Aim of the present study was the establishment of an efficient and reproducible model for irradiation of rat femora as a model for impaired osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Four different irradiation protocols were compared: single irradiation of the left femur with 20 Gy and explantation after 4 or 8 weeks (group A, B) and three irradiation fractions at 3–4 days intervals with 10 Gy and explantation after 4 or 8 weeks (group C, D). The contralateral, unirradiated femur served as control. Evaluation included histology, microcomputertomography (μCT), and real-time polymerase chain reaction. Histology showed a pronounced increase of vacuoles in bone marrow after irradiation, especially after 4 weeks (group A and C), demonstrating bone marrow edema and fatty degeneration. Irradiation provoked a decrease of total cell numbers in cortical bone and of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF1α)-positive cells in bone marrow. The expression of several markers (osteocalcin [OCN], runt-related transcription factor 2 [RUNX2], transforming growth factor beta 1 [TGFβ1], tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNFα], vascular endothelial growth factor A [VEGFA], and HIF1α) was decreased in group A after irradiation. This might suggest a decreased metabolism after irradiation. A significant decrease in small-sized vessels was seen in μCT evaluation in group A and D. Single irradiation with 20 Gy had the most severe and reproducible impact on osteogenesis and angiogenesis after 4 weeks while being well tolerated by all animals, thus making it an excellent model for evaluation of bone healing and vascularization in irradiated tissue.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RossetP., DeschaseauxF., and LayrolleP.Cell therapy for bone repair. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 100, S107, 2014.
2.
GroverV., KapoorA., MalhotraR., and SachdevaS.Bone allografts: a review of safety and efficacy. Indian J Dent Res, 22, 496, 2011.
3.
LaurencinC.T., and El-AminS.F.Xenotransplantation in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 16, 4, 2008.
4.
CorreiaS.I., PereiraH., Silva-CorreiaJ., Van DijkC.N., Espregueira-MendesJ., OliveiraJ.M., and ReisR.L.Current concepts: tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications in the ankle joint. J R Soc Interface, 11, 20130784, 2014.
5.
DesmonsS., HegerM., DelfosseC., FalgayracG., SarrazinT., DelattreC., CatrosS., MordonS., and PenelG.A preliminary investigation into the effects of X-ray radiation on superficial cranial vascularization. Calcif Tissue Int, 84, 379, 2009.
6.
CaoX., WuX., FrassicaD., YuB., PangL., XianL., WanM., LeiW., ArmourM., TryggestadE., WongJ., WenC.Y., LuW.W., and FrassicaF.J.Irradiation induces bone injury by damaging bone marrow microenvironment for stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108, 1609, 2011.
7.
RubinD.B., and GriemM.L.The Radiation Biology of the Vascular Endothelium, 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1998, pp. 13–38.
8.
ShirotaT., and TavassoliM.Alterations of bone marrow sinus endothelium induced by ionizing irradiation: implications in the homing of intravenously transplanted marrow cells. Blood Cells, 18, 197, 1992.
9.
ArnoldM., StasP., KummermehrJ., Schultz-HectorS., and TrottK.R.Radiation-induced impairment of bone healing in the rat femur: effects of radiation dose, sequence and interval between surgery and irradiation. Radiother Oncol, 48, 259, 1998.
10.
CohenM., NishimuraI., TamplenM., HokugoA., BeumerJ., SteinbergM.L., SuhJ.D., AbemayorE., and NabiliV.Animal model of radiogenic bone damage to study mandibular osteoradionecrosis. Am J Otolaryngol, 32, 291, 2011.
11.
FennerM., ParkJ., SchulzN., AmannK., GrabenbauerG.G., FahrigA., KargJ., WiltfangJ., NeukamF.W., and NkenkeE.Validation of histologic changes induced by external irradiation in mandibular bone. An experimental animal model. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 38, 47, 2010.
12.
LehnerB., BauerJ., RodelF., GrabenbauerG., NeukamF.W., and Schultze-Mosgau, S. Radiation-induced impairment of osseous healing with vascularized bone transfer: experimental model using a pedicled tibia flap in rat. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 33, 486, 2004.
13.
