Neural prostheses are electrode arrays implanted in the nervous system that record or stimulate electrical activity in neurons. Rapid growth in the use of neural prostheses in research and clinical applications has occurred in recent years, but instability and poor patency in the tissue–electrode interface undermines the longevity and performance of these devices. The application of tissue engineering strategies to the device interface is a promising approach to improve connectivity and communication between implanted electrodes and local neurons, and several research groups have developed new and innovative modifications to neural prostheses with the goal of seamless device–tissue integration. These approaches can be broadly categorized based on the strategy used to maintain and regenerate neurons at the device interface: (1) redesign of the prosthesis architecture to include finer-scale geometries and/or provide topographical cues to guide regenerating neural outgrowth, (2) incorporation of material coatings and bioactive molecules on the prosthesis to improve neuronal growth, viability, and adhesion, and (3) inclusion of cellular grafts to replenish the local neuron population or provide a target site for reinnervation (biohybrid devices). In addition to stabilizing the contact between neurons and electrodes, the potential to selectively interface specific subpopulations of neurons with individual electrode sites is a key advantage of regenerative interfaces. In this study, we review the development of regenerative interfaces for applications in both the peripheral and central nervous system. Current and future development of regenerative interfaces has the potential to improve the stability and selectivity of neural prostheses, improving the patency and resolution of information transfer between neurons and implanted electrodes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RosinB., SlovikM., MitelmanR., Rivlin-EtzionM., HaberS.N., VaadiaE., et al.Closed-loop deep brain stimulation is superior in ameliorating parkinsonism. Neuron, 72, 370, 2011.
2.
MorrellM.J.Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy. Neurology, 77, 1295, 2011.
3.
ZengF.G., RebscherS., HarrisonW., SunX., and FengH.Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng, 1, 115, 2008.
4.
WeilandJ.D., and HumayunM.S.Retinal prosthesis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 61, 1412, 2014.
HochbergL.R., BacherD., JarosiewiczB., MasseN.Y., SimeralJ.D., VogelJ., et al.Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature, 485, 372, 2012.
7.
RossiniP.M., MiceraS., BenvenutoA., CarpanetoJ., CavalloG., CitiL., et al.Double nerve intraneural interface implant on a human amputee for robotic hand control. Clin Neurophysiol, 121, 777, 2010.
8.
RaspopovicS., CapogrossoM., PetriniF.M., BonizzatoM., RigosaJ., Di PinoG., et al.Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses. Sci Transl Med, 6, 222ra19, 2014.
ClarkG.A., WendelkenS., PageD.M., DavisT., WarkH.A.C., RichardA., et al.Using multiple high-count electrode arrays in human median and ulnar nerves to restore sensorimotor function after previous transradial amputation of the hand. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 1977, 2014.
11.
JenningsJ.H., and StuberG.D.Tools for resolving functional activity and connectivity within intact neural circuits. Curr Biol, 24, R41, 2014.
12.
SpiraM.E., and HaiA.Multi-electrode array technologies for neuroscience and cardiology. Nat Nanotechnol, 8, 83, 2013.
13.
ObienM.E.J., DeligkarisK., BullmannT., BakkumD.J., and FreyU.Revealing neuronal function through microelectrode array recordings. Front Neurosci, 8, 2015.
14.
ChestekC.A., GiljaV., NuyujukianP., FosterJ.D., FanJ.M., KaufmanM.T., et al.Long-term stability of neural prosthetic control signals from silicon cortical arrays in rhesus macaque motor cortex. J Neural Eng, 8, 045005, 2011.
15.
PergeJ.A., HomerM.L., MalikW.Q., CashS., EskandarE., FriehsG., et al.Intra-day signal instabilities affect decoding performance in an intracortical neural interface system. J Neural Eng, 10, 036004, 2013.
16.
PrasadA., XueQ.-S., SankarV., NishidaT., ShawG., StreitW.J., et al.Comprehensive characterization and failure modes of tungsten microwire arrays in chronic neural implants. J Neural Eng, 9, 056015, 2012.
17.
PrasadA., XueQ.-S., DiemeR., SankarV., MayrandR.C., NishidaT., et al.Abiotic-biotic characterization of Pt/Ir microelectrode arrays in chronic implants. Front Neuroeng, 7, 2, 2014.
