In this study of three-dimensional (3D) printed composite β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)-/hydroxyapatite/poly(ɛ-caprolactone)-based constructs, the effects of vertical compositional ceramic gradients and architectural porosity gradients on the osteogenic differentiation of rabbit bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were investigated. Specifically, three different concentrations of β-TCP (0, 10, and 20 wt%) and three different porosities (33% ± 4%, 50% ± 4%, and 65% ± 3%) were examined to elucidate the contributions of chemical and physical gradients on the biochemical behavior of MSCs and the mineralized matrix production within a 3D culture system. By delaminating the constructs at the gradient transition point, the spatial separation of cellular phenotypes could be specifically evaluated for each construct section. Results indicated that increased concentrations of β-TCP resulted in upregulation of osteogenic markers, including alkaline phosphatase activity and mineralized matrix development. Furthermore, MSCs located within regions of higher porosity displayed a more mature osteogenic phenotype compared to MSCs in lower porosity regions. These results demonstrate that 3D printing can be leveraged to create multiphasic gradient constructs to precisely direct the development and function of MSCs, leading to a phenotypic gradient.
Impact Statement
In this study, three-dimensional (3D) printed ceramic/polymeric constructs containing discrete vertical gradients of both composition and porosity were fabricated to precisely control the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. By making simple alterations in construct architecture and composition, constructs containing heterogenous populations of cells were generated, where gradients in scaffold design led to corresponding gradients in cellular phenotype. The study demonstrates that 3D printed multiphasic composite constructs can be leveraged to create complex heterogeneous tissues and interfaces.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ThibaultR.A., Scott BaggettL., MikosA.G., and KasperF.K.Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on pregenerated extracellular matrix scaffolds in the absence of osteogenic cell culture supplements. Tissue Eng Part A, 16, 431, 2010.
2.
KeatingJ.F., and McQueenM.M.Substitutes for autologous bone graft in orthopaedic trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 83, 3, 2001.
3.
HabibovicP., and de GrootK.Osteoinductive biomaterials—properties and relevance in bone repair. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 1, 25, 2007.
4.
LuH.H., SubramonyS.D., BoushellM.K., and ZhangX.Tissue engineering strategies for the regeneration of orthopedic interfaces. Ann Biomed Eng, 38, 2142, 2010.
5.
BracagliaL.G., SmithB.T., WatsonE., ArumugasaamyN., MikosA.G., and FisherJ.P.3D printing for the design and fabrication of polymer-based gradient scaffolds. Acta Biomater, 56, 3, 2017.
6.
BayraktarH.H., MorganE.F., NieburG.L., MorrisG.E., WongE.K., and KeavenyT.M.Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech, 37, 27, 2004.
7.
OftadehR., Perez-ViloriaM., Villa-CamachoJ.C., VaziriA., and NazarianA.Biomechanics and mechanobiology of trabecular bone: a review. J Biomech Eng, 137, 010802, 2015.
8.
GongJ.K., ArnoldJ.S., and CohnS.H.Composition of trabecular and cortical bone. Anat Rec, 149, 325, 1964.
SikavitsasV.I., TemenoffJ.S., and MikosA.G.Biomaterials and bone mechanotransduction. Biomaterials, 22, 2581, 2001.
11.
BittnerS.M., GuoJ.L., MelchiorriA., and MikosA.G.Three-dimensional printing of multilayered tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater Today, 21, 861, 2018.
12.
YousefiA.M., HoqueM.E., PrasadR.G., and UthN.Current strategies in multiphasic scaffold design for osteochondral tissue engineering: a review. J Biomed Mater Res A, 103, 2460, 2015.
13.
OhS.H., KimT.H., and LeeJ.H.Creating growth factor gradients in three dimensional porous matrix by centrifugation and surface immobilization. Biomaterials, 32, 8254, 2011.
14.
BittnerS.M., GuoJ.L., and MikosA.G.Spatiotemporal control of growth factors in three-dimensional printed scaffolds. Bioprinting, 12, e00032, 2018.
15.
IlkhanizadehS., TeixeiraA.I., and HermansonO.Inkjet printing of macromolecules on hydrogels to steer neural stem cell differentiation. Biomaterials, 28, 3936, 2007.
16.
SeidiA., RamalingamM., Elloumi-HannachiI., OstrovidovS., and KhademhosseiniA.Gradient biomaterials for soft-to-hard interface tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 7, 1441, 2011.
17.
HanF., ZhouF., YangX., ZhaoJ., ZhaoY., and YuanX.A pilot study of conically graded chitosan-gelatin hydrogel/plga scaffold with dual-delivery of TGF-beta1 and BMP-2 for regeneration of cartilage-bone interface. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 103, 1344, 2015.
