The history of large-scale technological advances, such as the digital revolution in our era, suggests that core technologies yield wide benefits by serving as a method of invention, spawning new tools and techniques that surpass the performance of their predecessors.
Methods:
Digital platforms provide a method of invention in the health sector by enabling innovations in data collection, use, and sharing. Although wide adoption of computerized information technology in healthcare has produced mixed results, the advent of mobile health (mHealth) creates new opportunities for device-mediated advances in surgical and public health practice.
Conclusion:
Mobile solutions for collecting, using, and sharing patient-generated health data after surgery can yield important benefits for post-operative monitoring, whether the data are used to evaluate and manage individual patients or track infections and other outcomes in patient populations.
GrilichesZ. Hybrid corn and the economics of innovation. Science, 1960; 132:275–280.
3.
GrilichesZ. Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica, 1957; 25:501–522.
4.
BresnahanTF, TrajtenbergM. General purpose technologies: 'Engines of growth'?. J Econometrics, 1995; 65:83–108.
5.
MühleisenM. The long and short of the digital revolution. Finance Dev, 2018; 53:4–8.
6.
LipseyRG, CarlawKI, BekarCT. Economic Transformations: General Purpose Technologies and Long-Term Economic Growth (Technology as Revolution). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2005.
7.
DavidPA. The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. Am Econ Rev, 1990; 80:355–361.
8.
LipseyRC, BekarC, CarlawK. The consequences of changes in GPTs. In: HelpmanE (ed): General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998:193–218.
9.
SchulmanKA, RichmanBD. Toward an effective innovation agenda. N Engl J Med, 2019; 380:900–901.
10.
JonesSS, HeatonPS, RudinRS, SchneiderEC. Unraveling the IT productivity paradox. N Engl J Med, 2012; 366:2243–2245.
11.
PetersenE, PetrosilloN, KoopmansM; ESCMID Emerging Infections Task Force Expert Panel. Emerging infectionsan increasingly important topic: Review by the Emerging Infections Task Force. Clin Micro Infect, 2018; 24:369–375.
12.
SlaytonRB, TothD, LeeBY, et al.Vital signs: Estimated effects of a coordinated approach for action to reduce antibiotic-resistant infections in health care facilities-United States. MMWR, 2015; 64:826–831.
13.
WestDM. Going Mobile: How Wireless Technology is Reshaping Our Lives. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press;, 2015:1.
14.
KimJY, SteinhuhlSR. Medicine unplugged: Can M-Health transform healthcare? In: PhillipsRA (ed): America's Healthcare Transformation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2016:142–162.
15.
SinghK, LandmanAB. Mobile health. In: SheikhA, CresswellKM, WrightA, BatesDW (eds): Key Advances in Clinical Informatics: Transforming Health Care Through Health Information Technology. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2017:183–196.
16.
MamlinBW, TierneyWM. The promise of information and communication technology in healthcare: Extracting value from the chaos. Am J Med Sci, 2016; 351:59–68.
17.
JacksonGP, Moffatt-BruceSD, MeltonGB. Leveraging health information technologies to support surgical practice. JAMA Surg, 2018; 153:981–982.
18.
ArmstrongKA, CoytePC, BrownM, et al.Effect of home monitoring via mobile app on the number of in-person visits following ambulatory surgery: A randomized trial. JAMA Surg, 2017; 152:622–627.
19.
SangerPC, SimianuVV, GaskillCE, et al.Diagnosing surgical site infection using wound photography: A scenario-based study. J Am Coll Surg, 2016; 224:8–15.
20.
EvansHL, LoberWB. A pilot use of patient-generated wound data to improve postdischarge surgical site infection monitoring. JAMA Surg, 2017; 152:595–596.
21.
GunterRI, Fernandes-TaylorS, RahmanS, et al.Feasibility of an image-based mobile health protocol for postoperative wound monitoring. J Am Coll Surg, 2018; 226:277–286.
22.
BromanKK, GaskillCE, FaqihA, et al.Evaluation of wound photography for remote postoperative assessment of surgical site infections. JAMA Surg, 2019; 154:117–124.
23.
DrakeFT. Smartphone photographs-proceed, but with caution. JAMA Surg, 2019; 154:125.
24.
LinSY, ShanafeltTD, AschSM. Reimagining clinical documentation with artificial intelligence. Mayo Clin Proc, 2018; 93:563–565.
25.
RoskiJ, Bo-LinnGW, AndrewsTA. Creating value in health care through big data: Opportunities and policy implications. Health Aff, 2014; 33:1115–1122.
26.
SacristanJA, DillaT. No big data without small data: Learning health care systems begin and end with the individual patient. J Eval Clin Prac, 2015; 21:1014–1017.