18.
BiranR., MartinD.C., and TrescoP.A.Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays. Exp Neurol, 195, 115, 2005.
19.
KozaiT.D.Y., LiX., BodilyL.M., CaparosaE.M., ZenonosG.A., CarlisleD.L., et al.Effects of caspase-1 knockout on chronic neural recording quality and longevity: insight into cellular and molecular mechanisms of the reactive tissue response. Biomaterials, 35, 9620, 2014.
20.
McConnellG.C., ReesH.D., LeveyA.I., GutekunstC.A., GrossR.E., and BellamkondaR.V.Implanted neural electrodes cause chronic, local inflammation that is correlated with local neurodegeneration. J Neural Eng, 2009, 6, 056003.
21.
HenzeD.A., BorhegyiZ., CsicsvariJ., MamiyaA., HarrisK.D., and BuzsákiG.Intracellular features predicted by extracellular recordings in the hippocampus in vivo. J Neurophysiol, 84, 390, 2000.
22.
ChristensenM.B., PearceS.M., LedbetterN.M., WarrenD.J., ClarkG.A., and TrescoP.A.The foreign body response to the Utah Slant Electrode Array in the cat sciatic nerve. Acta Biomater, 10, 4650, 2014.
23.
Del ValleJ., and NavarroX. Interfaces with the peripheral nerve for the control of neuroprostheses. Int Rev Neurobiol, 109, 63, 2013.
24.
MannardA., SteinR.B., and CharlesD.Regeneration electrode units: implants for recording from single peripheral nerve fibers in freely moving animals. Science, 183, 547, 1974.
25.
AkinT., NajafiK., SmokeR.H., and BradleyR.M.A micromachined silicon sieve electrode for nerve regeneration applications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 41, 305, 1994.
26.
LagoN., UdinaE., RamachandranA., and NavarroX.Neurobiological assessment of regenerative electrodes for bidirectional interfacing injured peripheral nerves. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 54, 1129, 2007.
27.
LagoN., CeballosD., RodríguezF.J., StieglitzT., and NavarroX.Long term assessment of axonal regeneration through polyimide regenerative electrodes to interface the peripheral nerve. Biomaterials, 26, 2021, 2005.
28.
CastroJ., NegredoP., and AvendañoC.Fiber composition of the rat sciatic nerve and its modification during regeneration through a sieve electrode. Brain Res, 1190, 65, 2008.
29.
LacourS.P., AttaR., FitzGeraldJ.J., BlamireM., TarteE., and FawcettJ.Polyimide micro-channel arrays for peripheral nerve regenerative implants. Sens Actuat A Phys, 147, 456, 2008.
30.
LacourS.P., FitzgeraldJ.J., LagoN., TarteE., McMahonS., and FawcettJ.Long micro-channel electrode arrays: a novel type of regenerative peripheral nerve interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 17, 454, 2009.
31.
FitzGeraldJ.J., LacourS.P., McMahonS.B., and FawcettJ.W.Microchannels as axonal amplifiers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 55, 1136, 2008.
32.
MinevI.R., ChewD.J., DelivopoulosE., FawcettJ.W., and LacourS.P.High sensitivity recording of afferent nerve activity using ultra-compliant microchannel electrodes: an acute in vivo validation. J Neural Eng, 9, 026005, 2012.
33.
SrinivasanA., TahilramaniM., BentleyJ.T., GoreR.K., MillardD.C., MukhatyarV.J., et al.Microchannel-based regenerative scaffold for chronic peripheral nerve interfacing in amputees. Biomaterials, 41, 151, 2015.
34.
LotfiP., GardeK., ChouhanA.K., BengaliE., and Romero-OrtegaM.I.Modality-specific axonal regeneration: toward selective regenerative neural interfaces. Front Neuroeng, 4, 1, 2011.
35.
StoyanovaI.I., van WezelR.J.A., and RuttenW.L.C.In vivo testing of a 3D bifurcating microchannel scaffold inducing separation of regenerating axon bundles in peripheral nerves. J Neural Eng, 10, 066018, 2013.
36.
