Background: The lack of a universal system for fracture healing progress evaluation recommended by evidence-based orthopedics is mentioned in current literature. Radiographs and the observation of clinical signs and symptoms remain standard practice for the assessment of fracture healing progress. Objectives: The general aim of this study was to show the main functionalities of the Web-based telediagnostic tools designed to improve fracture healing assessment follow-up and to present a study of fracture healing assessment based on collected study group of long bone fracture cases. Methods: The originally designed Web-based system was used to assess remotely fracture healing in 40 complete radiographic sets (211 radiographs) randomly selected from a database. Digital radiographic images and clinical data were stored in the database and then subjected to detailed analysis. Descriptive classifications, scorings, and radiographic image optical density analysis measurements were used for a series of cases. Results: Curves on the graph, drawn from the consecutive follow-up measurements of fracture gap optical density, can slope down regularly in normal healing cases or remain irregular and disorganized in delayed unions. An association between optical density values, callus index, and descriptive scoring variables was found for normal healing based on results received from Web-based telediagnostic system. Conclusions: The development of Web-based telediagnostic applications have the potential to improve fracture qualitative and quantitative evaluation and monitoring for the improvement of the quality of fracture care. The results imply the feasibility of Web-based fracture healing assessment telediagnostic applications over the Internet.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbboudJA, BozentkaDJ, BeredjiklianPK. Telemedicine consultation for patients with upper extremity disorders is reliable. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005; 435:250–257.
2.
BaruffaldiF, GualdriniG, ToniA. Comparison of asynchronous and realtime teleconsulting for orthopaedic second opinions. J Telemed Telecare, 2002; 8:297–301.
3.
GlinkowskiW, CiszekB, GilM. Teleconsultations in orthopedic trauma and neurotrauma utilizing mobile digital assistant. Int Congr Ser, 2005; 1281:1329
4.
VladzymyrskyyAV. Four years' experience of teleconsultations in daily clinical practice. J Telemed Telecare, 2005; 11:294–297.
5.
MorshedS, CorralesL, GenantH, MiclauT3rd. Outcome assessment in clinical trials of fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008; 90,Suppl 1:62–67.
6.
WadeR, RichardsonJ. Outcome in fracture healing: A review. Injury, 2001; 32:109–114.
GlinkowskiW. Development of telediagnostic tools for decision support for Web based orthopaedic trauma evaluation. BlobelB, PharowP, ZvarovaJ, LopezD. eHealth: combining health telemetrics, telemedicine biomedical engineering and bioinformatics to the edge. CeHR Conference Proceedings 2007. Berlin, Germany: AKA, IOS Press, 2008; 213–219.
GlinkowskiW, ŻyłkowskiJ, WojciechowskiA, GóreckiA. The development of methods for quantitative clinical assessment of the fracture healing. PiętkaE, ŁęskiJ, FranielS. Proceedings of the XI International Conference Medical Informatics & Technology, Wisła, 2006; 46–61. http://itib.edu.pl/mit/papers/46.pdf.
11.
HuntDL, HaynesRB, HannaSE, SmithK. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. JAMA, 1998; 280:1339–1346.
12.
KornackiM, GlinkowskiW. Decision support systems (DSS) in fracture treatment. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, 1999; 30:71–74(Pol.).
13.
PayneTH. Computer decision support systems. Chest, 2000; 118:47S–52S.
14.
ClausonKA, MarshWA, PolenHH, SeamonMJ, OrtizBI. Clinical decision support tools: Analysis of online drug information databases. BMC Med Inform Decis Making, 2007; 7:7.
15.
BhandariM, GuyattGH, SwiontkowskiMF, TornetaP, SpragueS, SchemitschEH. A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopedic surgeons. J Orthop Trauma, 2002; 8:562–566.
16.
CorralesLA, MorshedS, BhandariM, MiclauT3rd. Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008; 90:1862–1868.
17.
HammerR, HammerbyS, LindholmB. Accuracy of radiological assessment of tibial shaft fractures in humans. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1985; 199:233–238.
18.
IslamO, SoboleskiD, SymonsS, DavidsonLK, AshworthMA, BabynP. Development and duration of radiographic signs of bone healing in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2000; 175:75–78.
19.
LaneJM, SandhuHS. Current approaches to experimental bone grafting. Orthop Clin North Am, 1987; 18:213–225.
20.
MadsenJE, HukkanenM, AuneAK, BasranI, MøllerJF, PolakJM, NordslettenL. Fracture healing and callus innervation after peripheral nerve resection in rats. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998; 351:230–240.
McKinleyDW, ChamblissML. Follow-up radiographs to detect callus formation after fractures. Arch Fam Med, 2000; 9:373–374.
23.
NordslettenL, MadsenJE, AlmaasR, RootweltT, HalseJ, KonttinenYT, HukkanenM, SantavirtaS. The neuronal regulation of fracture healing: effects of sciatic nerve resection in rats. Acta Orthop Scand, 1994; 65:299–304
24.
