A combination of hydrogels and stem cell spheroids has been used to engineer three-dimensional (3D) osteochondral tissue, but precise zonal control directing cell fate within the hydrogel remains a challenge. In this study, we developed a composite spheroid-laden bilayer hydrogel to imitate osteochondral tissue by spatially controlled differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells. Meticulous optimization of the spheroid-size and mechanical strength of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogel enables the cells to homogeneously sprout within the hydrogel. Moreover, fibers immobilizing transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1) or bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) were incorporated within the spheroids, which induced chondrogenic or osteogenic differentiation of cells in general media, respectively. The spheroids-filled GelMA solution was crosslinked to create the bilayer hydrogel, which demonstrated a strong interfacial adhesion between the two layers. The cell sprouting enhanced the adhesion of each hydrogel, demonstrated by increase in tensile strength from 4.8 ± 0.4 to 6.9 ± 1.2 MPa after 14 days of culture. Importantly, the spatially confined delivery of BMP-2 within the spheroids increased mineral deposition and more than threefold enhanced osteogenic genes of cells in the bone layer while the cells induced by TGF-β1 signals were apparently differentiated into chondrocytes within the cartilage layer. The results suggest that our composite spheroid-laden hydrogel could be used for the biofabrication of osteochondral tissue, which can be applied to engineer other complex tissues by delivery of appropriate biomolecules.
Impact statement
This research developed a bilayer hydrogel encapsulating two types of composite spheroids, with each layer engineered to induce osteogenic or chondrogenic differentiation. The hydrogel was prepared by adjusting the size of spheroids and mechanical strength of hydrogel to provide a desired microenvironment of encapsulated cells, leading to homogeneous sprouting. Spatially confined delivery of osteogenic or chondrogenic signals in each layer enabled the specific differentiation to each layer. Thus, our spheroid-laden bilayer hydrogel could be a potential model or therapeutic platform as three-dimensional (3D) osteochondral tissue.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
OuyangL, ArmstrongJPK, Salmeron-SanchezM, et al.Assembling living building blocks to engineer complex tissues. Adv Funct Mater, 2020; 30(26):1909009; doi: 10.1002/adfm.201909009
2.
ChenZ, XiaoH, ZhangH, et al.Heterogenous hydrogel mimicking the osteochondral ECM applied to tissue regeneration. J Mater Chem B, 2021; 9(41):8646–8658; doi: 10.1039/D1TB00518A
WeiW, DaiH. Articular cartilage and osteochondral tissue engineering techniques: Recent advances and challenges. Bioact Mater, 2021; 6(12):4830–4855; doi: 10.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2021.05.011
5.
NiuX, LiN, DuZ, et al.Integrated gradient tissue-engineered osteochondral scaffolds: Challenges, current efforts and future perspectives. Bioact Mater, 2023; 20:574–597; doi: 10.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2022.06.011
6.
FreitasGP, LopesHB, SouzaATP, et al.Cell therapy: Effect of locally injected mesenchymal stromal cells derived from bone marrow or adipose tissue on bone regeneration of rat calvarial defects. Sci Rep, 2019; 9(1):13476; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50067-6
7.
YangJ, ZhangYS, YueK, et al.Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 2017; 57:1–25; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.036
LienemannPS, Vallmajo-MartinQ, PapageorgiouP, et al.Smart hydrogels for the augmentation of bone regeneration by endogenous mesenchymal progenitor cell recruitment. Adv Sci, 2020; 7(7):1903395; doi: 10.1002/ADVS.201903395
10.
BertassoniLE. Bioprinting of complex multicellular organs with advanced functionality—Recent progress and challenges ahead. Adv Mater, 2022; 34(3):2101321; doi: 10.1002/adma.202101321
11.
ScalzoneA, FerreiraAM, Tonda-TuroC, et al.The interplay between chondrocyte spheroids and mesenchymal stem cells boosts cartilage regeneration within a 3D natural-based hydrogel. Sci Rep, 2019; 9(1):14630; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51070-7
12.
ShanbhagS, SulimanS, Mohamed-AhmedS, et al.Bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects using dissociated or spheroid mesenchymal stromal cells in scaffold-hydrogel constructs. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2021; 12(1):575; doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02642-w
13.
WhiteheadJ, GriffinKH, Gionet-GonzalesM, et al.Hydrogel mechanics are a key driver of bone formation by mesenchymal stromal cell spheroids. Biomaterials, 2021; 269:120607; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120607
14.
SheehyEJ, VinardellT, BuckleyCT, et al.Engineering osteochondral constructs through spatial regulation of endochondral ossification. Acta Biomater, 2013; 9(3):5484–5492; doi: 10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2012.11.008
15.
ChoH, KimJ, KimS, et al.Dual delivery of stem cells and insulin-like growth factor-1 in coacervate-embedded composite hydrogels for enhanced cartilage regeneration in osteochondral defects. J Control Release, 2020; 327:284–295; doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.08.002
16.