PurcellE.K., NaimY., YangA., LeachM.K., VelkeyJ.M., DuncanR.K., et al.Combining topographical and genetic cues to promote neuronal fate specification in stem cells. Biomacromolecules, 13, 3427, 2012.
37.
AbidianM.R., CoreyJ.M., KipkeD.R., and MartinD.C.Conducting-polymer nanotubes improve electrical properties, mechanical adhesion, neural attachment and neurite outgrowth of neural electrodes. Small, 6, 421, 2010.
38.
GreenR.A., LovellN.H., WallaceG.G., and Poole-WarrenL.A.Conducting polymers for neural interfaces: challenges in developing an effective long-term implant. Biomaterials, 29, 3393, 2008.
39.
LudwigK.A., UramJ.D., YangJ., MartinD.C., and KipkeD.R.Chronic neural recordings using silicon microelectrode arrays electrochemically deposited with a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) film. J Neural Eng, 3, 59, 2006.
40.
LeeJ.Y., BashurC.A., GoldsteinA.S., and SchmidtC.E.Polypyrrole-coated electrospun PLGA nanofibers for neural tissue applications. Biomaterials, 30, 4325, 2009.
LuY., LiT., ZhaoX., LiM., CaoY., YangH., et al.Electrodeposited polypyrrole/carbon nanotubes composite films electrodes for neural interfaces. Biomaterials, 31, 5169, 2010.
43.
KolarcikC.L., CattK., RostE., AlbrechtI.N., BourbeauD., DuZ., et al.Evaluation of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/carbon nanotube neural electrode coatings for stimulation in the dorsal root ganglion. J Neural Eng, 12, 016008, 2015.
44.
MalarkeyE.B., FisherK.A., BekyarovaE., LiuW., HaddonR.C., and ParpuraV.Conductive single-walled carbon nanotube substrates modulate neuronal growth. Nano Lett, 9, 264, 2009.
45.
GreenR.A., LovellN.H., and Poole-WarrenL.A.Impact of co-incorporating laminin peptide dopants and neurotrophic growth factors on conducting polymer properties. Acta Biomater, 6, 63, 2010.
46.
GreenR.A., LovellN.H., and Poole-WarrenL.A.Cell attachment functionality of bioactive conducting polymers for neural interfaces. Biomaterials, 30, 3637, 2009.
47.
RichardsonR.T., ThompsonB., MoultonS., NewboldC., LumM.G., CameronA., et al.The effect of polypyrrole with incorporated neurotrophin-3 on the promotion of neurite outgrowth from auditory neurons. Biomaterials, 28, 513, 2007.
48.
RichardsonR.T., WiseA.K., ThompsonB.C., FlynnB.O., AtkinsonP.J., FretwellN.J., et al.Polypyrrole-coated electrodes for the delivery of charge and neurotrophins to cochlear neurons. Biomaterials, 30, 2614, 2009.
49.
GomezN., and SchmidtC.E.Nerve growth factor-immobilized polypyrrole: bioactive electrically conducting polymer for enhanced neurite extension. J Biomed Mater Res, 81, 135, 2007.
50.
AbidianM.R., KimD.H., and MartinD.C.Conducting-polymer nanotubes for controlled drug release. Adv Mater, 18, 405, 2006.
51.
GuimardN.K., GomezN., and SchmidtC.E.Conducting polymers in biomedical engineering. Prog Polym Sci, 32, 876, 2007.
52.
ChanK.M., GordonT., ZochodneD.W., and PowerH.A.Improving peripheral nerve regeneration: from molecular mechanisms to potential therapeutic targets. Exp Neurol, 261, 826, 2014.
53.
KimD.H., Richardson-BurnsS.M., HendricksJ.L., SequeraC., and MartinD.C.Effect of immobilized nerve growth factor on conductive polymers: electrical properties and cellular response. Adv Funct Mater, 17, 79, 2007.
54.
ErnforsP., DuanM.L., ElShamyW.M., and CanlonB.Protection of auditory neurons from aminoglycoside toxicity by neurotrophin-3. Nat Med, 2, 463, 1996.
55.
NamgungU.The role of Schwann cell-axon interaction in peripheral nerve regeneration. Cells Tissues Organs, 200, 6, 2015.
56.