BlokhuisTJ, den BoerFC, BramerJAM, van LingenA, RoosJC, BakkerFC, PatkaP, HaarmanHJ. Evaluation of strength of healing fractures with dual energy xray absorptiometry. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000; 380:260–268.
25.
MarkelMD, ChaoEY. Noninvasive monitoring techniques for quantitative description of callus mineral content and mechanical properties. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1993; 293:37–45.
26.
DavisBJ, RobertsPJ, MoorcroftCI, BrownMF, ThomasPB, WadeRH. Reliability of radiographs in defining union of internally fixed fractures. Injury, 2004; 35:557–561.
27.
Eastaugh-WaringSJ, JoslinCC, HardyJR, CunninghamJL. Quantification of fracture healing from radiographs using the maximum callus index. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009; 467:1986–1991.
28.
GlinkowskiW, GóreckiA. Clinical experiences with ultrasonometric measurement of fracture healing. Technol Health Care, 2006; 14:321–333.
29.
WatanabeY, NishizawaY, TakenakaN, KobayashiM, MatsushitaT. Ability and limitation of radiographic assessment of fracture healing in rats. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009; 467:1981–1985.
30.
WhelanDB, BhandariM, McKeeMD, GuyattGH, KrederHJ, StephenD, SchemitschEH. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of the healing of tibial fractures after intramedullary fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2002; 84:15–18.
31.
OniOO, DunningJ, MobbsRJ, GreggPJ. Clinical factors and the size of the external callus in tibial shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1991; 273:278–283.
32.
den BoerFC, BramerJA, PatkaP, BakkerFC, BarentsenRH, FeilzerAJ, de LangeES, HaarmanHJ. Quantification of fracture healing with three-dimensional computed tomography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1998; 117:345–350.
33.
GershuniDH, SkyharMJ, ThompsonB, ResnickD, DonaldG, AkesonWH. A comparison of conventional radiography and computed tomography in the evaluation of spiral fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1985; 67:1388–1395.
34.
GrigoryanM, LynchJA, FierlingerAL, GuermaziA, FanB, MacLeanDB, MacLeanA, GenantHK. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of closed fracture healing using computed tomography and conventional radiography. Acad Radiol, 2003; 10:1267–1273.
MoedBR, WatsonJT, GoldschmidtP, van HolsbeeckM. Ultrasound for the early diagnosis of fracture healing after interlocking nailing of the tibia without reaming. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995; 310:137–144.
39.
LowetG, van der PerreG. Ultrasound velocity measurement in long bones: Measurement method and simulation of ultrasound wave propagation. J Biomech, 1996; 29:1255–1262.
40.
ProtopappasVC, FotiadisDI, MalizosKN. Guided ultrasound wave propagation in intact and healing long bones. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2006; 32:693–708.
41.
RobertsSG, SteeleCR. Efficacy of monitoring long-bone fracture healing by measurement of either bone stiffness or resonant frequency: Numerical simulation. J Orthop Res, 2000; 18:691–697.
42.
NakatsuchiY, TsuchikaneA, NomuraA. Assessment of fracture healing in the tibia using the impulse response method. J Orthop Trauma, 1996; 10:50–62.
43.
RowińskiJ, GlinkowskiW, GłębowskiP. Estimation of optical density of bone tissue radiograms with laser densitometry. PlutaM. Proceedings of SPIE, optics in biophysics and biochemistry. Warsaw, Poland: SPIE-PL, 1996; 2:143–148.
44.
ClaesLE, CunninghamJL. Monitoring the mechanical properties of healing bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009; 467:1964–1971.
RamotowskiW, GranowskiR. Zespol: An original method of stable osteosynthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1991; 272:67–75.
47.
EinhornTA. Enhancement of fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1995; 77:940–956.
48.
RaikinSM, LandsmanJC, AlexanderWA, FroimsonMI, PlaxtonNA. Effect of nicotine on the rate and strength of long bone fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998; 353:231–237.
49.
KrestanCR, NoskeH, VasilevskaV, WeberM, SchuellerG, ImhofH, CzernyC. MDCT versus digital radiography in the evaluation of bone healing in orthopedic patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006; 186:1754–1760.
50.
MoorcroftCI, OgrodnikPJ, ThomasPB, WadeRH. Mechanical properties of callus in human tibial fractures: A preliminary investigation. Clin Biomech, 2001; 16:776–782.
51.
PanjabiMM, WalterSD, KarudaM, WhiteAA, LawsonJP. Correlations of radiographic analysis of healing fractures with strength: A statistical analysis of experimental osteotomies. J Orthop Res, 1985; 3:212–218.
52.
TachakraS, HollingdaleJ, UcheCU. Evaluation of telemedical orthopaedic specialty support to a minor accident and treatment service. J Telemed Telecare, 2001; 7:27–31.
53.
KrupinskiE, GonzalesM, GonzalesC, WeinsteinRS. Evaluation of a digital camera for acquiring radiographic images for telemedicine applications. Telemed J E Health, 2000; 6:297–302.
