Abstract
Abstract
Background:
To determine if there is a difference in periocular post-operative infection rates when utilizing new versus re-processed monopolar electrocautery tips.
Methods:
Retrospective cohort study of 4,976 consecutive surgical cases involving 17,149 procedures. Post-operative infections were identified using chart review, facility infection surveillance records, and surgeon reporting. The main outcome measure was the presence or absence of infection within 30 post-operative days. The Fischer exact test was used to compare infection rates between cautery modalities. All statistical analysis was conducted at the 0.05 α level.
Results:
There was no statistically significant difference between new and re-processed monopolar cautery infection rates (p=0.3879).
Conclusions:
Post-operative infection rates are similar for periocular surgery using both new and re-processed monopolar cautery. These findings suggest that re-processed cautery is a viable option for periocular surgery to decrease cost and reduce material waste without affecting the quality of care.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.