KellerL, PijnenburgL, Idoux-GilletY, et al.Preclinical safety study of a combined therapeutic bone wound dressing for osteoarticular regeneration. Nat Commun, 2019; 10(1):2156; doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10165-5
17.
KimS, KimEM, YamamotoM, et al.Engineering multi-cellular spheroids for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Adv Healthc Mater, 2020; 9(23):2000608; doi: 10.1002/adhm.202000608
18.
BelloAB, KimY, ParkS, et al.Matrilin3/TGFβ3 gelatin microparticles promote chondrogenesis, prevent hypertrophy, and induce paracrine release in MSC spheroid for disc regeneration. NPJ Regen Med, 2021; 6(1):50; doi: 10.1038/s41536-021-00160-0
19.
AhmadT, ByunH, LeeJ, et al.Stem cell spheroids incorporating fibers coated with adenosine and polydopamine as a modular building blocks for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2020; 230:119652; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119652
20.
LeeJ, LeeS, AhmadT, et al.Human adipose-derived stem cell spheroids incorporating platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and bio-minerals for vascularized bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2020; 255:120192; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120192
21.
KimS, ByunH, LeeS, et al.Spatially arranged encapsulation of stem cell spheroids within hydrogels for the regulation of spheroid fusion and cell migration. Acta Biomater, 2022; 142:60–72; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.01.047
22.
HuX, XiaZ, CaiK. Recent advances in 3D hydrogel culture systems for mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy and cell behavior regulation. J Mater Chem B, 2022; 10(10):1486–1507; doi: 10.1039/D1TB02537F
23.
CuiX, Alcala-OrozcoCR, BaerK, et al.3D bioassembly of cell-instructive chondrogenic and osteogenic hydrogel microspheres containing allogeneic stem cells for hybrid biofabrication of osteochondral constructs. Biofabrication, 2022; 14(3):034101; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac61a3
24.
AyanB, WuY, KaruppagounderV, et al.Aspiration-assisted bioprinting of the osteochondral interface. Sci Rep, 2020; 10(1):13148; doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69960-6
25.
JiangW, XiangX, SongM, et al.An all-silk-derived bilayer hydrogel for osteochondral tissue engineering. Mater Today Bio, 2022; 17:100485; doi: 10.1016/J.MTBIO.2022.100485
26.
LiuB, ZhaoY, ZhuT, et al.Biphasic double-network hydrogel with compartmentalized loading of bioactive glass for osteochondral defect repair. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020; 8:752; doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00752
27.
ShinJ-Y, ParkJ, JangH-K, et al.Efficient formation of cell spheroids using polymer nanofibers. Biotechnol Lett, 2012; 34(5):795–803; doi: 10.1007/s10529-011-0836-9
28.
Gionet-GonzalesMA, LeachJK. Engineering principles for guiding spheroid function in the regeneration of bone, cartilage, and skin. Biomed Mater, 2018; 13(3):034109; doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aab0b3
29.
AhmadT, LeeJ, ShinYM, et al.Hybrid-spheroids incorporating ECM like engineered fragmented fibers potentiate stem cell function by improved cell/cell and cell/ECM interactions. Acta Biomater, 2017; 64:161–175; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.022
30.
LeeJ, LeeJ, LeeS, et al.Bioactive membrane immobilized with lactoferrin for modulation of bone regeneration and inflammation. Tissue Eng Part A, 2020; 26(23–24):1243–1258; doi: 10.1089/TEN.TEA.2020.0015/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/TEN.TEA.2020.0015_FIGURE 9.JPEG
31.
ChaeSJ, HongJ, HwangboH, et al.The utility of biomedical scaffolds laden with spheroids in various tissue engineering applications. Theranostics, 2021; 11(14):6818–6832; doi: 10.7150/THNO.58421
32.
NakamuraA, MurataD, FujimotoR, et al.Bio-3D printing iPSC-derived human chondrocytes for articular cartilage regeneration. Biofabrication, 2021; 13(4):044103; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac1c99
33.
DalyAC, KellyDJ. Biofabrication of spatially organised tissues by directing the growth of cellular spheroids within 3D printed polymeric microchambers. Biomaterials, 2019; 197:194–206; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.12.028
34.
HeoDN, HospodiukM, OzbolatIT. Synergistic interplay between human MSCs and HUVECs in 3D spheroids laden in collagen/fibrin hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 2019; 95:348–356; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.046
35.
MonteiroMV, GasparVM, FerreiraLP, et al.Hydrogel 3D in vitro tumor models for screening cell aggregation mediated drug response. Biomater Sci, 2020; 8(7):1855–1864; doi: 10.1039/C9BM02075F
36.
KandučM, KimWK, RoaR, et al.How the shape and chemistry of molecular penetrants control responsive hydrogel permeability. ACS Nano, 2021; 15(1):614–624; doi: 10.1021/ACSNANO.0C06319/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/NN0C06319_0004.JPEG
37.
