Nipple–areola complex reconstruction is a common procedure that often accompanies breast reconstruction. Historically, local skin flaps were utilized for nipple reconstruction, with more recent techniques exploring the addition of implanted material. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TE&RM) represents a potential source of stable and biocompatible implantable tissue, which may have a positive effect on cosmetic outcomes. Conventional TE&RM techniques involve seeding a scaffold with the patients' own cells and using growth factors to promote survival. The clinical applicability of these techniques is limited by its cost and ability to produce sufficient volumes of viable tissue. This article reviews the evolution of nipple reconstruction techniques and current TE&RM protocols; these two fields are then combined to propose a novel approach of using TE&RM scaffolds to augment conventional nipple reconstruction.
Impact Statement
This work provides a comprehensive overview and critique of nipple reconstruction techniques to date. It then explores different tissue engineering concepts and how these may improve clinical outcomes for patients undergoing nipple reconstruction. A novel technique is proposed, whereby a three-dimensional-printed tissue-engineered construct is used as an autologous graft to assist nipple reconstruction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BardM., and SutherlandA.M.Psychological impact of cancer and its treatment. IV. Adaptation to radical mastectomy. Cancer, 8, 656, 1955.
2.
RennekerR., and CutlerM.Psychological problems of adjustment to cancer of the breast. J Am Med Assoc, 148, 833, 1952.
3.
StavrouD., WeissmanO., PolynikiA., et al.Quality of life after breast cancer surgery with or without reconstruction. Eplasty, 9, 18, 2009.
4.
MomohA.O., ColakogluS., de BlacamC., et al.The impact of nipple reconstruction on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg, 69, 389, 2012.
5.
WellischD.K., SchainW.S., NooneR.B., and LittleJ.W.3rd.The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg, 80, 699, 1987.
6.
NimboriboonpornA., and ChuthapisithS.Nipple-areola complex reconstruction. Gland Surg, 3, 35, 2014.
7.
SistiA., GrimaldiL., TassinariJ., et al.Nipple-areola complex reconstruction techniques: a literature review. Eur J Surg Oncol, 42, 441, 2016.
8.
JaborM.A., ShayaniP., CollinsD.R.Jr., KarasT., and CohenB.E.Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg, 110, 457, 2002.
9.
FewJ.W., MarcusJ.R., CasasL.A., AitkenM.E., and ReddingJ.Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg, 104, 1321, 1999.
10.
ShestakK.C., GabrielA., LandeckerA., PetersS., ShestakA., and KimJ.Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg, 110, 780, 2002.
11.
KrollS.S., ReeceG.P., MillerM.J., et al.Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg, 99, 1602, 1997.
12.
CohenI.K., WardJ.A., and ChandrasekharB.The pinwheel flap nipple and barrier areola graft reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg, 77, 995, 1986.
13.
MuruciA., DantasJ.J., and NogueriraL.R.Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg, 61, 558, 1978.
14.
BeckerH.The use of intradermal tattoo to enhance the final result of nipple-areola reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg, 77, 673, 1986.
15.
SpearS.L., and AriasJ.Long-term experience with nipple-areola tattooing. Ann Plast Surg, 35, 232, 1995.
16.
RaoS.S., SeamanB.J., and DavisonS.P.The acellular dermal matrix onlay graft for areolar reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg, 72, 508, 2014.
17.
MillardD.R.Jr. Nipple and areola reconstruction by split-skin graft from the normal side. Plast Reconstr Surg, 50, 350, 1972.
18.
BunchmanH.H.2nd, LarsonD.L., HuangT.T., and LewisS.R.Nipple and areola reconstruction in the burned breast. The “double bubble” technique. Plast Reconstr Surg, 54, 531, 1974.
19.
BroadbentT.R., WoolfR.M., and MetzP.S.Restoring the mammary areola by a skin graft from the upper inner thigh. Br J Plast Surg, 30, 220, 1977.
20.
LittleJ.W.3rd, MunasifiT., and McCullochD.T.One-stage reconstruction of a projecting nipple: the quadrapod flap. Plast Reconstr Surg, 71, 126, 1983.
21.
ChangW.H.Nipple reconstruction with a T flap. Plast Reconstr Surg, 73, 140, 1984.
22.
CroninE.D., HumphreysD.H., and Ruiz-RazuraA.Nipple reconstruction: the S flap. Plast Reconstr Surg, 81, 783, 1988.
23.
KrollS.S., and HamiltonS.Nipple reconstruction with the double-opposing-tab flap. Plast Reconstr Surg, 84, 520, 1989.
24.
BhattyM.A., and BerryR.B.Nipple-areola reconstruction by tattooing and nipple sharing. Br J Plast Surg, 50, 331, 1997.
25.
