A significant challenge in oncology is the need to develop in vitro models that accurately mimic the complex microenvironment within and around normal and diseased tissues. Here, we describe a self-folding approach to create curved hydrogel microstructures that more accurately mimic the geometry of ducts and acini within the mammary glands, as compared to existing three-dimensional block-like models or flat dishes. The microstructures are composed of photopatterned bilayers of poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA), a hydrogel widely used in tissue engineering. The PEGDA bilayers of dissimilar molecular weights spontaneously curve when released from the underlying substrate due to differential swelling ratios. The photopatterns can be altered via AutoCAD-designed photomasks so that a variety of ductal and acinar mimetic structures can be mass-produced. In addition, by co-polymerizing methacrylated gelatin (methagel) with PEGDA, microstructures with increased cell adherence are synthesized. Biocompatibility and versatility of our approach is highlighted by culturing either SUM159 cells, which were seeded postfabrication, or MDA-MB-231 cells, which were encapsulated in hydrogels; cell viability is verified over 9 and 15 days, respectively. We believe that self-folding processes and associated tubular, curved, and folded constructs like the ones demonstrated here can facilitate the design of more accurate in vitro models for investigating ductal carcinoma.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Breast Cancer.. American Cancer Society. 2014. Retrieved from www.cancer.org/acs/groups/cid/documents/webcontent/003090-pdf.pdf; Last accessed on March2, 2016.
2.
The Breast Cancer Landscape.. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program. 2016. Retreived from http://cdmrp.army.mil/bcrp/pdfs/bc_landscape.pdf; Last accessed March2, 2016.
3.
World Health Organization/International Agency for Research on Cancer. Latest world cancer statistics—global cancer burden rises to 14.1 million new cases in 2012: marked increase in breast cancers must be addressed. World Health Organization Press Release N° 223, 2013.
4.
SiegelR.L., MillerK.D., and JemalA.Cancer statistics, 2015. CA: a cancer. J Clin, 65, 5, 2015.
5.
BombonatiA., and SgroiD.C.The molecular pathology of breast cancer progression. J Pathol, 223, 307, 2011.
6.
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2015. Atlanta: American Cancer Society. 2015.
7.
WangC., TangZ., ZhaoY., YaoR., LiL., and SunW.Three-dimensional in vitro cancer models: a short review. Biofabrication, 6, 022001, 2014.
8.
PampaloniF., ReynaudE.G., and StelzerE.H.The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 8, 839, 2007.
9.
BakerB.M., and ChenC.S.Deconstructing the third dimension: how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues. J Cell Sci, 125, 3015, 2012.
10.
TibbittM.W., and AnsethK.S.Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng, 103, 655, 2009.
11.
AsgharW., El AssalR., ShafieeH., PitteriS., PaulmuruganR., and DemirciU.Engineering cancer microenvironments for in vitro 3-D tumor models. Mater Today, 18, 539, 2015.
12.
HickmanJ.A., GraeserR., de HoogtR., VidicS., BritoC., GutekunstM., van der KuipH., and ConsortiumI.P.Three-dimensional models of cancer for pharmacology and cancer cell biology: capturing tumor complexity in vitro/ex vivo. Biotechnol J, 9, 1115, 2014.
13.
KimJ.B., SteinR., and O'HareM.J.Three-dimensional in vitro tissue culture models of breast cancer—a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 85, 281, 2004.
14.
KimJ.B.Three-dimensional tissue culture models in cancer biology. Semin Cancer Biol, 15, 365, 2005.
15.
DebnathJ., MuthuswamyS.K., and BruggeJ.S.Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures. Methods, 30, 256, 2003.
16.
WeigeltB., GhajarC.M., and BissellM.J.The need for complex 3D culture models to unravel novel pathways and identify accurate biomarkers in breast cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 69–70, 42, 2014.
17.
NikkhahM., StroblJ.S., and AgahM.Attachment and response of human fibroblast and breast cancer cells to three dimensional silicon microstructures of different geometries. Biomed Microdevices, 11, 429, 2009.
18.
RumplerM., WoeszA., DunlopJ.W., van DongenJ.T., and FratzlP.The effect of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth. J R Soc Interface, 5, 1173, 2008.
19.
SerboJ.V., KuoS., LewisS., LehmannM., LiJ., GraciasD.H., and RomerL.H.Patterning of fibroblast and matrix anisotropy within 3d confinement is driven by the cytoskeleton. Adv Healthc Mater, 5, 146, 2016.
20.
NelsonC.M., VanduijnM.M., InmanJ.L., FletcherD.A., and BissellM.J.Tissue geometry determines sites of mammary branching morphogenesis in organotypic cultures. Science, 314, 298, 2006.
