Tendon injuries are common musculoskeletal system disorders, but the tendons have poor regeneration ability. To address this issue, tendon tissue engineering provides potential strategies for future therapeutic treatment. Elements of the physical microenvironment, such as the mechanical force and surface topography, play a vital role in regulating stem cell fate, enhancing the differentiation efficiency of seed cells in tendon tissue engineering. Various inducible scaffolds have been widely explored for tendon regeneration, and scaffold-enhancing modifications have been extensively studied. In this review, we systematically summarize the effects of the physical microenvironment on stem cell differentiation and tendon regeneration; we also provide an overview of the inducible scaffolds for stem cell tenogenic differentiation. Finally, we suggest some potential scaffold-based therapies for tendon injuries, presenting an interesting perspective on tendon regenerative medicine.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ButlerD.L., Juncosa-MelvinN., BoivinG.P., et al.Functional tissue engineering for tendon repair: a multidisciplinary strategy using mesenchymal stem cells, bioscaffolds, and mechanical stimulation. J Orthop Res, 26, 1, 2008.
2.
NourissatG., BerenbaumF., and DuprezD.Tendon injury: from biology to tendon repair. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 11, 223, 2015.
3.
LuiP.P., RuiY.F., NiM., and ChanK.M.Tenogenic differentiation of stem cells for tendon repair-what is the current evidence?. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 5, e144, 2011.
4.
GohJ.C., OuyangH.W., TeohS.H., ChanC.K., and LeeE.H.Tissue-engineering approach to the repair and regeneration of tendons and ligaments. Tissue Eng, 9 (Suppl. 1), S31, 2003.
5.
BagnaninchiP.O., YangY., ElH.A.J., and MaffulliN.Tissue engineering for tendon repair. Br J Sports Med, 41, e10. discussion, e10, 2007.
6.
ButlerD.L., JuncosaN., and DresslerM.R.Functional efficacy of tendon repair processes. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 6, 303, 2004.
7.
ChenJ.L., ZhangW., LiuZ.Y., HengB.C., OuyangH.W., and DaiX.S.Physical regulation of stem cells differentiation into Teno-lineage: current strategies and future direction. Cell Tissue Res, 360, 195, 2015.
8.
StancoD., ViganòM., PeruccaO.C., et al.Multidifferentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue and hamstring tendons for musculoskeletal cell-based therapy. Regen Med, 10, 729, 2015.
9.
LeongD.J., and SunH.B.Mesenchymal stem cells in tendon repair and regeneration: basic understanding and translational challenges. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1383, 88, 2016.
10.
ChenX., YinZ., ChenJ.L., et al.Scleraxis-overexpressed human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells for tendon tissue engineering with knitted silk-collagen scaffold. Tissue Eng A, 20, 1583, 2014.
11.
BiY., EhirchiouD., KiltsT.M., et al.Identification of tendon stem/progenitor cells and the role of the extracellular matrix in their niche. Nat Med, 13, 1219, 2007.
12.
HuJ.J., YinZ., ShenW.L., et al.Pharmacological regulation of in situ tissue stem cells differentiation for soft tissue calcification treatment. Stem Cells, 34, 1083, 2016.
13.
HarrisM.T., ButlerD.L., BoivinG.P., FlorerJ.B., SchantzE.J., and WenstrupR.J.Mesenchymal stem cells used for rabbit tendon repair can form ectopic bone and express alkaline phosphatase activity in constructs. J Orthop Res, 22, 998, 2004.
14.
ZeugolisD.I., ChanJ.C.Y., and PanditA.Tendons: engineering of functional tissues. In: PalluaN., SuscheckC., eds. Tissue Engineering. Berlin, Germany: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 537–572.
15.
SubramanianA., and SchillingT.F.Tendon development and musculoskeletal assembly: emerging roles for the extracellular matrix. Development, 142, 4191, 2015.
16.
HynesR.O.Stretching the boundaries of extracellular matrix research. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 15, 761, 2014.
17.
SpanoudesK., GasparD., PanditA., and ZeugolisD.I.The biophysical, biochemical, and biological toolbox for tenogenic phenotype maintenance in vitro. Trends Biotechnol, 32, 474, 2014.
18.
WangJ.H.Mechanobiology of tendon. J Biomech, 39, 1563, 2006.
19.
BayerM.L., SchjerlingP., HerchenhanA., et al.Release of tensile strain on engineered human tendon tissue disturbs cell adhesions, changes matrix architecture, and induces an inflammatory phenotype. PLoS One, 9, e86078, 2014.
