Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is essential for long-term management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, evidence regarding the effectiveness of various PR delivered via telemedicine (tele-pulmonary rehabilitation [tele-PR]) is lacking. This study aims to assess the comparative effects of different tele-PR types on clinical outcomes in patients with COPD.
Methods:
The following databases were searched: PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and EBSCO Open Dissertations from inception to May 2023. We included randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, and cohort studies investigating the effects of tele-PR on exercise capacity. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group risk of bias was used to assess the quality of included studies. Data were analyzed using STATA 17.0 with a random-effects model. Tele-PR comparisons were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA).
Results:
Seven studies (n = 815) encompassing five tele-PR types were included in the network meta-analysis. Two studies were justified as having a high risk of bias. There were no significant differences among different types of tele-PR and face-to-face PR, in terms of improving the 6-minute walk test. However, the hierarchy estimation suggested that tele-coaching by virtual agents more often than three sessions per week is more likely to be better than other tele-PRs (SUCRA 95.4%).
Discussion:
While uncertainty persists regarding the optimal tele-PR delivery model, our study suggests that tele-PR was not different from face-to-face PR. However, limited studies and evidence of low-quality underscore the need for well-designed clinical trials to yield more robust comparative evidence.
SorianoJB, KendrickPJ, PaulsonKR, et al.Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Respir Med, 2020; 8(6):585–596; doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30105-3
3.
ChenS, KuhnM, PrettnerK, et al.The global economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for 204 countries and territories in 2020–50: A health-augmented macroeconomic modelling study. Lancet Glob Health, 2023; 11(8):e1183–e1193.
4.
VogelmeierCF, CrinerGJ, MartinezFJ, et al.Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 report. GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2017; 195(5):557–582; doi: 10.1164/rccm.201701-0218PP
5.
NugentR, BertramMY, JanS, et al.Investing in non-communicable disease prevention and management to advance the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet, 2018; 391(10134):2029–2035; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30667-6
6.
HollandAE, CoxNS, Houchen-WolloffL, et al.Defining modern pulmonary rehabilitation. An official American Thoracic Society workshop report. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2021; 18(5):e12–e29; doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202102-146ST
7.
SpruitMA, SinghSJ, GarveyC, et al.ATS/ERS Task Force on Pulmonary Rehabilitation. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: Key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2013; 188(8):e13–e64; doi: 10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST
8.
AugustineA, BhatA, VaishaliK, et al.Barriers to pulmonary rehabilitation—A narrative review and perspectives from a few stakeholders. Lung India, 2021; 38(1):59–63; doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_116_20
9.
HollandAE, MahalA, HillCJ, et al.Benefits and costs of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a multi-centre randomised controlled equivalence trial. BMC Pulm Med, 2013; 13:57; doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-13-57
10.
Uche-OkoyeD, AjembaMN, AmyB, et al.Is telerehabilitation an effective maintenance strategy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases: A systematic review. Bull Natl Res Cent, 2023; 47(1):13; doi: 10.1186/s42269-023-00980-8
11.
HollandAE, CoxNS. Telerehabilitation for COPD: Could pulmonary rehabilitation deliver on its promise? Respirology, 2017; 22(4):626–627; doi: 10.1111/resp.13028
12.
OraJ, PrendiE, AttinàML, et al.Efficacy of respiratory tele-rehabilitation in COPD patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis, 2022; 92(4); doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2022.2105
13.
ZanaboniP, DinesenB, HjalmarsenA, et al.Long-term integrated telerehabilitation of COPD Patients: A multicentre randomised controlled trial (iTrain). BMC Pulm Med, 2016; 16(1):126; doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0288-z
14.
LaverKE, Adey-WakelingZ, CrottyM, et al.Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020; 1(1):CD010255; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3
15.
BrennanD, TindallL, TheodorosD, et al.A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines. Int J Telerehabil, 2010; 2(2):31–34; doi: 10.5195/ijt.2010.6063
16.
MichaelchukW, OliveiraA, MarzoliniS, et al.Design and delivery of home-based telehealth pulmonary rehabilitation programs in COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Inform, 2022; 162:104754; doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104754
17.
