The use of virtual care (VC) among individuals with chronic disease is well-documented, yet evidence on quality of care outcomes, such as frequency of subsequent hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and mortality, is fragmented. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence of quality of care outcomes, namely subsequent outpatient encounters, hospital admissions, ED visits, and mortality, associated with VC among outpatients with chronic diseases.
Methods
: A search strategy was developed and applied to six electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL) for articles published between January 1, 2013 and July 6, 2024. Eligible studies included synchronous VC (e.g., live, video, or audio based) between a patient and health care provider. A narrative synthesis compared VC with in-person care, considering types of outpatient care, specialty, VC components, follow-up duration, and outcomes.
Results
: After reviewing 5,679 abstracts, 24 articles were included. Studies were predominantly from the United States (n = 11), followed by Australia (n = 3) and Canada (n = 2). The follow-up durations ranged from 2 weeks to 2 years, with 14 studies having follow-up durations of 6 months or less. Studies predominantly reported no difference or lower rates of hospital admissions (n = 18/20), ED visits (n = 11/12), and mortality (n = 12/14) among outpatients who used VC compared with those who had in-person visits. Half of the studies (n = 3/6) reported more subsequent outpatient encounters for patients using VC for the initial outpatient encounter compared with those who had in-person visits.
Conclusion
: The review indicated that outpatient VC is associated with fewer or no different volume of hospital admissions or ED visits among people with chronic conditions but may be associated with an increased number of outpatient follow-up visits. Robust research at scale that considers the volume of VC consumed and associations with outcomes over longer follow-up periods is required.
ZelmerJ, SheikhA, ZimlichmanE, et al.Transforming care and outcomes with digital health through and beyond the pandemic. Catalyst Non-Issue Content, 2022; 3(3); doi: 10.1056/CAT.22.0053
3.
SinhaA. An overview of telemedicine: The virtual gaze of health care in the next century. Med Anthropol Q, 2000; 14(3):291–309; doi: 10.1525/maq.2000.14.3.291
4.
YoungA, Orchanian-CheffA, ChanCT, et al.Video-Based telemedicine for kidney disease care: A scoping review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol , 2021; 16(12):1813–1823.
5.
CalderonVJ, KasturiarachiBM, LinE, et al.Review of the mobile stroke unit experience worldwide. Interv Neurol, 2018; 7(6):347–358; doi: 10.1159/000487334
6.
VilendrerS, LestoquoyA, ArtandiM, et al.A 360 degree mixed-methods evaluation of a specialized COVID-19 outpatient clinic and remote patient monitoring program. BMC Prim Care, 2022; 23(1):151; doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01734-7
7.
PedoneC, ChiurcoD, ScarlataS, et al.Efficacy of multiparametric telemonitoring on respiratory outcomes in elderly people with COPD: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res, 2013; 13:82; doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-82
8.
NSW Minister for Health. Virtual Care Clinics Highly Rated by Majority of Patients. NSW Minister for Health: Sydney, Australia; 2023.
9.
OmboniS, CampoloL, PanzeriE. Telehealth in chronic disease management and the role of the Internet-of-Medical-Things: The Tholomeus® experience. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2020; 17(7):659–670; doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1782734
10.
OrlandoJF, BeardM, KumarS. Systematic review of patient and caregivers’ satisfaction with telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patients’ health. PLoS One, 2019; 14(8):e0221848; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221848
11.
KruseCS, KrowskiN, RodriguezB, et al.Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open, 2017; 7(8):e016242; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016242
12.
LiE, TsopraR, GimenezGL, et al.Benefits and challenges of using virtual primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: From key lessons to a framework for implementation. medRxiv, 2021; 2021(07.28.21261021); doi: 10.1101/2021.07.28.21261021
13.
WosikJ, ClowseMEB, OvertonR, et al.Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patterns of outpatient cardiovascular care. Am Heart J, 2021; 231:1–5; doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.074
14.
AbbittD, ChoyK, CastleR, et al.Telehealth follow-up after inguinal hernia repair in veterans. J Surg Res, 2023; 287:186–192; doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.02.030
15.
AdamsK, WahabL, RhodehouseBC, et al.Management and outcomes of chest pain telemedicine visits in a cardiology clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent), 2023; 36(3):304–307; doi: 10.1080/08998280.2023.2187205
16.
DeswalA, PetersenNJ, UrbauerDL, et al.Racial variations in quality of care and outcomes in an ambulatory heart failure cohort. Am Heart J, 2006; 152(2):348–354; doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.12.004
17.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Patient-Centred Care: Improving Quality and Safety through Partnerships with Patients and Consumers. ACSQHC: Sydney; 2011.