HorderH, Guaza LasherasM, GrummelN, et al.Bioprinting and differentiation of adipose-derived stromal cell spheroids for a 3D breast cancer-adipose tissue model. Cells, 2021; 10(4):803; doi: 10.3390/cells10040803
38.
PiaoY, YouH, XuT, et al.Biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels. Eng Regen, 2021; 2:47–56; doi: 10.1016/j.engreg.2021.03.002
39.
MonteiroN, ThrivikramanG, AthirasalaA, et al.Photopolymerization of cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels using a dental curing light for regenerative dentistry. Dent Mater, 2018; 34(3):389–399; doi: 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2017.11.020
40.
LachowskiD, CortesE, RiceA, et al.Matrix stiffness modulates the activity of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in hepatic stellate cells to perpetuate fibrosis. Sci Rep, 2019; 9(1):7299; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43759-6
41.
ChaudhuriO, GuL, KlumpersD, et al.Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat Mater, 2016; 15(3):326–334; doi: 10.1038/nmat4489
42.
WozniakMA, ModzelewskaK, KwongL, et al.Focal adhesion regulation of cell behavior. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2004; 1692(2–3):103–119; doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.04.007
43.
YanaiR, TetsuoF, ItoS, et al.Extracellular calcium stimulates osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells by enhancing bone morphogenetic protein-2 expression. Cell Calcium, 2019; 83:102058; doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2019.102058
44.
WangW, RigueurD, LyonsKM. TGFβ signaling in cartilage development and maintenance. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today, 2014; 102(1):37–51; doi: 10.1002/bdrc.21058
45.
GoodrichCP, BrennerMP, RibbeckK. Enhanced diffusion by binding to the crosslinks of a polymer gel. Nat Commun, 2018; 9(1):4348; doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06851-5
46.
KimW, GwonY, ParkS, et al.Therapeutic strategies of three-dimensional stem cell spheroids and organoids for tissue repair and regeneration. Bioact Mater, 2023; 19:50–74; doi: 10.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2022.03.039
47.
LeeJ, LeeS, HuhSJ, et al.Directed regeneration of osteochondral tissue by hierarchical assembly of spatially organized composite spheroids. Adv Sci, 2022; 9(3):2103525; doi: 10.1002/advs.202103525
TsaiC-C, HongY-J, LeeRJ, et al.Enhancement of human adipose-derived stem cell spheroid differentiation in an in situ enzyme-crosslinked gelatin hydrogel. J Mater Chem B, 2019; 7(7):1064–1075; doi: 10.1039/C8TB02835D
50.
ZhouM, LeeBH, TanYJ, et al.Microbial transglutaminase induced controlled crosslinking of gelatin methacryloyl to tailor rheological properties for 3D printing. Biofabrication, 2019; 11(2):025011; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab063f
51.
LoessnerD, MeinertC, KaemmererE, et al.Functionalization, preparation and use of cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl–based hydrogels as modular tissue culture platforms. Nat Protoc, 2016; 11(4):727–746; doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.037
52.
ChenX, JiangC, WangT, et al.Hyaluronic acid-based biphasic scaffold with layer-specific induction capacity for osteochondral defect regeneration. Mater Des, 2022; 216:110550; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110550
53.
BurdisR, Chariyev-PrinzF, BroweDC, et al.Spatial patterning of phenotypically distinct microtissues to engineer osteochondral grafts for biological joint resurfacing. Biomaterials, 2022; 289:121750; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121750
54.
ZhangW, LianQ, LiD, et al.Cartilage repair and subchondral bone migration using 3D printing osteochondral composites: A one-year-period study in rabbit trochlea. Biomed Res Int, 2014; 2014:746138; doi: 10.1155/2014/746138
55.
LiJJ, KimK, Roohani-EsfahaniS-I, et al.A biphasic scaffold based on silk and bioactive ceramic with stratified properties for osteochondral tissue regeneration. J Mater Chem B, 2015; 3(26):5361–5376; doi: 10.1039/C5TB00353A
56.
WangQ, LiuZ, TangC, et al.Tough interfacial adhesion of bilayer hydrogels with integrated shape memory and elastic properties for controlled shape deformation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021; 13(8):10457–10466; doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c22484
57.
SeoS-J, MahapatraC, SinghRK, et al.Strategies for osteochondral repair: Focus on scaffolds. J Tissue Eng, 2014; 5:2041731414541850; doi: 10.1177/2041731414541850
58.
GraysonWL, BhumiratanaS, Grace ChaoPH, et al.Spatial regulation of human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in engineered osteochondral constructs: Effects of pre-differentiation, soluble factors and medium perfusion. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2010; 18(5):714–723; doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.01.008
59.
MatareseG, La CavaA, HorvathTL. In vivo veritas, in vitro artificia. Trends Mol Med, 2012; 18(8):439–442; doi: 10.1016/J.MOLMED.2012.05.003
60.
MarenzanaM, ArnettTR. The key role of the blood supply to bone. Bone Res, 2013; 1(3):203–215; doi: 10.4248/BR201303001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