21.
BischelL.L., SungK.E., Jimenez-TorresJ.A., MaderB., KeelyP.J., and BeebeD.J.The importance of being a lumen. FASEB J, 28, 4583, 2014.
XiW., SchmidtC.K., SanchezS., GraciasD.H., Carazo-SalasR.E., JacksonS.P., and SchmidtO.G.Rolled-up functionalized nanomembranes as three-dimensional cavities for single cell studies. Nano Lett, 14, 4197, 2014.
24.
VerbridgeS.S., ChakrabartiA., DelNeroP., KweeB., VarnerJ.D., StroockA.D., and FischbachC.Physicochemical regulation of endothelial sprouting in a 3D microfluidic angiogenesis model. J Biomed Mater Res A, 101, 2948, 2013.
25.
BischelL.L., BeebeD.J., and SungK.E.Microfluidic model of ductal carcinoma in situ with 3D, organotypic structure. BMC Cancer, 15, 12, 2015.
26.
SeunarineK., MeredithD.O., RiehleM.O., WilkinsonC.D.W., and GadegaardN.Biodegradable polymer tubes with lithographically controlled 3D micro- and nanotopography. Microelectron Eng, 85, 1350, 2008.
27.
PapenburgB.J., LiuJ., HigueraG.A., BarradasA.M., de BoerJ., van BlitterswijkC.A., WesslingM., and StamatialisD.Development and analysis of multi-layer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 30, 6228, 2009.
28.
DengM., KumbarS.G., NairL.S., WeikelA.L., AllcockH.R., and LaurencinC.T.Biomimetic structures: biological implications of dipeptide-substituted polyphosphazene-polyester blend nanofiber matrices for load-bearing bone regeneration. Adv Funct Mater, 21, 2641, 2011.
29.
ShihY.H., YangJ.C., LiS.H., YangW.C.V., and ChenC.C.Bio-electrospinning of poly(l-lactic acid) hollow fibrous membrane. Text Res J, 82, 602, 2012.
30.
HeX.H., WangW., DengK., XieR., JuX.J., LiuZ., and ChuL.Y.Microfluidic fabrication of chitosan microfibers with controllable internals from tubular to peapod-like structures. RSC Adv, 5, 928, 2015.
YueT., NakajimaM., TakeuchiM., HuC., HuangQ., and FukudaT.On-chip self-assembly of cell embedded microstructures to vascular-like microtubes. Lab Chip, 14, 1151, 2014.
35.
SilvaJ.M., DuarteA.R., CustodioC.A., SherP., NetoA.I., PinhoA.C., FonsecaJ., ReisR.L., and ManoJ.F.Nanostructured hollow tubes based on chitosan and alginate multilayers. Adv Healthc Mater, 3, 433, 2014.
36.
OzawaF., InoK., TakahashiY., ShikuH., and MatsueT.Electrodeposition of alginate gels for construction of vascular-like structures. J Biosci Bioeng, 115, 459, 2013.
37.
SolettiL., HongY., GuanJ., StankusJ.J., El-KurdiM.S., WagnerW.R., and VorpD.A.A bilayered elastomeric scaffold for tissue engineering of small diameter vascular grafts. Acta Biomater, 6, 110, 2010.
38.
ZhangY., YuY., and OzbolatI.T.Direct bioprinting of vessel-like tubular microfluidic channels. J Nanotechnol Eng Med, 4, 020902, 2013.
39.
ArayanarakoolR., MeyerA.K., HelbigL., SanchezS., and SchmidtO.G.Tailoring three-dimensional architectures by rolled-up nanotechnology for mimicking microvasculatures. Lab Chip, 15, 2981, 2015.
40.
ZhuJ., and MarchantR.E.Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds. Expert Rev Med Devices, 8, 607, 2011.
41.
NguyenK.T., and WestJ.L.Photopolymerizable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials, 23, 4307, 2002.
42.
AnnabiN., NicholJ.W., ZhongX., JiC., KoshyS., KhademhosseiniA., and DehghaniF.Controlling the porosity and microarchitecture of hydrogels for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 16, 371, 2010.
43.
DruryJ.L., and MooneyD.J.Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials, 24, 4337, 2003.
44.
SerboJ.V., and GerechtS.Vascular tissue engineering: biodegradable scaffold platforms to promote angiogenesis. Stem Cell Res Ther, 4, 8, 2013.
45.
MalachowskiK., BregerJ., KwagH.R., WangM.O., FisherJ.P., SelaruF.M., and GraciasD.H.Stimuli-responsive theragrippers for chemomechanical controlled release. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 53, 8045, 2014.
