Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-03
Technology-Facilitated Depression Self-Management Linked with Lay Supporters and Primary Care Clinics: Randomized Controlled Trial in a Low-Income Sample
To test whether technology-facilitated self-management support improves depression in primary care settings.
Methods:
We randomized 204 low-income primary care patients who had at least moderate depressive symptoms to intervention or control. Intervention participants received 12 months of weekly automated interactive voice response telephone calls that assessed their symptom severity and provided self-management strategies. Their patient-nominated supporter (CarePartner) received corresponding guidance on self-management support, and their primary care team received urgent notifications. Those randomized to enhanced usual care received printed generic self-management instructions.
Results:
One-year attrition rate was 14%. By month 6, symptom severity on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) decreased 2.5 points more in the intervention arm than in the control arm (95% CI −4.2 to −0.8, p = 0.003). This benefit was similar at month 12 (p = 0.004). Intervention was also over twice as likely to lead to ≥50% reduction in symptom severity by month 6 (OR = 2.2 (1.1, 4.7)) and a decrease of ≥5 PHQ-9 points by month 12 (OR = 2.3 (1.2, 4.4)).
Conclusions:
Technology-facilitated self-management guidance with lay support and clinician notifications improves depression for primary care patients. Subsequent research should examine implementation and generalization to other chronic conditions.
clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01834534.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnsseauM, DierickM, BuntinkxF, et al.High prevalence of mental disorders in primary care. J Affect Disord, 2004; 78:49–55.
2.
KatonW, SchulbergH. Epidemiology of depression in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 1992; 14:237–247.
3.
MarcusSC, OlfsonM. National trends in the treatment for depression from 1998 to 2007. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2010; 67:1265–1273.
4.
RiihimäkiK, VuorilehtoM, MelartinT, IsometsäE. Five-year outcome of major depressive disorder in primary health care. Psycholog Med, 2014; 44:1369–1379.
5.
CoventryPA, HudsonJL, KontopantelisE, et al.Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials. PLoS One, 2014; 9:e108114.
6.
BishopTF, RamsayPP, CasalinoLP, BaoY, PincusHA, ShortellSM. Care management processes used less often for depression than for other chronic conditions in US primary care practices. Health Aff, 2016; 35:394–400.
7.
ThomasD, MacDowellM, GlasserM. Rural mental health workforce needs assessment: A national survey. Rural Remote Health, 2012; 12:1–12.
8.
CallahanEJ, BertakisKD, AzariR, RobbinsJ, HelmsLJ, MillerJ. The influence of depression on physician-patient interaction in primary care. Fam Med, 1996; 28:346–351.
9.
BauerMS, Deane LeaderHU, LaiZ, KilbourneAM. Primary care and behavioral health practice size: The challenge for healthcare reform. Med Care, 2012; 50:843.
10.
HolmAL, SeverinssonE. Chronic care model for the management of depression: Synthesis of barriers to, and facilitators of, success. Int J Ment Health Nurs, 2012; 21:513–523.
11.
LiuC-F, FortneyJ, VivellS, et al.Time allocation and caseload capacity in telephone depression care management. Am J Manag Care, 2007; 13:652–660.
12.
RamirezM, WuS, JinH, et al.Automated remote monitoring of depression: Acceptance among low-income patients in diabetes disease management. JMIR Ment Health, 2016; 3:e6.
13.
VidyantiI, WuB, WuS. Low-income minority patient engagement with automated telephonic depression assessment and impact on health outcomes. Qual Life Res, 2015; 24:1119–1129.
14.
PietteJD, RoslandA-M, MarinecNS, StriplinD, BernsteinSJ, SilveiraMJ. Engagement with automated patient monitoring and self-management support calls: Experience with a thousand chronically-ill patients. Med Care, 2013; 51:216.
15.
KobakKA, GreistJH, JeffersonJW, MundtJC, KatzelnickDJ. Computerized assessment of depression and anxiety over the telephone using interactive voice response. MD Comput, 1999; 16:64–68.
16.
SantiniZI, KoyanagiA, TyrovolasS, MasonC, HaroJM. The association between social relationships and depression: A systematic review. J Affect Disord, 2015; 175:53–65.
17.
SchwarzbachM, LuppaM, ForstmeierS, KönigHH, Riedel-HellerSG. Social relations and depression in late life—A systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2014; 29:1–21.
18.
StrineT, KroenkeK, DhingraS, BalluzLS, GonzalezO, BerryJT, MokdadAH. The associations between depression, health-related quality of life, social support, life satisfaction, and disability in community-dwelling US adults. J Nerv Ment Dis, 2009; 197:61–64.
19.
StahlST, BeachSR, MusaD, SchulzR. Living alone and depression: The modifying role of the perceived neighborhood environment. Aging Ment Health, 2017; 21:1065–1071.
