Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2015-01
Reduced Cost and Mortality Using Home Telehealth to Promote Self-Management of Complex Chronic Conditions: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study of 4,999 Veteran Patients
Objective:This retrospective analysis of 2009–2012 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) administrative data assessed the efficacy of care coordination home telehealth (CCHT), a model of care designed to reduce institutional care.Materials and Methods:Outcomes for 4,999 CCHT–non-institutional care (NIC) patients were compared with usual (non-CCHT) care in a matched cohort group (MCG) of 183,872 Veterans. Both cohorts were comprised of patients with complex chronic conditions with statistically similar baseline (pre-CCHT enrollment) healthcare costs, when adjusted for age, sex, chronic disease, emergency room (ER) visits, hospital admissions, hospital lengths of stay, and pharmacy costs.Results:Subsequent analyses after 12 months of CCHT-NIC enrollment showed mean annual healthcare costs for CCHT-NIC patients fell 4%, from $21,071 to $20,206, whereas the corresponding costs for MCG patients increased 48%, from $20,937 to $31,055. Higher mean annual pharmacy expenditure of 22% ($470 over baseline) for CCHT-NIC patients versus 15% for MCG patients ($326 over baseline) was attributable to the medication compliance effect of better care coordination. Several healthcare cost drivers (e.g., ER visits and admissions) had sizable declines in the CCHT-NIC group. Medicare usage review in both cohorts excluded this as a confounding factor in cost analyses. Prefinal case selection criteria analysis of both cohorts yielded a 9.8% mortality rate in CCHT patients versus 16.58% in non-CCHT patients.Conclusions:This study corroborates previous positive VHA analyses of CCHT but contradicts results from recent non-VHA studies, highlighting the efficacy of the VHA's standardized CCHT model, which incorporates a biopsychosocial approach to care that emphasizes patient self-management.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Profile of Veterans: 2011 data from the American Community Survey. Available at www.va.gov/vetdata/ (last accessed April22, 2014).
2.
AghaZ, LofgrenRP, VanRuiswykJV, LaydePM. Are patients at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers sicker? A comparative analysis of health status and medical resource use. Arch Intern Med, 2000; 160:3252–3257.
3.
MeyerM, KobbR, RyanP. Chronic disease in the home. Dis Manage, 2002; 5:87–94.
4.
Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2001.
5.
Veterans Millennium Healthcare and Benefits Act. U.S. Public Law 106–117. November30, 1999.
6.
Veterans Health Administration. Enrollee health care demand model. Testimony of the Honorable Jonathan Perlin before the Committee on Veteran's Affairs. U.S. House of Representatives. June23, 2005. Available at www.va.gov/ocla/HVAC/05062310.asp (last accessed April22, 2014).
7.
LonginoCF, BradleyDE. A first look at retirement migration trends in 2000. Gerontologist, 2003; 43:904–907.
8.
CowperDC, LonginoCFJr, KubalJD, ManheimLM, DienstfreySJ, PalmerJM. The retirement migration of U.S. Veterans, 1960,1970, 1980, and 1990. J Appl Gerontol, 2003; 19:123–137.
9.
RyanP, KobbP, HilsenP. Making the right connection: Matching patients to technology. Telemed J E Health, 2003; 9:81–88.
10.
KobbR, HilsenP, RyanP. Assessing technology needs for the elderly. Finding the perfect match for the home. Home Healthc Nurs, 2003; 21:666–673.
11.
LorigK, RitterP, StewartA, SobelD, BrownBW, BanduraA, GonzalezV, LaurentD, HolmanH. Chronic disease self-management program 2-year health status and healthcare utilization outcomes. Med Care, 2001; 39:1217–1223.
12.
Statement of the Honorable Robert H. Roswell, MD, Under Secretary for Health, Department of Veterans Affairs on VA's Long-Term Care Programs before The Committee on Veterans' Affairs Subcommittee on Health, U.S. House of Representatives. May22, 2003. Available at www.va.gov/ocla/testimony/hvac/sh/03my2210.asp (last accessed April22, 2014).
