Regenerating articular cartilage and fibrocartilaginous tissue such as the meniscus is still a challenge in orthopedic medicine. While a range of different scaffolds have been developed for joint repair, none have facilitated the development of a tissue that mimics the complexity of soft tissues such as articular cartilage. Furthermore, many of these scaffolds are not designed to function in mechanically challenging joint environments. The overall goal of this study was to develop a porous, biomimetic, shape-memory alginate scaffold for directing cartilage regeneration. To this end, a scaffold was designed with architectural cues to guide cellular and neo-tissue alignment, which was additionally functionalized with a range of extracellular matrix cues to direct stem cell differentiation toward the chondrogenic lineage. Shape-memory properties were introduced by covalent cross-linking alginate using carbodiimide chemistry, while the architecture of the scaffold was modified using a directional freezing technique. Introducing such an aligned pore structure was found to improve the mechanical properties of the scaffold, and promoted higher levels of sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAG) and collagen deposition compared to an isotropic (nonaligned) pore geometry when seeded with adult human stem cells. Functionalization with collagen improved stem cell recruitment into the scaffold and facilitated more homogenous cartilage tissue deposition throughout the construct. Incorporating type II collagen into the scaffolds led to greater cell proliferation, higher sGAG and collagen accumulation, and the development of a stiffer tissue compared to scaffolds functionalized with type I collagen. The results of this study demonstrate how both scaffold architecture and composition can be tailored in a shape-memory alginate scaffold to direct stem cell differentiation and support the development of complex cartilaginous tissues.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GannonA.R., NagelT., and KellyD.J.The role of the superficial region in determining the dynamic properties of articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 20, 1417, 2012.
2.
MowV.C., and GuoX.E.Mechano-electrochemical properties of articular cartilage: their inhomogeneities and anisotropies. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 4, 175, 2002.
3.
MadeiraC., SanthagunamA., SalgueiroJ.B., and CabralJ.M.Advanced cell therapies for articular cartilage regeneration. Trends Biotechnol, 33, 35, 2015.
4.
FelsonD.T.Osteoarthritis of the Knee. N Engl J Med, 354, 841, 2006.
HangodyL., and FulesP.Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85-ASuppl 2, 25, 2003.
7.
ZukP.A., ZhuM., MizunoH., HuangJ., FutrellJ.W., KatzA.J., et al.Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng, 7, 211, 2001.
8.
GilloglyS.D., and WheelerK.S.Autologous chondrocyte implantation with collagen membrane. Sports Med Arthrosc, 23, 118, 2015.
9.
GriffinD.J., BonnevieE.D., LachowskyD.J., HartJ.C., SparksH.D., MoranN., et al.Mechanical characterization of matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI(R)) grafts in an equine model at 53 weeks. J Biomech, 48, 1944, 2015.
10.
PlaceE.S., EvansN.D., and StevensM.M.Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat Mater, 8, 457, 2009.
11.
BakerB.M., GeeA.O., ShethN.P., HuffmanG.R., SennettB.J., SchaerT.P., et al.Meniscus tissue engineering on the nanoscale: from basic principles to clinical application. J Knee Surg, 22, 45, 2009.
12.
MalafayaP.B., SilvaG.A., and ReisR.L.Natural-origin polymers as carriers and scaffolds for biomolecules and cell delivery in tissue engineering applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 59, 207, 2007.
13.
OliveiraS.M., ReisR.L., and ManoJ.F.Towards the design of 3D multiscale instructive tissue engineering constructs: current approaches and trends. Biotechnol Adv, 33, 842, 2015.
14.
HutmacherD.W.Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials, 21, 2529, 2000.
15.
GomesM.E., MalafayaP.B., and ReisR.L.Methodologies for processing biodegradable and natural origin scaffolds for bone and cartilage tissue-engineering applications. Methods Mol Biol, 238, 65, 2004.
16.
SutherlandA.J., ConverseG.L., HopkinsR.A., and DetamoreM.S.The bioactivity of cartilage extracellular matrix in articular cartilage regeneration. Adv Healthcare Mater, 4, 29, 2015.
17.
BendersK.E.M., van WeerenP.R.., BadylakS.F., SarisD.B.F., DhertW.J.A., and MaldaJ.Extracellular matrix scaffolds for cartilage and bone regeneration. Trends Biotechnol, 31, 169, 2013.
