ImG.-I.Endogenous cartilage repair by recruitment of stem cells. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 22, 160, 2015.
2.
YoonJ.-K., et al.Enhanced bone repair by guided osteoblast recruitment using topographically defined implant. Tissue Eng Part A, 22, 654, 2016.
3.
TalacuaH., et al.In situ tissue engineering of functional small-diameter blood vessels by host circulating cells only. Tissue Eng Part A, 21, 2583, 2015.
4.
WilesK., FishmanJ.M., De CoppiP., and BirchallM.A.The host immune response to tissue-engineered organs: current problems and future directions. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 22, 208, 2016.
5.
WiseS.G., et al.Blended polyurethane and tropoelastin as a novel class of biologically interactive elastomer. Tissue Eng Part A, 22, 524, 2016.
6.
RothuizenT.C., et al.Tailoring the foreign body response for in situ vascular tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 21, 436, 2015.
7.
KimI.L.et al.Fibrous scaffolds with varied fiber chemistry and growth factor delivery promote repair in a porcine cartilage defect model. Tissue Eng Part A, 21, 2680, 2015.
8.
PontaillerM., et al.Polymer-based reconstruction of the inferior vena cava in rat: stem cells or RGD peptide?. Tissue Eng Part A, 21, 1552, 2015.
9.
KhosraviR., et al.Biomechanical diversity despite mechanobiological stability in tissue engineered vascular grafts two years post-implantation. Tissue Eng Part A, 21, 1529, 2015.
10.
QuijanoL., LynchK., AllanC., BadylakS., and AhsanT.Looking ahead to engineering epimorphic regeneration of a human digit or limb. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 22, 1, 2015.
11.
KrawiecJ.T., et al.In vivo functional evaluation of tissue-engineered vascular grafts fabricated using human adipose-derived stem cells from high cardiovascular risk populations. Tissue Eng Part A, 22, 765, 2016.
12.
WolfM.T., VodovotzY., TotteyS., BrownB.N., and BadylakS.F.Predicting in vivo responses to biomaterials via combined in vitro and in silico analysis. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 21, 148, 2015.