LerouxelE., MoreauA., BoulerJ.M., GiumelliB., DaculsiG., WeissP., and MalardO.Effects of high doses of ionising radiation on bone in rats: a new model for evaluation of bone engineering. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 47, 602, 2009.
14.
LerouxelE., WeissP., GiumellI.B., MoreauA., PiletP., GuicheuxJ., CorreP., BoulerJ.M., DaculsiG., and MalardO.Injectable calcium phosphate scaffold and bone marrow graft for bone reconstruction in irradiated areas: an experimental study in rats. Biomaterials, 27, 4566, 2006.
15.
NyarubaM.M., YamamotoI., KimuraH., and MoritaR.Bone fragility induced by X-ray irradiation in relation to cortical bone-mineral content. Acta Radiol, 39, 43, 1998.
16.
Schultze-MosgauS., LehnerB., RodelF., WehrhanF., AmannK., KoppJ., ThorwarthM., NkenkeE., and GrabenbauerG.Expression of bone morphogenic protein 2/4, transforming growth factor-beta1, and bone matrix protein expression in healing area between vascular tibia grafts and irradiated bone-experimental model of osteonecrosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 61, 1189, 2005.
17.
BartonM.Tables of equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions: a simple application of the linear quadratic formula. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 31, 371, 1995.
18.
ChomczynskiP., and SacchiN.Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem, 162, 156, 1987.
19.
SfeirC., HoL., DollB., AzariK., and HollingerJ.O.Fracture repair. In: LiebermanJ., and FriedlaenderG., eds. Bone Regeneration and Repair. New York: Humana Press, 2005, pp. 21–44.
20.
Daldrup-LinkH.E., HenningT., and LinkT.M.MR imaging of therapy-induced changes of bone marrow. Eur Radiol, 17, 743, 2007.
21.
HuangW., YangY., SunZ., and ZengX.Early radiation-induced bone marrow injury: serial MR imaging during initial 4 weeks after irradiation. Acad Radiol, 16, 733, 2009.
22.
CuriM.M., CardosoC.L., de LimaH.G., KowalskiL.P., and MartinsM.D.Histopathologic and histomorphometric analysis of irradiation injury in bone and the surrounding soft tissues of the jaws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 74, 190, 2016.
23.
CavenaghE.C., WeinbergerE., ShawD.W., WhiteK.S., and GeyerJ.R.Hematopoietic marrow regeneration in pediatric patients undergoing spinal irradiation: MR depiction. Am J Neuroradiol, 16, 461, 1995.
24.
KimH., ChoH.J., KimS.W., LiuB., ChoiY.J., LeeJ., SohnY.D., LeeM.Y., HougeM.A., and YoonY.S.CD31+ cells represent highly angiogenic and vasculogenic cells in bone marrow: novel role of nonendothelial CD31+ cells in neovascularization and their therapeutic effects on ischemic vascular disease. Circ Res, 107, 602, 2010.
25.
HuiS.K., SharkeyL., KidderL.S., ZhangY., FairchildG., CoghillK., XianC.J., and YeeD.The influence of therapeutic radiation on the patterns of bone marrow in ovary-intact and ovariectomized mice. PLoS One, 7, e42668, 2012.
26.
LevesqueJ.P., WinklerI.G., HendyJ., WilliamsB., HelwaniF., BarbierV., NowlanB., and NilssonS.K.Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization results in hypoxia with increased hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1 alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor A in bone marrow. Stem Cells, 25, 1954, 2007.
27.
SpencerJ.A., FerraroF., RoussakisE., KleinA., WuJ., RunnelsJ.M., ZaherW., MortensenL.J., AltC., TurcotteR., YusufR., CoteD., VinogradovS.A., ScaddenD.T., and LinC.P.Direct measurement of local oxygen concentration in the bone marrow of live animals. Nature, 508, 269, 2014.
28.
MaedaM., BryantM.H., YamagataM., LiG., EarleJ.D., and ChaoE.Y.Effects of irradiation on cortical bone and their time-related changes. A biomechanical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 70, 392, 1988.
29.
TakahashiS., SugimotoM., KotouraY., SasaiK.Oka, M., and Yamamuro, T. Long-term changes in the haversian systems following high-dose irradiation. An ultrastructural and quantitative histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 76, 722, 1994.