18.
PieperJ.S., van der KraanP.M., HafmansT., KampJ., BumaP., van SusanteJ.L., et al.Crosslinked type II collagen matrices: preparation, characterization, and potential for cartilage engineering. Biomaterials, 23, 3183, 2002.
19.
MurphyC.M., HaughM.G., and O'BrienF.J.The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 31, 461, 2010.
20.
MatsikoA., LevingstoneT.J., GleesonJ.P., and O'BrienF.J.Incorporation of TGF-beta 3 within collagen-hyaluronic acid scaffolds improves their chondrogenic potential. Adv Healthc Mater, 4, 1175, 2015.
21.
RagetlyG., GriffonD.J., and ChungY.S.The effect of type II collagen coating of chitosan fibrous scaffolds on mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and chondrogenesis. Acta Biomater, 6, 3988, 2010.
22.
RagetlyG.R., GriffonD.J., LeeH.B., and ChungY.S.Effect of collagen II coating on mesenchymal stem cell adhesion on chitosan and on reacetylated chitosan fibrous scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 21, 2479, 2010.
23.
GuillaumeO., DalyA., LennonK., GansauJ., BuckleyS.F., and BuckleyC.T.Shape-memory porous alginate scaffolds for regeneration of the annulus fibrosus: effect of TGF-beta3 supplementation and oxygen culture conditions. Acta Biomater, 10, 1985, 2014.
24.
GuillaumeO., NaqviS.M., LennonK., and BuckleyC.T.Enhancing cell migration in shape-memory alginate-collagen composite scaffolds: in vitro and ex vivo assessment for intervertebral disc repair. J Biomater Appl, 29, 1230, 2015.
25.
AlsbergE., AndersonK.W., AlbeirutiA., RowleyJ.A., and MooneyD.J.Engineering growing tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 99, 12025, 2002.
26.
OlderøyM.Ø., LilledahlM.B., BeckwithM.S., MelvikJ.E., ReinholtF., SikorskiP., et al.Biochemical and structural characterization of neocartilage formed by mesenchymal stem cells in alginate hydrogels. PLoS One, 9, e91662, 2014.
27.
RutgersM., SarisD.B., VonkL.A., van RijenM.H., AkrumV., LangeveldD., et al.Effect of collagen type I or type II on chondrogenesis by cultured human articular chondrocytes. Tissue Eng Part A, 19, 59, 2013.
28.
BosnakovskiD., MizunoM., KimG., TakagiS., OkumuraM., and FujinagaT.Chondrogenic differentiation of bovine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in different hydrogels: influence of collagen type II extracellular matrix on MSC chondrogenesis. Biotechnol Bioeng, 93, 1152, 2006.
29.
LevingstoneT.J., MatsikoA., DicksonG.R., O'BrienF.J., and GleesonJ.P.A biomimetic multi-layered collagen-based scaffold for osteochondral repair. Acta Biomater, 10, 1996, 2014.
30.
WangL., ShanskyJ., BorselliC., MooneyD., and VandenburghH.Design and fabrication of a biodegradable, covalently crosslinked shape-memory alginate scaffold for cell and growth factor delivery. Tissue Eng Part A, 18, 2000, 2012.
31.
YamamotoM., JamesD., LiH., ButlerJ., RafiiS., and RabbanyS.Generation of stable co-cultures of vascular cells in a honeycomb alginate scaffold. Tissue Eng Part A, 16, 299, 2010.
32.
AroraA., KothariA., and KattiD.S.Pore orientation mediated control of mechanical behavior of scaffolds and its application in cartilage-mimetic scaffold design. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 51, 169, 2015.
ZhangH., HussainI., BrustM., ButlerM.F., RannardS.P., and CooperA.I.Aligned two- and three-dimensional structures by directional freezing of polymers and nanoparticles. Nat Mater, 4, 787, 2005.
35.
SillT.J., and von RecumH.A.Electrospinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 29, 1989, 2008.
36.
PorrelliD., TravanA., TurcoG., MarsichE., BorgognaM., PaolettiS., et al.Alginate–hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with isotropic or anisotropic pore structure: material properties and biological behavior. Macromol Mater Eng, 300, 989, 2015.
37.
