Because of the limitations of current surgical methods in the treatment of degenerative disc disease, tissue-engineered intervertebral discs (TE-IVDs) have become an important target. This study investigated the biochemical and mechanical responses of composite TE-IVDs to dynamic unconfined compression. TE-IVDs were manufactured by floating an injection molded alginate nucleus pulposus (NP) in a type I collagen annulus fibrosus (AF) that was allowed to contract for 2 weeks before loading. The discs were mechanically stimulated at a range of strain amplitude (1–10%) for 2 weeks with a duty cycle of 1 h on–1 h off–1 h on before being evaluated for their biochemical and mechanical properties. Mechanical loading increased all properties in a dose-dependent manner. Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) increased between 2.8 and 2.2 fold in the AF and NP regions, respectively, whereas the hydroxyproline content increased between 1.2 and 1.8 fold. The discs also experienced a 2-fold increase in the equilibrium modulus and a 4.3-fold increase in the instantaneous modulus. Full effects for all properties were seen by 5% strain amplitude. These data suggest that dynamic loading increases the functionality of our TE-IVDs with region-dependent responses using a method that may be scaled up to larger disc models to expedite maturation for implantation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WhatleyB.R., and WenX.Intervertebral disc (IVD): structure, degeneration, repair and regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C, 32, 61, 2012.
2.
AntoniouJ., SteffenT., NelsonF., WinterbottomN., HollanderA.P., PooleR.A., et al.The human lumbar intervertebral disc. J Clin Invest, 98, 996, 1996.
CowanJ.A., DimickJ.B., WainessR., UpchurchG.R., ChandlerW.F., and MarcaF.La. Changes in utilization of spinal fusion in the United States. Neurosurgery, 58, 15, 2006.
5.
MizunoH., RoyA.K., ZaporojanV., VacantiC.A., UedaM., and BonassarLJ. Biomechanical and biochemical characterization of composite tissue-engineered intervertebral discs. Biomaterials, 27, 362, 2006;
6.
NestiL.J., LiW.-J., ShantiR.M., JiangY.J., JacksonW., FreedmanB.A., et al.Intervertebral disc tissue engineering using a novel hyaluronic acid-nanofibrous scaffold (HANFS) amalgam. Tissue Eng Part A, 14, 1527, 2008.
7.
ParkS.-H, GilE.S., ChoH., MandalB., TienL.W., MinB.-H., et al.Intervertebral disk tissue engineering using biphasic silk composite scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A, 18, 447, 2012.
8.
NerurkarN.L., SenS., HuangA.H., ElliottD.M., and MauckR.L.Engineered disc-like angle-ply structures for intervertebral disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 35, 867, 2010.
9.
MizunoH., RoyA.K., VacantiC A., KojimaK., UedaM., and BonassarLJ.Tissue-engineered composites of anulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus for intervertebral disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 29, 1290, 2004.
10.
NerurkarN.L., BakerB.M., SenS., WibleE.E., ElliottD.M., and MauckR.L.Nanofibrous biologic laminates replicate the form and function of the annulus fibrosus. Nat Mater, 8, 986, 2009.
11.
BowlesR.D., GebhardH.H., DykeJ.P., BallonD.J., TomasinoA., CunninghamM.E., et al.Image-based tissue engineering of a total intervertebral disc implant for restoration of function to the rat lumbar spine. NMR Biomed, 25, 443, 2011.
12.
BowlesR.D., GebhardH.H., HärtlR., and BonassarLJ.Tissue-engineered intervertebral discs produce new matrix, maintain disc height, and restore biomechanical function to the rodent spine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108, 13106, 2011.
13.
HunterC.J., ImlerS.M., MalaviyaP., NeremR.M., and LevenstonM.E.Mechanical compression alters gene expression and extracellular matrix synthesis by chondrocytes cultured in collagen I gels. Biomaterials, 23, 1249, 2002.
14.
BonassarL.J., GrodzinskyA.J., FrankE.H., DavilaS.G., BhaktavN.R., and TrippelS.B.The effect of dynamic compression on the response of articular cartilage to insulin-like growth factor-I. Orthop Res, 19, 11, 2001.
15.
BuschmannM.D., GluzbandY.A., Grodzinsky.A.J., and HunzikerE.B.Mechanical compression modulates matrix biosynthesis in chondrocyte/agarose culture. J Cell Sci, 108, 1497, 1995.
16.
WaldmanS.D., CoutoD.C., GrynpasM.D., PilliarR.M., and KandelR.A.A single application of cyclic loading can accelerate matrix deposition and enhance the properties of tissue-engineered cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 14, 323, 2006.