30.
RabeloG.D., BelettiM.E., and DechichiP.Histological analysis of the alterations on cortical bone channels network after radiotherapy: a rabbit study. Microsc Res Tech, 73, 1015, 2010.
31.
SugimotoM., TakahashiS., KotouraY., ShibamotoY., TakahashiM., AbeM., IshizakiK., and YamamuroT.Osteocyte viability after high-dose irradiation in the rabbit. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 297, 247, 1993.
32.
MidgleyC.A., OwensB., BriscoeC.V., ThomasD.B., LaneD.P., and HallP.A.Coupling between gamma irradiation, p53 induction and the apoptotic response depends upon cell type in vivo. J Cell Sci, 108, 1843, 1995.
33.
GalT.J., Munoz-AntoniaT., Muro-CachoC.A., and KlotchD.W.Radiation effects on osteoblasts in vitro: a potential role in osteoradionecrosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 126, 1124, 2000.
34.
SakuraiT., SawadaY., YoshimotoM., KawaiM., and MiyakoshiJ.Radiation-induced reduction of osteoblast differentiation in C2C12 cells. J Radiat Res, 48, 515, 2007.
35.
BandaM., BommineniA., ThomasR.A., LuckinbillL.S., and TuckerJ.D.Evaluation and validation of housekeeping genes in response to ionizing radiation and chemical exposure for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR. Mutat Res, 649, 126, 2008.
36.
PonnaiyaB., AmundsonS.A., GhandhiS.A., SmilenovL.B., GeardC.R., BuonannoM., and BrennerD.J.Single-cell responses to ionizing radiation. Radiat Environ Biophys, 52, 523, 2013.
37.
TeyssierF., BayJ.O., DionetC., and VerrelleP.Cell cycle regulation after exposure to ionizing radiation. Bull Cancer, 86, 345, 1999.
38.
LuchnikA.N., HisamutdinovT.A., and GeorgievG.P.Inhibition of transcription in eukaryotic cells by X-irradiation: relation to the loss of topological constraint in closed DNA loops. Nucleic Acids Res, 16, 5175, 1988.
39.
HallE.J., and GiacciaA.J.Radiobiology for Radiologists, 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
40.
Daldrup-LinkH.E., LinkT.M., RummenyE.J., AugustC., KonemannS., JurgensH., and HeindelW.Assessing permeability alterations of the blood-bone marrow barrier due to total body irradiation: in vivo quantification with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Bone Marrow Transplant, 25, 71, 2000.
41.
DickerA.P., WilliamsT.L., and GrantD.S.Targeting angiogenic processes by combination rofecoxib and ionizing radiation. Am J Clin Oncol, 24, 438, 2001.
42.
ImaizumiN., MonnierY., HegiM., Mirimanoff.R.O., and RueggC.Radiotherapy suppresses angiogenesis in mice through TGF-betaRI/ALK5-dependent inhibition of endothelial cell sprouting. PLoS One, 5, e11084, 2010.
43.
HorchR.E., BeierJ.P., KneserU., and ArkudasA.Successful human long-term application of in situ bone tissue engineering. J Cell Mol Med, 18, 1478, 2014.
44.
ArkudasA., PryymachukG., BeierJ.P., WeigelL., KornerC., SingerR.F., BleizifferO., PolykandriotisE., HorchR.E., and KneserU.Combination of extrinsic and intrinsic pathways significantly accelerates axial vascularization of bioartificial tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg, 129, 55e–65e, 2012.
45.
ArkudasA., TjiawiJ., BleizifferO., GrabingerL., PolykandriotisE., BeierJ.P., SturzlM., HorchR.E., and KneserU.Fibrin gel-immobilized VEGF and bFGF efficiently stimulate angiogenesis in the AV loop model. Mol Med, 13, 480, 2007.
46.
SonstevoldT., JohanessenA.C., and StuhrL.A rat model of radiation injury in the mandibular area. Radiat Oncol, 10, 129, 2015.
47.
ThamesH.D.Jr, WithersH.R., PetersL.J., and FletcherG.H.Changes in early and late radiation responses with altered dose fractionation: implications for dose-survival relationships. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 8, 219, 1982.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