PopaE.G., CaridadeS.G., ManoJ.F., ReisR.L., and GomesM.E.Chondrogenic potential of injectable kappa-carrageenan hydrogel with encapsulated adipose stem cells for cartilage tissue-engineering applications. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 9, 550, 2015.
38.
MurphyS.V., and AtalaA.3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotech, 32, 773, 2014.
39.
BinulalN.S., NatarajanA., MenonD., BhaskaranV.K., MonyU., and NairS.V.PCL-gelatin composite nanofibers electrospun using diluted acetic acid-ethyl acetate solvent system for stem cell-based bone tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 25, 325, 2014.
40.
GarriguesN.W., LittleD., Sanchez-AdamsJ., RuchD.S., and GuilakF.Electrospun cartilage-derived matrix scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 102, 3998, 2014.
41.
CaliariS.R., RamirezM.A., and HarleyB.A.C.The development of collagen-GAG scaffold-membrane composites for tendon tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 32, 8990, 2011.
42.
MandalB.B., GilE.S., PanilaitisB., and KaplanD.L.Laminar silk scaffolds for aligned tissue fabrication. Macromol Biosci, 13, 48, 2013.
43.
AlmeidaH.V., CunniffeG.M., VinardellT., BuckleyC.T., O'BrienF.J., and KellyD.J.Coupling freshly isolated CD44+ infrapatellar fat pad-derived stromal cells with a TGF-β3 eluting cartilage ECM-derived scaffold as a single-stage strategy for promoting chondrogenesis. Adv Healthcare Mater, 4, 1043, 2015.
44.
SeyerJ.M., BrickleyD.M., and GlimcherM.J.The isolation of two types of collagen from embryonic bovine epiphyseal cartilage. Calc Tis Res, 17, 25, 1974.
45.
HerbageD., BouilletJ., and BernengoJ.C.Biochemical and physiochemical characterization of pepsin-solubilized type-II collagen from bovine articular cartilage. Biochem J, 161, 303, 1977.
46.
MillerE.J.Structural studies on cartilage collagen employing limited cleavage and solubilization with pepsin. Biochemistry, 11, 4903, 1972.
47.
WojtowiczA.M., ShekaranA., OestM.E., DupontK.M., TemplemanK.L., HutmacherD.W., et al.Coating of biomaterial scaffolds with the collagen-mimetic peptide GFOGER for bone defect repair. Biomaterials. 31, 2574, 2010.
48.
Mun-HwanL., ChangkookY., and Kyo-HanK.Combined effect of a microporous layer and type I collagen coating on a biphasic calcium phosphate scaffold for bone Tissue Engineering. Materials, 8, 1150, 2015.
49.
BuckleyC.T., VinardellT., ThorpeS.D., HaughM.G., JonesE., McGonagleD., et al.Functional properties of cartilaginous tissues engineered from infrapatellar fat pad-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomech, 43, 920, 2010.
50.
SheehyE.J., MesallatiT., VinardellT., and KellyD.J.Engineering cartilage or endochondral bone: a comparison of different naturally derived hydrogels. Acta Biomater, 13, 245, 2015.
51.
BuckleyC.T., and KellyD.J.Expansion in the presence of FGF-2 enhances the functional development of cartilaginous tissues engineered using infrapatellar fat pad derived MSCs. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 11, 102, 2012.
52.
SteeleJ.A.M., McCullenS.D., CallananA., AutefageH., AccardiM.A., DiniD., et al.Combinatorial scaffold morphologies for zonal articular cartilage engineering. Acta Biomater, 10, 2065, 2014.
53.
Ignat'evaN.Y., DanilovN.A., AverkievS.V., ObrezkovaM.V., LuninV.V., and SobolE.N.Determination of hydroxyproline in tissues and the evaluation of the collagen content of the tissues. J Anal Chem, 62, 51, 2007.
54.
AlmeidaH.V., LiuY., CunniffeG.M., MulhallK.J., MatsikoA., BuckleyC.T., et al.Controlled release of transforming growth factor-β3 from cartilage-extra-cellular-matrix-derived scaffolds to promote chondrogenesis of human-joint-tissue-derived stem cells. Acta Biomater, 10, 4400, 2014.
55.
XuC.Y., InaiR., KotakiM., and RamakrishnaS.Aligned biodegradable nanofibrous structure: a potential scaffold for blood vessel engineering. Biomaterials, 25, 877, 2004.