20.
ZhangJ., and WangJ.H.The effects of mechanical loading on tendons–an in vivo and in vitro model study. PLoS One, 8, e71740, 2013.
21.
MaedaT., SakabeT., SunagaA., et al.Conversion of mechanical force into TGF-β-mediated biochemical signals. Curr Biol, 21, 933, 2011.
22.
WangT., LinZ., DayR.E., et al.Programmable mechanical stimulation influences tendon homeostasis in a bioreactor system. Biotechnol Bioeng, 110, 1495, 2013.
23.
EliassonP., AnderssonT., and AspenbergP.Achilles tendon healing in rats is improved by intermittent mechanical loading during the inflammatory phase. J Orthop Res, 30, 274, 2012.
24.
AnderssonT., EliassonP., HammermanM., SandbergO., and AspenbergP.Low-level mechanical stimulation is sufficient to improve tendon healing in rats. J Appl Physiol 1985, 113, 1398, 2012.
25.
SongF., JiangD., WangT., et al.Mechanical loading improves tendon-bone healing in a rabbit anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction model by promoting proliferation and matrix formation of mesenchymal stem cells and tendon cells. Cell Physiol Biochem, 41, 875, 2017.
26.
ThorpeC.T., ChaudhryS., LeiI.I., et al.Tendon overload results in alterations in cell shape and increased markers of inflammation and matrix degradation. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 25, e381, 2015.
27.
DowningT.L., SotoJ., MorezC., et al.Biophysical regulation of epigenetic state and cell reprogramming. Nat Mater, 12, 1154, 2013.
28.
BiehlJ.K., YamanakaS., DesaiT.A., BohelerK.R., and RussellB.Proliferation of mouse embryonic stem cell progeny and the spontaneous contractile activity of cardiomyocytes are affected by microtopography. Dev Dyn, 238, 1964, 2009.
29.
YinZ., ChenX., ZhuT., et al.The effect of decellularized matrices on human tendon stem/progenitor cell differentiation and tendon repair. Acta Biomater, 9, 9317, 2013.
30.
HanY.L., WangS., ZhangX., et al.Engineering physical microenvironment for stem cell based regenerative medicine. Drug Discov Today, 19, 763, 2014.
31.
EnglishA., AzeemA., SpanoudesK., et al.Substrate topography: a valuable in vitro tool, but a clinical red herring for in vivo tenogenesis. Acta Biomater, 27, 3, 2015.
32.
TzimaE., Irani-TehraniM., KiossesW.B., et al.A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature, 437, 426, 2005.
33.
CrowderS.W., LeonardoV., WhittakerT., PapathanasiouP., and StevensM.M.Material cues as potent regulators of epigenetics and stem cell function. Cell Stem Cell, 18, 39, 2016.
34.
GudiS., NolanJ.P., and FrangosJ.A.Modulation of GTPase activity of G proteins by fluid shear stress and phospholipid composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 95, 2515, 1998.
35.
MarotoR., RasoA., WoodT.G., KuroskyA., MartinacB., and HamillO.P.TRPC1 forms the stretch-activated cation channel in vertebrate cells. Nat Cell Biol, 7, 179, 2005.
36.
HumphreyJ.D., DufresneE.R., and SchwartzM.A.Mechanotransduction and extracellular matrix homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 15, 802, 2014.
37.
PaxtonJ.Z., HagertyP., AndrickJ.J., and BaarK.Optimizing an intermittent stretch paradigm using ERK1/2 phosphorylation results in increased collagen synthesis in engineered ligaments. Tissue Eng A, 18, 277, 2012.
38.
Elosegui-ArtolaA., AndreuI., AEMB., et al.Force triggers YAP nuclear entry by regulating transport across nuclear pores. Cell, 171, 1397, 2017.
39.
GiganteA., CesariE., BusilacchiA., et al.Collagen I membranes for tendon repair: effect of collagen fiber orientation on cell behavior. J Orthop Res, 27, 826, 2009.
40.
YaoD., LiuH., and FanY.Silk scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Exp Biol Med (Maywood), 241, 238, 2016.
41.
OuyangH.W., GohJ.C., MoX.M., TeohS.H., and LeeE.H.The efficacy of bone marrow stromal cell-seeded knitted PLGA fiber scaffold for Achilles tendon repair. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 961, 126, 2002.
42.