46.
ZakharchenkoS., SperlingE., and IonovL.Fully biodegradable self-rolled polymer tubes: a candidate for tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomacromolecules, 12, 2211, 2011.
47.
BregerJ.C., YoonC., XiaoR., KwagH.R., WangM.O., FisherJ.P., NguyenT.D., and GraciasD.H.Self-folding thermo-magnetically responsive soft microgrippers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 7, 3398, 2015.
48.
BassikN., BrafmanA., ZarafsharA.M., JamalM., LuvsanjavD., SelaruF.M., and GraciasD.H.Enzymatically triggered actuation of miniaturized tools. J Am Chem Soc, 132, 16314, 2010.
49.
BaekK., JeongJ.H., ShkumatovA., BashirR., and KongH.In situ self-folding assembly of a multi-walled hydrogel tube for uniaxial sustained molecular release. Adv Mater, 25, 5568, 2013.
50.
ZhaoC., LinZ., YinH., MaY., XuF., and YangW.PEG molecular net-cloth grafted on polymeric substrates and its bio-merits. Sci Rep, 4, 4982, 2014.
51.
Le GoffG.C., SrinivasR.L., HillW.A., and DoyleP.S.Hydrogel microparticles for biosensing. Eur Polym J, 72, 386, 2015.
52.
RusbyJ., BrachtelE., MichaelsonJ., KoernerF., and SmithB.Breast duct anatomy in the human nipple: three-dimensional patterns and clinical implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 106, 171, 2007.
53.
RamsayD.T., KentJ.C., OwensR.A., and HartmannP.E.Ultrasound imaging of milk ejection in the breast of lactating women. Pediatrics, 113, 361, 2004.
54.
RamsayD.T., KentJ.C., HartmannR.A., and HartmanP.E.Anatomy of the lactating human breast redefined with ultrasound imaging. J Anat, 206, 525, 2005.
55.
NemirS., HayengaH.N., and WestJ.L.PEGDA hydrogels with patterned elasticity: novel tools for the study of cell response to substrate rigidity. Biotechnol Bioeng, 105, 636, 2010.
56.
HwangN.S., VargheseS., ZhangZ., and ElisseeffJ.Chondrogenic differentiation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cells in arginine-glycine-aspartate-modified hydrogels. Tissue Eng, 12, 2695, 2006.
57.
AlbrechtD.R., TsangV.L., SahR.L., and BhatiaS.N.Photo- and electropatterning of hydrogel-encapsulated living cell arrays. Lab Chip, 5, 111, 2005.
58.
PandaP., AliS., LoE., ChungB.G., HattonT.A., KhademhosseiniA., and DoyleP.S.Stop-flow lithography to generate cell-laden microgel particles. Lab Chip, 8, 1056, 2008.
59.
AliS., SaikJ.E., GouldD.J., DickinsonM.E., and WestJ.L.Immobilization of cell-adhesive laminin peptides in degradable PEGDA hydrogels influences endothelial cell tubulogenesis. Biores Open Access, 2, 241, 2013.
60.
Munoz-PintoD.J., Jimenez-VergaraA.C., GharatT.P., and HahnM.S.Characterization of sequential collagen-poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate interpenetrating networks and initial assessment of their potential for vascular tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 40, 32, 2015.
61.
BaderR.A., HerzogK.T., and KaoW.J.A study of diffusion in poly(ethyleneglycol)-gelatin based semi-interpenetrating networks for use in wound healing. Polym Bull (Berl), 62, 381, 2009.
PanH., WanamiL.S., DissanayakeT.R., and BachelderR.E.Autocrine semaphorin3A stimulates alpha2 beta1 integrin expression/function in breast tumor cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 118, 197, 2009.
66.
NeveR.M., ChinK., FridlyandJ., YehJ., BaehnerF.L., FevrT., ClarkL., BayaniN., CoppeJ.P., TongF., SpeedT., SpellmanP.T., DeVriesS., LapukA., WangN.J., KuoW.L., StilwellJ.L., PinkelD., AlbertsonD.G., WaldmanF.M., McCormickF., DicksonR.B., JohnsonM.D., LippmanM., EthierS., GazdarA., and GrayJ.W.A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. Cancer Cell, 10, 515, 2006.
67.
Comparison of All Genes in Neve CellLine Oncomine Research Edition. www.oncomine.org
68.
SchnittS.J., and CollinsL.C.Biopsy Interpretation of the Breast. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009.
69.
KalluriR., and ZeisbergM.Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer, 6, 392, 2006.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