56.
EngelmayrG.C.Jr., ChengM., BettingerC.J., BorensteinJ.T., LangerR., and FreedL.E.Accordion-like honeycombs for tissue engineering of cardiac anisotropy. Nat Mater, 7, 1003, 2008.
57.
ChouC.L., RiveraA.L., SakaiT., CaplanA.I., GoldbergV.M., WelterJ.F., et al.Micrometer scale guidance of mesenchymal stem cells to form structurally oriented cartilage extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng Part A, 19, 1081, 2013.
58.
KamimuraW., HattoriR., KoyamaH., MiyataT., and TakatoT.A calcium-cross-linked hydrogel based on alginate-modified atelocollagen functions as a scaffold material. J Biomat Sci Polym Ed, 23, 609, 2012.
59.
NehrerS., BreinanH.A., RamappaA., ShortkroffS., YoungG., MinasT., et al.Canine chondrocytes seeded in type I and type II collagen implants investigated in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res, 38, 95, 1997.
60.
NehrerS., BreinanH.A., RamappaA., YoungG., ShortkroffS., LouieL.K., et al.Matrix collagen type and pore size influence behaviour of seeded canine chondrocytes. Biomaterials, 18, 769, 1997.
61.
FreyriaA.M., RonziereM.C., CortialD., GaloisL., HartmannD., HerbageD., et al.Comparative phenotypic analysis of articular chondrocytes cultured within type I or type II collagen scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A, 15, 1233, 2009.
62.
ChoiB., KimS., LinB., WuB.M., and LeeM.Cartilaginous extracellular matrix-modified chitosan hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 6, 20110, 2014.
63.
ForsythC.B., PulaiJ., and LoeserR.F.Fibronectin fragments and blocking antibodies to alpha2beta1 and alpha5beta1 integrins stimulate mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and increase collagenase 3 (matrix metalloproteinase 13) production by human articular chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum, 46, 2368, 2002.
64.
LoeserR.F.Growth factor regulation of chondrocyte integrins. Differential effects of insulin-like growth factor 1 and transforming growth factor beta on alpha 1 beta 1 integrin expression and chondrocyte adhesion to type VI collagen. Arthritis Rheum, 40, 270, 1997.
65.
LoeserR.F.Integrins and cell signaling in chondrocytes. Biorheology, 39, 119, 2002.
66.
DurrJ., GoodmanS., PotocnikA., von der MarkH., and von der MarkK.Localization of beta 1-integrins in human cartilage and their role in chondrocyte adhesion to collagen and fibronectin. Exp Cell Res, 207, 235, 1993.
67.
SchneiderbauerM.M., DuttonC.M., and ScullyS.P.Signaling “cross-talk” between TGF-beta1 and ECM signals in chondrocytic cells. Cell Signal, 16, 1133, 2004.
68.
ReidD.L., AydelotteM.B., and MollenhauerJ.Cell attachment, collagen binding, and receptor analysis on bovine articular chondrocytes. J Orthop Res, 18, 364, 2000.
69.
GigoutA., JolicoeurM., NeleaM., RaynalN., FarndaleR., and BuschmannM.D.Chondrocyte aggregation in suspension culture is GFOGER-GPP- and beta1 integrin-dependent. J Biol Chem, 283, 31522, 2008.
70.
LuoL., ThorpeS.D., BuckleyC.T., and KellyD.J.The effects of dynamic compression on the development of cartilage grafts engineered using bone marrow and infrapatellar fat pad derived stem cells. Biomed Mater, 10, 055011, 2015.
71.
LiuY., BuckleyC.T., AlmeidaH.V., MulhallK.J., and KellyD.J.Infrapatellar fat pad-derived stem cells maintain their chondrogenic capacity in disease and can be used to engineer cartilaginous grafts of clinically relevant dimensions. Tissue Eng Part A, 20, 3050, 2014.
72.
CarrollS.F., BuckleyC.T., and KellyD.J.Cyclic hydrostatic pressure promotes a stable cartilage phenotype and enhances the functional development of cartilaginous grafts engineered using multipotent stromal cells isolated from bone marrow and infrapatellar fat pad. J Biomech, 47, 2115, 2014.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
