Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-09
Improved Medication Adherence and Frequency of Blood Glucose Self-Testing Using an m-Health Platform Versus Usual Care in a Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial Among People with Type 2 Diabetes in India
In 2015, India had an estimated 69.2 million people with diabetes and a national prevalence of 8.7%. Evidence is mounting for the benefits of telemedicine in diabetes care, but remains limited on mobile-health (m-Health) interventions.
Introduction:
This study assessed the impact of an m-Health diabetes platform on clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, patient and provider satisfaction, and app usage.
Materials and Methods:
This open-label, two-arm parallel study enrolled 91 people at 3 sites in India, aged 18–65, with type 2 diabetes, and an A1c between 7.5% and 12.5% (58–113 mmol/mol). Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to m-Health or usual care and observed for 6 months. All received free visits, laboratory tests, transportation fees, and strips and lancets. Intervention participants received the m-Health app and a mobile phone data stipend.
Results:
A1c change was previously reported as statistically significant. Significantly more participants in intervention than control had improved medication adherence (39.0% vs. 12.8%; p = 0.03) and increased frequency of blood glucose (BG) self-testing (39.0% vs. 10.3%; p = 0.01) at 6 months from baseline. No other outcomes were significantly different. Among m-Health users, 75% of participants actively used the app at week 24. Participants entered 29,668 medications and 2,575 BG readings, sent 497 messages, and received 890 messages. Most participants (80%) were satisfied with all aspects of the app and all seven providers rated the software very acceptable.
Discussion:
Participants assigned to m-Health had increased medication adherence and frequency of BG testing compared with usual care participants.
Conclusions:
This tool could be an effective way to expand access to quality chronic disease care and improve outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 7th ed. [Internet]. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation, 2015. Available at www.idf.org/diabetesatlas (last accessed November15, 2016).
2.
StrattonIM, AdlerAI, NeilHA, MatthewsDR, ManleySE, CullCA, et al.Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study. BMJ, 2000; 321:405–412.
3.
OdegardPS, CarpinitoG, ChristensenDB. Medication adherence program: Adherence challenges and interventions in type 2 diabetes. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003), 2013; 53:267–272.
4.
PeyrotM, BarnettAH, MeneghiniLF, Schumm-DraegerP-M. Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational Global Attitudes of Patients and Physicians in Insulin Therapy study. Diabet Med, 2012; 29:682–689.
5.
MohanV, ShahSN, JoshiSR, SeshiahV, SahayBK, BanerjeeS, et al.Current status of management, control, complications and psychosocial aspects of patients with diabetes in India: Results from the DiabCare India 2011 study. Indian J Endocrinol Metab, 2014; 18:370–378.
6.
NagpalJ, BhartiaA. Quality of diabetes care in the middle- and high-income group populace: The Delhi Diabetes Community (DEDICOM) survey. Diabetes Care, 2006; 29:2341–2348.
7.
JoshiSR, AnjanaRM, DeepaM, PradeepaR, BhansaliA, DhandaniaVK, et al.Prevalence of dyslipidemia in urban and rural India: The ICMR-INDIAB study. PLoS One, 2014; 9:e96808.
8.
World Bank. Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people) [Internet]. 2013. Available at http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.CEL.SETS.P2 (last accessed August 4, 2016).
9.
GSM Association.. The Mobile Economy India 2015. 2015. Available at https://www.gsmaintelligence.com/research/?file=4113a57d43a9e93968e7ed00123ba4b2&download (last accessed on July 1, 2016).
10.
de JonghT, Gurol-UrganciI, Vodopivec-JamsekV, CarJ, AtunR. Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012; 12:CD007459.
11.
FreeC, PhillipsG, GalliL, WatsonL, FelixL, EdwardsP, et al.The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: A systematic review. PLoS Med, 2013; 10:e1001362.
12.
BashshurRL, ShannonGW, SmithBR, WoodwardMA. The empirical evidence for the telemedicine intervention in diabetes management. Telemed J E Health, 2015; 21:321–354.
13.
MarcolinoMS, MaiaJX, AlkmimMBM, BoersmaE, RibeiroAL. Telemedicine application in the care of diabetes patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2013; 8:e79246.
14.
PalK, EastwoodSV, MichieS, FarmerA, BarnardML, PeacockR, et al.Computer-based interventions to improve self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care, 2014; 37:1759–1766.
15.
