FariasFAC, DagostiniCM, BiccaYA, et al.Remote patient monitoring: A systematic review. Telemed J E Health, 2020; 26:576–583.
2.
SheaBJ, ReevesBC, WellsG, et al.AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 2017; 358:j4008.
3.
WhittakerR, McRobbieH, BullenC, et al.Mobile phone text messaging and app-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019; 10:CD006611.
4.
SchiavoJH. PROSPERO: An international register of systematic review protocols. Med Ref Serv Q, 2019; 38:171–80.
5.
TopferL-A, ParadaA, MenonD, et al.Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 1999; 15:297–303.
6.
HarkerJ, KleijnenJ. What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments. Int J Evid Based Healthc, 2012; 10:397–410.
7.
ZealandN. New Zealand health strategy: Future direction. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health, 2016.
8.
MoherD, LiberatiA, TetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Med, 2009; 6:e1000097.
9.
PhillipsB, BallC, SackettD, et al. Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine-levels of evidence (March 2009). 2009. Available at https://www.cebm.net/2009/06/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009/ (last accessed June22, 2020).