pediatric telemedicine. The least helpful aspects of the training, according to responses, were shadowing visits (n = 1) and working the night shift (n = 1); remaining participants indicated all of it was impactful (n = 5). Whereas three participants noted all their goals were met, responses from the remaining four participants were varied with three themes noted. Two participants hoped to learn more about the use of peripheral devices during the training, one hoped to learn more about conducting the interview, and one would have liked to see alternative forms of telemedicine such as “a provider-to-provider telehealth experience (e.g., consults/referrals).”
Discussion
We developed a virtual telemedicine training rotation for residents and medical students as a quality improvement initiative, aiming to build capacity among early career physicians who may choose to implement telemedicine in their future pediatric practice. We found participants came into the rotation possessing knowledge about telemedicine requirements, with survey respondents offering correct responses at pretest to questions about barriers and benefits of telemedicine utilization, necessary documentation, patient satisfaction, and knowledge about federal regulations impacting telemedicine. At pretest, all participants were aware that the COVID-19 pandemic increased patient volumes, and following the rotation, participants had learned that the pandemic improved patient education on telemedicine. The posttest improvement was most notable for understanding the diagnostic limitations of telemedicine.
Regarding practical experience and exposure to telemedicine at pretest, only one participant responded as having prior telemedicine experience. After the program, all participants responded as having formal training. At pretest, only 28.6% of participants believed they could adequately perform a telemedicine examination. Afterward, 100% had gained comfort with the modality. The gained experience and improved comfort level were important as most participants chose the rotation because of their interest and curiosity about telehealth.
Regarding effective program components, students noted that the telemedicine standards and clinical guidelines were most beneficial. Clinical guidelines were then integrated into daily teaching practices to support their use. Participants were asked to review the guidelines corresponding to the patient on the platform. For example, if a patient presented with eye redness and eye discharge, the student performed the virtual history and physical and then was asked to review the conjunctivitis guideline to best understand the assessment and plan. Blending the practical experience with the academic follow-up during the real-time post-visit huddle provided a positive overall experience for the participant.
Participants also noted that the program’s one-on-one preceptor-to-student ratio was effective. The participants felt that working with multiple attending physicians during their elective was beneficial as it exposed them to a wide variety of teaching styles. Therefore, 2 h block times for teaching per attending were implemented. This allowed participants to work alongside four different preceptors during an 8 h shift. Exposure to various teaching methods, real-time review of the clinical telemedicine guidelines, and one-on-one time with several attendings resulted in a positive overall participant experience.
Finally, in evaluating the survey responses, it was evident that some participants interpreted questions differently. For example, in seeking participants’ opinions on whether they believed they could conduct an examination via telemedicine, we received open-ended responses consistent with the information we were seeking (“I think I can do a limited exam via telemedicine”) as well as responses that were inconsistent (“You are able to see general things such as appearance, activity level, etc., but you are unable to auscultate or palpate”). Future iterations of survey questions will be reworded to better target the intended information.
The strengths of our study include a 100% response rate to the digital survey. Given that it is a confidential survey, there is a reduced risk of bias. Feedback was requested shortly after the rotation, diminishing recall bias when answering the posttest survey questions. Study limitations include the small sample size and the assessment of data from a single medical school and pediatric resident training program. Future directions for this project include making program adaptations based on participant feedback, refining the survey questions, and engaging more residents and students to participate in the rotation.
Conclusion
The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged educational institutions to expedite the incorporation of telemedicine into medical school clinical clerkships and residency training programs. Designed within the AAMC telehealth competency guideline framework, 8 our virtual telemedicine rotation was inspired to help address the shortfall in available pediatricians prepared to administer health care virtually. Importantly, opportunities for residents and medical students to participate in a telemedicine training rotation may foster comfort with telemedicine and increase the likelihood that they will utilize the virtual modality in their future practice. Whereas other pediatric teaching programs use online modules and virtual workshops, our telehealth teaching program is based on live, real-time clinical encounters.17–20 Our urgent care pediatric platform is multiperson, where participants, preceptors, and patients meet from different locations in a single virtual room. At every clinical encounter, students can access and review the patient’s electronic medical record and request assistance from translators if needed. The pre-and post-visit huddle and one-on-one preceptor-to-participant teaching model enable individualized and tailored instruction based on the AAMC telehealth competencies. Our program uses participant survey feedback for continuous improvement and ongoing refinement. Telemedicine rotation curricula should be revised regularly based on participant feedback to ensure that the content appropriately challenges participants. Using a quality improvement lens to facilitate the ongoing refinement of our program, we hope to benefit the next generation of pediatricians by exposing and training them in this virtual model of care, refining and improving our teaching methods, and offering a foundation for other telemedicine training programs.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the contributions of telemedicine providers Chellise Cato, MD; Rene Chalom, MD; Mattilie Gednas, ARNP; Wayne Ho, MD; Robert Karch, MD; Lisa Kernen, MD; Sarah Romero, MD; and Rachel Schare, MD. We thank Sarah Hendy and the Nemours Children’s Health System technology team for their onboarding support of the students and residents. We thank all the students and residents who completed the telemedicine rotation. We also thank the University of Central Florida, College of Medicine, and the Nemours Children’s Hospital, Florida Pediatric Residency Program for their partnership.
Authors’ Contributions
J.M.-B.: Conceptualization (lead), investigation (support), and writing—reviewing and editing (support). C.M.Z.-G.: Conceptualization (support), data curation (lead), formal analysis (lead), writing—original draft (lead), and writing—reviewing and editing (equal). A.A.-P.: Conceptualization (support) and investigation (support). P.S.-J.: Conceptualization (support); software (lead); investigation (support); and writing—reviewing and editing (equal).
Author Disclosure Statement
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Funding Information
No funding was received for this article.
