GuyattGH, OxmanAD, SchünemannHJ, TugwellP, KnottnerusA. 2011. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol, 64:380–382.
2.
QaseemA, SnowV, OwensDK, ShekelleP, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College ofPhysicians. 2010. The development of clinical practice guidelines and guidance statements of the American College of Physicians: summary of methods. Ann Intern Med, 153:194–199.
3.
Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine 2011 Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.nap.edu (accessed April12, 2020).
4.
AnsariMT, TsertsvadzeA, MoherD. 2009. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: a perspective. PLoS Med, 6:e1000151.
5.
QaseemA, KansagaraD, LinJS, MustafaRA, WiltTJ, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College ofPhysicians. 2019. The Development of Clinical Guidelines and Guidance Statements by the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians: update of methods. Ann Intern Med, 170:863–870.
6.
SawkaAM, CartySE, HaugenBR, HennesseyJV, KoppPA, PearceEN, SosaJA, TufanoRP, JonklaasJ. 2018. American Thyroid Association guidelines and statements: past, present, and future. Thyroid, 28:692–706.
7.
GuyattG, AgoritsasT, LytvynL, SiemieniukR, VandvikP. 2019. BMJ rapid recommendations: creating tools to support a revolution in clinical practice guideline adoption. Canad J Gen Intern Med, 14:6–12.
8.
TricociP, AllenJM, KramerJM, CaliffRM, SmithSC. 2009. Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA, 301:831–841.
9.
BritoJP, DomecqJP, MuradMH, GuyattGH, MontoriVM. 2013. The Endocrine Society guidelines: when the confidence cart goes before the evidence horse. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 98:3246–3252.
10.
AlexanderPE, GionfriddoMR, LiSA, BeroL, StoltzfusRJ, NeumannI, BritoJP, DjulbegovicB, MontoriVM, NorrisSL, SchünemannHJ, ThabaneL, GuyattGH. 2016. A number of factors explain why WHO guideline developers make strong recommendations inconsistent with GRADE guidance. J Clin Epidemiol, 70:111–122.
11.
AlexanderPE, BeroL, MontoriVM, BritoJP, StoltzfusR, DjulbegovicB, NeumannI, RaveS, GuyattG. 2014. World Health Organization recommendations are often strong based on low confidence in effect estimates. J Clin Epidemiol, 67:629–634.
12.
AgoritsasT, MerglenA, HeenAF, KristiansenA, NeumannI, BritoJP, Brignardello-PetersenR, AlexanderPE, RindDM, VandvikPO, GuyattGH. 2017. UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey. BMJ Open, 7:e018593.
13.
AgoritsasT, NeumannI, MendozaC, GuyattGH. 2017. Guideline conflict of interest management and methodology heavily impacts on the strength of recommendations: comparison between two iterations of the American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol, 81:141–143.
14.
MeyerC, BowersA, WayantC, CheckettsJ, ScottJ, MusuvathyS, VassarM. 2018. Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology's clinical practice guidelines. PLoS One, 13:e0204720.
15.
SchumacherRC, NguyenOK, MakamAN. 2019. Evidence-based medicine and the American Thoracic Society guidelines-reply. JAMA Intern Med, 179:1004–1005.
16.
SchumacherRC, NguyenOK, DeshpandeK, MakamAN. 2019. Evidence-based medicine and the American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guidelines. JAMA Intern Med, 179:584–586.
17.
Bautista-OrdunoKG, Dorsey-TrevinoEG, Gonzalez-GonzalezJG, Castillo-GonzalezDA, Garcia-LealM, Raygoza-CortezK, GionfriddoMR, Rodriguez-GutierrezR. 2020. American Thyroid Association Guidelines are Inconsistent with GRADE—A meta-epidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol, 123:180–188.e2.
SmallridgeRC, AinKB, AsaSL, BibleKC, BrierleyJD, BurmanKD, KebebewE, LeeNY, NikiforovYE, RosenthalMS, ShahMH, ShahaAR, TuttleRM. 2012. American Thyroid Association guidelines for management of patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer. Thyroid, 22:1104–1139.
20.
JonklaasJ, BiancoAC, BauerAJ, BurmanKD, CappolaAR, CeliFS, CooperDS, KimBW, PeetersRP, RosenthalMS, SawkaAM. 2014. Guidelines for the treatment of hypothyroidism: prepared by the American Thyroid Association Task Force on thyroid hormone replacement. Thyroid, 24:1670–1751.