18.
McAlisterF, HsuZ, DongY, et al.Changes in outpatient care patterns and subsequent outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cohort analysis from a single payer healthcare system. medRxiv, 2022.
19.
SammourY, SpertusJA, AustinBA, et al.Outpatient management of heart failure during the COVID-19 pandemic after adoption of a telehealth model. JACC Heart Fail, 2021; 9(12):916–924; doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.07.003
20.
LeeDD, AryaLA, AndyUU, et al.Video virtual clinical encounters versus office visits for postoperative care after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A randomized clinical trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 2021; 27(7):432–438; doi: 10.1097/spv.0000000000000909
21.
YangC, KesslerM, TaebiN, et al.Remote Follow-up with a mobile application is equal to traditional outpatient follow-up after bariatric surgery: The BELLA pilot trial. Obes Surg, 2023; 33(6):1702–1709; doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06587-2
22.
StamenovaV, ChuC, BorgundvaagE, et al.Virtual care use prior to emergency department admissions during a stable COVID-19 period in Ontario, Canada. PLoS One, 2023; 18(4):e0277065; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277065
23.
PangL, LiuH, LiuZ, et al.Role of telemedicine in inflammatory bowel disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res, 2022; 24(3):e28978; doi: 10.2196/28978
24.
DhamP, ColmanS, SapersonK, et al.Collaborative care for psychiatric disorders in older adults: A systematic review. Can J Psychiatry, 2017; 62(11):761–771; doi: 10.1177/0706743717720869
25.
OliveiraCRA, PiresMC, MeiraKC, et al.Effect of a structured multilevel telehealth service on hospital admissions and mortality during COVID-19 in a resource-limited region in Brazil: Retrospective cohort study. J Med Internet Res, 2024; 26:e48464; doi: 10.2196/48464
26.
MoherD, LiberatiA, TetzlaffJ, et al.; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 2009; 6(7):e1000097; doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
27.
HoK, Cj, HogganB. Telemedicine: Opportunities and Developments in Member States. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland; 2010.
28.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHI). Admitted Patients. AIHI: 2024.
29.
World Health Organization. Noncommunicable Diseases. WHO: 2023.
PageMJ, McKenzieJE, BossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021; 372:n71; doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
34.
ParnellK, KuhlenschmidtK, MadniD, et al.Using telemedicine on an acute care surgery service: Improving clinic efficiency and access to care. Surg Endosc, 2021; 35(10):5760–5765; doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08055-9
35.
DuryeaEL, AdhikariEH, AmbiaA, et al.Comparison between in-person and audio-only virtual prenatal visits and perinatal outcomes. JAMA Netw Open, 2021; 4(4):e215854; doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5854
36.
GilmerG, JacksonN, KoscumbS, et al.A retrospective analysis of clinical utilization between patients who used telemedicine and office visits in outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2023; 102(1):34–42; doi: 10.1097/phm.0000000000002012
37.
HatefE, LansD, BandeianS, et al.Outcomes of In-Person and telehealth ambulatory encounters during COVID-19 within a large commercially insured cohort. JAMA Netw Open, 2022; 5(4):e228954; doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8954
38.
KubesJN, GraetzI, WileyZ, et al.Associations of telemedicine vs. in-person ambulatory visits and cancellation rates and 30-day follow-up hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Prev Med Rep, 2021; 24:101629; doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101629
39.
NguyenHQ, BaeckerA, HoT, et al.Association between post-hospital clinic and telephone follow-up provider visits with 30-day readmission risk in an integrated health system. BMC Health Serv Res, 2021; 21(1):826; doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06848-9
40.
RadtkeS, UmehR, ChavezM, et al.Utilizing telemedicine for delivery of postoperative care following minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 2021; 10(3):148–153; doi: 10.4103/gmit.Gmit_66_20
41.
SarpongNO, KuylEV, OngC, et al.Reduction in hospital length of stay and increased utilization of telemedicine during the “return-to-normal” period of the COVID-19 pandemic does not adversely influence early clinical outcomes in patients undergoing total hip replacement: A case-control study. Acta Orthop, 2022; 93:528–533; doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2268
42.
ShahM, DouglasJ, CareyR, et al.Reducing ER Visits and readmissions after head and neck surgery through a phone-based quality improvement program. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2021; 130(1):24–31; doi: 10.1177/0003489420937044
43.
SungYS, ZhangD, EswaranH, et al.Evaluation of a telemedicine program managing high-risk pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes in Arkansas’s Medicaid program. Semin Perinatol, 2021; 45(5):151421; doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151421
44.
