Restricted accessLetterFirst published online 2015-10
Comments on the Article: “Meta-Analysis of Prevention of Surgical Site Infections after Incision Closure with Triclosan-Coated Sutures: Robustness to New Evidence”
DaoudFC, EdminstonCE, LeaperD. Meta-analysis of prevention of surgical site infections following incision closure with triclosan-coated sutures: Robustness to new evidence. Surg Infect, 2014; 15:165–180.
2.
ZhuangCP, CaiGY, WangYQ. Comparsion of two absorbable sutures in the abdominal wall incision. J Clin Rehab Tiss Eng Res, 2009; 13:4045–4048.
3.
RasicZ, SchwarzD, AdamVN, et al.Efficacy of antimicrobial triclosan-coated polyglatin 910 (Vicryl* Plus) suture for closure of abdominal wall after colorectal surgery. Coll Antropol, 2011; 35439–35443.
4.
HoranTC, GaynesRP, MartoneWJ, et al.CDC definition of nocosomial surgical site infections, 1992: A modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 1992; 10:606–608.
5.
GalalI, El-HindawayK. Impact of using triclosan-antibacterial sutures on incidence of surgical site infection. Am J Surg, 2011; 202:133–138.
6.
Thimour-BergströmL, Roman-EmanuelC, ScherstenH, et al.Triclosan-coated sutures reduce surgical site infection after open vein bypass grafting patients: A randomized contolled trial. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg, 2013; 44:931–938.
7.
IsikI, SelimenD, SenayS, AlhanC. Efficiency of antibacterial suture material in cardiac surgery: A double-blind randomized prospective study. Heart Surg Forum, 2012; 15:E40–E45.
8.
DienerMK, KnebelP, KieserM, et al.Effectiveness of triclosan-coated PDS Plus versus uncoated PDS II sutures for prevention of surgical site infection after abdominal wall closure: The randomized controlled PROUD trial. Lancet, 2014; 384:142–152.