SpearS.L., SchaffnerA.D., JespersenM.R., and GoldsteinJ.A.Donor-site morbidity and patient satisfaction using a composite nipple graft for unilateral nipple reconstruction in the radiated and nonradiated breast. Plast Reconstr Surg, 127, 1437, 2011.
26.
DeanN.R., NeildT., HaynesJ., GoddardC., and CooterR.D.Fading of nipple-areolar reconstructions: the last hurdle in breast reconstruction? Br J Plast Surg, 55, 574, 2002.
27.
AdamsW.M.Labial transplant for correction of loss of the nipple. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946), 4, 295, 1949.
28.
KlatskyS.A., and MansonP.N.Toe pulp free grafts in nipple reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg, 68, 245, 1981.
29.
AmaranteJ.T., Santa-CombaA., ReisJ., and MalheiroE.Halux pulp composite graft in nipple reconstruction. Aesthet Plast Surg, 18, 299, 1994.
30.
BrentB., and BostwickJ.Nipple-areola reconstruction with auricular tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg, 60, 353, 1977.
31.
BersonM.I.Construction of pseudoareola. Surgery, 20, 808, 1946.
32.
RichterD.F., ReichenbergerM.A., and FaymonvilleC.Comparison of the nipple projection after reconstruction with three different methods. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir, 36, 374, 2004.
33.
AntonM.A., EskenaziL.B., and HartrampfC.R.Nipple reconstruction with local flaps: star and wrap flaps. Semin Plast Surg, 5, 67, 1991.
MoriH., and HataY.Modified C-V flap in nipple reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 61, 1109, 2008.
36.
TemizG., YeşiloğluN., ŞirinoğluH., and SariciM.A new modification of C.-V. flap technique in nipple reconstruction: rolled triangular dermal-fat flaps. Aesthet Plast Surg, 39, 173, 2015.
37.
Elizabeth ClarkS., and TurtonE.The CC-V flap: a novel technique for augmenting a C.-V. nipple reconstruction using a free dermal graft. World J Plast Surg, 3, 8, 2014.
38.
EvansK.K., RaskoY., LenertJ., and OldingM.The use of calcium hydroxylapatite for nipple projection after failed nipple-areolar reconstruction: early results. Ann Plast Surg, 55, 25, 2005.
39.
GuerraA.B., KhoobehiK., MetzingerS.E., and AllenR.J.New technique for nipple areola reconstruction: arrow flap and rib cartilage graft for long-lasting nipple projection. Ann Plast Surg, 50, 31, 2003.
40.
ChengM.H., RodriguezE.D., SmarttJ.M., and Cardenas-MejiaA.Nipple reconstruction using the modified top hat flap with banked costal cartilage graft: long-term follow-up in 58 patients. Ann Plast Surg, 59, 621, 2007.
41.
MoriH., UemuraN., and OkazakiM.Nipple reconstruction with banked costal cartilage after vertical-type skin-sparing mastectomy and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. Breast Cancer, 22, 95, 2015.
42.
LipaJ.E., AddisonP.D., and NeliganP.C.Patient satisfaction following nipple reconstruction incorporating autologous costal cartilage. Can J Plast Surg, 16, 85, 2008.
43.
JonesA.P., and ErdmannM.Projection and patient satisfaction using the “Hamburger” nipple reconstruction technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 65, 207, 2012.
44.
TanabeH.Y., TaiY., KiyokawaK., and YamauchiT.Nipple-areola reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap and rolled auricular cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg, 100, 431, 1997.
45.
ChiaH.L., WongM., and TanB.K.Nipple reconstruction with rolled dermal graft support. Arch Plast Surg, 41, 158, 2014.
46.
HallockG.G.Polyurethane nipple prosthesis. Ann Plast Surg, 24, 80, 1990.
47.
HandelN., and GutierrezJ.Long-term safety and efficacy of polyurethane foam-covered breast implants. Aesthet Surg J, 26, 265, 2006.
48.
WongR.K., WichtermanL., and ParsonS.D.Skin sparing nipple reconstruction with polytetrafluoroethylene implant. Ann Plast Surg, 61, 256, 2008.
49.
JankauJ., JaśkiewiczJ., and AnkiewiczA.A new method for using a silicone rod for permanent nipple projection after breast reconstruction procedures. Breast, 20, 124, 2011.
50.
HoltonL.H., HaerianH., SilvermanR.P., et al.Improving long-term projection in nipple reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix: an animal model. Ann Plast Surg, 55, 304, 2005.
51.
GarramoneC.E., and LamB.Use of AlloDerm in primary nipple reconstruction to improve long-term nipple projection. Plast Reconstr Surg, 119, 1663, 2007.
52.
NahabedianM.Y.Secondary nipple reconstruction using local flaps and AlloDerm. Plast Reconstr Surg, 115, 2056, 2005.