CaliariS.R., WeisgerberD.W., RamirezM.A., KelkhoffD.O., and HarleyB.A.The influence of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold relative density and microstructural anisotropy on tenocyte bioactivity and transcriptomic stability. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 11, 27, 2012.
43.
SahooS., OuyangH., GohJ.C., TayT.E., and TohS.L.Characterization of a novel polymeric scaffold for potential application in tendon/ligament tissue engineering. Tissue Eng, 12, 91, 2006.
44.
BelliniD., CencettiC., SacchettaA.C., et al.PLA-grafting of collagen chains leading to a biomaterial with mechanical performances useful in tendon regeneration. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 64, 151, 2016.
45.
XuY., WuJ., WangH., et al.Fabrication of electrospun poly(L-lactide-co-ɛ-caprolactone)/collagen nanoyarn network as a novel, three-dimensional, macroporous, aligned scaffold for tendon tissue engineering. Tissue Eng C Methods, 19, 925, 2013.
46.
SensiniA., GualandiC., CristofoliniL., et al.Biofabrication of bundles of poly(lactic acid)-collagen blends mimicking the fascicles of the human Achille tendon. Biofabrication, 9, 015025, 2017.
47.
TongS.Y., WangZ., LimP.N., WangW., and ThianE.S.Uniformly-dispersed nanohydroxapatite-reinforced poly(ɛ-caprolactone) composite films for tendon tissue engineering application. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 70, 1149, 2017.
48.
YangG., RothrauffB.B., LinH., GottardiR., AlexanderP.G., and TuanR.S.Enhancement of tenogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cells by tendon-derived extracellular matrix. Biomaterials, 34, 9295, 2013.
49.
OmaeH., ZhaoC., SunY.L., AnK.N., and AmadioP.C.Multilayer tendon slices seeded with bone marrow stromal cells: a novel composite for tendon engineering. J Orthop Res, 27, 937, 2009.
50.
NingL.J., ZhangY.J., ZhangY., et al.The utilization of decellularized tendon slices to provide an inductive microenvironment for the proliferation and tenogenic differentiation of stem cells. Biomaterials, 52, 539, 2015.
51.
WangX., QiuY., CarrA.J., TriffittJ.T., SabokbarA., and XiaZ.Improved human tenocyte proliferation and differentiation in vitro by optimized silk degumming. Biomed Mater, 6, 035010, 2011.
52.
StollC., JohnT., EndresM., et al.Extracellular matrix expression of human tenocytes in three-dimensional air-liquid and PLGA cultures compared with tendon tissue: implications for tendon tissue engineering. J Orthop Res, 28, 1170, 2010.
53.
ZhangC., YuanH., LiuH., et al.Well-aligned chitosan-based ultrafine fibers committed Teno-lineage differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells for Achilles tendon regeneration. Biomaterials, 53, 716, 2015.
54.
QinT.W., SunY.L., ThoresonA.R., et al.Effect of mechanical stimulation on bone marrow stromal cell-seeded tendon slice constructs: a potential engineered tendon patch for rotator cuff repair. Biomaterials, 51, 43, 2015.
55.
BurkJ., PlengeA., BrehmW., HellerS., PfeifferB., and KasperC.Induction of tenogenic differentiation mediated by extracellular tendon matrix and short-term cyclic stretching. Stem Cells Int, 2016, 7342379, 2016.
56.
AbousleimanR.I., ReyesY., McFetridgeP., and SikavitsasV.Tendon tissue engineering using cell-seeded umbilical veins cultured in a mechanical stimulator. Tissue Eng A, 15, 787, 2009.
57.
Juncosa-MelvinN., MatlinK.S., HoldcraftR.W., NirmalanandhanV.S., and ButlerD.L.Mechanical stimulation increases collagen type I and collagen type III gene expression of stem cell-collagen sponge constructs for patellar tendon repair. Tissue Eng, 13, 1219, 2007.
58.
ChenJ.L., YinZ., ShenW.L., et al.Efficacy of hESC-MSCs in knitted silk-collagen scaffold for tendon tissue engineering and their roles. Biomaterials, 31, 9438, 2010.
59.
BosworthL.A., RathboneS.R., BradleyR.S., and CartmellS.H.Dynamic loading of electrospun yarns guides mesenchymal stem cells towards a tendon lineage. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 39, 175, 2014.
60.
GrierW.G., MoyA.S., and HarleyB.A.Cyclic tensile strain enhances human mesenchymal stem cell Smad 2/3 activation and tenogenic differentiation in anisotropic collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Eur Cells Mater, 33, 227, 2017.