Mendes XavierD, Lanza GalvãoE, Aliane FonsecaA, et al.Effects of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea, exercise capacity, quality of life and impact of the disease in COPD patients: A systematic review. COPD, 2022; 19(1):18–46; doi: 10.1080/15412555.2021.2020234
18.
HigginsJPT, ThomasJ, ChandlerJ, et al. editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane; 2022. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. [Last accessed May 19, 2022].
19.
HuttonB, SalantiG, CaldwellDM, et al.The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: Checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med, 2015; 162(11):777–784.
DhippayomT, SaldanhaIJ, ChaiyakunaprukN, et al.Characterizing health services interventions for evidence syntheses by using the theme, intensity, provider/platform (TIP) framework. J Evid Based Med, 2022; 15(4):333–337; doi: 10.1111/jebm.12511
22.
BashshurR, ShannonG, KrupinskiE, et al.The taxonomy of telemedicine. Telemed J E Health, 2011; 17(6):484–494; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0103
23.
RichmondT, PetersonC, CasonJ, et al.American telemedicine association’s principles for delivering telerehabilitation services. Int J Telerehabil, 2017; 9(2):63–68; doi: 10.5195/ijt.2017.6232
ChaimaniA, HigginsJP, MavridisD, et al.Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS One, 2013; 8(10):e76654.
26.
SalantiG. Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: Many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool. Res Synth Methods, 2012; 3(2):80–97.
27.
AlwakeelAJ, SicondolfoA, RobitailleC, et al.The accessibility, feasibility, and safety of a standardized community-based tele-pulmonary rehab program for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A 3-year real-world prospective study. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2022; 19(1):39–47; doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-638OC
28.
BhattSP, BaughD, HitchcockJ, et al.Video telehealth pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with clinical improvement similar to center-based pulmonary rehabilitation. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2022; 19(2):331–333; doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202104-419RL
29.
Cerdán-de-Las-HerasJ, BalbinoF, LøkkeA, et al.Effect of a new tele-rehabilitation program versus standard rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Med, 2021; 11(1):11; doi: 10.3390/jcm11010011
30.
HansenH, BielerT, BeyerN, et al.Supervised pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus pulmonary rehabilitation in severe COPD: A randomised multicentre trial. Thorax, 2020; 75(5):413–421; doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214246
31.
LiY, QianH, YuK, et al.The long-term maintenance effect of remote pulmonary rehabilitation via social media in COPD: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2022; 17:1131–1142; doi: 10.2147/COPD.S360125
32.
PaneroniM, ColomboF, PapaliaA, et al.Is telerehabilitation a safe and viable option for patients with COPD? A feasibility study. COPD, 2015; 12(2):217–225; doi: 10.3109/15412555.2014.933794
33.
VasilopoulouM, PapaioannouAI, KaltsakasG, et al.Home-based maintenance tele-rehabilitation reduces the risk for acute exacerbations of COPD, hospitalisations and emergency department visits. Eur Respir J, 2017; 49(5):1602129; doi: 10.1183/13993003.02129-2016
34.
GarveyC, BaylesMP, HammLF, et al.Pulmonary rehabilitation exercise prescription in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Review of selected guidelines: An official statement from the American association of cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev, 2016; 36(2):75–83; doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000171
35.
SpruitMA, BurtinC, De BoeverP, et al.COPD and exercise: Does it make a difference? Breathe (Sheff), 2016; 12(2):e38–e49; doi: 10.1183/20734735.003916
36.
BoltonCE, Bevan-SmithEF, BlakeyJD, et al.British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee. British thoracic society guideline on pulmonary rehabilitation in adults. Thorax, 2013; 68(Suppl 2):ii1–ii30; doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203808
37.
JenkinsAR, GowlerH, CurtisF, et al.Efficacy of supervised maintenance exercise following pulmonary rehabilitation on health care use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2018; 13:257–273; doi: 10.2147/COPD.S150650
38.
PatsakiI, AvgeriV, RigouliaT, et al.Benefits from incorporating virtual reality in pulmonary rehabilitation of COPD patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Respir Med, 2023; 91(4):324–336; doi: 10.3390/arm91040026
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
