Cartilage tissue, encompassing hyaline cartilage, fibrocartilage, and elastic cartilage, plays a pivotal role in the human body because of its unique composition, structure, and biomechanical properties. However, the inherent avascularity and limited regenerative capacity of cartilage present significant challenges to its healing following injury. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of cartilage tissue engineering, focusing on the critical components of cell sources, scaffolds, and growth factors tailored to the regeneration of each cartilage type. We explore the similarities and differences in the composition, structure, and biomechanical properties of the three cartilage types and their implications for tissue engineering. A significant emphasis is placed on innovative strategies for cartilage regeneration, including the potential for in situ transformation of cartilage types through microenvironmental manipulation, which may offer novel avenues for repair and rehabilitation. The review underscores the necessity of a nuanced approach to cartilage tissue engineering, recognizing the distinct requirements of each cartilage type while exploring the potential of transforming one cartilage type into another as a flexible and adaptive repair strategy. Through this detailed examination, we aim to broaden the understanding of cartilage tissue engineering and inspire further research and development in this promising field.
Impact Statement
The necessity for a nuanced approach to cartilage tissue engineering, recognizing the distinct requirements of each cartilage type while exploring the potential of transforming one cartilage type to another as a flexible and adaptive repair strategy, is thoroughly examined. Our detailed investigation aims to broaden the understanding of cartilage tissue engineering and inspire further research and development in this promising field.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WangM, WuY, LiG, et al.Articular cartilage repair biomaterials: Strategies and applications. Mater Today Bio, 2024; 24:100948; doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.100948
2.
WuJ, ChenQ, DengC, et al.Exquisite design of injectable hydrogels in cartilage repair. Theranostics, 2020; 10(21):9843–9864; doi: 10.7150/thno.46450
3.
ZeineddineHA, FrushTJ, SalehZM, et al.Applications of tissue engineering in joint arthroplasty: Current concepts update. Orthop Clin North Am, 2017; 48(3):275–288; doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2017.03.002
4.
WangX, LiZ, ShiT, et al.Injectable dextran hydrogels fabricated by metal-free click chemistry for cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2017; 73:21–30; doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.053
5.
MostafaS, PakvasaM, CoalsonE, et al.The wonders of BMP9: From mesenchymal stem cell differentiation, angiogenesis, neurogenesis, tumorigenesis, and metabolism to regenerative medicine. Genes Dis, 2019; 6(3):201–223; doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2019.07.003
6.
VisscherDO, LeeH, van ZuijlenPPM, et al.A photo-crosslinkable cartilage-derived extracellular matrix bioink for auricular cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 2021; 121:193–203; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.029
7.
WeiW, DaiH. Articular cartilage and osteochondral tissue engineering techniques: Recent advances and challenges. Bioact Mater, 2021; 6(12):4830–4855; doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.011
8.
HwangWS. Ultrastructure of human foetal and neonatal hyaline cartilage. J Pathol, 1978; 126(4):209–214; doi: 10.1002/path.1711260404
9.
MüllerFA, MüllerL, HofmannI, et al.Cellulose-based scaffold materials for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2006; 27(21):3955–3963; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.031
10.
NeamePJ, TappH, AzizanA. Noncollagenous, nonproteoglycan macromolecules of cartilage. Cell Mol Life Sci, 1999; 55(10):1327–1340; doi: 10.1007/s000180050373
ZhangZ. Chondrons and the pericellular matrix of chondrocytes. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 2015; 21(3):267–277; doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2014.0286
13.
MowVC, GuoXE. Mechano-electrochemical properties of articular cartilage: Their inhomogeneities and anisotropies. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 2002; 4:175–209; doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.110701.120309
14.
CohenNP, FosterRJ, MowVC. Composition and dynamics of articular cartilage: Structure, function, and maintaining healthy state. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1998; 28(4):203–215; doi: 10.2519/jospt.1998.28.4.203
15.
