Abstract
Background:
Rural hospitals struggle to staff inpatient services and may not have the clinical expertise to achieve optimal outcomes. Telehospitalist services could address these problems by bringing hospital medicine expertise to rural communities.
Introduction:
Veterans Health Administration (VHA) rural hospitals need staffing alternatives to address gaps in inpatient coverage. This needs assessment identified perceived need for telehospitalist services as well as potential applications, benefits, and barriers from an administration perspective.
Materials and Methods:
We used a rapid qualitative assessment approach based on semistructured interviews with 15 physician administrators at 12 rural and low-complexity hospitals in VHA in 2018.
Results:
We identified a range of needs that could be addressed by telehospitalist services, including direct care delivery, support for local providers, and on-demand coverage to fill staffing gaps. Potential benefits included cost reductions, improved care quality, education, and addressing feelings of insular practice. Potential barriers included provider buy-in, cost, and technological limitations.
Discussion:
Our findings suggest that telehospitalist services could address inpatient coverage gaps, but with a range of views on how the service could be deployed. Telehospitalist services providing intermittent coverage could meet unmet clinical needs at appropriate economies of scale. Administrators were enthusiastic about applying innovative inpatient telemedicine initiatives, but perceived staff reluctance. The dynamic and multidisciplinary nature of inpatient care requires program acceptance at multiple levels, which may account for why it traditionally lags behind outpatient telemedicine.
Conclusions:
Rural hospital physician administrators perceived telehospitalist models as a viable option to address staffing needs and improve quality of care.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.