Background:To explore the effects of using remote Internet follow-up on postradiotherapy compliance with medical advice provided to patients with esophageal cancer.Patients and Methods:Between January 1 and August 1, 2013, in total, 128 patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer treated with radiotherapy were randomly assigned to either an observation group (n=64) or a control group (n=64). The control group received routine outpatient follow-up, whereas the observation group received additional remote Internet follow-up for 6 months after discharge from the hospital. The treatment effects and compliance were investigated using a questionnaire.Results:At 3 months and 6 months after discharge, patients in the observation group had sought significantly more consultations and undergone more periodic re-examinations than patients in the control group (all p<0.001). Furthermore, both the disease-free survival rate and the symptom reduction rate were significantly higher in the observation group compared with the control group (all p<0.001).Conclusions:Remote Internet follow-up is an easy and fast method for improving postradiotherapy compliance with medical instructions and promoting normalization among patients with esophageal cancer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CostaA, LalanneCM, MarciéS, et al.Development and use of a computer system in a radio-therapy department: SISGRAD. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1987; 13:1949–1955.
2.
CoccoA, ValentiniV, BalducciM, et al.START: An advanced radiation therapy information system. Rays, 1996; 21:278–289.
3.
WhiteLE, Krosasei-WoodMA, MatherF. Technology meets health care: Distance learning and telehealth. Ochsner J, 2001; 3:22–29.
4.
YinWB, YuZH, eds. Radiation oncology, 4th ed. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press, 2008:558.
5.
DelcambreC, JacobJH, PottierD, et al.Localized squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus: Retrospective analysis of three treatment schedules. Radiother Oncol, 2001; 59:195–243.
6.
Esophageal Cancer Association Professional Committee of China. The diagnosis and treatment of esophageal standardization guide. Beijing: Beijing Union Medical University Press, 2011.
7.
YatesJW, ChalmerB, McKegneyFP. Evaluation of patients with advanced cancer using the Karnofsky performance status. Cancer, 1980; 45:2220–2224.
8.
CaseL, SimkusR. Wireless application for complex wound management. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 2003:805.
9.
GfirtnerH, KropfF. A patient documentation system for radiation therapy by computer-planning. 2. 5-year experience with the Patient Documentation System PATDOK and recording of irradiation data [in German]. Strahlenther Onkol, 1986; 162:585–591.
10.
NesbittTS, MarcinJP, et al.Perceptions of local health care quality in 7 rural communities with telemedicine. J Rural Health, 2005; 21:79–85.
11.
RogersFB, RicciM, CaputoM, et al.The use of telemedicine for real-time video consultation between trauma center and community hospital in a rural setting improves early trauma care: Preliminary results. J Trauma, 2001; 51:1037–1041.
12.
SchlagPM, MoestaKT, RakovskyS, et al.Telemedicine: The new must for surgery. Arch Surg, 1999; 134:1216–1221.
13.
TaniguchiE, OhashiS. Construction of a regional telementoring network for endoscopic surgery in Japan. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed, 2000; 4:195–199.
14.
BullerDB, WoodallWG, ZimmermanDE, et al.Formative research activities to provide Web-based nutrition education to adults in the Upper Rio Grande Valley. Fam Community Health, 2001; 24:1–12.
15.
JohnsonA, GormanM, LewisC, et al.Interactive videoconferencing improves nutrition intervention in a rural population. J Am Diet Assoc, 2001; 101:173–174.
16.
CainMM, Sarassohn-KahnJ, WayneJC. Health e-People: The online consumer experience: Five-year forecast. Oakland, CA: Institute for the Future, California Health Care Foundation, 2000.
17.
NesbittTS, HiltyDM, KuennethCA, et al.Development of a telemedicine program: A review of 1,000 videoconferencing consultations. West J Med, 2000; 173:169–174.
18.
PammerW, HaneyM, LmhcN, et al.Use of telehealth to extend child protection team services. Pediatrics, 2001; 108:584–590.
JemalA, SiegelR, WardE, et al.Cancer statistics 2008. CA Cancer J Clin, 2008; 58:71–96.
21.
WebsterDM, SundaramP, ByrneME. Injectable nanomaterials for drug delivery: Carriers, targeting moieties, and therapeutics. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2013; 84:1–20.
22.
CrossleyGH, BoyleA, VitenseH, et al.The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) trial: The value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011; 57:1181–1189.
23.
VarmaN, EpsteinAE, IrimpenA, et al.Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: The Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) Trial. Circulation, 2010; 122:325–332.