WiggenhauserPS, SchantzJT, RotterN. Cartilage engineering in reconstructive surgery: Auricular, nasal and tracheal engineering from a surgical perspective. Regen Med, 2017; 12(3):303–314; doi: 10.2217/rme-2016-0160
16.
LittleCJ, BawolinNK, ChenX. Mechanical properties of natural cartilage and tissue-engineered constructs. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 2011; 17(4):213–227; doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2010.0572
17.
Silva-CorreiaJ, CorreiaSI, OliveiraJM, ReisRL. Tissue engineering strategies applied in the regeneration of the human intervertebral disk. Biotechnol Adv, 2013; 31(8):1514–1531; doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.07.010
18.
LauAG, KindigMW, KentRW. Morphology, distribution, mineral density and volume fraction of human calcified costal cartilage. Acta Biomater, 2011; 7(3):1202–1209; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.019
19.
SterodimasA, de FariaJ, CorreaWE, PitanguyI. Tissue engineering and auricular reconstruction: A review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2009; 62(4):447–452; doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.11.046
20.
LehmannJ, NürnbergerS, NarcisiR, et al.Recellularization of auricular cartilage via elastase-generated channels. Biofabrication, 2019; 11(3):e035012; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab1436
21.
LeeJM, SultanMT, KimSH, et al.Artificial auricular cartilage using silk fibroin and polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel. Int J Mol Sci, 2017; 18(8):1707; doi: 10.3390/ijms18081707
22.
BumaP, RamrattanNN, van TienenTG, VethRPH. Tissue engineering of the meniscus. Biomaterials, 2004; 25(9):1523–1532; doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00499-x
23.
YanD, ZhouG, ZhouX, et al.The impact of low levels of collagen IX and pyridinoline on the mechanical properties of in vitro engineered cartilage. Biomaterials, 2009; 30(5):814–821; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.042
OttoIA, MelchelsFPW, ZhaoX, et al.Auricular reconstruction using biofabrication-based tissue engineering strategies. Biofabrication, 2015; 7(3):e032001; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/032001
26.
ChangCS, YangCY, HsiaoHY, et al.Cultivation of auricular chondrocytes in poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(ε-caprolactone) hydrogel for tracheal cartilage tissue engineering in a rabbit model. Eur Cell Mater, 2018; 35:350–364; doi: 10.22203/eCM.v035a24
27.
BicharaDA, O’SullivanN-A, PomerantsevaI, et al.The tissue-engineered auricle: Past, present, and future. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 2012; 18(1):51–61; doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2011.0326
28.
KwonH, BrownWE, LeeCA, et al.Surgical and tissue engineering strategies for articular cartilage and meniscus repair. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2019; 15(9):550–570; doi: 10.1038/s41584-019-0255-1
29.
MakrisEA, HadidiP, AthanasiouKA. The knee meniscus: Structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. Biomaterials, 2011; 32(30):7411–7431; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.037
ZhangL, HuJ, AthanasiouKA. The role of tissue engineering in articular cartilage repair and regeneration. Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 2009; 37(1–2):1–57; doi: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v37.i1-2.10
32.
CohenBP, BernsteinJL, MorrisonKA, et al.Tissue engineering the human auricle by auricular chondrocyte-mesenchymal stem cell co-implantation. PLoS One, 2018; 13(10):e0202356; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202356
33.
KangN, LiuX, GuanY, et al.Effects of co-culturing BMSCs and auricular chondrocytes on the elastic modulus and hypertrophy of tissue engineered cartilage. Biomaterials, 2012; 33(18):4535–4544; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.019
34.
DongX, AskinasC, KimJ, et al.Efficient engineering of human auricular cartilage through mesenchymal stem cell chaperoning. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2022; 16(9):825–835; doi: 10.1002/term.3332
35.
KudvaAK, DikinaAD, LuytenFP, et al.Gelatin microspheres releasing transforming growth factor drive in vitro chondrogenesis of human periosteum derived cells in micromass culture. Acta Biomater, 2019; 90:287–299; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.039
36.
