Atrial fibrillation (AF) burden is strongly associated with an increased risk of stroke, which, in most cases, can be prevented through earlier detection of AF and the timely initiation of anticoagulation therapy. Smartphone devices can provide a simple, non-invasive, cost-effective early AF detection solution.
Methods:
PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for studies comparing smartphone-based photoplethysmography (PPG) with standard electrocardiogram for AF detection. A bivariate random-effects model with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was applied to generate the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve.
Results:
Fourteen studies were included, comprising 5,090 patients with an AF prevalence of 31.6%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93–0.97) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95–0.98). The area under the SROC curve was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94–0.99). The diagnostic odds ratio was 960 (95% CI, 439–2,104), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 51%). The projected positive and negative predictive values were 66.5% and 99.7%, respectively, in the elderly population aged >65 years and 39.2% and 99.9% in the general population.
Conclusion:
Smartphone-based PPG demonstrated relatively high sensitivity and specificity and appears capable of ruling out AF. Patients aged >65 are more likely to benefit from AF screening.
KornejJ, BörschelCS, BenjaminEJ, et al.Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in the 21st century. Circ Res, 2020; 127(1):4–20; doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316340
AshburnerJM, LeePR, RivetCM, et al.The implementation and acceptability of a mobile application for screening for atrial fibrillation at home. Telemed J E Health, 2021; 27(11):1305–1310; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0427
5.
SijerčićA, TahirovićE. Photoplethysmography-based smart devices for detection of atrial fibrillation. Tex Heart Inst J, 2022; 49(5); doi: 10.14503/THIJ-21-7564
6.
MutkeMR, BrasierN, RaichleC, et al.Comparison and combination of single-lead ECG and photoplethysmography algorithms for wearable-based atrial fibrillation screening. Telemed J E Health, 2021; 27(3):296–302; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0036
7.
KnightS, LipothJ, NamvariM, et al.The accuracy of wearable photoplethysmography sensors for telehealth monitoring: A scoping review. Telemed J E Health, 2023; 29(6):813–828; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0182
8.
AvramR, RamsisM, CristalAD, et al.Validation of an algorithm for continuous monitoring of atrial fibrillation using a consumer smartwatch. Heart Rhythm, 2021; 18(9):1482–1490; doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.044
9.
HillNR, GrovesL, DickersonC, et al.Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: A multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England. Eur Heart J Digit Health, 2022; 3(2):195–204; doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac009
10.
Van GelderIC, RienstraM, BuntingKV, et al.;ESC Scientific Document Group. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J, 2024; 45(36):3314–3414; doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae176
11.
OrchardJ, NeubeckL, FreedmanB, et al.eHealth tools to provide structured assistance for atrial fibrillation screening, management, and guideline‐recommended therapy in metropolitan general practice: The AF‐SMART study. J Am Heart Assoc, 2019; 8(1):e010959; doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010959
12.
LinzD, GawalkoM, BetzK, et al.Atrial fibrillation: Epidemiology, screening and digital health. Lancet Reg Health Eur, 2024; 37:100786; doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100786
13.
McInnesMDF, MoherD, ThombsBD, et al.;and the PRISMA-DTA Group. Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. JAMA, 2018; 319(4):388–396; doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163
14.
WhitingPF, RutjesAWS, WestwoodME, et al.;QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med, 2011; 155(8):529–536; doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
15.
GruwezH, EvensS, ProesmansT, et al.Accuracy of physicians interpreting photoplethysmography and electrocardiography tracings to detect atrial fibrillation: Interpret-AF. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2021; 8:734737; doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.734737
16.
CoudercJ-P, PageA, LutzM, et al.Assessment of facial video-based detection of atrial fibrillation across human complexion. Cardiovasc Digit Health J, 2022; 3(6):305–312; doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.08.003
17.
GruwezH, EzzatD, Van PuyveldeT, et al.Real-world validation of smartphone-based photoplethysmography for rate and rhythm monitoring in atrial fibrillation. Europace, 2024; 26(4); doi: 10.1093/europace/euae065
18.
YanBP, LaiWHS, ChanCKY, et al.Contact‐Free screening of atrial fibrillation by a smartphone using facial pulsatile photoplethysmographic signals. J Am Heart Assoc, 2018; 7(8); doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008585
19.
RozenG, VaidJ, HosseiniSM, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of a novel mobile phone application for the detection and monitoring of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol, 2018; 121(10):1187–1191; doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.01.035
20.
PohM-Z, PohYC, ChanP-H, et al.Diagnostic assessment of a deep learning system for detecting atrial fibrillation in pulse waveforms. Heart, 2018; 104(23):1921–1928; doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313147
21.
McMANUSDD, ChongJW, SoniA, et al.PULSE‐SMART: Pulse‐Based arrhythmia discrimination using a novel smartphone application. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2016; 27(1):51–57; doi: 10.1111/jce.12842
22.
FanY-Y, LiY-G, LiJ, et al.Diagnostic Performance of a Smart Device With Photoplethysmography Technology for Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Pilot Study (Pre-mAFA II Registry). JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2019; 7(3):e11437; doi: 10.2196/11437
23.
