Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-08
* Understanding the Spatiotemporal Degradation Behavior of Aggrecanase-Sensitive Poly(ethylene glycol) Hydrogels for Use in Cartilage Tissue Engineering
Enzyme-sensitive hydrogels are promising cell delivery vehicles for cartilage tissue engineering. However, a better understanding of their spatiotemporal degradation behavior and its impact on tissue growth is needed. The goal of this study was to combine experimental and computational approaches to provide new insights into spatiotemporal changes in hydrogel crosslink density and extracellular matrix (ECM) growth and how these changes influence the evolving macroscopic properties as a function of time. Hydrogels were designed from aggrecanase-sensitive peptide crosslinks using a simple and robust thiol–norbornene photoclick reaction. To study the influence of variations in cellular activity of different donors, chondrocytes were isolated from either juvenile or adult bovine donors. Initial studies were performed to validate and calibrate the model against experiments. Through this process, two key features were identified. These included spatial variations in the hydrogel crosslink density in the immediate vicinity of the cell and the presence of cell clustering within the construct. When these spatial heterogeneities were incorporated into the computational model along with model inputs of initial hydrogel properties and cellular activity (i.e., enzyme and ECM production rates), the model was able to capture the spatial and temporal evolution of ECM growth that was observed experimentally for both donors. In this study, the juvenile chondrocytes produced an interconnected matrix within the cell clusters leading to overall improved ECM growth, while the adult chondrocytes resulted in poor ECM growth. Overall, the computational model was able to capture the spatiotemporal ECM growth of two different donors and provided new insights into the importance of spatial heterogeneities in facilitating ECM growth. Our long-term goal is to use this model to predict optimal hydrogel designs for a wide range of donors and improve cartilage tissue engineering.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
TibbittM.W., and AnsethK.S.Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng, 103, 655, 2009.
2.
TibbittM.W., RodellC.B., BurdickJ.A., and AnsethK.S.Progress in material design for biomedical applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 112, 14444, 2015.
3.
ParkY., LutolfM.P., HubbellJ.A., HunzikerE.B., and WongM.Bovine primary chondrocyte culture in synthetic matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels as a scaffold for cartilage repair. Tissue Eng, 10, 515, 2004.
4.
SridharB.V., BrockJ.L., SilverJ.S., LeightJ.L., RandolphM.A., and AnsethK.S.Development of a cellularly degradable PEG hydrogel to promote articular cartilage extracellular matrix deposition. Adv Healthc Mater, 4, 702, 2015.
5.
SkaalureS.C., ChuS., and BryantS.J.An enzyme-sensitive PEG hydrogel based on aggrecan catabolism for cartilage tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater, 4, 420, 2015.
6.
BahneyC.S., HsuC.-W., YooJ.U., WestJ.L., and JohnstoneB.A bioresponsive hydrogel tuned to chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. FASEB J, 25, 1486, 2011.
7.
ParmarP.A., SkaalureS.C., ChowL.W., St-PierreJ.P., StoichevskaV., PengY.Y., WerkmeisterJ.A., RamshawJ.A., and StevensM.M.Temporally degradable collagen-mimetic hydrogels tuned to chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials, 99, 56, 2016.
8.
BryantS.J., and AnsethK.S.Hydrogel properties influence ECM production by chondrocytes photoencapsulated in poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res, 59, 63, 2002.
9.
NicodemusG.D., SkaalureS.C.and Bryant, S.J. Gel structure has an impact on pericellular and extracellular matrix deposition, which subsequently alters metabolic activities in chondrocyte-laden PEG hydrogels. Acta Biomater, 7, 492, 2011.
10.
HascallV.C., and SajderaS.W.Physical properties and polydispersity of proteoglycan from bovine nasal cartilage. J Biol Chem, 245, 4920, 1970.
11.
LodishH., and BaltimoreD.L.Collagen: the fibrous proteins of the matrix. In: EliasJ., et al., eds. Molecular Cell Biology. NY: W. H. Freeman, 2000, Chapter 22.3.
12.
NeumannA.J., QuinnT., and BryantS.J.Nondestructive evaluation of a new hydrolytically degradable and photo-clickable PEG hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 39, 1, 2016.
13.
RobertsJ.J., NicodemusG.D., GreenwaldE.C., and BryantS.J.Degradation improves tissue formation in (un)loaded chondrocyte-laden hydrogels. Clin Orthop, 469, 2725, 2011.
14.
VernereyF.J., GreenwaldE.C., and BryantS.J.Triphasic mixture model of cell-mediated enzymatic degradation of hydrogels. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng, 15, 1197, 2012.