17.
DavissonT., KunigS., ChenA., SahR., and RatcliffeA.Static and dynamic compression modulate matrix metabolism in tissue engineered cartilage. J Orthop Res, 20, 842, 2002.
18.
SalvatierraJ.C., YuanT.Y., FernandoH., CastilloA., GuW.Y., CheungH.S., et al.Difference in energy metabolism of annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus cells of the intervertebral disc. Cell Mol Bioeng, 4, 302, 2011.
19.
MauckR.L., SoltzM.A., WangC.C.B., WongD.D., ChaoP.-H.G., and AteshianG.A.Functional tissue engineering of articular cartilage through dynamic loading of chondrocyte-seeded agarose gels. J Biomed Eng, 122, 252, 2000.
20.
KisidayJ.D., JinM., DiMiccoM.A., KurzB., and GrodzinskyA.J.Effects of dynamic compressive loading on chondrocyte biosynthesis in self-assembling peptide scaffolds. J Biomech, 37, 595, 2004.
21.
HuangH., KammR.D., and LeeR.T. Cell mechanics and mechanotransduction: pathways, probes, and physiology. Am J Physiol, 287, C1, 2004.
22.
O'HaraB.P., UrbanJ.P.G., and MaroudasA. Influence of cyclic loading on nutrition of articular cartilage. Ann Rheum Dis, 49, 536, 1990.
23.
MauckR.L., HungC.T., and AteshianG.A.Modeling of neutral solute transport in a dynamically loaded porous permeable gel: implications for articular cartilage biosynthesis and tissue engineering. J Biomech Eng, 125, 602, 2003.
24.
ChanS.C.W., FergusonS.J., and Gantenbein-RitterB.The effects of dynamic loading on the intervertebral disc. Eur Spine J, 20, 1796, 2011.
25.
WuertzK., GodburnK., MacLeanJ.J., BarbirA., DonnellyJ.S., RoughleyP.J., et al.In vivo remodeling of intervertebral discs in response to short- and long-term dynamic compression. J Orthop Res, 27, 1235, 2009.
26.
MacLeanJ.J., LeeC.R., AliniM., and IatridisJ.C.The effects of short-term load duration on anabolic and catabolic gene expression in the rat tail intervertebral disc. J Orthpaedic Res, 23, 1120, 2005.
27.
MacLeanJ.J., LeeC.R., AliniM., and IatridisJ.C.Anabolic and catabolic mRNA levels of the intervertebral disc vary with the magnitude and frequency of in vivo dynamic compression. J Orthop Res, 22, 1193, 2004.
28.
Illien-JüngerS., Gantenbein-RitterB., GradS., LezuoP., IngD., FergusonS.J., et al.The combined effects of limited nutrition and high-frequency loading on intervertebral discs with endplates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 35, 1744, 2010.
29.
WalshA.J.L., and LotzJ.C.Biological response of the intervertebral disc to dynamic loading. J Biomech, 37, 329, 2004.
30.
KoreckiC.L., KuoC.K., TuanR.S., and IatridisJ.C.Intervertebral disc cell response to dynamic compression is age and frequency dependent. J Orthop Res, 27, 800, 2009.
31.
MasuokaK., MichalekA.J., MacLeanJ.J., StokesI.A.F., and IatridisJ.C.Different effects of static versus cyclic compressive loading on rat intervertebral disc height and water loss in vitro. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 32, 1974, 2007.
32.
KoreckiC.L., MacLeanJ.J., and IatridisJ.C.Dynamic compression effects on intervertebral disc mechanics and biology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 33, 1403, 2008.
33.
KisidayJ.D., LeeJ.H., SiparskyP.N., FrisbieD.D., FlanneryC.R., SandyJ.D., et al.Catabolic responses of chondrocyte-seeded peptide hydrogel to dynamic compression. Ann Biomed Eng, 37, 1368, 2009.
34.
KockL.M., SchulzR.M., van DonkelaarC.C., ThümmlerC.B., BaderA., and ItoK.RGD-dependent integrins are mechanotransducers in dynamically compressed tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. J Biomech, 42, 2177, 2009.
35.
VillanuevaI., HauschulzD.S., MejicD., and BryantS.J.Static and dynamic compressive strains influence nitric oxide production and chondrocyte bioactivity when encapsulated in PEG hydrogels of different crosslinking densities. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 16, 909, 2008.
36.
MauckR.L., NicollS.B., SeyhanS.L., AteshianG.A., and HungC.T.Synergistic action of growth factors and dynamic loading for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng, 9, 597, 2003.