RodriguesM.C.O., RodriguesA.A., GloverL.E., VoltarelliJ., and BorlonganC.V.Peripheral nerve repair with cultured schwann cells: getting closer to the clinics. ScientificWorldJournal, 2012, 1, 2012.
57.
KoppesA.N., NordbergA.L., PaolilloG.M., GoodsellN.M., DarwishH.A., ZhangL., et al.Electrical stimulation of schwann cells promotes sustained increases in neurite outgrowth. Tissue Eng Part A, 20, 494, 2014.
58.
SondellM., LundborgG., and KanjeM.Vascular endothelial growth factor has neurotrophic activity and stimulates axonal outgrowth, enhancing cell survival and Schwann cell proliferation in the peripheral nervous system. J Neurosci, 19, 5731, 1999.
59.
BehanB.L., DeWittD.G., BogdanowiczD.R., KoppesA.N., BaleS.S., and ThompsonD.M.Single-walled carbon nanotubes alter Schwann cell behavior differentially within 2D and 3D environments. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 96, 46, 2011.
60.
StieglitzT., RufH., GrossM., SchuettlerM., and MeyerJ.U.A biohybrid system to interface peripheral nerves after traumatic lesions: design of a high channel sieve electrode. Biosens Bioelectron, 17, 685, 2002.
61.
LanghalsN.B., UrbanchekM.G., RayA., and BrennerM.J.Update in facial nerve paralysis: tissue engineering and new technologies. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 22, 291, 2014.
62.
KungT.A., LanghalsN.B., MartinD.C., JohnsonP.J., CedernaP.S., and UrbanchekM.G.Regenerative peripheral nerve interface viability and signal transduction with an implanted electrode. Plast Reconstr Surg, 133, 1380, 2014.
63.
LanghalsN.B., MemberI., WooS.L., MoonJ.D., LarsonJ.V, LeachM.K., et al.Electrically stimulated signals from a long-term regenerative peripheral nerve interface. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 1989, 2014.
64.
PolikovV.S., TrescoP.A., and ReichertW.M.Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. J Neurosci Methods, 148, 1, 2005.
65.
KozaiT.D.Y., Jaquins-GerstlA.S., VazquezA.L., MichaelA.C., and CuiX.T.Brain tissue responses to neural implants impact signal sensitivity and intervention strategies. ACS Chem Neurosci, 6, 48, 2015.
66.
SeymourJ.P., and KipkeD.R.Neural probe design for reduced tissue encapsulation in CNS. Biomaterials, 28, 3594, 2007.
67.
SeymourJ.P., LanghalsN.B., AndersonD.J., and KipkeD.R.Novel multi-sided, microelectrode arrays for implantable neural applications. Biomed Microdevices, 13, 441, 2011.
68.
KarumbaiahL., SaxenaT., CarlsonD., PatilK., PatkarR., GauppE.A., et al.Relationship between intracortical electrode design and chronic recording function. Biomaterials, 34, 8061, 2013.
69.
SkousenJ.L., BridgeM.J., and TrescoP.A.A strategy to passively reduce neuroinflammation surrounding devices implanted chronically in brain tissue by manipulating device surface permeability. Biomaterials, 36, 33, 2015.
70.
SkousenJ.L., MerriamS.M.E., SrivannavitO., PerlinG., WiseK.D., and TrescoP.A.Reducing surface area while maintaining implant penetrating profile lowers the brain foreign body response to chronically implanted planar silicon microelectrode arrays. Prog Brain Res, 194, 167, 2011.
71.
KozaiT.D.Y., LanghalsN.B., PatelP.R., DengX., ZhangH., SmithK.L., et al.Ultrasmall implantable composite microelectrodes with bioactive surfaces for chronic neural interfaces. Nat Mater, 11, 1065, 2012.
HeW., and BellamkondaR.V.Nanoscale neuro-integrative coatings for neural implants. Biomaterials, 26, 2983, 2005.
74.
WuZ.-R., MaJ., LiuB.-F., XuQ.-Y., and CuiF.-Z.Layer-by-layer assembly of polyelectrolyte films improving cytocompatibility to neural cells. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 81, 355, 2007.