53.
ChenW.F., BarounisD., and KalimuthuR.A novel cost-saving approach to the use of acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in postmastectomy breast and nipple reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg, 125, 479, 2010.
54.
KimE.K., and LeeT.J.Use of lyophilized allogeneic costal cartilage: is it effective to maintain the projection of the reconstructed nipple? Ann Plast Surg, 66, 128, 2011.
55.
LefkovitsG.Irradiated homologous costal cartilage for augmentation rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg, 25, 317, 1990.
56.
VelidedeoğluH., DemirZ., SahinU., KurtayA., and ErolO.O.Block and Surgicel-wrapped diced solvent-preserved costal cartilage homograft application for nasal augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg, 115, 2081, 2005.
57.
BlauH.M., and PomerantzJ.H.Re“evolutionary” Regenerative Medicine. JAMA, 305, 87, 2011.
58.
ServiceR.F.Tissue engineering. Coming soon to a knee near you: cartilage like your very own. Science, 322, 1460, 2008.
59.
ProbstF.A., HutmacherD.W., MüllerD.F., MachensH.G., and SchantzJ.T.Calvarial reconstruction by customized bioactive implant. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir, 42, 369, 2010.
60.
HutmacherD.W.A road map for a tissue engineering concept for restoring structure and function after limb loss. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 24, 2659, 2013.
61.
PampaloniF., ReynaudE.G., and StelzerE.H.K.The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 8, 839, 2007.
62.
BanyardD.A., BourgeoisJ.M., WidgerowA.D., and EvansG.R.Regenerative biomaterials: a review. Plast Reconstr Surg, 135, 1740, 2015.
63.
DaghighiS., SjollemaJ., van der MeiH.C., BusscherH.J., and RochfordE.T.Infection resistance of degradable versus non-degradable biomaterials: an assessment of the potential mechanisms. Biomaterials, 34, 8013, 2013.
64.
AndersonJ.M., RodriguezA., and ChangD.T.Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol, 20, 86, 2008.
65.
PuskasJ.E., and LuebbersM.T.Breast implants: the good, the bad and the ugly. Can nanotechnology improve implants? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol, 4, 153, 2012.
AwwadH.K., AggarM.E., MocktarN., and BarsoumM.Intercapillary distance measurement as an indicator of hypoxia in carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys, 12, 1329, 1986.
DomingosM., DinucciD., CometaS., AlderighiM., BártoloP.J., and ChielliniF.Polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via bioextrusion for tissue engineering applications. Int J Biomater, 2009, 239643, 2009.
70.
MurphyS.V., and AtalaA.3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32, 773, 2014.
71.
ChoiJ.H., GimbleJ.M., LeeK., et al.Adipose tissue engineering for soft tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng B Rev, 16, 413, 2010.
72.
AhtiainenK., MaunoJ., ElläV., et al.Autologous adipose stem cells and polylactide discs in the replacement of the rabbit temporomandibular joint disc. J R Soc Interface, 10, 20130287, 2013.
73.
DengD., WangW., WangB., et al.Repair of Achilles tendon defect with autologous ASCs engineered tendon in a rabbit model. Biomaterials, 35, 8801, 2014.
74.
LamC.X., HutmacherD.W., SchantzJ.T., WoodruffM.A., and TeohS.H.Evaluation of polycaprolactone scaffold degradation for 6 months in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A, 90, 906, 2009.
75.
MauneyJ.R., NguyenT., GillenK., Kirker-HeadC., GimbleJ.M., and KaplanD.L.Engineering adipose-like tissue in vitro and in vivo utilizing human bone marrow and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells with silk fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials, 28, 5280, 2007.
76.
LavikE., and LangerR.Tissue engineering: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 65, 1, 2004.
77.
WeiserB., PrantlL., SchubertT.E., et al.In vivo development and long-term survival of engineered adipose tissue depend on in vitro precultivation strategy. Tissue Eng Part A, 14, 275, 2008.
78.
PatrickC.W.Breast tissue engineering. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 6, 109, 2004.
79.
MooneyD.J., OrganG., VacantiJ.P., and LangerR.Design and fabrication of biodegradable polymer devices to engineer tubular tissues. Cell Transplant, 3, 203, 1994.
80.
DaiR., WangZ., SamanipourR., KooK.I., and KimK.Adipose-derived stem cells for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Stem Cells Int, 2016, 6737345, 2016.
81.
ZhuM., ZhouZ., ChenY., et al.Supplementation of fat grafts with adipose-derived regenerative cells improves long-term graft retention. Ann Plast Surg, 64, 222, 2010.
82.