15.
DhoteV., et al.On the role of hydrogel structure and degradation in controlling the transport of cell-secreted matrix molecules for engineered cartilage. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 19, 61, 2013.
16.
SkaalureS.C., AkalpU., VernereyF.J., and BryantS.J.Tuning reaction and diffusion mediated degradation of enzyme-sensitive hydrogels. Adv Healthc Mater, 5, 432, 2016.
17.
AkalpU., BryantS.J., and VernereyF.J.Tuning tissue growth with scaffold degradation in enzyme-sensitive hydrogels: a mathematical model. Soft Matter, 12, 7505, 2016.
18.
FarnsworthN.L., AntunezL.R., and BryantS.J.Dynamic compressive loading differentially regulates chondrocyte anabolic and catabolic activity with age. Biotechnol Bioeng, 110, 2046, 2013.
19.
LutolfM.P., TirelliN., CerritelliS., CavalliL., and HubbellJ.A.Systematic modulation of Michael-type reactivity of thiols through the use of charged amino acids. Bioconjug Chem, 12, 1051, 2001.
20.
RobertsJ.J., EarnshawA., FergusonV.L., and BryantS.J.Comparative study of the viscoelastic mechanical behavior of agarose and poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 99B, 158, 2011.
21.
KimY.-J., SahR.L.Y., DoongJ.-Y.H., and GrodzinskyA.J.Fluorometric assay of DNA in cartilage explants using Hoechst 33258. Anal Biochem, 174, 168, 1988.
22.
TempletonD.M.The basis and applicability of the dimethylmethylene blue binding assay for sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Connect Tissue Res, 17, 23, 1988.
23.
WoessnerJ.F.The determination of hydroxyproline in tissue and protein samples containing small proportions of this imino acid. Arch Biochem Biophys, 93, 440, 1961.
24.
DhoteV., and VernereyF.J.Mathematical model of the role of degradation on matrix development in hydrogel scaffold. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 13, 167, 2014.
25.
PeppasN.A.Structure and Properties of Polymeric Materials. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, 1984.
26.
PeppasN.A.Hydrogels in Medicine and Pharmacy, Vol. 2. Polymers. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1987.
27.
MacoskoC., and MillerD.R.A new derivation of average molecular weights of nonlinear polymers. Macromolecules, 9, 199, 1976.
28.
TibbittM.W., KloxinA.M., SawickiL.A., and AnsethK.S.Mechanical properties and degradation of chain and step-polymerized photodegradable hydrogels. Macromolecules, 46, 2785, 2013.
29.
LutolfM.P., et al.Synthetic matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive hydrogels for the conduction of tissue regeneration: engineering cell-invasion characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100, 5413, 2003.
30.
AkalpU., et al.Determination of the polymer-solvent interaction parameter for PEG hydrogels in water: application of a self learning algorithm. Polymer, 66, 135, 2015.
31.
Brannon-PeppasL., and PeppasN.A.Solute and penetrant diffusion in swellable polymers. IX. The mechanisms of drug release from ph-sensitive swelling-controlled systems. J Control Release, 8, 267, 1989.
32.
LustigS.R., and PeppasN.A.Solute diffusion in swollen membranes. IX. Scaling laws for solute diffusion in gels. J Appl Polym Sci, 36, 735, 1988.
33.
MerrillE.W., DennisonK.A., and SungC.Partitioning and diffusion of solutes in hydrogels of poly (ethylene oxide). Biomaterials, 14, 1117, 1993.
34.
AndersonM.L., MottP.H., and RolandC.M.The compression of bonded rubber disks. Rubber Chem Technol, 77, 293, 2004.
35.
AnsethK.S., BowmanC.N., and Brannon-PeppasL.Mechanical properties of hydrogels and their experimental determination. Biomaterials, 17, 1647, 1996.
36.
GouldS.T., DarlingN.J., and AnsethK.S.Small peptide functionalized thiol–ene hydrogels as culture substrates for understanding valvular interstitial cell activation and de novo tissue deposition. Acta Biomater, 8, 3201, 2012.
37.
AkalpU., BryantS.J., and VernereyF.J.Tuning tissue growth with scaffold degradation in enzyme-sensitive hydrogels: a mathematical model. Soft Matter, 12, 7505, 2016.
38.
WongM., PonticielloM., KovanenV., and JurvelinJ.S.Volumetric changes of articular cartilage during stress relaxation in unconfined compression. J Biomech, 33, 1049, 2000.
39.