WinslowB.D., ChristensenM.B., YangW.K., SolzbacherF., and TrescoP.A.A comparison of the tissue response to chronically implanted Parylene-C-coated and uncoated planar silicon microelectrode arrays in rat cortex. Biomaterials, 31, 9163, 2010.
77.
AzemiE., LagenaurC.F., and CuiX.T.The surface immobilization of the neural adhesion molecule L1 on neural probes and its effect on neuronal density and gliosis at the probe/tissue interface. Biomaterials, 32, 681, 2011.
78.
HortschM.The L1 family of neural cell adhesion molecules: old proteins performing new tricks. Neuron, 17, 587, 1996.
79.
AzemiE., StaufferW.R., GostockM.S., LagenaurC.F., and CuiX.T.Surface immobilization of neural adhesion molecule L1 for improving the biocompatibility of chronic neural probes: in vitro characterization. Acta Biomater, 4, 1208, 2008.
80.
ZhongY., YuX., GilbertR., and BellamkondaR V.Stabilizing electrode-host interfaces: a tissue engineering approach. J Rehabil Res Dev, 38, 627, 2001.
81.
KolarcikC.L., BourbeauD., AzemiE., RostE., ZhangL., LagenaurC.F., et al.In vivo effects of L1 coating on inflammation and neuronal health at the electrode-tissue interface in rat spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion. Acta Biomater, 8, 3561, 2012.
82.
KennedyP.R.The cone electrode: a long-term electrode that records from neurites grown onto its recording surface. J Neurosci Methods, 29, 181, 1989.
83.
KennedyP.R., MirraS.S., and BakayR.A.E.The cone electrode: ultrastructural studies following long-term recording in rat and monkey cortex. Neurosci Lett, 142, 89, 1992.
84.
KennedyP.R., and BakayR.A.Activity of single action potentials in monkey motor cortex during long-term task learning. Brain Res, 760, 251, 1997.
85.
BartelsJ., AndreasenD., EhirimP., MaoH., SeibertS., WrightE.J., et al.Neurotrophic electrode: method of assembly and implantation into human motor speech cortex. J Neurosci Methods, 174, 168, 2008.
86.
KennedyP.Reliable neural interface: the first quarter century of the neurotrophic electrode. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2012, 3332, 2012.
87.
PurcellE.K., SeymourJ.P., YandamuriS., KipkeD.R.In vivo evaluation of a neural stem cell-seeded prosthesis. J Neural Eng, 6, 026005, 2009.
88.
AzemiE., GobbelG.T., and CuiX.T.Seeding neural progenitor cells on silicon-based neural probes. J Neurosurg, 113, 673, 2010.
89.
PurcellE.K., SinghA., and KipkeD.R.Alginate composition effects on a neural stem cell-seeded scaffold. Tissue Eng Part C, 15, 541, 2009.
90.
DimmelerS., DingS., RandoT.A., and TrounsonA.Translational strategies and challenges in regenerative medicine. Nat Med, 20, 814, 2014.
91.
KhanA.M., WhitenD.M., NadolJ.B., and EddingtonD.K.Histopathology of human cochlear implants: correlation of psychophysical and anatomical measures. Hear Res, 205, 83, 2005.
92.
PurcellE.K., ThompsonD.E., LudwigK.A., and KipkeD.R.Flavopiridol reduces the impedance of neural prostheses in vivo without affecting recording quality. J Neurosci Methods, 183, 149, 2009.
93.
KozaiT.D.Y., GugelZ., LiX., GilgunnP.J., KhilwaniR., OzdoganlarO.B., et al.Chronic tissue response to carboxymethyl cellulose based dissolvable insertion needle for ultra-small neural probes. Biomaterials, 35, 9255, 2014.
94.
CellotG., TomaF.M., Kasap VarleyZ., LaishramJ., VillariA., QuintanaM., et al.Carbon nanotube scaffolds tune synaptic strength in cultured neural circuits: novel frontiers in nanomaterial-tissue interactions. J Neurosci, 31, 12945, 2011.
95.
SrinivasanA., LiangG., and BellamkondaR.V. “Regenerative microchannel electrode array for peripheral nerve interfacing.” Neural Engineering (NER), 2011 5th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on. IEEE, 2011.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