13.
FillenbaumGG. Activities of daily living. In: MaddoxGL, ed. The encyclopedia of aging. New York: Springer, 1987:460–464.
14.
KatzS. Assessing self-maintenance: Activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Assoc, 1983; 31:721–727.
15.
DarkinsA, FosterL, AndersonC, GoldschmidtL, SelvinG. The design, implementation, and operational management of a comprehensive quality management program to support national telehealth networks. Telemed J E Health, 2013; 19:557–564.
16.
ChumblerNR, MkantaWN, RichardsonLC, HarrisL, DarkinsA, KobbB, RyanP. Remote patient-provided communication: Empirical test of a dialogic model of cancer care. J Telemed Telecare, 2007; 13:20–25.
17.
ChumblerNR, NeugaardB, KobbR, RyanP, QinH, JooY. An observational study of veterans with diabetes receiving weekly or daily home telehealth monitoring. J Telemed Telecare, 2005; 11:150–156.
18.
ChumblerNR, NeugaardB, KobbR, RyanP, QinH, JooY. Evaluation of a care coordination/home telehealth program for veterans with diabetes: Health services utilization and health-related quality of life. Eval Health Prof, 2005; 28:464–478.
19.
DarkinsA, RyanP, KobbR, FosterL, EdmonsonE, WakefieldB, LancasterA. Care coordination/home telehealth: The systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemed J E Health, 2008; 14:1118–1126.
20.
RomanowR. Building on values: The future of healthcare in Canada—Final report. Commission on the Future of Healthcare in Canada, Ottawa. 2002. Available at www.cbc.ca/healthcare/final_report.pdf (last accessed September2, 2013).
21.
KunLG. Telehealth and the global health network in the 21st century. From homecare to public health informatics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 2001; 64:155–167.
22.
DorseyER, VenkataramanV, GranaMJ, BullMT, GeorgeBP, BoydCM, BeckCA, RajanB, SeidmannA, BiglanKM. Randomized controlled clinical trial of “virtual house calls” for Parkinsons disease. JAMA Neurol, 2013; 70:565–570.
23.
The Joint Commission. Home—The best place for healthcare. A positioning statement from the Joint Commission on the state of the home care industry. Chicago: The Joint Commission, 2011.
24.
PareG, JaanaM, SicotteC. Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic disease: The evidence base. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2007; 14:269–277.
25.
BensinkM, HaileyD, WoottonR. A systematic review of success and failures in home telehealth: Preliminary results. J Telemed Telecare, 2006; 12(Suppl 3):8–16.
26.
PolisenaJ, TranK, CimonK, HuttonB, McGillS, PalmerK. Home telehealth for diabetes management: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2009; 11:913–930.
27.
GaikwadR. The role of home-based information and communications technology interventions in chronic disease management: A systematic literature review. Health Inform J, 2009; 15:122–146.
28.
WoottonR, DimmickSL, KvedarJC, HaileyD. Home telehealth: Connecting within the community. In: WoottonR, DimmickSL, KvedarJC, eds. The evidence base. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2006:53–62.
29.
YongP, OlsenL. Discussion. In: The healthcare imperative. Lowering costs and improving outcomes: Workshop series summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2010:448.
30.
BarnettA, van der PolsJ, DobsonA. Regression to the mean: What it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol, 2005; 34:215–220.
31.
HumenskyJ, CarrettaH, de GrootK, BrownMM, TarlovE, HynesDM. Service utilization of Veterans dually eligible for VA and Medicare fee-for-service: 1999–2004. Medicare Care Medicaid Res Rev, 2012; 2(3):e1–e22.
32.
TakahashiPY, PecinaJL, UpatisingB, ChaudhryR, ShahND, Van HoutenH, ChaS, CroghanI, NaessensJM, HansonGJ. A randomized controlled trial of telemonitoring in older adults with multiple health issues to prevent hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Arch Intern Med, 2012; 172:773–779.