MowV.C., GibbsM.C., LaiW.M., ZhuW.B., and AthanasiouK.A.Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage-II. A numerical algorithm and an experimental study. J Biomech, 22, 853, 1989.
40.
GuilakF., JonesW.R., Ting-BeallH.P., and LeeG.M.The deformation behavior and mechanical properties of chondrocytes in articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 7, 59, 1999.
41.
VernereyF.J.A mixture approach to investigate interstitial growth in engineering scaffolds. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 15, 259, 2016.
42.
AboudiJ., ArnoldS.M., and BednarcykB.A.Micromechanics of Composite Materials: A Generalized Multiscale Analysis Approach. North Holland: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2012.
43.
Nemat-NasserS., and HoriM.Micromechanics: Overall Properties of Heterogeneous Materials. North Hollard: Elsevier, 2013.
44.
HoyleC.E., and BowmanC.N.Thiol–ene click chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed, 49, 1540, 2010.
45.
FairbanksB.D., et al.A versatile synthetic extracellular matrix mimic via thiol-norbornene photopolymerization. Adv Mater, 21, 5005, 2009.
46.
KääbM.J., GwynnA.I., and NötzliH.P.Collagen fibre arrangement in the tibial plateau articular cartilage of man and other mammalian species. J Anat, 193, 23, 1998.
47.
FiresteinG.S., BuddR., GabrielS.E., McInnesI.B., and O'DellJ.R.Kelley and Firestein's Textbook of Rheumatology. North Holland: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2016.
48.
LiY., WeiX., ZhouJ., and WeiL.The age-related changes in cartilage and osteoarthritis. Biomed Res Int, 2013, e916530, 2013.
49.
LoboV., PatilA., PhatakA., and ChandraN.Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: impact on human health. Pharmacogn Rev, 4, 118, 2010.
50.
RichardsD.M.C., DeanR.T., and JessupW.Membrane proteins are critical targets in free radical mediated cytolysis. Biochim Biophys Acta, 946, 281, 1988.
51.
DonoghueN., YamP.T., JiangX.M., and HoggP.J.Presence of closely spaced protein thiols on the surface of mammalian cells. Protein Sci Publ Protein Soc, 9, 2436, 2000.
52.
FarnsworthN., BensardC., and BryantS.J.The role of the PCM in reducing oxidative stress induced by radical initiated photoencapsulation of chondrocytes in poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 20, 1326, 2012.
53.
FlanneryC., et al.Variability in the G3 domain content of bovine aggrecan from cartilage extracts and chondrocyte cultures. Arch Biochem Biophys, 297, 52, 1992.
54.
IlicM.Z., RobinsonH.C., and HandleyC.J.Characterization of aggrecan retained and lost from the extracellular matrix of articular cartilage: involvement of carboxy-terminal processing in the catabolism of aggrecan. J Biol Chem, 273, 17451, 1998.
55.
NicodemusG.D., and BryantS.J.The role of hydrogel structure and dynamic loading on chondrocyte gene expression and matrix formation. J Biomech, 41, 1528, 2008.
56.
KashiwagiM., TortorellaM., NagaseH., and BrewK.TIMP-3 is a potent inhibitor of aggrecanase 1 (ADAM-TS4) and aggrecanase 2 (ADAM-TS5). J Biol Chem, 276, 12501, 2001.
57.
HashimotoG., AokiT., NakamuraH., TanzawaK., and OkadaY.Inhibition of ADAMTS4 (aggrecanase-1) by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP-1, 2, 3 and 4). FEBS Lett, 494, 192, 2001.
58.
GavrilovicJ., HembryR.M., ReynoldsJ.J., and MurphyG.Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) regulates extracellular type I collagen degradation by chondrocytes and endothelial cells. J Cell Sci, 87 (Pt 2), 357, 1987.
59.
TortorellaM.D., et al.α2-macroglobulin is a novel substrate for ADAMTS-4 and ADAMTS-5 and represents an endogenous inhibitor of these enzymes. J Biol Chem, 279, 17554, 2004.
60.
DangottL.J., and CunninghamL.W.Residual α2-macroglobulin in fetal calf serum and properties of its complex with thrombin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 107, 1243, 1982.
61.
LoeserR.F.Aging and osteoarthritis: the role of chondrocyte senescence and aging changes in the cartilage Matrix. Osteoarthr. Cartil. OARS Osteoarthr Res Soc, 17, 971, 2009.
62.
SkaalureS.C., MilliganI.L., and BryantS.J.Age impacts extracellular matrix metabolism in chondrocytes encapsulated in degradable hydrogels. Biomed Mater, 7, 024111, 2012.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
