This “invited submission” concisely reviews the author's involvement in the early era of tissue engineering and summarizes his perspective. He points out the journal was present in this early era and that it functions as a viewing chamber for seeing the last 25 years of progress and that it stands ready to provide viewing of the next 25 years.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FinchJ.The ancient origins of prosthetic medicine. Lancet, 377, 548, 2011.
GraczykE.L., ResnikL., SchieferM.A., SchmittM.S., and TylerD.J.Home use of a neural-connected sensory prosthesis provides the functional and psychosocial experience of having a hand again. Sci Rep, 8, 9866, 2018.
4.
VacantiC.A.The history of tissue engineering. J Cell Molec Med, 10, 569, 2006.
5.
VacantiJ.P.Beyond transplantation: third annual Samuel Jason Mixter lecture. Arch Surg, 123, 545, 1988.
6.
BellE., SherS., HullB., MerrillC., RosenS., and ChamsonA.The reconstitution of living skin. J Invest Dermatol, 81, 2S, 1983.
7.
RheinwaldJ.G., and GreenH.Serial cultivation of strains of human epidermal keratinocytes: the formation of keratinizing colonies from single cells. Cell, 6, 331, 1975.
8.
YannasI.V., and BurkeJ.F.Design of an artificial skin. I. Basic design principles. J Biomed Mater Res, 14, 65, 1980.
9.
BellE., ParenteauN., GayR., and NolteC.The living skin equivalent: its manufacturer, its organotypic properties and its responses to irritants. Toxicol In Vitro, 5, 591, 1991.
10.
PangarkarN., PharoahM., NigamA., HutmacherD., and ChampS.Advanced Tissue Sciences Inc.: learning from the past, a case study for regenerative medicine. Regen Med, 5, 823, 2010.
11.
AtalaA.Tissue engineering of human bladder. Br Med Bull, 97, 81, 2011.
AdamowiczJ., PokrywczynskaM., Van BredaS.V., KloskowskiT., and DrewaT.Concise review: tissue engineering of urinary bladder; we still have a long way to go? Stem Cells Transl Med, 6, 2033, 2017.
MajumadarM.K., ThiedeM.A., MoscaJ.D., MoormanM., and GersonS.L.Phenotypic and functional comparison of cultures of marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and stromal cells. J Cell Physiol, 176, 57, 1998.
18.
LazarusH.M., HaynesworthS.E., GersonS.L., RosenthalN., and CaplanA.I.Ex-vivo expansion and subsequent infusion of human bone marrow-derived stromal progenitor cells (mesenchymal progenitor cells) [MPCs]: implications for therapeutic use. Bone Marrow Transpl, 16, 557, 1995.
19.
CaplanA.I.What's in a name? Tiss Eng, Part A, 16, 2415, 2010.
20.
CaplanA.I.All MSCs are pericytes? Cell Stem Cell, 3, 229, 2008.
21.
DeugarteD.A., MorizonoK., ElbarbaryA., et al.Comparison of multi-lineage cells from human adipose tissue and bone marrow. Cells Tissues Organs, 174, 101, 2003.
22.
Guimaraes-CamboaN., CattaneoP., YunfuS., et al.Pericytes of multiple organs do not behave as mesenchymal stem cells in vivo. Cell Stem Cell, 20, 1, 2017.
23.
KopenG.C., ProckopD.J., and PhinneyD.G.Marrow stromal cells migrate throughout forebrain and cerebellum, and they differentiate into astrocytes after injection into neonatal mouse brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96, 10711, 1999.
24.
YooJ.U., BarthelT.S., NishimuraK., et al.The chondrogenic potential of human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. J Bone Joint Surg, 80, 1745, 1998.
25.
CorreaD., SomozaR.A., GreenbergS.A., et al.Sequential stimulation with fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) 2, 9 and 18 regulate the ultimate phenotype of MSC-derived chondrocytes. Osteoarthr Cartilage, 23, 443, 2015.
26.
MansourJ.M., and WelterJ.F.Review: multimodal evaluation of tissue-engineered cartilage. J Med Biol Eng, 33, 1, 2012.
27.
SomozaR.A., CorreaD., LabatI., et al.Transcriptome-wide analyses of human neonatal articular cartilage and human mesenchymal stem cell-derived cartilage provide a new molecular target for evaluating engineered cartilage. Tiss Eng Part A, 24, 335, 2018.
