Introduction:The digital divide affecting elderly patients may compromise the diffusion of telemedicine systems for this age segment. It might be that the difficulties in the passage from trials to the effective distribution of telemedicine systems are also due to the awareness of a personal digital divide in the target population.Materials and Methods:The analysis aims to estimate the number of people over the age of 50 years with potential cardiovascular problems able to access the Web. It made use of data from several sources (the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe and the Istituto Nazionale di Statistica Multiscopo Survey). Furthermore, with regard to Italy, the estimates obtained from official data were compared with those obtained in a survey investigating heart failure patients in Tuscany.Results:In 2011, the percentage of people suffering from cardiovascular diseases and with Web access was 24% in Europe, with significant differences by country (ranging from 53% in Switzerland to below 20% in Italy, Spain, and Portugal). In Italy, however, the proportion of people with Web access increased from 2007 to 2011, and the survey in Tuscany showed that elderly people with limited information and communications technology skills overcame challenges and learned how to connect to the Web because they started to appreciate new technologies.Conclusions:The opportunity to use the Internet to monitor patients with chronic disease can serve as a challenge to reduce the digital divide gap and, furthermore, to increase their social and technological inclusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LindbergB, NilssonC, ZottermanD, SöderbergS, SkärL. Using information and communication technology in home care for communication between patients, family members, and healthcare professionals: A systematic review. Int J Telemed Appl, 2013; 2013:461829.
2.
Van DeursenAJAM, van DijkJAGM. Internet skills performance tests: Are people ready for ehealth?. J Med Internet Res, 2011; 13:e35.
3.
LiangT. Matrix analysis of the digital divide in ehealth services using awareness, want, and adoption gap. J Med Internet Res, 2012; 14:e11.
4.
ChoiN, DiNittoD. Internet use among older adults: Association with health needs, psychological capital, and social capital. J Med Internet Res, 2013; 15:e97.
5.
ShowellC, TurnerP. The PLU problem: Are we designing personal ehealth for people like us?. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2013; 183:276–280.
6.
CastellsM. The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. London: Oxford University Press, 2001.
7.
SartoriL. Il divario digitale. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino, 2006.
8.
WesselsB. The reproduction and reconfiguration of inequality. Differentiation and class, status and power in the dynamics of digital divides. In: RagneddaM, MuschertGW, eds. The digital divide. The Internet and social inequality in international perspective. New York: Routledge, 2013:17–28.
9.
van DijkJAGM. A theory of the digital divide. In: RagneddaM, MuschertGW, eds. The digital divide. The Internet and social inequality in international perspective. New York: Routledge, 2013:29–51.
10.
LittE. Measuring users' internet skills: A review of past assessments and a look toward the future. New Media Soc, 2013; 15:612–630.
11.
Vicente CuervoMR, López MenéndezAJ. A multivariate framework for the analysis of the digital divide: Evidence for the European Union-15. Inform Manage, 2006; 43:756–766.
12.
NicholsM, TownsendN, ScarboroughP, Luengo-FernandezR, LealJ, GrayA, RaynerM. European cardiovascular disease statistics 2012. Brussels: European Heart Network and Sophia Antipolis: European Society of Cardiology, 2012.
13.
RomanoMF, SardellaMV, AlboniF, L'AbbateA, MariottiR, Di BelloV. The informative contribution of the “virtual medical visit” in a new heart failure telemedicine integrated system. Telemed J E Health, 2014; 20:508–521.
14.
JonesR. Development of a questionnaire and cross-sectional survey of patient ehealth readiness and ehealth inequalities. Med 2.0 2013; 2:e9. doi: 10.2196/med20.2559. Available at www.medicine20.com/2013/2/e9/ (last accessed November11, 2014).
15.
LeungL. Effects of Internet connectedness and information literacy on quality of life. Soc Indicators Res, 2010; 98:273–290.
16.
SeybertH. Internet use in households and by individuals in 2011. In: Statistics in focus. Vol. 66. Luxembourg: Eurostat, 2012; 57–75.
17.
Van DijkJAGM. Evolution of the digital divide. The digital divide turns to inequality of skills and usage. In: BusJ, et al., eds. Digital enlightenment yearbook 2012. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2012:57–75.
18.
Eurostat. l'Italia del digital divide. April2012. Available at www.webnews.it/2012/04/16/eurostat-italia-digital-divide/ (last accessed November11, 2014).
19.
CimpermanM, Makovec BrenčičM, TrkmanP, de Leonni StanonikM. Older adults' perceptions of home telehealth service. Telemed J E Health, 2013; 19:786–790.
20.
CorreaT, StraubhaarJD, ChenW, SpenceJ. Brokering new technologies: The role of children in their parents' usage of the Internet. New Media Soc, 2013October15 [Epub]. doi:10.1177/1461444813506975.
21.
KochS. Healthy ageing supported by technology—A cross-disciplinary research challenge. Inform Health Soc Care, 2010; 35:81–91.
22.
PescosolidoB. Social connectedness in health, morbidity and mortality, and health care—The contributions, limits and further potential of health and retirement study. Forum Health Econ Policy, 2011; 14:11.
23.
HankK. Proximity and contacts between older parents and their children: A European comparison. J Marriage Fam, 2007; 69:157–173.
24.
LewinK. Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Row, 1951.
25.
WinterR., Munn-GiddingsC. A handbook for action research in health and social care. New York: Routledge, 2001.
26.
KellyD, SimpsonS, BrownP. An action research project to evaluate the clinical practice facilitator role for junior nurses in an acute hospital setting. J Clin Nurs, 2002; 11:90–98.
