Abstract
The use of biomaterials and regenerative medicine has been well recognized as a promising means to repair dural defects. However, there have been few reports on preclinical large animal models of dural defects, which are crucial to evaluate the performances of dural repair materials. In addition, the methods of preparing animal models vary among studies. To ensure high-quality research results and prevent unnecessary financial losses, a standard method of animal model preparation needs to be established. In this study, we designed and evaluated three different surgeries (methods A, B, and C) involving different temporal muscle and skull incision techniques to prepare beagle dog dural defect model. It was found that method C was associated with an appropriate surgical duration and better postoperative recovery without obvious complications compared with methods A and B. Moreover, the surgical approach used in method C avoided the potentially dense vascular region in the cranial midline and retained an adequate blood supply for the temporal muscle. Our results suggest that method C is a safe and effective procedure that allows the preparation of a stable large animal model for studies on dural repair materials and regenerative medicine.
Impact Statement
Using biomaterials and regenerative medicine to repair tissue defects has been a very hot research field, during which the development of stable large animal models with appropriate biotechnology is crucial. Recently, more and more researchers are paying attention to dural defect repair. However, the lack of widely recognized stable large animal models has seriously affected the related further research. In this study, a stable large animal dural defect model is developed exactly for the first time. Therefore, the article would attract considerable attention and be highly cited after publication.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