61.
XuY., DongS., ZhouQ., et al.The effect of mechanical stimulation on the maturation of TDSCs-poly(L-lactide-co-e-caprolactone)/collagen scaffold constructs for tendon tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 35, 2760, 2014.
62.
XuY., WangQ., LiY., et al.Cyclic tensile strain induces tenogenic differentiation of tendon-derived stem cells in bioreactor culture. BioMed Res Int, 2015, 790804, 2015.
63.
IannoneM., VentreM., FormisanoL., CasalinoL., PatriarcaE.J., and NettiP.A.Nanoengineered surfaces for focal adhesion guidance trigger mesenchymal stem cell self-organization and tenogenesis. Nano Lett, 15, 1517, 2015.
64.
ShiY., ZhouK., ZhangW., et al.Microgrooved topographical surface directs tenogenic lineage specific differentiation of mouse tendon derived stem cells. Biomed Mater, 12, 015013, 2017.
65.
AlshomerF., ChavesC., SerraT., AhmedI., and KalaskarD.M.Micropatterning of nanocomposite polymer scaffolds using sacrificial phosphate glass fibers for tendon tissue engineering applications. Nanomedicine, 13, 1267, 2017.
66.
ZhengZ., RanJ., ChenW., et al.Alignment of collagen fiber in knitted silk scaffold for functional massive rotator cuff repair. Acta Biomater, 51, 317, 2017.
67.
YounesiM., IslamA., KishoreV., AndersonJ.M., and AkkusO.Tenogenic induction of human MSCs by anisotropically aligned collagen biotextiles. Adv Funct Mater, 24, 5762, 2014.
68.
YinZ., ChenX., ChenJ.L., et al.The regulation of tendon stem cell differentiation by the alignment of nanofibers. Biomaterials, 31, 2163, 2010.
69.
YinZ., ChenX., SongH.X., et al.Electrospun scaffolds for multiple tissues regeneration in vivo through topography dependent induction of lineage specific differentiation. Biomaterials, 44, 173, 2015.
70.
WangW., HeJ., FengB., et al.Aligned nanofibers direct human dermal fibroblasts to tenogenic phenotype in vitro and enhance tendon regeneration in vivo. Nanomedicine (Lond), 11, 1055, 2016.
71.
WuY., WangZ., YingH.F.J., SanW.Y., WangW., and SanT.E.Direct E-jet printing of three-dimensional fibrous scaffold for tendon tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 105, 616, 2017.
72.
CardwellR.D., DahlgrenL.A., and GoldsteinA.S.Electrospun fibre diameter, not alignment, affects mesenchymal stem cell differentiation into the tendon/ligament lineage. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 8, 937, 2014.
73.
CzaplewskiS.K., TsaiT.L., Duenwald-KuehlS.E., VanderbyR., and LiW.J.Tenogenic differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells dictated by properties of braided submicron fibrous scaffolds. Biomaterials, 35, 6907, 2014.
74.
RaabeO., ShellK., FietzD., et al.Tenogenic differentiation of equine adipose-tissue-derived stem cells under the influence of tensile strain, growth differentiation factors and various oxygen tensions. Cell Tissue Res, 352, 509, 2013.
75.
NirmalanandhanV.S., Juncosa-MelvinN., ShearnJ.T., et al.Combined effects of scaffold stiffening and mechanical preconditioning cycles on construct biomechanics, gene expression, and tendon repair biomechanics. Tissue Eng A, 15, 2103, 2009.
76.
EngebretsonB., MussettZ.R., and SikavitsasV.I.Tenocytic extract and mechanical stimulation in a tissue-engineered tendon construct increases cellular proliferation and ECM deposition. Biotechnol J, 12, 2017.
77.
WuS., WangY., StreubelP.N., and DuanB.Living nanofiber yarn-based woven biotextiles for tendon tissue engineering using cell tri-culture and mechanical stimulation. Acta Biomater, 62, 102, 2017.
78.
ZhangC., WangX., ZhangE., et al.An epigenetic bioactive composite scaffold with well-aligned nanofibers for functional tendon tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 66, 141, 2018.
79.
TongW.Y., ShenW., YeungC.W., et al.Functional replication of the tendon tissue microenvironment by a bioimprinted substrate and the support of tenocytic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials, 33, 7686, 2012.
