Abstract
Background:
State professional licensure has been cited as a significant barrier to widespread telehealth adoption, and states have developed strategies to reduce such licensure burdens through policy changes. We aimed to measure the association between state-level medical licensure policies and outpatient telehealth utilization between 2018 and 2022 among Medicare beneficiaries.
Methods:
We conducted a quasi-experimental study of a 5% sample of age-qualifying Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries between January 2018 and December 2022. We assessed state-level medical licensure policy for telehealth visits, captured as participation in Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (IMLC) before the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) and/or policy relaxation during the COVID-19 PHE. Outcomes included out-of-state telehealth (OOS-TH) and in-state telehealth (IS-TH). We evaluated the association between state-level policies and outcomes through logistic regression, adjusting for patient-level characteristics and month/year of the encounter.
Results:
We analyzed 141,199,029 outpatient encounters for 1,682,501 Medicare beneficiaries. In the pre-COVID-19 era, IMLC participation was associated with higher OOS-TH (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.09–2.40) but not IS-TH (aOR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96–1.01). In the COVID-19 era, we observed higher IS-TH in IMLC-only states (aOR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.08–1.10) and states with COVID-19 policy relaxations (aOR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.10–1.12). We observed lower OOS-TH utilization by IMLC participation (aOR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.72–0.75) and COVID-19 policy relaxations (aOR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.81–0.85).
Conclusions:
Permissive licensure policies were higher telehealth utilization, though we observed mixed effects in telehealth type (IS-TH vs. OOS-TH) and by time (pre-COVID-19 vs. COVID-19). Variability in IS-TH and OOS-TH utilization may indicate that while local policies can improve telehealth access, interstate barriers still exist.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