KarimA, HallAC. Chondrocyte morphology in stiff and soft agarose gels and the influence of fetal calf serum. J Cell Physiol, 2017; 232(5):1041–1052; doi: 10.1002/jcp.25507
37.
RastogiP, KandasubramanianB. Review of alginate-based hydrogel bioprinting for application in tissue engineering. Biofabrication, 2019; 11(4):e042001; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab331e
38.
IslamMM, ShahruzzamanM, BiswasS, et al.Chitosan based bioactive materials in tissue engineering applications—A review. Bioact Mater, 2020; 5(1):164–183; doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.012
39.
SalatiMA, KhazaiJ, TahmuriAM, et al.Agarose-based biomaterials: Opportunities and challenges in cartilage tissue engineering. Polymers (Basel), 2020; 12(5):1150; doi: 10.3390/polym12051150
40.
ShiW, SunM, HuX, et al.Structurally and functionally optimized silk-fibroin-gelatin scaffold using 3D printing to repair cartilage injury In Vitro and In Vivo. Adv Mater, 2017; 29(29); doi: 10.1002/adma.201701089
41.
BilgenB, JayasuriyaCT, OwensBD. Current concepts in meniscus tissue engineering and repair. Adv Healthc Mater, 2018; 7(11):e1701407; doi: 10.1002/adhm.201701407
42.
MendesLF, KatagiriH, TamWL, et al.Advancing osteochondral tissue engineering: Bone morphogenetic protein, transforming growth factor, and fibroblast growth factor signaling drive ordered differentiation of periosteal cells resulting in stable cartilage and bone formation in vivo. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2018; 9(1):42; doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-0787-3
43.
WangC, YueH, HuangW, et al.Cryogenic 3D printing of heterogeneous scaffolds with gradient mechanical strengths and spatial delivery of osteogenic peptide/TGF-β1 for osteochondral tissue regeneration. Biofabrication, 2020; 12(2):e025030; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab7ab5
44.
DengY, LeiG, LinZ, et al.Engineering hyaline cartilage from mesenchymal stem cells with low hypertrophy potential via modulation of culture conditions and Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Biomaterials, 2019; 192:569–578; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.036
45.
ShenH, LinH, SunAX, et al.Acceleration of chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by sustained growth factor release in 3D graphene oxide incorporated hydrogels. Acta Biomater, 2020; 105:44–55; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.048
46.
ZhouM, LozanoN, WychowaniecJK, et al.Graphene oxide: A growth factor delivery carrier to enhance chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in 3D hydrogels. Acta Biomater, 2019; 96:271–280; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.027
LiebesnyPH, MroszczykK, ZlotnickH, et al.Enzyme pretreatment plus locally delivered HB-IGF-1 stimulate integrative cartilage repair in vitro. Tissue Eng Part A, 2019; 25(17–18):1191–1201; doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2019.0013
49.
LiangY, IdreesE, SzojkaARA, et al.Chondrogenic differentiation of synovial fluid mesenchymal stem cells on human meniscus-derived decellularized matrix requires exogenous growth factors. Acta Biomater, 2018; 80:131–143; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.038
50.
ChenL, LiuJ, GuanM, et al.Growth factor and its polymer scaffold-based delivery system for cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Nanomedicine, 2020; 15:6097–6111; doi: 10.2147/IJN.S249829
51.
LeeKI, OlmerM, BaekJ, et al.Platelet-derived growth factor-coated decellularized meniscus scaffold for integrative healing of meniscus tears. Acta Biomater, 2018; 76:126–134; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.06.021
52.
Font TelladoS, ChieraS, BonaniW, et al.Heparin functionalization increases retention of TGF-β2 and GDF5 on biphasic silk fibroin scaffolds for tendon/ligament-to-bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 2018; 72:150–166; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.017
53.
WangY, ChenG, YanJ, et al.Upregulation of SIRT1 by kartogenin enhances antioxidant functions and promotes osteogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2018; 2018:1368142; doi: 10.1155/2018/1368142
54.