33.
HendersonC, KnappM, FernandezJ, BeechamJ, HiraniS, CartwrightM, RixonL, BeynonM, RogersA, BowerP, DollH, FitzpatrickR, SteventonA, BardsleyM, HendyJ, NewmanS. Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): Nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2013; 346.
34.
SteventonA, BardsleyM, BillingsJ, DixonJ, DollH, BeynonM, HiraniS, CartwrightM, RixonL, KnappM, HendersonC, RogersA, HendyJ, FitzpatrickR, NewmanS. Effect of telecare on use of health and social care services: Findings from the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. Age Ageing, 2013; 42:501–508.
35.
StroetmannK, KubitschkeL, RobinsonS, StroetmannV, CullenK, McDaidD. How can telehealth help in the provision of integrated care?. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2010.
36.
National Academy of Sciences. Aging and the macroeconomy: Long-term implications of an older population. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2012.
37.
KayyaliB, KimmelZ, van KuikenS. Spurring the market for high-tech home healthcare. McKinsey. 2011. Available at www.mckinsey.com/insights/health_systems_and_services/spurring_the_market_for_high-tech_home_health_care (last accessed September3, 2013).
38.
LandersSH. Why healthcare is going home. N Engl J Med, 2010; 363:1690–1691.
39.
Price Waterhouse Coopers. Emerging mhealth: Paths for growth. June2012. Available at www.pwc.in/press-releases/global-mhealth-adoption.jhtml (last accessed December30, 2013).
40.
KumarS, NilsenWJ, AbernethyA, AtienzaA, PatrickK, PavelM, RileyWT, SharA, SpringB, Spruijt-MetzD, HedekerD, HonavarV, KravitzR, LefebvreRC, MohrDC, MurphySA, QuinnC, ShustermanV, SwendemanD. Mobile health technology evaluation: The mHealth Evidence Workshop. Am J Prev Med, 2013; 45:228–236.
41.
UpatisingB, HansonGJ, KimYL, ChaSS, YihY, TakahashiP. Effects of home telemonitoring on transitions between frailty states and death for older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Gen Med, 2013; 6:145–151.
42.
KinosianB, TompkinsH, EdesT. Factors associated with reduction in inpatient days by home based primary care (HBPC). J Am Geriatr Soc, 2008; 65(Suppl 4):S197–S198.
43.
EngelGL. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 1977; 196:129–136.
44.
Borrell-CarrióF, SuchmanAL, EpsteinRM. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: Principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med, 2004; 2:576–582.
45.
BrownSH, LincolnMJ, GroenPJ, KolodnerR. VistA—U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs national-scale HIS. Int J Med Inform, 2003; 69:135–156.
46.
DaleJA, BehkamiNA, OlsenGS, DorrD. A multi-perspective analysis of lessons learned from building an integrated care coordination information system (ICCIS). AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 2012; 129–135.
47.
DorrD, WilcoxA, BrunkerC, BurdonR, DonnellyS. The effect of technology-supported, multidisease care management on the mortality and hospitalization of seniors. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2008; 56:2195–2202.
48.
AdangEM, WensingM. Economic barriers to implementation of innovations in healthcare: Is the long run-short run efficiency discrepancy a paradox?. Health Policy, 2008; 88:236–242.
49.
KohnD. The role of business process reengineering in health care. Top Health Inf Manage, 1994; 14:1–6.
50.
OlsenL, AisnerD, McGinnisJM. The learning healthcare system: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, 2007.
51.
WasseranJ, RingelJ, WynnB, ZwanzigerJ, RicciK, NewberryS, GenoveseB, SchoenbaumM. An analysis of the Veterans Equitable Resource Allocation (VERA) system. Santa Monica, CA: National Defense Research Institute and RAND Health, 2001.
52.
KitsiouS, PareG, JaannaM. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic diseases: A critical assessment of their methodological quality. J Med Internet Res, 2013; 15(7):e150.