WorswickJ, WayneSC, BennettR, FianderM, MayhewA, WeirMC, et al.Improving quality of care for persons with diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews—What does the evidence tell us?. Syst Rev, 2013; 2:26.
16.
Sealed Envelope Ltd.. Simple randomisation service. 2015. Available at www.sealedenvelope.com/simple-randomiser/v1/ (last accessed April10, 2016).
17.
BeckerMH.The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974; 2:324–508.
18.
SchwarzerR.Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol, 2008; 57:1–29.
19.
AjzenI.The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 1991; 50:179–211.
20.
BanduraA.Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev, 1977; 84:191–215.
21.
MarshallGN, HaysRD. The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18) [Internet]. 1994 [cited July10, 2015]. Available at www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7865.html (last accessed June22, 2016).
22.
WareJ, SnyderM, WrightW.Development and validation of scales to measure patient satisfaction with medical care services. In: Part A: Review of literature, overview of methods and results regarding construction of scales, vol. I. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, 1976; Publication No. PB 288–329.
23.
WareJ, SnyderM, WrightW.Development and validation of scales to measure patient satisfaction with medical care services. In: Part B: Results regarding scales constructed from the patient satisfaction questionnaire and measures of other health care perceptions, vol. I. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, 1976; Publication No. PB 288–300.
24.
ToobertDJ, HampsonSE, GlasgowRE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: Results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care, 2000; 23:943–950.
25.
McGuireBE, MorrisonTG, HermannsN, SkovlundS, EldrupE, GagliardinoJ, et al.Short-form measures of diabetes-related emotional distress: The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID)-5 and PAID-1. Diabetologia, 2010; 53:66–69.
26.
PolonskyWH, AndersonBJ, LohrerPA, WelchG, JacobsonAM, AponteJE, et al.Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care, 1995; 18:754–760.
27.
LorigKR, SobelDS, RitterPL, LaurentD, HobbsM. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract, 2001; 4:256–262.
28.
RAND.. Improved Chronic Illness for Care Evaluation (ICICE) study: Data collection tools [Internet]. Available at www.rand.org/health/projects/icice/tools.html (last accessed June22, 2016).
29.
TudiverF, WolffLT, MorinPC, TeresiJ, PalmasW, StarrenJ, et al.Primary care providers' perceptions of home diabetes telemedicine care in the IDEATel project. J Rural Health, 2007; 23:55–61.
30.
KleinmanNJ, ShahA, ShahS, PhatakS, ViswanathanV. Impact of the Gather m-Health system on A1c: Primary results of a multisite randomized clinical trial among people with type 2 diabetes in India. Diabetes Care, 2016; 39:e169–e179.
31.
RamJ, SelvamS, SnehalathaC, NandithaA, SimonM, ShettyAS, et al.Improvement in diet habits, independent of physical activity helps to reduce incident diabetes among prediabetic Asian Indian men. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2014; 106:491–495.
32.
RamachandranA, SnehalathaC, RamJ, SelvamS, SimonM, NandithaA, et al.Effectiveness of mobile phone messaging in prevention of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle modification in men in India: A prospective, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2013; 1:191–198.
33.
ShettyAS, ChamukuttanS, NandithaA, RajRKC, RamachandranA. Reinforcement of adherence to prescription recommendations in Asian Indian diabetes patients using short message service (SMS)—A pilot study. J Assoc Physicians India, 2011; 59:711–714.
34.
SepahSC, JiangL, PetersAL. Translating the diabetes prevention program into an online social network: Validation against CDC standards. Diabetes Educ, 2014; 40:435–443.
35.
SepahSC, JiangL, PetersAL. Long-term outcomes of a Web-based diabetes prevention program: 2-year results of a single-arm longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res, 2015; 17:e92.
36.
QuinnCC, CloughSS, MinorJM, LenderD, OkaforMC, Gruber-BaldiniA. WellDoc mobile diabetes management randomized controlled trial: Change in clinical and behavioral outcomes and patient and physician satisfaction. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2008; 10:160–168.
37.
QuinnCC, ShardellMD, TerrinML, BarrEA, BallewSH, Gruber-BaldiniAL. Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control. Diabetes Care, 2011; 34:1934–1942.
38.
MohrDC, SchuellerSM, RileyWT, BrownCH, CuijpersP, DuanN, et al.Trials of intervention principles: Evaluation methods for evolving behavioral intervention technologies. J Med Internet Res, 2015; 17:e166.