ZhouQ, ZhangJH, YuanS, et al.A new insight of kartogenin induced the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) selectively differentiate into chondrocytes by activating the bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP-7)/Smad5 pathway. Med Sci Monit, 2019; 25:4960–4967; doi: 10.12659/MSM.916696
55.
FanW, YuanL, LiJ, et al.Injectable double-crosslinked hydrogels with kartogenin-conjugated polyurethane nano-particles and transforming growth factor β3 for in-situ cartilage regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2020; 110:110705; doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110705
56.
ValianiA, IzadiMA, BahramianH, et al.Comparison between the effect of kartogenin and TGFβ3 on chondrogenesis of human adipose-derived stem cells in fibrin scaffold. Bratisl Lek Listy, 2017; 118(10):591–597; doi: 10.4149/BLL_2017_114
57.
OnoY, IshizukaS, KnudsonCB, KnudsonW. Chondroprotective effect of kartogenin on CD44-mediated functions in articular cartilage and chondrocytes. Cartilage, 2014; 5(3):172–180; doi: 10.1177/1947603514528354
58.
TianG, JiangS, LiJ, et al.Cell-free decellularized cartilage extracellular matrix scaffolds combined with interleukin 4 promote osteochondral repair through immunomodulatory macrophages: In vitro and in vivo preclinical study. Acta Biomater, 2021; 127:131–145; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.054
59.
GongL, LiJ, ZhangJ, et al.An interleukin-4-loaded bi-layer 3D printed scaffold promotes osteochondral regeneration. Acta Biomater, 2020; 117:246–260; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.039
60.
DengZH, LiYS, GaoX, et al.Bone morphogenetic proteins for articular cartilage regeneration. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2018; 26(9):1153–1161; doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.03.007
61.
KimHJ, HanMA, ShinJY, et al.Intra-articular delivery of synovium-resident mesenchymal stem cells via BMP-7-loaded fibrous PLGA scaffolds for cartilage repair. J Control Release, 2019; 302:169–180; doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.04.002
62.
Gomez-PuertoMC, IyengarPV, García de VinuesaA, et al.Bone morphogenetic protein receptor signal transduction in human disease. J Pathol, 2019; 247(1):9–20; doi: 10.1002/path.5170
63.
SunY, YouY, JiangW, et al.3D-bioprinting a genetically inspired cartilage scaffold with GDF5-conjugated BMSC-laden hydrogel and polymer for cartilage repair. Theranostics, 2019; 9(23):6949–6961; doi: 10.7150/thno.38061
McPhailMJ, JanusJR, LottDG. Advances in regenerative medicine for otolaryngology/head and neck surgery. BMJ, 2020; 369:m718; doi: 10.1136/bmj.m718
66.
LeeKI, GaminiR, OlmerM, et al.Mohawk is a transcription factor that promotes meniscus cell phenotype and tissue repair and reduces osteoarthritis severity. Sci Transl Med, 2020; 12(567):eaan7967; doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan7967
67.
KwonH, PaschosNK, HuJC, AthanasiouK. Articular cartilage tissue engineering: The role of signaling molecules. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2016; 73(6):1173–1194; doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-2115-8
68.
HuweLW, SullanGK, HuJC, AthanasiouKA. Using costal chondrocytes to engineer articular cartilage with applications of passive axial compression and bioactive stimuli. Tissue Eng Part A, 2018; 24(5-6):516–526; doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2017.0136
69.
LeeJK, HuweLW, PaschosN, et al.Tension stimulation drives tissue formation in scaffold-free systems. Nat Mater, 2017; 16(8):864–873; doi: 10.1038/nmat4917
70.
MeinertC, SchrobbackK, HutmacherDW, KleinTJ. A novel bioreactor system for biaxial mechanical loading enhances the properties of tissue-engineered human cartilage. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):16997; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16523-x
71.