LipnerJ., ShenH., CavinattoL., et al.In vivo evaluation of adipose-derived stromal cells delivered with a nanofiber scaffold for tendon-to-bone repair. Tissue Eng Part A, 21, 2766, 2015.
20.
KamedaT., KoikeC., SaitohK., KuroiwaA., and IbaH.Developmental patterning in chondrocytic cultures by morphogenic gradients: BMP induces expression of Indian hedgehog and noggin. Genes Cells, 4, 175, 1999.
21.
PhillipsJ.E., BurnsK.L., Le DouxJ.M., GuldbergR.E., and GarciaA.J.Engineering graded tissue interfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105, 12170, 2008.
22.
RoyT.D., SimonJ.L., RicciJ.L., RekowE.D., ThompsonV.P., and ParsonsJ.R.Performance of degradable composite bone repair products made via three-dimensional fabrication techniques. J Biomed Mater Res A, 66, 283, 2003.
23.
O'BrienF.J., HarleyB.A., WallerM.A., YannasI.V., GibsonL.J., and PrendergastP.J.The effect of pore size on permeability and cell attachment in collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. Technol Health Care, 15, 3, 2007.
24.
Di LucaA., OstrowskaB., Lorenzo-MolderoI., et al.Gradients in pore size enhance the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells in three-dimensional scaffolds. Sci Rep, 6, 22898, 2016.
25.
StoryB.J., WagnerW.R., GaisserD.M., CookS.D., and Rust-DawickiA.M.In vivo performance of a modified csti dental implant coating. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, 749, 1998.
26.
KruytM.C., de BruijnJ.D., WilsonC.E., et al.Viable osteogenic cells are obligatory for tissue-engineered ectopic bone formation in goats. Tissue Eng, 9, 327, 2003.
27.
KimK., DeanD., MikosA.G., and FisherJ.P.Effect of initial cell seeding density on early osteogenic signal expression of rat bone marrow stromal cells cultured on cross-linked poly(propylene fumarate) disks. Biomacromolecules, 10, 1810, 2009.
28.
MurphyC.M., HaughM.G., and O'BrienF.J.The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 31, 461, 2010.
29.
KimS.S., AhnK.M., ParkM.S., LeeJ.H., ChoiC.Y., and KimB.S.A poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffold with enhanced osteoconductivity. J Biomed Mater Res A, 80, 206, 2007.
30.
ManoJ.F., SousaR.A., BoeselL.F., NevesN.M., and ReisR.L.Bioinert, biodegradable and injectable polymeric matrix composites for hard tissue replacement: state of the art and recent developments. Compos Sci Technol, 64, 789, 2004.
31.
LiaoH.T., LeeM.Y., TsaiW.W., WangH.C., and LuW.C.Osteogenesis of adipose-derived stem cells on polycaprolactone-beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold fabricated via selective laser sintering and surface coating with collagen type I. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 10, E337, 2016.
32.
ParkC.-H., KimE.K., TijingL.D., et al.Preparation and characterization of La/Pcl composite fibers containing beta tricalcium phosphate (B-TCP) particles. Ceram Int, 40, 5049, 2014.
33.
YeoM., LeeH., and KimG.Three-dimensional hierarchical composite scaffolds consisting of polycaprolactone, beta-tricalcium phosphate, and collagen nanofibers: fabrication, physical properties, and in vitro cell activity for bone tissue regeneration. Biomacromolecules, 12, 502, 2011.
34.
LohfeldS., CahillS., BarronV., et al.Fabrication, mechanical and in vivo performance of polycaprolactone/tricalcium phosphate composite scaffolds. Acta Biomater, 8, 3446, 2012.
35.
AzevedoM.C., ReisR.L., ClaaseM.B., GrijpmaD.W., and FeijenJ.Development and properties of polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite composite biomaterials. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 14, 103, 2003.
36.
ShalumonK.T., SowmyaS., SathishD., ChennazhiK.P., NairS.V., and JayakumarR.Effect of incorporation of nanoscale bioactive glass and hydroxyapatite in PCL/Chitosan nanofibers for bone and periodontal tissue engineering. J Biomed Nanotechnol, 9, 430, 2013.
37.
GuarinoV., CausaF., NettiP.A., et al.The role of hydroxyapatite as solid signal on performance of PCL porous scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 86, 548, 2008.
38.
Roohani-EsfahaniS.I., Nouri-KhorasaniS., LuZ., AppleyardR., and ZreiqatH.The influence hydroxyapatite nanoparticle shape and size on the properties of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with hydroxyapatite-PCL composites. Biomaterials, 31, 5498, 2010.
39.
