Abstract
Background:
Although store-and-forward teledermatology (SFT) has demonstrated good diagnostic sensitivity for melanoma, little is known about the diagnostic precision (positive predictive value [PPV]).
Introduction:
We conducted this investigation to ascertain the PPV of melanoma diagnosis among teledermatology readers.
Materials and Methods:
We reviewed teledermatology consultations on 8,706 patients completed during the period February 1, 2015–January 31, 2016. Melanoma was included in the differential diagnosis of 551 conditions. We conducted a chart review of each condition to determine the final diagnosis.
Results:
We ascertained a final diagnosis in 503 conditions. Sixty-nine conditions were ultimately diagnosed as melanoma, a PPV of 13.7%. There was considerable variability in PPV among readers. Image quality was associated with higher PPV.
Discussion:
Overall, SFT program PPV compared favorably with that found in two published studies of face-to-face dermatology clinic care.
Conclusion:
To increase the diagnostic precision of SFT program melanoma diagnosis, efforts should be directed toward improving selected individual reader's PPV and image quality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