SandriM., FilardoG., KonE., et al.Fabrication and pilot in vivo study of a collagen-BDDGE-elastin core-shell scaffold for tendon regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 4, 52, 2016.
82.
YangC., DengG., ChenW., YeX., and MoX.A novel electrospun-aligned nanoyarn-reinforced nanofibrous scaffold for tendon tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 122, 270, 2014.
83.
KishoreV., BullockW., SunX., Van DykeW.S., and AkkusO.Tenogenic differentiation of human MSCs induced by the topography of electrochemically aligned collagen threads. Biomaterials, 33, 2137, 2012.
84.
SharmaR.I., and SnedekerJ.G.Paracrine interactions between mesenchymal stem cells affect substrate driven differentiation toward tendon and bone phenotypes. PLoS One, 7, e31504, 2012.
85.
WulfM., ShankerM., SchuetzM., et al.Lower material stiffness in rupture-repaired Achilles tendon during walking: transmission-mode ultrasound for post-surgical tendon evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.100 7/s00167-017-4624-5.
86.
BeasonD.P., ConnizzoB.K., DourteL.M., et al.Fiber-aligned polymer scaffolds for rotator cuff repair in a rat model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 21, 245, 2012.
87.
MoshiriA., OryanA., and Meimandi-PariziA.Synthesis, development, characterization and effectiveness of bovine pure platelet gel-collagen-polydioxanone bioactive graft on tendon healing. J Cell Mol Med, 19, 1308, 2015.
88.
TheissF., MirsaidiA., MhannaR., et al.Use of biomimetic microtissue spheroids and specific growth factor supplementation to improve tenocyte differentiation and adaptation to a collagen-based scaffold in vitro. Biomaterials, 69, 99, 2015.
89.
SahooS., AngL.T., Cho-HongG.J., and TohS.L.Bioactive nanofibers for fibroblastic differentiation of mesenchymal precursor cells for ligament/tendon tissue engineering applications. Differentiation, 79, 102, 2010.
90.
KapoorA., CaporaliE.H., KenisP.J., and StewartM.C.Microtopographically patterned surfaces promote the alignment of tenocytes and extracellular collagen. Acta Biomater, 6, 2580, 2010.
91.
LinL., ShenQ., XueT., and YuC.Heterotopic ossification induced by Achilles tenotomy via endochondral bone formation: expression of bone and cartilage related genes. Bone, 46, 425, 2010.
92.
ChenX., YinZ., ChenJ.L., et al.Force and scleraxis synergistically promote the commitment of human ES cells derived MSCs to tenocytes. Sci Rep, 2, 977, 2012.
93.
DeepthiS., NivedhithaS.M., DeeptiK.J., and JayakumarR.Layered chitosan-collagen hydrogel/aligned PLLA nanofiber construct for flexor tendon regeneration. Carbohydr Polym, 153, 492, 2016.
94.
PanJ., LiuG.M., NingL.J., et al.Rotator cuff repair using a decellularized tendon slices graft: an in vivo study in a rabbit model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 23, 1524, 2015.
95.
OthmanZ., CilleroP.B., van RijtS., and HabibovicP.Understanding interactions between biomaterials and biological systems using proteomics. Biomaterials, 167, 191, 2018.
96.
SunaG., WojakowskiW., LynchM., et al.Extracellular matrix proteomics reveals interplay of aggrecan and aggrecanases in vascular remodeling of stented coronary arteries. Circulation, 137, 166, 2018.
97.
MehdizadehA., GardinerB.S., LavagninoM., and SmithD.W.Predicting tenocyte expression profiles and average molecular concentrations in Achilles tendon ECM from tissue strain and fiber damage. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 16, 1329, 2017.
98.
ChenX., QiY.Y., WangL.L., et al.Ligament regeneration using a knitted silk scaffold combined with collagen matrix. Biomaterials, 29, 3683, 2008.
99.
YangG., LinH., RothrauffB.B., YuS., and TuanR.S.Multilayered polycaprolactone/gelatin fiber-hydrogel composite for tendon tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 35, 68, 2016.
100.
GonçalvesA.I., RodriguesM.T., CarvalhoP.P., et al.Exploring the potential of starch/polycaprolactone aligned magnetic responsive scaffolds for tendon regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater, 5, 213, 2016.
101.
YinZ., HuJ.J., YangL., et al.Single-cell analysis reveals a nestin+tendon stem/progenitor cell population with strong tenogenic potentiality. Sci Adv, 2, e1600874, 2016.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
