Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Access to dermatologists is limited for disadvantaged patients, who may receive suboptimal dermatologic care from nonspecialists. We assessed if teledermatology could improve primary care provider (PCP)-delivered care for cutaneous disease at a clinic serving uninsured patients.

Materials and Methods:

Utilizing the American Academy of Dermatology's free AccessDerm program, we offered store-and-forward teledermatology to PCPs, who initiated consultations at will during clinical care independent of the study. We retrospectively analyzed all consultations from 2013 to 2017 and collected patient age/sex, teledermatologist diagnosis, time to teledermatologist reply, time to next dermatology appointment, as well as PCP- and teledermatologist-proposed care plans.

Results:

Retrospective analysis of 131 consults revealed a 37-h mean teledermatology response-time versus a 14-day appointment wait (p < 0.00001). Teledermatologists provided a definitive care plan without in-person evaluation for 82 (65%) of completed consults and recommended interim treatments while awaiting appointments in 15 cases, thus accelerating care plan delivery in 97 cases (76%). The triage decision rate differed among diagnostic categories; deferral to in-person evaluation was more frequent for neoplasms (p < 0.0001). When PCPs specified preconsult treatment plans, 82% differed from teledermatologist-advised management. Following teledermatologist recommendations would have changed the clinical course in 70% of cases, potentially avoiding suboptimal care, including inappropriate corticosteroids, antimicrobials, and emergency room referrals.

Conclusions:

We found teledermatology can effectively guide PCPs in resource-limited settings by accelerating delivery of dermatologist-recommended care plans for uninsured patients. Expanding teledermatology for PCPs in under-resourced clinics has the potential to improve treatment of cutaneous disease by nonspecialists and to mitigate suboptimal care for disadvantaged patients.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wilmer

, et al. Most common dermatologic conditions encountered by dermatologists and nondermatologists. Cutis, 2014; 94:285–292.

Kerr

, et al. The profile of dermatological problems in primary care. Clin Exp Dermatol, 2010; 35:380–383.

Lowell

, et al. Dermatology in primary care: Prevalence and patient disposition. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2001; 45:250–255.

Ayoubi

, et al. Dermatologic care of uninsured patients managed at free clinics. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2019; 81:433–437.

Resneck

Jr. , Isenstein

, Kimball

AB.

Few Medicaid and uninsured patients are accessing dermatologists. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2006; 55:1084–1088.

Mulcahy

, et al. Variation in dermatologist visits by sociodemographic characteristics. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2017; 76:918–924.

James

WD.

The use of technology in providing dermatologic care to vulnerable populations. Cutis, 2012; 89:53–54.

Chansky

, Simpson

, Lipoff

. Implementation of a dermatology teletriage system to improve access in an underserved clinic: A retrospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2017; 77:975–977.

Nelson

, et al. Impact of store-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology on outpatient dermatologic care: A prospective study in an underserved urban primary care setting. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2016; 74:484.e1–490.e1.

10.

Uscher-Pines

, et al. Effect of Teledermatology on access to dermatology care among medicaid enrollees. JAMA Dermatol, 2016; 152:905–912.

11.

Armstrong

, et al. Teledermatology operational considerations, challenges, and benefits: The referring providers' perspective. Telemed J E Health, 2012; 18:580–584.

12.

Leavitt

, et al. Teledermatology as a tool to improve access to care for medically underserved populations: A retrospective descriptive study. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2016; 75:1259–1261.

13.

Naka

, Lu

, Porto

. Villagra J, Wu ZH, Anderson D. Impact of dermatology eConsults on access to care and skin cancer screening in underserved populations: A model for teledermatology services in community health centers. J Am Acad Dermatol , 2018; 78:293–302.

14.

Mohan

, Molina

, Stavert

. Store and forward teledermatology improves dermatology knowledge among referring primary care providers: A survey-based cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2018; 79:960–961.

15.

Piette

, Nougairede

, Vuong

, Crickx

, Tran

. Impact of a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention versus usual care on delay before beginning treatment: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in ambulatory care. J Telemed Telecare, 2017; 23:725–732.

16.

Whited

JD.

Quality of life: A research gap in teledermatology. Int J Dermatol, 2015; 54:1124–1128.

17.

Yang

, Barbieri

, Kovarik

. Cost analysis of a store and forward teledermatology consult system in Philadelphia. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2019; 81:758–764.

18.

Warshaw

, Gravely

, Nelson

. Reliability of store and forward teledermatology for skin neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2015; 72:426–435.

19.

Warshaw

, et al. Accuracy of teledermatology for pigmented neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2009; 61:753–765.

