Despite widespread adoption of health information technology, U.S. providers face persistent barriers to coordination of care. We sought to develop and implement a patient-centered smartphone app that facilitates care coordination when patients receive care at any hospital in a region.
Materials and Methods:
Partnering with patients and primary care teams at a federally qualified health center (FQHC), we developed an app that (1) used real-time location data to identify encounters at 41 regional hospitals; (2) sent notifications to users' phones, asking them to confirm hospital arrival/discharge, and; (3) sent automated messages to primary care teams about confirmed hospital encounters. App design included multiple, successive rounds of active patient participation. In a small beta test of the initial version of the app, high-risk, low-income FQHC patients ran the app on their phone for 3 months. A formative mixed methods evaluation examined the app's technical performance and user experience.
Results:
Twelve patients enrolled in the beta test and provided follow-up data; 11 (92%) were racial/ethnic minorities. Participants obtained emergency or inpatient care at four regional hospitals. The app had 75% sensitivity to detect events when notifications should have fired, and 90% positive predictive value (PPV) of events when notifications fired. Barriers to implementation related to the app's user interface and the performance of its location tracking algorithm.
Conclusions:
We partnered with patients from a traditionally underserved population to develop a new smartphone-based approach to regional care coordination. The app had moderate sensitivity and high PPV for identifying regional hospital visits.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Office-based Physician Electronic Health Record Adoption, Health IT Quick-Stat #50. 2016. Available at https://dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/physician-ehr-adoption-trends.php (last accessed July10, 2018).
2.
Adler-MilsteinJ, JhaAK. Health information exchange amongU.S. hospitals: Who's in, who's out, and why?. Healthc (Amst), 2014; 2:26–32.
3.
PrgometM, LiL, NiazkhaniZ, GeorgiouA, WestbrookJI. Impact of commercial computerized provider order entry (CPOE) and clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) on medication errors, length of stay, and mortality in intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2017; 24:413–422.
4.
BuntinMB, BurkeMF, HoaglinMC, BlumenthalD. The benefits of health information technology: A review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff (Millwood), 2011; 30:464–471.
5.
O'MalleyAS, GrossmanJM, CohenGR, KemperNM, PhamHH. Are electronic medical records helpful for care coordination? Experiences of physician practices. J Gen Intern Med, 2010; 25:177–185.
6.
RichardsonJE, VestJR, GreenCM, KernLM, KaushalR, InvestigatorsH. A needs assessment of health information technology for improving care coordination in three leading patient-centered medical homes. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2015; 22:815–820.
7.
MortonS, ShihSC, WintherCH, TinocoA, KesslerRS, ScholleSH. Health IT-enabled care coordination: A National Survey of patient-centered medical home clinicians. Ann Fam Med, 2015; 13:250–256.
8.
LammersEJ, Adler-MilsteinJ, KocherKE. Does health information exchange reduce redundant imaging? Evidence from emergency departments. Med Care, 2014; 52:227–234.
9.
HershWR, TottenAM, EdenKB, et al.Outcomes from health information exchange: Systematic review and future research needs. JMIR Med Inform, 2015; 3:e39.
10.
RudinRS, MotalaA, GoldzweigCL, ShekellePG. Usage and effect of health information exchange: A systematic review. Ann Intern Med, 2014; 161:803–811.
11.
VestJR, CampionTRJr., Kaushal RHI, TECInvestigators.Challenges, alternatives, and paths to sustainability for health information exchange efforts. J Med Syst, 2013; 37:9987.
12.
HolmgrenAJ, PatelV, Adler-MilsteinJ. Progress in interoperability: Measuring US Hospitals' engagement in sharing patient data. Health Aff (Millwood), 2017; 36:1820–1827.
13.
BrownRS, PeikesD, PetersonG, SchoreJ, RazafindrakotoCM. Six features of Medicare coordinated care demonstration programs that cut hospital admissions of high-risk patients. Health Aff (Millwood), 2012; 31:1156–1166.
14.