OhgushiH., OkumuraM., TamaiS., ShorsE.C., and CaplanA.I.Marrow cell induced osteogenesis in porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate: a comparative histomorphometric study of ectopic bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res, 24, 1563, 1990.
40.
BergmannC., LindnerM., ZhangW., et al.3D printing of bone substitute implants using calcium phosphate and bioactive glasses. J Eur Ceram Soc, 30, 2563, 2010.
41.
BergmannC.J., OdekerkenJ.C., WeltingT.J., et al.Calcium phosphate based three-dimensional cold plotted bone scaffolds for critical size bone defects. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 852610, 2014.
42.
InzanaJ.A., OlveraD., FullerS.M., et al.3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomaterials, 35, 4026, 2014.
43.
LinL., ChowK.L., and LengY.Study of hydroxyapatite osteoinductivity with an osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A, 89, 326, 2009.
44.
SamavediS., WhittingtonA.R., and GoldsteinA.S.Calcium phosphate ceramics in bone tissue engineering: a review of properties and their influence on cell behavior. Acta Biomater, 9, 8037, 2013.
45.
SzpalskiC., WetterauM., BarrJ., and WarrenS.M.Bone tissue engineering: current strategies and techniques—part I: scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 18, 246, 2012.
46.
SpalazziJ.P., DagherE., DotyS.B., GuoX.E., RodeoS.A., and LuH.H.In vivo evaluation of a multiphased scaffold designed for orthopaedic interface tissue engineering and soft tissue-to-bone integration. J Biomed Mater Res A, 86, 1, 2008.
CatledgeS.A., ClemW.C., ShrikishenN., et al.An electrospun triphasic nanofibrous scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Mater, 2, 142, 2007.
49.
Diaz-GomezL., SmithB.T., KontoyiannisP.D., BittnerS.M., MelchiorriA.J., and MikosA.G.Multimaterial segmented fiber printing for gradient tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 25, 12, 2019.
50.
BittnerS.M., SmithB.T., Diaz-GomezL., et al.Fabrication and mechanical characterization of 3D printed vertical uniform and gradient scaffolds for bone and osteochondral tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 90, 37, 2019.
51.
TrachtenbergJ.E., PlaconeJ.K., SmithB.T., FisherJ.P., and MikosA.G.Extrusion-based 3D printing of poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds with hydroxyapatite gradients. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 28, 532, 2017.
52.
LamJ., LuS., MeretojaV.V., TabataY., MikosA.G., and KasperF.K.Generation of osteochondral tissue constructs with chondrogenically and osteogenically predifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells encapsulated in bilayered hydrogels. Acta Biomater, 10, 1112, 2014.
53.
DominiciM., Le BlancK., MuellerI., et al.Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy Position Statement. Cytotherapy, 8, 315, 2006.
54.
BancroftG.N., SikavitsasV.I., van den DolderJ., et al.Fluid flow increases mineralized matrix deposition in 3D perfusion culture of marrow stromal osteoblasts in a dose-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 99, 12600, 2002.
55.
LuS., LeeE.J., LamJ., TabataY., and MikosA.G.Evaluation of gelatin microparticles as adherent-substrates for mesenchymal stem cells in a hydrogel composite. Ann Biomed Eng, 44, 1894, 2016.
56.
DuY., LiuH., YangQ., et al.Selective laser sintering scaffold with hierarchical architecture and gradient composition for osteochondral repair in rabbits. Biomaterials, 137, 37, 2017.
57.
HuangW., CarlsenB., WulurI., et al.BMP-2 exerts differential effects on differentiation of rabbit bone marrow stromal cells grown in two-dimensional and three-dimensional systems and is required for in vitro bone formation in a PLGA scaffold. Exp Cell Res, 299, 325, 2004.
58.
SmoakM.M., HanA., WatsonE., et al.Fabrication and characterization of electrospun decellularized muscle-derived scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 25, 276, 2019.
59.
SikavitsasV.I., BancroftG.N., HoltorfH.L., JansenJ.A., and MikosA.G.Mineralized matrix deposition by marrow stromal osteoblasts in 3D perfusion culture increases with increasing fluid shear forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100, 14683, 2003.
60.
LianJ.B., and SteinG.S.Concepts of osteoblast growth and differentiation: basis for modulation of bone cell development and tissue formation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 3, 269, 1992.
61.
LianJ.B., and SteinG.S.Development of the osteoblast phenotype: molecular mechanisms mediating osteoblast growth and differentiation. Iowa Orthop J, 15, 118, 1995.
62.
TakahashiY., YamamotoM., and TabataY.Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in biodegradable sponges composed of gelatin and beta-tricalcium phosphate. Biomaterials, 26, 3587, 2005.
63.