21.
AlexanderEK, PearceEN, BrentGA, BrownRS, ChenH, DosiouC, GrobmanWA, LaurbergP, LazarusJH, MandelSJ, PeetersRP, SullivanS. 2017. Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and the postpartum. Thyroid, 27:315–389.
22.
HaugenBR, AlexanderEK, BibleKC, DohertyGM, MandelSJ, NikiforovYE, PaciniF, RandolphGW, SawkaAM, SchlumbergerM, SchuffKG, ShermanSI, SosaJA, StewardDL, TuttleRM, WartofskyL. 2016. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid, 26:1–133.
23.
RossDS, BurchHB, CooperDS, GreenleeMC, LaurbergP, MaiaAL, RivkeesSA, SamuelsM, SosaJA, StanMN, WalterMA. 2016. American Thyroid Association guidelines for diagnosis and management of hyperthyroidism and other causes of thyrotoxicosis. Thyroid, 26:1343–1421.
24.
GuyattGH, Alonso-CoelloP, SchünemannHJ, DjulbegovicB, NothackerM, LangeS, MuradMH, AklEA. 2016. Guideline panels should seldom make good practice statements: guidance from the GRADE Working Group. J Clin Epidemiol, 80:3–7.
25.
Castillo-GonzalezDA, Dorsey-TrevinoEG, Gonzalez-GonzalezJG, Garcia-LealM, Bautista-OrduñoKG, RaygozaK, GionfriddoMR, OspinaNMS, Rodriguez-GutierrezR. 2020. A deeper analysis in thyroid research: a meta-epidemiological study of the American Thyroid Association clinical guidelines. PLoS One, 15:e0234297.
26.
SinclairD, IsbaR, KredoT, ZaniB, SmithH, GarnerP. 2013. World Health Organization guideline development: an evaluation. PLoS One, 8:e63715.
27.
BarbuiC, DuaT, van OmmerenM, YasamyMT, FleischmannA, ClarkN, ThornicroftG, HillS, SaxenaS. 2010. Challenges in developing evidence-based recommendations using the GRADE approach: the case of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders. PLoS Med, 7:e1000322.
28.
GärtnerFR, PortieljeJE, LangendamM, HairwassersD, AgoritsasT, GijsenB, LiefersGJ, PieterseAH, StiggelboutAM. 2019. Role of patient preferences in clinical practice guidelines: a multiple methods study using guidelines from oncology as a case. BMJ Open, 9:e032483.
29.
KumarA, MiladinovicB, GuyattGH, SchünemannHJ, DjulbegovicB. 2016. GRADE guidelines system is reproducible when instructions are clearly operationalized even among the guidelines panel members with limited experience with GRADE. J Clin Epidemiol, 75:115–118.
30.
LusterM, AktolunC, AmendoeiraI, BarczyńskiM, BibleKC, DuntasLH, EliseiR, Handkiewicz-JunakD, HoffmannM, JarząbB, LeenhardtL, MusholtTJ, NewboldK, NixonIJ, SmitJ, Sobrinho-SimõesM, SosaJA, TuttleRM, VerburgFA, WartofskyL, FührerD. 2019. European Perspective on 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Proceedings of an Interactive International Symposium. Thyroid, 29:7–26.
31.
TuttleRM, AhujaS, AvramAM, BernetVJ, BourguetP, DanielsGH, DillehayG, DraganescuC, FluxG, FührerD, GiovanellaL, GreenspanB, LusterM, MuylleK, SmitJWA, Van NostrandD, VerburgFA, HegedüsL. 2019. Controversies, consensus, and collaboration in the use of 131I therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer: a joint statement from the American Thyroid Association, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the European Thyroid Association. Thyroid, 29:461–470.
32.
MercuriM, GafniA. 2018. The evolution of GRADE (part 3): a framework built on science or faith?. J Eval Clin Pract, 24:1223–1231.
33.
MercuriM, GafniA. 2018. The evolution of GRADE (part 2): still searching for a theoretical and/or empirical basis for the GRADE framework. J Eval Clin Pract, 24:1211–1222.
34.
MercuriM, GafniA. 2018. The evolution of GRADE (part 1): is there a theoretical and/or empirical basis for the GRADE framework?. J Eval Clin Pract, 24:1203–1210.