20.
HintonL, Apesoa-VaranoEC, UnützerJ, Dwight-JohnsonM, ParkM, BarkerJC. A descriptive qualitative study of the roles of family members in older men's depression treatment from the perspectives of older men and primary care providers. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2015; 30:514–522.
21.
RoslandA-M, HeislerM, JanevicMR, et al.Current and potential support for chronic disease management in the United States: The perspective of family and friends of chronically ill adults. Fam Syst Health, 2013; 31:119.
22.
PerlickDA, BerkL, KaczynskiR, et al.Caregiver burden as a predictor of depression among family and friends who provide care for persons with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord, 2016; 18:183–191.
23.
MartínJ, PadiernaA, van WijngaardenB, et al.Caregivers consequences of care among patients with eating disorders, depression or schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry, 2015; 15:124.
24.
PietteJD, GregorMA, ShareD, et al.Improving heart failure self-management support by actively engaging out-of-home caregivers: Results of a feasibility study. Congest Heart Fail, 2008; 14:12–18.
25.
PietteJD, AikensJE, TrivediR, et al.Depression self-management assistance using automated telephonic assessments and social support. Am J Manag Care, 2013; 19:892–900.
26.
AikensJE, TrivediR, HeapyA, PfeifferPN, PietteJD. Potential impact of incorporating a patient-selected support person into mHealth for depression. J Gen Int Med, 2015; 30:797–803.
27.
PietteJD, ValensteinM, EisenbergD, et al.Rationale and methods of a trial to evaluate a depression telemonitoring program that includes a patient-selected support person. J Clin Trials, 2015; 5:205.
28.
KroenkeK, SpitzerRL. The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr Ann, 2002; 32:1–7.
29.
ArrollB, Goodyear-SmithF, CrengleS, et al.Validation of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to screen for major depression in the primary care population. Ann Fam Med, 2010; 8:348–353.
30.
LöweB, KroenkeK, HerzogW, GräfeK. Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: Sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). J Affect Disord, 2004; 81:61–66.
31.
LöweB, UnützerJ, CallahanCM, PerkinsAJ, KroenkeK. Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Med Care, 2004; 42:1194–1201.
32.
Department of Numbers: Michigan household income. 2015. Available at https://www.deptofnumbers.com/income/michigan/ (last accessed February1, 2020).
33.
US Department of Health and Human Services 2015 Poverty Guidelines. 2015. Available at https://aspe.hhs.gov/2015-poverty-guidelines (last accessed February3, 2020).
34.
FirthJ, TorousJ, NicholasJ, et al.The efficacy of smartphone-based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry, 2017; 16:287–298.
35.
AndrewsG, BasuA, CuijpersP, et al.Computer therapy for the anxiety and depression disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: An updated meta-analysis. J Anxiety Disord, 2018; 55:70–78.
36.
MeadN, LesterH, Chew-GrahamC, GaskL, BowerP. Effects of befriending on depressive symptoms and distress: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry, 2010; 196:96–101.
37.
NewmanMG, SzkodnyLE, LleraSJ, PrzeworskiA. A review of technology-assisted self-help and minimal contact therapies for anxiety and depression: Is human contact necessary for therapeutic efficacy?. Clin Psychol Rev, 2011; 31:89–103.
38.
MohrD, CuijpersP, LehmanK. Supportive accountability: A model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. J Med Internet Res, 2011; 13:e30.
39.
AikensJE, TrivediR, AronDC, PietteJD. Integrating support persons into diabetes telemonitoring to improve self-management and medication adherence. J Gen Intern Med, 2015; 30:319–326.
40.
PietteJD, StriplinD, FisherL, et al.Effects of accessible health technology and caregiver support posthospitalization on 30-day readmission risk: A randomized trial. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2020; 46:109–117.
41.
PietteJD, StriplinD, MarinecN, ChenJ, AikensJE. A randomized trial of mobile health support for heart failure patients and their informal caregivers: Impacts on caregiver-reported outcomes. Med Care, 2015; 53:692–699.
42.
IraniE, NiyomyartA, Hickman JrRL. Systematic review of technology-based interventions targeting chronically ill adults and their caregivers. West J Nurs Res, 2020; 42:974–992.
43.
JanevicMR, YujraACA, MarinecN, et al.Feasibility of an interactive voice response system for monitoring depressive symptoms in a lower-middle income Latin American country. Int J Ment Health Syst, 2016; 10:59.
44.
PietteJ, SenA, AikensJ. Randomized controlled trial of mhealth telemonitoring with enhanced caregiver support for diabetes self-management. J Clin Trials, 2014; 4:2167–0870.1000194.
45.
PietteJD, StriplinD, MarinecN, et al.Improving post-hospitalization transition outcomes through accessible health information technology and caregiver support: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Trials, 2015; 5:240.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