SchweizerR., TsujiW., GorantlaV.S., MarraK.G., RubinJ.P., and PlockJ.A.The role of adipose-derived stem cells in breast cancer progression and metastasis. Stem Cells Int, 2015, 120949, 2015.
83.
LuF., LiJ., GaoJ., et al.Improvement of the survival of human autologous fat transplantation by using VEGF-transfected adipose-derived stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg, 124, 1437, 2009.
84.
MoseleyT.A., ZhuM., and HedrickM.H.Adipose-derived stem and progenitor cells as fillers in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg, 118, 121s, 2006.
85.
KølleS.F., Fischer-NielsenA., MathiasenA.B., et al.Enrichment of autologous fat grafts with ex-vivo expanded adipose tissue-derived stem cells for graft survival: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 382, 1113, 2013.
86.
BielliA., ScioliM.G., GentileP., et al.Adult adipose-derived stem cells and breast cancer: a controversial relationship. Springerplus, 3, 345, 2014.
87.
RigottiG., MarchiA., GalièM., et al.Clinical treatment of radiotherapy tissue damage by lipoaspirate transplant: a healing process mediated by adipose-derived adult stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg, 119, 1409, 2007.
88.
ColemanS.R., and SaboeiroA.P.Fat grafting to the breast revisited: safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg, 119, 775, 2007.
89.
BernardR.W., and BeranS.J.Autologous fat graft in nipple reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg, 112, 964, 2003.
PashosN.C., ScarrittM.E., GimbleJ.M., ChaffinA.E., and BunnellB.A.640. A tissue engineered nipple and areola complex. Mol Ther, 23, S254, 2015.
92.
ColwellA.S., and BreuingK.H.Primary nipple reconstruction with AlloDerm: is a dermal flap always necessary? Plast Reconstr Surg, 124, 260e, 2009.
93.
SattesonE.S., ReynoldsM.F., BondA.M., and PestanaI.A.An analysis of complication risk factors in 641 nipple reconstructions. Breast J, 22, 379, 2016.
94.
RadisicM., MaldaJ., EppingE., GengW., LangerR., and Vunjak-NovakovicG.Oxygen gradients correlate with cell density and cell viability in engineered cardiac tissue. Biotechnol Bioeng, 93, 332, 2006.
95.
BerryD.C., StenesenD., ZeveD., and GraffJ.M.The developmental origins of adipose tissue. Development, 140, 3939, 2013.
96.
ZhangW., WrayL.S., Rnjak-KovacinaJ., et al.Vascularization of hollow channel-modified porous silk scaffolds with endothelial cells for tissue regeneration. Biomaterials, 56, 68, 2015.
97.
VerseijdenF., Posthumus-van SluijsS.J., FarrellE., et al.Prevascular structures promote vascularization in engineered human adipose tissue constructs upon implantation. Cell Transplant, 19, 1007, 2010.
98.
DoldererJ.H., AbbertonK.M., ThompsonE.W., et al.Spontaneous large volume adipose tissue generation from a vascularized pedicled fat flap inside a chamber space. Tissue Eng, 13, 673, 2007.
99.
FindlayM.W., DoldererJ.H., TrostN., et al.Tissue-engineered breast reconstruction: bridging the gap toward large-volume tissue engineering in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg, 128, 1206, 2011.
100.
RichardsD., JiaJ., YostM., MarkwaldR., and MeiY.3D bioprinting for vascularized tissue fabrication. Ann Biomed Eng, 45, 132, 2017.
101.
KinnairdT., StabileE., BurnettM.S., et al.Marrow-derived stromal cells express genes encoding a broad spectrum of arteriogenic cytokines and promote in vitro and in vivo arteriogenesis through paracrine mechanisms. Circ Res, 94, 678, 2004.
102.
McCarthyC.M., VanLaekenN., LennoxP., ScottA.M., and PusicA.L.The efficacy of Artecoll injections for the augmentation of nipple projection in breast reconstruction. Eplasty, 10, e7, 2010.
103.
EoS., KimS.S., and Da LioA.L.Nipple reconstruction with C-v flap using dermofat graft. Ann Plast Surg, 58, 137, 2007.
104.
BielliA., ScioliM.G., GentileP., CervelliV., and OrlandiA.Adipose tissue-derived stem cell therapy for post-surgical breast reconstruction—more light than shadows. Adv Clin Exp Med Off Organ Wroclaw Med Univ, 24, 545, 2015.
105.
TaralloV., VesciL., CapassoO., et al.A placental growth factor variant unable to recognize vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-1 inhibits VEGF-dependent tumor angiogenesis via heterodimerization. Cancer Res, 70, 1804, 2010.
106.
VisscherL.E., ChengM., ChhayaM., et al.Breast augmentation and reconstruction from a regenerative medicine point of view: state of the art and future perspectives. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 23, 281, 2017.