ThompsonJC, CichowskiSB, RogersRG, et al.Outpatient visits versus telephone interviews for postoperative care: A randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J, 2019; 30(10):1639–1646; doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03895-z
45.
UppalA, KothariAN, ScallyCP, et al.; D3CODE Team. Adoption of telemedicine for postoperative follow-up after inpatient cancer-related surgery. JCO Oncol Pract, 2022; 18(7):e1091–e1099; doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00819
46.
WangB, HuskampHA, RoseS, et al.Association between telemedicine use in nonmetropolitan counties and quality of care received by medicare beneficiaries with serious mental illness. JAMA Netw Open, 2022; 5(6):e2218730; doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18730
47.
WaseemN, BoulangerM, YanekLR, et al.Disparities in telemedicine success and their association with adverse outcomes in patients with thoracic cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open, 2022; 5(7):e2220543; doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20543
48.
TakahashiPY, ThorsteinsdottirB, McCoyRG, et al.Impact of program changes including telemedicine and telephonic care during the COVID-19 pandemic in preventing 30-Day hospital readmission for patients in a care transitions program. J Prim Care Community Health, 2024; 15:21501319241226547; doi: 10.1177/21501319241226547
49.
WongVW, WangA, ManoharanM. Utilisation of telehealth for outpatient diabetes management during COVID-19 pandemic: How did the patients fare? Intern Med J, 2021; 51(12):2021–2026; doi: 10.1111/imj.15441
50.
LambooyS, KrishnasamyR, PollockA, et al.Telemedicine for outpatient care of kidney transplant and CKD patients. Kidney Int Rep, 2021; 6(5):1265–1272; doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.02.016
51.
VenuthurupalliSK, RolfeA, FanningJ, et al.; NHMRC CKD.CRE and the CKD.QLD Collaborative. Chronic kidney disease, Queensland (CKD.QLD) registry: Management of CKD with telenephrology. Kidney Int Rep, 2018; 3(6):1336–1343; doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.07.013
52.
McAlisterFA, HsuZ, DongY, et al.Frequency and type of outpatient visits for patients with cardiovascular ambulatory‐care sensitive conditions during the COVID‐19 pandemic and subsequent outcomes: A retrospective cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc, 2023; 12(3):e027922; doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027922
53.
WangZ, YanW, LuY, et al.Effect of combining conventional and telehealth methods on managing peritoneal dialysis patients: A retrospective single-center study. Int J Clin Pract, 2022; 2022:6524717; doi: 10.1155/2022/6524717
54.
RasmussenBS, FroekjaerJ, BjerregaardMR, et al.A randomized controlled trial comparing telemedical and standard outpatient monitoring of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care, 2015; 38(9):1723–1729; doi: 10.2337/dc15-0332
55.
Smith-StrømH, IglandJ, ØstbyeT, et al.The effect of telemedicine follow-up care on diabetes-related foot ulcers: A cluster-randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Diabetes Care, 2018; 41(1):96–103; doi: 10.2337/dc17-1025
56.
HakanenO, TorkkiP, LuukkainenV, et al.A prospective cohort study: The effects of preoperative E-health on the postoperative course of tonsillectomy patients. Am J Otolaryngol, 2024; 45(4):104304; doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104304
57.
KrzesińskiP, JankowskaEA, SiebertJ, et al.Effects of an outpatient intervention comprising nurse-led non-invasive assessments, telemedicine support and remote cardiologists’ decisions in patients with heart failure (AMULET study): A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Heart Fail, 2022; 24(3):565–577; doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2358
58.
Sánchez-GuarnidoAJ, UrquizaBM, SánchezM, et al.Teletherapy and hospitalizations in patients with serious mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective multicenter study. PLoS One, 2022; 17(4):e0267209; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267209
59.
KishimotoT, KinoshitaS, KitazawaM, et al.; J‐PROTECT collaborators. Live two-way video versus face-to-face treatment for depression, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A 24-week randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2024; 78(4):220–228; doi: 10.1111/pcn.13618
60.
BangeEM, LiY, KumarP, et al.The association between telemedicine, advance care planning, and unplanned hospitalizations among high-risk patients with cancer. Cancer, 2024; 130(4):636–644; doi: 10.1002/cncr.35116
61.
PuthumanaRM, GrosgogeatCA, DavisJK, et al.Telemedicine and resource utilization in pulmonary clinic. BMC Pulm Med, 2024; 24(1):267; doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03066-x
62.
Rey-AldanaD, Mazón-RamosP, Portela-RomeroM, et al.Longer-Term results of a universal electronic consultation program at the cardiology department of a galician healthcare area. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 2022; 15(1):e008130; doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008130
63.