37.
KimY.-J., BonassarL.J., GrodzinskyA.J., and BonassarJ.The role of cartilage streaming potential, fluid flow and pressure in the stimulation of chondrocyte biosynthesis during dynamic compression. J Biomech, 28, 1055, 1995.
38.
KimY.-J., SahR.L., GrodzinskyA.J., PlaasA.H., and SandyJ.D.Mechanical regulation of cartilage biosynthetic behavior: physical stimuli. Arch Biochem Biophys, 311, 1, 1994.
39.
PuetzerJ.L., BallynsJ.J., and BonassarL.J.The effect of the duration of mechanical stimulation and post-stimulation culture on the structure and properties of dynamically compressed tissue-engineered menisci. Tissue Eng Part A, 18, 1365, 2012.
40.
WangP., YangL., and HsiehA.H.Nucleus pulposus cell response to confined and unconfined compression implicates mechanoregulation by fluid shear stress. Ann Biomed Eng, 39, 1101, 2011.
41.
RezaA.T., and NicollS.B.Hydrostatic pressure differentially regulates outer and inner annulus fibrosus cell matrix production in 3D scaffolds. Ann Biomed Eng, 36, 204, 2008.
42.
BowlesR.D., WilliamsR.M., ZipfelW.R., and BonassarL.J.Self-assembly of aligned tissue-engineered annulus fibrosus and intervertebral disc composite via collagen gel contraction. Tissue Eng Part A, 16, 1339, 2010.
43.
ElsdaleT., and BardJ.Collagen substrata for studies on cell behavior. J Cell Biol, 54, 626, 1972.
44.
PuetzerJ.L., and BonassarL.J.High density type I collagen gels for tissue engineering of whole menisci. Acta Biomater, 9, 7787, 2013.
45.
EnobakhareB.O., BaderD.L., and LeeD.A.Quantification of sulfated glycosaminoglycans in chondrocyte/alginate cultures, by use of 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue. Anal Biochem, 243, 189, 1996.
46.
NeumanR.E., and LoganM.A.The determination of hydroxyproline. J Biol Chem, 184, 299, 1949.
47.
OkajimaT., NakamuraK., ZhangH., LingN., TanabeT., YasudaT., et al.Sensitive colorimetric bioassays for insulin-like growth factor (IGF) stimulation of cell proliferation and glucose consumption: use in studies of IGF analogs. Endocrinology, 130, 2201, 1992.
48.
SahR.L., KimY.J., DoongJ.Y., GrodzinskyA.J, PlaasA.H, and SandyJ.D.Biosynthetic response of cartilage explants to dynamic compression. J Orthop Res, 7, 619, 1989.
49.
TranS.C., CooleyA.J., and ElderS.H.Effect of a mechanical stimulation bioreactor on tissue engineered, scaffold-free cartilage. Biotechnol Bioeng, 108, 1421, 2011.
50.
KellyT.-A.N., NgK.W., WangC.C.-B., AteshianG.A., and HungC.T.Spatial and temporal development of chondrocyte-seeded agarose constructs in free-swelling and dynamically loaded cultures. J Biomech, 39, 1489, 2006.
51.
HandaT., IshiharaH., OhshimaH., OsadaR., TsujiH., and ObataK.Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis and matrix metalloproteinase production in the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 22, 1085, 1997.
52.
LiuG.Z., IshiharaH., OsadaR., KimuraT., and TsujiH.Nitric oxide mediates the change of proteoglycan synthesis in the human lumbar intervertebral disc in response to hydrostatic pressure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 26, 134, 2001.
53.
WuertzK., UrbanJ.P.G., KlasenJ., IgnatiusA., WilkeH., ClaesL., et al.Influence of extracellular osmolarity and mechanical stimulation on gene expression of intervertebral disc cells. J Orthop Res, 25, 1513, 2007.
54.
GokorschS., WeberC., WedlerT., and CzermakP.A stimulation unit for the application of mechanical strain on tissue engineered anulus fibrosus cells: a new system to induce extracellular matrix synthesis by anulus fibrosus cells dependent on cyclic mechanical strain. Int J Artif Organs, 28, 1242, 2005.
55.
GillettN.A., GerlachR., CassidyJ.J., and BrownS.A.Age-related changes in the beagle spine. Acta Orthop Scand, 59, 503, 1988.
56.
HoM.M., KellyT.-A.N., GuoX.E., AteshianG.A., and HungC.T.Spatially varying material properties of the rat caudal intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 31, E486, 2006.