HueyDJ, AthanasiouKA. Tension-compression loading with chemical stimulation results in additive increases to functional properties of anatomic meniscal constructs. PLoS One, 2011; 6(11):e27857; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027857
72.
FrauchigerDA, TekariA, WöltjeM, et al.A review of the application of reinforced hydrogels and silk as biomaterials for intervertebral disc repair. Eur Cell Mater, 2017; 34:271–290; doi: 10.22203/eCM.v034a17
73.
LiM, YinH, YanZ, et al.The immune microenvironment in cartilage injury and repair. Acta Biomater, 2022; 140:23–42; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.12.006
74.
HodgkinsonT, KellyDC, CurtinCM, O’BrienFJ. Mechanosignalling in cartilage: An emerging target for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2022; 18(2):67–84; doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00724-w
75.
YeungP, ZhangW, WangXN, et al.A human osteoarthritis osteochondral organ culture model for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2018; 162:1–21; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.02.002
76.
VágóJ, KatonaÉ, TakácsR, et al.Cyclic uniaxial mechanical load enhances chondrogenesis through entraining the molecular circadian clock. J Pineal Res, 2022; 73(4):e12827; doi: 10.1111/jpi.12827
77.
ArmientoAR, AliniM, StoddartMJ. Articular fibrocartilage—Why does hyaline cartilage fail to repair? Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2019; 146:289–305; doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.12.015
78.
ZhangW, LuW, YuQ, et al.Upregulated desmin/integrin β1/MAPK axis promotes elastic cartilage regeneration with increased ECM mechanical strength. Int J Biol Sci, 2023; 19(9):2740–2755; doi: 10.7150/ijbs.83024
LeeCH, ShahB, MoioliEK, MaoJJ. CTGF directs fibroblast differentiation from human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells and defines connective tissue healing in a rodent injury model. J Clin Invest, 2010; 120(9):3340–3349; doi: 10.1172/JCI43230
81.
HanS, LeeMC, Rodríguez-delaRosaA, et al.Engineering stem cell fate controlling biomaterials to develop muscle connective tissue layered myofibers. Adv Funct Mater, 2024; 34(3):2304153; doi: 10.1002/adfm.202304153
82.
ChenH, CuiY, ZhangD, et al.The role of fibroblast growth factor 8 in cartilage development and disease. J Cell Mol Med, 2022; 26(4):990–999; doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17174
83.
LuiJC, ColbertM, CheungCSF, et al.Cartilage-targeted IGF-1 treatment to promote longitudinal bone growth. Mol Ther, 2019; 27(3):673–680; doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.01.017
84.
CollinsJA, KimCJ, ColemanA, et al.Cartilage-specific Sirt6 deficiency represses IGF-1 and enhances osteoarthritis severity in mice. Ann Rheum Dis, 2023; 82(11):1464–1473; doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224385
85.
LiJ, JiangH, LvZ, et al.Articular fibrocartilage-targeted therapy by microtubule stabilization. Sci Adv, 2022; 8(46):eabn8420; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn8420
86.
LiJ, FanC, LvZ, et al.Microtubule stabilization targeting regenerative chondrocyte cluster for cartilage regeneration. Theranostics, 2023; 13(10):3480–3496; doi: 10.7150/thno.85077
87.
NordbergRC, BielajewBJ, TakahashiT, et al.Recent advancements in cartilage tissue engineering innovation and translation. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2024; 20(6):323–346; doi: 10.1038/s41584-024-01118-4
88.
CaprioND, DavidsonMD, DalyAC, BurdickJA. Injectable MSC spheroid and microgel granular composites for engineering tissue. Adv Mater, 2024; 36(14):e2312226; doi: 10.1002/adma.202312226
89.
ChenM, LuY, LiuY, et al.Injectable microgels with hybrid exosomes of chondrocyte-targeted FGF18 gene-editing and self-renewable lubrication for osteoarthritis therapy. Adv Mater, 2024; 36(16):e2312559; doi: 10.1002/adma.202312559