20.

Barbieri

, et al. Primary care providers' perceptions of mobile store-and-forward teledermatology. Dermatol Online J, 2015; 21:pii13030/qt2jt0h05w.

21.

Warshaw

, et al. Teledermatology for diagnosis and management of skin conditions: A systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2011; 64:759–772.

22.

Thind

, Brooker

, Ormerod

. Teledermatology: A tool for remote supervision of a general practitioner with special interest in dermatology. Clin Exp Dermatol, 2011; 36:489–494.

23.

Ludwick

, et al. Evaluation of a telehealth clinic as a means to facilitate dermatologic consultation: Pilot project to assess the efficiency and experience of teledermatology used in a primary care network. J Cutan Med Surg, 2010; 14:7–12.

24.

Cutts

, et al. Community health asset mapping partnership engages Hispanic/Latino health seekers and providers. N C Med J, 2016; 77:160–167.

25.

Sarria-Santamera

, et al. A systematic review of the use of health services by immigrants and native populations. Public Health Rev, 2016; 37:28.

26.

Feldman

, et al. Health care utilization among migrant Latino farmworkers: The case of skin disease. J Rural Health, 2009; 25:98–103.

27.

Jacobsen

, et al. Defining the need for skin cancer prevention education in uninsured, minority, and immigrant communities. JAMA Dermatol, 2016; 152:1342–1347.

28.

Pichardo-Geisinger

, et al. Dermatologist-diagnosed skin diseases among immigrant Latino poultry processors and other manual workers in North Carolina, USA. Int J Dermatol, 2013; 52:1342–1348.

29.

Quandt

, et al. Self-reported skin symptoms and skin-related quality of life among Latino immigrant poultry processing and other manual workers. Am J Ind Med, 2014; 57:605–614.

30.

Coates

, Kvedar

, Granstein

. Teledermatology: From historical perspective to emerging techniques of the modern era: Part I: History, rationale, and current practice. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2015; 72:563–574; quiz 575–576.

31.

Coustasse

, et al. Use of teledermatology to improve dermatological access in rural areas. Telemed J E Health, 2019; 25:1022–1032.

32.

McFarland

, Raugi

, Reiber

. Primary care provider and imaging technician satisfaction with a teledermatology project in rural Veterans Health Administration clinics. Telemed J E Health, 2013; 19:815–825.

33.

Vallejos

, et al. Teledermatology consultations provide specialty care for farmworkers in rural clinics. J Rural Health, 2009; 25:198–202.

34.

Faye

, et al. A Teledermatology pilot programme for the management of skin diseases in primary health care centres: Experiences from a resource-limited country (Mali, West Africa). Trop Med Infect Dis, 2018; 3:pii:E88

35.

Nair

, Nair

. Teledermatology: A possible reality in rural India. Int J Dermatol, 2015; 54:375–376.

36.

Byamba

, et al. Mobile teledermatology for a prompter and more efficient dermatological care in rural Mongolia. Br J Dermatol, 2015; 173:265–267.

37.

Uhlenhake

, Brodell

, Mosto

. The dermatology work force: A focus on urban versus rural wait times. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2009; 61:17–22.

38.

Nguyen

, et al. Practical and sustainable teledermatology and teledermatopathology: Specialty care in Cameroon Africa. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol , 2017; 10:47–56.

39.

Walters

LEM

, Scott

, Mars

. A teledermatology scale-up framework and roadmap for sustainable scaling: Evidence-based development. J Med Internet Res, 2018; 20:e224.

40.

Becevic

, Mutrux

, Edison

. Show-Me ECHO: Complex disease care capacity-building telehealth program. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2016; 226:233–236.

41.

Lewis

, Becevic

, Myers

, Helming

, Mutrux, Fleming

, Edison

. Dermatology ECHO—an innovative solution to address limited access to dermatology expertise. Rural Remote Health, 2018; 18:4415.

42.

Madu

, Chang

, Kayembe

, Kovarik

. Teledermatology as a means to provide multispecialty Care: A case of global specialty collaboration. Pediatr Dermatol, 2017; 34:e89–e92.

43.

Desai

, McKoy

, Kovarik

. Overview of international teledermatology. Pan Afr Med J, 2010; 6:3.

44.

Bobbs

, et al. Building a global teledermatology collaboration. Int J Dermatol, 2016; 55:446–449.

Teledermatology Consultation Can Optimize Treatment of Cutaneous Disease by Nondermatologists in Under-Resourced Clinics

Abstract

Background:

Materials and Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Get full access to this article

References