AroraVM, ProchaskaML, FarnanJM, et al.Problems after discharge and understanding of communication with their primary care physicians among hospitalized seniors: A mixed methods study. J Hosp Med, 2010; 5:385–391.
15.
BatesDW.Health information technology and care coordination: The next big opportunity for informatics?. Yearb Med Inform, 2015; 10:11–14.
16.
TusoP, HuynhDN, GarofaloL, et al.The readmission reduction program of Kaiser Permanente Southern California-knowledge transfer and performance improvement. Perm J, 2013; 17:58–63.
17.
TangN, SteinJ, HsiaRY, MaselliJH, GonzalesR. Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997–2007. JAMA, 2010; 304:664–670.
18.
JiangHJ, BoutwellAE, MaxwellJ, BourgoinA, RegensteinM, AndresE. Understanding patient, provider, and system factors related to Medicaid readmissions. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2016; 42:115–121.
19.
LylesCR, HarrisLT, JordanL, et al.Patient race/ethnicity and shared medical record use among diabetes patients. Med Care, 2012; 50:434–440.
20.
TieuL, SchillingerD, SarkarU, et al.Online patient websites for electronic health record access among vulnerable populations: Portals to nowhere?. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2017; 24:e47–e54.
21.
FitzpatrickL.The Time Is Now: The Case for Digital Health Innovation for the Poor and Underserved. The Commonwealth Fund; 2018. Available at https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2018/time-now-case-digital-health-innovation-poor-and-underserved (last accessed November7, 2019).
22.
NguyenKT, OlginJE, PletcherMJ, et al.Smartphone-based geofencing to ascertain hospitalizations. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 2017; 10e003326.
23.
AllynB.Digital Ambulance Chasers? Law Firms Send Ads To Patients' Phones Inside ERs. Philadelphia, PA: WHYY Radio, All Things Considered, 2018.
24.
LissDT, SerranoE, WakemanJ, et al.“The Doctor Needs to Know”: Acceptability of smartphone location tracking for care coordination. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2018; 6:e112.
25.
SmithA.Smartphone Ownership 2013: Pew Research Center; Washington, DC; 2013. Available at www.pewinternet.org/2013/06/05/smartphone-ownership-2013 (last accessed November18, 2019).
26.
Erie Family Health Centers. About Erie. 2019. Available at https://www.eriefamilyhealth.org/about-erie (last accessed November7, 2019).
27.
ConnJ.Chicago-area HIE sues IT vendor over shutdown plans. 2016. Available at www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160420/NEWS/160429995 (last accessed January9, 2019).
28.
SchorschK.Rauner ends struggling health care initiative. 2015. Available at www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20150922/NEWS03/150929963/rauner-ends-struggling-health-care-initiative (last accessed January9, 2019).
29.
HoldenRJ, CarayonP, GursesAP, et al.SEIPS 2.0: A human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics, 2013; 56:1669–1686.
30.
DonabedianA.Basic approaches to assessment: structure, process, and outcome. In: Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Vol. 1. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1980.
31.
WagnerEH.Chronic disease management: What will it take to improve care for chronic illness?. Eff Clin Pract, 1998; 1:2–4.
32.
National Center for Health Statistics. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey:. 2011. Emergency Department Summary Tables. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014. Available at www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/2011_ed_web_tables.pdf (last accessed November18, 2019).
33.
SinghSV.Native App Development vs. Hybrid App Development. 2018. Available at https://hackernoon.com/native-app-development-vs-hybrid-app-development-dd83122a738c (last accessed November11, 2019).
34.
Pew Research Center. Mobile Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: 2018. Available at www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile (last accessed August6, 2018).
35.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. MIPS Explore Measures—Care Coordination Improvement Activities—QPP. 2018. Available at https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/explore-measures/improvement-activities?py=2018&measureSubcategoryName=Care%20Coordination (last accessed November18, 2019).
36.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Transitional Care Management Services. 2016. Available at https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/Transitional-Care-Management-Services-Fact-Sheet-ICN908628.pdf (last accessed November18, 2019).