DhallaIA, O’BrienT, MorraD, et al.Effect of a postdischarge virtual ward on readmission or death for high-risk patients: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2014; 312(13):1305–1312; doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.11492
64.
KingJ, PooSX, El-SayedA, et al.; GLINT Research Network. Towards NHS Zero: Greener gastroenterology and the impact of virtual clinics on carbon emissions and patient outcomes. A multisite, observational, cross-sectional study. Frontline Gastroenterol, 2023; 14(4):287–294; doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102215
65.
SabırlıR, KarsliE, CanacikO, et al.Use of whatsapp for polyclinic consultation of suspected patients with COVID-19: Retrospective case control study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2020; 8(12):e22874; doi: 10.2196/22874
66.
SidhuA, ChaparroC, ChowCW, et al.Outcomes of telehealth care for lung transplant recipients. Clin Transplant, 2019; 33(6):e13580; doi: 10.1111/ctr.13580
67.
DiamantidisCJ, CookDJ, DunningS, et al.Missing care: The initial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CKD care delivery. J Gen Intern Med, 2022; 37(16):4241–4247; doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07805-w
68.
WilcockAD, HuskampHA, BuschAB, et al.Use of telemedicine and quality of care among medicare enrollees with serious mental illness. JAMA Health Forum, 2023; 4(10):e233648-e233648; doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3648
69.
AbernethyA, AdamsL, BarrettM, et al.The promise of digital health: Then, now, and the future. NAM Perspect, 2022; 2022; doi: 10.3147/8/202206e
70.
SnoswellCL, HaydonHM, KellyJT, et al.How do consumers prefer their care delivered: In-person, telephone or videoconference? J Telemed Telecare, 2024; 30(10):1555–1562; doi: 10.1177/1357633X231160333
71.
HaimiM, GorenU, GrossmanZ. Barriers and challenges to telemedicine usage among the elderly population in Israel in light of the COVID-19 era: A qualitative study. Digit Health, 2024; 10:20552076241240235; doi: 10.1177/20552076241240235
72.
RothwellE, EllingtonL, PlanalpS, et al.Exploring challenges to telehealth communication by specialists in poison information. Qual Health Res, 2012; 22(1):67–75; doi: 10.1177/1049732311420446
73.
FergusonJM, JacobsJ, YefimovaM, et al.Virtual care expansion in the veterans health administration during The COVID-19 pandemic: Clinical services and patient characteristics associated with utilization. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2021; 28(3):453–462; doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa284
74.
PatelSY, MehrotraA, HuskampHA, et al.Variation in telemedicine use and outpatient care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood), 2021; 40(2):349–358; doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01786
75.
ReschenME, BowenJ, NovakA, et al.Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department attendances and acute medical admissions. BMC Emerg Med, 2021; 21(1):143; doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00529-w
76.
Rennert-MayE, LealJ, ThanhNX, et al.The impact of COVID-19 on hospital admissions and emergency department visits: A population-based study. PLoS One, 2021; 16(6):e0252441; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252441
77.
MelnickG, O’LearyJF, ZanielloBA, et al.COVID-19 driven decline in emergency visits: Has it continued, is it permanent, and what does it mean for emergency physicians? Am J Emerg Med, 2022; 61:64–67; doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.08.031
78.
SchusterNA, HoogendijkEO, KokAAL, et al.Ignoring competing events in the analysis of survival data may lead to biased results: A nonmathematical illustration of competing risk analysis. J Clin Epidemiol, 2020; 122:42–48; doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.004
79.
BunnF, GoodmanC, RussellB, et al.Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: A realist synthesis. BMC Geriatr, 2018; 18(1):165; doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0853-9
80.
EzeamiiVC, OkobiOE, Wambai-SaniH, et al.Revolutionizing healthcare: How telemedicine is improving patient outcomes and expanding access to care. Cureus, 2024; 16(7):e63881; doi: 10.7759/cureus.63881
81.
HarrisonR, MitchellR, WalsanR, et al.Unlocking the promise of virtual care in hospitals: The Smarter Hospitals Project Protocol. BMC Health Serv Res, 2024 In Review.
82.
HarrisonR, MitchellR, WalsanR, et al.Unlocking the promise of virtual care in hospitals: The Smarter Hospitals Project Protocol. 2024.
83.
ShahVV, VillafloresCW, ChuongLH, et al.Association between in-person vs telehealth follow-up and rates of repeated hospital visits among patients seen in the emergency department. JAMA Netw Open, 2022; 5(10):e2237783; doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37783
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