Diaz-GomezL., KontoyiannisP.D., MelchiorriA.J., and MikosA.G.Three-dimensional printing of tissue engineering scaffolds with horizontal pore and composition gradients. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 25, 411, 2019.
64.
SmoakM., HoganK., KrieghL., et al.Modulation of mesenchymal stem cell behavior by nano-and micro-sized B-tricalcium phosphate particles in suspension and composite structures. J Nanopart Res, 17, 182, 2015.
65.
MarinoG., RossoF., CafieroG., et al.Beta-tricalcium phosphate 3D scaffold promote alone osteogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cells: in vitro study. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 21, 353, 2010.
66.
LuZ., and ZreiqatH.Beta-tricalcium phosphate exerts osteoconductivity through alpha2beta1 integrin and down-stream MAPK/Erk signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 394, 323, 2010.
67.
WenL., WangY., WangH., et al.L-Type calcium channels play a crucial role in the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 424, 439, 2012.
68.
Aquino-MartínezR., ArtigasN., GámezB., RosaJ.L., and VenturaF.Extracellular calcium promotes bone formation from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by amplifying the effects of BMP-2 on Smad signalling. PLoS One, 12, e0178158, 2017.
69.
SurmenevR.A., SurmenevaM.A., and IvanovaA.A.Significance of calcium phosphate coatings for the enhancement of new bone osteogenesis—a review. Acta Biomater, 10, 557, 2014.
70.
dos SantosE.A., FarinaM., SoaresG.A., and AnselmeK.Chemical and topographical influence of hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate surfaces on human osteoblastic cell behavior. J Biomed Mater Res A, 89A, 510, 2009.
71.
BarradasA.M.C., FernandesH.A.M., GroenN., et al.A calcium-induced signaling cascade leading to osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Biomaterials, 33, 3205, 2012.
72.
HeoS.J., KimS.E., WeiJ., et al.Fabrication and characterization of novel nano-and micro-HA/PCL composite scaffolds using a modified rapid prototyping process. J Biomed Mater Res A, 89, 108, 2009.
73.
WilliamsJ.M., AdewunmiA., SchekR.M., et al.Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials, 26, 4817, 2005.
74.
ParkS.A., LeeS.H., and KimW.D.Fabrication of porous polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite (PCL/HA) blend scaffolds using a 3D plotting system for bone tissue engineering. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 34, 505, 2011.
75.
ParkJ., LeeS.J., JoH.H., et al.Fabrication and characterization of 3D-printed bone-like B-tricalcium phosphate/polycaprolactone scaffolds for dental tissue engineering. J Ind Eng Chem, 46, 175, 2017.
76.
KimK., YeattsA., DeanD., and FisherJ.P.Stereolithographic bone scaffold design parameters: osteogenic differentiation and signal expression. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 16, 523, 2010.
77.
HuriP.Y., OzilgenB.A., HuttonD.L., and GraysonW.L.Scaffold pore size modulates in vitro osteogenesis of human adipose-derived stem/stromal cells. Biomed Mater, 9, 045003, 2014.
78.
KastenP., BeyenI., NiemeyerP., LuginbühlR., BohnerM., and RichterW.Porosity and pore size of B-tricalcium phosphate scaffold can influence protein production and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: an in vitro and in vivo study. Acta Biomater, 4, 1904, 2008.
79.
KimK., DeanD., WallaceJ., BreithauptR., MikosA.G., and FisherJ.P.The influence of stereolithographic scaffold architecture and composition on osteogenic signal expression with rat bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials, 32, 3750, 2011.
80.
MatsikoA., GleesonJ.P., and O'BrienF.J.Scaffold mean pore size influences mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenic differentiation and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng Part A, 21, 486, 2014.
81.
HarrisG.M., PiroliM.E., and JabbarzadehE.Deconstructing the effects of matrix elasticity and geometry in mesenchymal stem cell lineage commitment. Adv Funct Mater, 24, 2396, 2014.
82.
McMurtreyR.J.Roles of diffusion dynamics in stem cell signaling and three-dimensional tissue development. Stem Cells Dev, 26, 1293, 2017.
83.
RabeM., VerdesD., and SeegerS.Understanding protein adsorption phenomena at solid surfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 162, 87, 2011.
84.
KretlowJ.D., and MikosA.G.Review: mineralization of synthetic polymer scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng, 13, 927, 2007.
85.
KarageorgiouV., and KaplanD.Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 26, 5474, 2005.
86.
SteinG.S., LianJ.B., and OwenT.A.Relationship of cell growth to the regulation of tissue-specific gene expression during osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J, 4, 3111, 1990.
87.
ZhuL., and SkoultchiA.I.Coordinating cell proliferation and differentiation. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 11, 91, 2001.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