ChanP, WongC, PohYC, et al.Diagnostic performance of a smartphone‐based photoplethysmographic application for atrial fibrillation screening in a primary care setting. J Am Heart Assoc, 2016; 5(7):e003428; doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003428
24.
BrasierN, RaichleCJ, DörrM, et al.Detection of atrial fibrillation with a smartphone camera: First prospective, international, two-centre, clinical validation study (DETECT AF PRO). Europace, 2019; 21(1):41–47; doi: 10.1093/europace/euy176
25.
KrivosheiL, WeberS, BurkardT, et al.Smart detection of atrial fibrillation. Europace, 2017; 19(5):euw125–euw757; doi: 10.1093/europace/euw125
26.
FernstadJ, SvennbergE, AbergP, et al.Validation of a novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics. Europace, 2022; 24(Suppl 1); doi: 10.1093/europace/euac053.578
27.
MolD, RiezebosRK, MarqueringHA, et al.Performance of an automated photoplethysmography-based artificial intelligence algorithm to detect atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Digit Health J, 2020; 1(2):107–110; doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.08.004
28.
ProesmansT, MortelmansC, Van HaelstR, et al.Mobile phone–based use of the photoplethysmography technique to detect atrial fibrillation in primary care: Diagnostic accuracy study of the fibricheck app. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2019; 7(3):e12284; doi: 10.2196/12284
29.
PrasitlumkumN, CheungpasitpornW, ChokesuwattanaskulA, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of smart gadgets/wearable devices in detecting atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Cardiovasc Dis, 2021; 114(1):4–16; doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2020.05.015
30.
O’SullivanJW, GriggS, CrawfordW, et al.Accuracy of smartphone camera applications for detecting atrial fibrillation. JAMA Netw Open, 2020; 3(4):e202064; doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2064
31.
GillS, BuntingKV, SartiniC, et al.Smartphone detection of atrial fibrillation using photoplethysmography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart, 2022; 108(20):1600–1607; doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320417
32.
YangTY, HuangL, MalwadeS, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of ambulatory devices in detecting atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2021; 9(4):e26167; doi: 10.2196/26167
33.
JoglarJA, ChungMK, ArmbrusterAL, et al.;Peer Review Committee Members. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation, 2024; 149(1):e1–e156; doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193
34.
DörrM, NohturfftV, BrasierN, et al.The WATCH AF Trial: SmartWATCHes for detection of atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol, 2019; 5(2):199–208; doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.10.006
35.
BabarF, CheemaAM, AhmadZ, et al.Sensitivity and specificity of wearables for atrial fibrillation in elderly populations: A systematic review. Curr Cardiol Rep, 2023; 25(7):761–779; doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01898-3
36.
HermansANL, GawalkoM, DohmenL, et al.Mobile health solutions for atrial fibrillation detection and management: A systematic review. Clin Res Cardiol, 2022; 111(5):479–491; doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01941-9
37.
SattarY, SongD, SarvepalliD, et al.Accuracy of pulsatile photoplethysmography applications or handheld devices vs. 12-lead ECG for atrial fibrillation screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 2022; 65(1):33–44; doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-01068-x
38.
FribergL, EngdahlJ, FrykmanV, et al.Population screening of 75- and 76-year-old men and women for silent atrial fibrillation (STROKESTOP). Europace, 2013; 15(1):135–140; doi: 10.1093/europace/eus217
39.
HalcoxJPJ, WarehamK, CardewA, et al.Assessment of remote heart rhythm sampling using the AliveCor heart monitor to screen for atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 2017; 136(19):1784–1794; doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030583
40.
SvennbergE, FribergL, FrykmanV, et al.Clinical outcomes in systematic screening for atrial fibrillation (STROKESTOP): A multicentre, parallel group, unmasked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2021; 398(10310):1498–1506; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01637-8
41.
LubitzSA, AtlasSJ, AshburnerJM, et al.Screening for atrial fibrillation in older adults at primary care visits: VITAL-AF randomized controlled trial. Circulation, 2022; 145(13):946–954; doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057014
42.
KohKT, LawWC, ZawWM, et al.Smartphone electrocardiogram for detecting atrial fibrillation after a cerebral ischaemic event: A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Europace, 2021; 23(7):1016–1023; doi: 10.1093/europace/euab036
43.
RizasKD, FreyerL, SapplerN, et al.Smartphone-based screening for atrial fibrillation: A pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Nat Med, 2022; 28(9):1823–1830; doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01979-w
44.
GruwezH, VerbruggeFH, ProesmansT, et al.Smartphone-based atrial fibrillation screening in the general population: Feasibility and impact on medical treatment. Eur Heart J Digit Health, 2023; 4(6):464–472; doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztad054
45.
CalvertP, MillsMT, HowarthK, et al.Remote rhythm monitoring using a photoplethysmography smartphone application after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Digit Health, 2024; 5(4):461–468; doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae028
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
